Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirate eye patch: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:01, 10 November 2005

Latest revision as of 17:33, 8 February 2023

(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''REDIRECTED''' to [[Eyepatch]]. [[User:JIP|&mdash; <span style="color:#CC0000;">J</span><span style="color:#00CC00;">I</span><span style="color:#0000CC;">P</span>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 12:34, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

===[[Pirate eye patch]]===

This seems to be a vanity/joke entry for a non-notable term. The first version of the article said ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pirate_eye_patch&oldid=27627753 first concieved in Paris France in 2005 by two unnamed brits]''. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 22:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Line 6 ⟶ 12:

* '''Delete.''' Vanity neologism. If this term were broadly used, it would show up at least ''once'' on a Google search. A search for "pirate eye patch" yields several pages of Halloween accessories, but nothing in any way related to sex. Compare this to the massive results for "donkey punch". [[User:Bhumiya|Bhumiya]]/[[User_talk:Bhumiya|Talk]] 18:37, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per nom --[[User:Rogerd|Rogerd]] 03:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

*I just redirected it to [[pirate]]. much less fuss than deletion. Though if you still want to delete it, count this as a '''delete'''. - [[User:Nunh-huh|Nunh-huh]] 03:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

**Since there is no mention of eye patches at [[pirate]] I think the redirect does not serve any purpose and should be deleted. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 17:48, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

***Actiually, on second look there is a mention, a link to [[Eyepatch]]. That is a better redirect. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 18:29, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

**I agree. There's no reason for this page to exist. [[User:Bhumiya|Bhumiya]]/[[User_talk:Bhumiya|Talk]] 17:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>