Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 10: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:27, 30 October 2005

Latest revision as of 23:23, 19 March 2023

(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <fontspan colorstyle="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#008000;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|xd]]</fontspan>]]^{([[User_talk:Titoxd|?!?]])} 01:27, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

===[[The 10]]===

'''Delete'''. Original research spin off on book called 100 most influential people or somesuch. This is just too witty for wiki. <em>&mdash;[[User:Gaff|<fontspan colorstyle="Indigocolor:indigo;">[[User:Gaff|Gaff]]</fontspan>]] ^{<small>[[User_talk:Gaff|<b><font colorstyle="color:MediumSlateBlue; font-size:smaller;">[[User_talk:Gaff|ταλκ]]</fontb>]]}</small></b></em> 03:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as nonsense. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] 05:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. OR, POV. The external link is for [[The 100]], not The 10.{{[[User:Freshgavin|<span style="color: white; font-size: x-small; background:blue">&nbsp;freshgavin</span>]][[User_talk:Freshgavin|<span style="color: blue; font-size: x-small;">ΓΛĿЌ&nbsp;</sig}}span>]] 06:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Even literary value minimal. Started off witty, then descended into sorority har-har. [[User:The Minister of War|The Minister of War]] 10:08, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' inherently POV - [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis Guy, you know?]] 10:18, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Line 18:

*'''Keep'''. I don't get why people are so desperate to delete this article. It seems just as valid as the 100 article. Either keep both articles or delete both. --[[User:128.122.128.61]] 01:15, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

**[[The 100]] is an article about a notable book (notable in that it has spawned uncountable God-awful imitations and crap TV shows). [[The 10]] is listcruft. - [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis Guy, you know?]] 12:19, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

***[[Wikipedia:Listcruft|Listcruft]]. That's an interesting term. Did you just invent it?

**** No, it seems to be in common usage in these parts - [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis Guy, you know?]] 08:19, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

*Patent nonsense. <b>Delete</b>. (Or should I say "deleet"?) - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 09:23, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Line 32:

*'''Keep''' The article is a good idea. I'm not a big fan of most of the people lasted, but I HATE JAINISM DELETE THAT ARTICLE INSTEAD? --[[User:216.165.11.95]] 15:16, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>