Content deleted Content added
→Is JavaFX Script fully open source?: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Java}}. Tag: |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Java|importance=low}}
}}
== What is JavaFX Script (merge with F3?)==
So, I'm not the only one who hasn't got a clue what JavaFX Script is? [[User:EAi|EAi]] 21:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Line 45 ⟶ 48:
I know that javafx compiler is open source, but scene graph element isn't atm. scenegraph.dev.java.net holds old version of it. I think it should be clearly mentioned in the article. Maybe javafx compiler being OS makes JavaFX Script open sourced and scenegraph is not a part of JavaFX Script, but part of JavaFX rather? If someone could clarify...
== JavaFX Script merge JavaFX Article==
'''JavaFX is NOT a scripting language:'''
{{Cquote|
Even though it is called JavaFX Script, JavaFX is NOT a scripting language (in the dynamic sense). JavaFX code gets compiled to Java bytecode at design time. So, JavaFX is similar to Flex (except for the XML-UI part). Note that JavaFX started as a scripting language in Sun Labs, but quickly became a compiled language (probably for performance reasons). Sun keeps using the term “JavaFX Script” to distinguish the language from the JavaFX brand and to avoid using the word “language,” which would make it too obvious that JavaFX is another language all together.
[http://java.sys-con.com/node/994363 Ellison at JavaOne: Myths About JavaFX, Android, and J2ME]}}
It is described as a "compiled, statically typed, declarative, scripting language".
Is this then a paradoxical statement? I would have thought that 'compiled' and 'scripting' are mutually exclusive. But perhaps my definitions of those terms is not accurate. I thought that scripting means read at run time - ie interpreted.
So I agree with the blockquote above. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.4.250.229|80.4.250.229]] ([[User talk:80.4.250.229|talk]]) 18:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I disagree. JavaFX Script is separate from the other functionality that JavaFX provides (cross-platform UIs focusing on mobile, for example). This article, documenting that Oracle is discontinuing JavaFX Script while moving JavaFX to a purely Java API further proves my point: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/JavaFX-Script-is-dead-long-live-JavaFX-1082823.html --[[User:Rehevkor5|Rehevkor5]] ([[User talk:Rehevkor5|talk]]) 16:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on [[JavaFX Script]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/811639024|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101029215752/http://javafx.com/roadmap/ to http://javafx.com/roadmap/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610234324/https://openjfx.dev.java.net/ to https://openjfx.dev.java.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 22:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
|