Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cirrus Field: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:38, 10 November 2005

Latest revision as of 20:54, 1 September 2012

(21 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)

Line 2:

[[Image:CirrusField.jpg|thumb|250px|Cirrus Field]]

[[Image:CirrusField02.jpg|thumb|250px|Edited version - bit more cloud detail]]

[[Image:CirrusField-color.jpg|thumb|250px|Cirrus Field Color]]

Line 10 ⟶ 11:

*'''Comment''' - Well, they're all, uh, white, if you couldn't tell. ;) Anyway, here's a color version.[[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 10:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

*I like both. The black and white version is quite dramatic, but the colour version probably better illustrates the clouds. [[User:Raven4x4x|Raven4x4x]] 11:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' I dislike the black and white version, not as a picture but as an ''encyclopedia'' illustration.The colour of the clouds and the colour of the background are important to understanding what it shows. I will '''support''' the colour one - [[User:Arpingstone|Adrian Pingstone]] 15:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Comment:''' I don't know, but something in the bottom portion seems distracting. Maybe the dip in the forest in the left-hand side? [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] <small>( [[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <font color = brown> note? ]])</font color></small> 00:40, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

*As soon as I can I will support the color image. The black and white one makes it appear like a thunder cloud. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|^(talk)]] 12:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

**As promised '''support''' color image. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|^(talk)]] 16:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Support''' colour image, and I would also suggest that you nominate the black and white image as an FPC on commons. [[User:Raven4x4x|Raven4x4x]] 04:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

:*'''Comment''':I don't know man, I get the feeling they don't like edited photographs there. Somebody nominated my sakura picture there and it only got one support vote and a whole bunch of opposes. Over there, they seem to have very different standards. Even my Energy Arc, which was unanimously supported here with something like 18 votes, got 2 or 3 opposes![[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 06:05, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

*Comment. Added an edited version with a bit of extra detail in clouds. --[[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]] 10:17, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Reply''' - No offense, (really) but I don't like that at all. :)[[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 00:15, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''( + ) Support'''. Black and white is more artistic, but color is more useful. Either way, I support all versions. --[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]] ^{[[User_talk:Piotrus|Talk]]} 05:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

* '''Oppose b&w versions, support colour version'''. I quite like the original b&w one (Fir0002's edit is ok, but looks a little too messy with the extra contrast), but doesn't quite fit my idea of an encyclopedic image; the colour one is attractive and potentially more useful. [[User:Enochlau|Enochlau]] 07:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''( + ) Support''' The color version is sharp and almost perfect for this kind of illustration. [[User:Sverdrup|&mdash; Sverdrup]] 14:02, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Oppose B&W, Support color''' The color version has a greater allure to it - I think the color contrast between the blue and green is better than the contrast in the B&W. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vaeiou|Vaeiou]] ([[User talk:Vaeiou|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vaeiou|contribs]]) 13:14, 17 November 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

*<s>'''Oppose'''</s>- very poor placement in the article (it isn't even the primary picture on the page). It's just stuck into the article in a large gallery section with the somewhat cryptic caption, "Cirrus Clouds, mixed sky". How is this picture adding somthing that the others (all 5 of them) are not? Try Commons or try giving it a better caption and improving its positioning. [[User:BrokenSegue|'''B'''roken]] [[User talk:BrokenSegue|'''S''']]. I'm '''Neutral''' about it now after the new placement and caption. [[User:BrokenSegue|'''B'''roken]] [[User talk:BrokenSegue|'''S''']] 20:39, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' - How about now? I changed the article's pictur to the color version too.[[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 05:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

*Considering that you also took the pic that was on top of the article before your last edit I think I can safely say that I liked that one much better. Artistically the new one is better. But the old one conveys the concept of cirrus clouds better as an encyclopaedic image. Hence '''Oppose''' to all versions of this image. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 09:04, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

{{FPCresult|Promoted|Image:CirrusField-color.jpg}} [[User:Raven4x4x|Raven4x4x]] 05:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

<!-- additional votes go above this line -->

<br style="clear:both;" />