Research:Wikimedia France Research Award/nominated papers/Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualisations/it: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:13, 16 April 2022

Latest revision as of 10:17, 10 December 2022

(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

<noinclude><languages /></noinclude>

<span id="Studying_Cooperation_and_Conflict_between_Authors_with_history_flow_Visualisations"></span>

== Studio sulla cooperazione e il conflitto tra autori con visualizzazioni di flussi storici ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

[[Research:Wikimedia France Research Award/papers submission#Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations|Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with ''history flow'' Visualizations]] is a quantitative, data vizualization oriented paper. It belongs to the first-wave works that provided foundations for much of the later work on Wikipedia.

</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

[http://web.media.mit.edu/~fviegas/papers/history_flow.pdf See the full text here].

</div>

<span id="Summary"></span>

=== Sommario ===

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

Fernanda Viegas, Marin Wattenberg, and Kushal Dave describe a visualization system they have built called history flow that they use to visualize changes made to Wikipedia articles. The authors suggest that their papers makes three distinct contributions:

</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

History flow itself which is able to reveal editing patterns in Wikipedia and provide context for editors. Several examples of collaboration patterns that become visible using the visualization tool and contribute to the literature on Wikipedia. Implications of these patterns for design and governance of online social spaces.

</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

The paper is largely an examination of Wikipedia and the early parts of the paper give background into the sites. It uses shortcomings in the design of the Wikipedia to motivate the history flow visualization which essentially depicts articles, over time, with colors representing authors who contributed text in question. The interface is particularly good at representing major deletions and insertions.

</div>

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

The authors use a lightweight statistical analysis to reveal patterns of editing on Wikipedia. In particular, they show vandalism including mass-deletion, the creation of phony redirects, and addition of idiosyncratic copy and show that it rarely stays on the site for more than few minutes before being removed.

<div class="mw-translate-fuzzy">

Loro mostrano anche un patten di zig-zag che rappresenta negoziazione di contenuto, spesso nella forma di compili guerre. Loro tentano anche di offrire dei dati di base sulla stabilità di Wikipedia e la crescita di articoli su media. Loro suggeriscono qualche cosa per il quale ora è preso accordato da ricercatori di wikis: quello studiando Wikipedia può avere le importanti implicazioni per altri tipi di lavoro

</div>

LoroAnche mostrano anche un pattenmodello diin zig-zagzigzag che rappresenta la negoziazione di contenuto, spessofrequentemente nellain forma di compiliguerre guerre.di Loroedizioni. tentanoAnche anchecercano di offrireprovvedere deialcuni dati di basebasici sulla stabilità di Wikipedia e la crescita dimedia articolidegli su mediaarticoli. LoroSuggeriscono suggerisconoquello qualcheche cosain perquesto ilmomento qualei oraricercatori èdi presowikis accordatodanno daper ricercatori di wikisseduto: quello studiandostudiare Wikipedia può avere leimplicazioni importanti implicazioni per altri tipi di lavoro.

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

Most of this summary originates in the one posted [http://acawiki.org/Studying_cooperation_and_conflict_between_authors_with_history_flow_visualizations acawiki.org].

</div>

<span id="Jury_comments"></span>

=== Commenti di giuria ===