Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pbit sort: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
close - delete
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Jaxl|<font colorspan style= "color:darkblue;">Rob</fontspan>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font colorspan style= "color:green;">e</fontspan>]][[User:Jaxl|<font colorspan style= "color:darkblue;">rt</fontspan>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jaxl|<font colorspan style= "color:darkred;"><small>'''T'''</small></fontspan>]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Jaxl|<font colorspan style= "color:green;"><small>'''@'''</small></fontspan>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jaxl|<font colorspan style= "color:orange;"><small>'''C'''</small></fontspan>]] </sup> 01:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
===[[Pbit sort]]===
This article appears to be original research. Google can't find any references except the same paper linked in this article. [[User:P3d0Doradus|P3d0Doradus]] 23:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. I can't even find a definition of "pbit" that fits the context. - [[User:Dalbury|Dalbury]] [[User_talk:Dalbury|(talk)]] 01:32, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per nomination. The paper doesn't look like something that has gotten through peer review, it looks more like the first version which you go over once more before submitting it for consideration. My first hunch is that someone has rediscovered [[radix sort]], but I haven't checked the algorithm well enough to be sure that I'm not 100% off the mark. - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] 08:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. → [[User:Extreme Unction|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#ff0000;"><b><i>Ξxtreme</i></b></fontspan> Unction]] {<span style="font -size=0:x-small;">[[User talk:Extreme Unction|yak yak yak]]</fontspan> ł <fontspan style="font-size=0:x-small;">[[Special:Contributions/Extreme Unction|blah blah blah]]</fontspan>} 12:52, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' It seems to be supported by a small amount of academic research, but it is not a widely known term. It was added by an anonymous editor, so that '''may''' be the author of the paper, making it OR, but we don't know. --[[User:Rogerd|Rogerd]] 15:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>