Talk:Integration using Euler's formula: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Created page with 'The title of this article seems misleading, since the term ''integration using complex analysis'' would usually be construed as meaning things like the [[residue c...'
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Mathematics|priority=mid}}
}}
 
==Misleading title?==
The title of this article seems misleading, since the term ''integration using complex analysis'' would usually be construed as meaning things like the [[residue calculus]]. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
:What do you think about the title "[[Complexifying the integral]]"? This is the terminology used by Prof. Mattuck of MIT [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpM1jJ0lob8] [[User:Hamsterlopithecus|Hamsterlopithecus]] ([[User talk:Hamsterlopithecus|talk]]) 19:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 
== 'extremely tedious' simply not true ==
 
It is just as straightforward to solve the 2nd integral using trig identities, no more than 3 lines of working using a total of 2 trig identities.
 
'extremely tedious' is in fact, extremely misleading <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikidness69|Wikidness69]] ([[User talk:Wikidness69|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikidness69|contribs]]) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Copied and pasted from another site ==
 
Seems like most if the stuff has been simply copied and pasted from this site:
https://handwiki.org/wiki/Integration_using_Euler%27s_formula#:~:text=In%20integral%20calculus%2C%20Euler's%20formula,i%20x%20and%20then%20integrated.
 
Please confirm [[User:Uddhav9|Uddhav9]] ([[User talk:Uddhav9|talk]]) 15:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)