Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dar book: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 86.16.108.247 identified as vandalism to last revision by AGK. (TW) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7:
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dar book|Dar book]] ===
Line 32:
Furthermore, there is a host of accounts on the same IPs as these users that may well be sleepers. If any more accounts appear pushing this line, please bring them up here. [[User:Sam Korn|Sam Korn]] <sup>[[User talk:Sam Korn|(smoddy)]]</sup> 09:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:{{clerknote}} Defenz 07 indefblocked. Dar book blocked for 48 hours. —[[User:Wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:Wknight94|talk]]) 15:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
*<p>{{Clerk-Note|2=.}}</p><p>In the course of archiving this request, I included {{user|RainbowOfLight}} at the case's entry on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case]]. I am unsure why RainbowOfLight was stricken from the involved accounts list, and to avoid any omissions from the master list (that list includes accounts that are confirmed as being ''not'' sock puppets, as well as positively linked users), I included it there; if there is a particular reason why this should not be so, please message or email me with background and an explanation, and I will fix the matter as promptly as possible.</p><p>[[User:AGK|<
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
| |||