Capitalism: Difference between revisions

[pending revision][accepted revision]
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 1:
{{Short description|Economic system based on private ownership}}
In common usage, the word '''capitalism''' means an [[economic system]] in which all or most of the [[means of production]] are [[private property|privately owned]] and [[management|operated]], and the [[investment]] of [[capital (economics)|capital]] and the [[production]], [[logistics|distribution]] and [[price]]s of [[commodities]] ([[good (economics)|goods]] and [[services]]) are determined mainly in a [[free market]], rather than by the [[state]]. In capitalism, the means of production are generally operated for [[profit]].{{wikiquote}}
{{About|an economic system}}
{{Redirect|Capitalist|other uses|Capitalist (disambiguation)}}
{{Pp-pc|small=yes}}
{{Use American English|date=January 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{{Capitalism sidebar}}
{{Economic systems sidebar|expanded=by ideology}}
{{Liberalism sidebar|related}}
 
'''Capitalism''' is an [[economic system]] based on the private ownership of the [[means of production]] and their use for the purpose of obtaining [[Profit (economics)|profit]].<ref name=Zimbalist1988>{{cite book |last1=Zimbalist |last2=Sherman |last3=Brown |first1=Andrew |first2=Howard J. |first3=Stuart |title=Comparing Economic Systems: A Political-Economic Approach |publisher=Harcourt College Publishing|year=1988|isbn=978-0-15-512403-5 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/comparingeconomi0000zimb_q8i6/page/6 6–7] |quote=Pure capitalism is defined as a system wherein all of the means of production (physical capital) are privately owned and run by the capitalist class for a profit, while most other people are workers who work for a salary or wage (and who do not own the capital or the product).|url=https://archive.org/details/comparingeconomi0000zimb_q8i6/page/6}}</ref><ref name=Rosser2003>{{cite book |last1=Rosser |first1=Mariana V. |last2=Rosser |first2=J Barkley |title=Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy |publisher=MIT Press|year=2003|isbn=978-0-262-18234-8|page=7|quote=In capitalist economies, land and produced means of production (the capital stock) are owned by private individuals or groups of private individuals organized as firms.}}</ref><ref name=Jenks>{{cite book |first=Chris |last=Jenks |title=Core Sociological Dichotomies |quote=Capitalism, as a mode of production, is an economic system of manufacture and exchange which is geared toward the production and sale of commodities within a market for profit, where the manufacture of commodities consists of the use of the formally free labor of workers in exchange for a wage to create commodities in which the manufacturer extracts surplus value from the labor of the workers in terms of the difference between the wages paid to the worker and the value of the commodity produced by him/her to generate that profit. |___location=London|publisher=SAGE Publishing|page=383}}</ref><ref name=Gilpin2018>{{cite book |title=The Challenge of Global Capitalism : The World Economy in the 21st Century |last=Gilpin |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Gilpin |isbn=978-0-691-18647-4 |oclc=1076397003 |year=2018|publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref><ref name=Sternberg2015>{{cite journal|last1=Sternberg |first1=Elaine |title=Defining Capitalism |journal=Economic Affairs|year=2015|volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=380–396 |doi=10.1111/ecaf.12141|s2cid=219373247}}</ref> This socioeconomic system has developed historically through several stages and is defined by a number of basic constituent elements: [[private property]], [[profit motive]], [[capital accumulation]], [[Competition (economics)|competitive markets]], [[commodification]], [[Wage labour|wage labor]], and an emphasis on [[innovation]] and [[economic growth]].<ref name=Heilbroner2018>{{cite book|last1=Heilbroner|first1=RobertL.|title=The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |year=2018|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|___location=London|isbn=978-1-349-95189-5 |pages=1378–1389 |edition=3rd |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_154|chapter=Capitalism |doi=10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_154}}</ref><ref name=Hodgson2015>{{cite book|last1=Hodgson|first1=GeoffreyM.|title=Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future|year=2015|publisher=University of Chicago Press|___location=Chicago|isbn=9780226168142|url=https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo18523749.html}}</ref><ref name=Berend2015>{{cite book |last1=Berend |first1=Ivan T. |title=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences |chapter=Capitalism |year=2015|pages=94–98|doi=10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.62003-2|isbn=978-0-08-097087-5 }}</ref><ref name=Bonanno2012>{{cite book|last1=Antonio|first1=RobertJ.|last2=Bonanno|first2=Alessandro |title=The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization |chapter=Capitalism |year=2012|doi=10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog060|isbn=978-1-4051-8824-1}}</ref><ref name=Beamish2018>{{cite book|last1=Beamish |first1=Rob |chapter=Capitalism |title=Core Concepts in Sociology |year=2018|pages=17–22 |doi=10.1002/9781394260331.ch6|isbn=978-1-119-16861-4 }}</ref><ref name=Gregory2013>{{cite book|last1=Gregory|first1=Paul|last2=Stuart|first2=Robert|year=2013|title=The Global Economy and its Economic Systems|publisher=South-Western College Publishing|page=41|isbn=978-1-285-05535-0|quote=Capitalism is characterized by private ownership of the factors of production. Decision making is decentralized and rests with the owners of the factors of production. Their decision making is coordinated by the market, which provides the necessary information. Material incentives are used to motivate participants.}}</ref> Capitalist economies tend to experience a [[business cycle]] of economic growth followed by [[Recession|recessions]].<ref name=Hodrick1997>{{cite journal|last1=Hodrick|first1=R.|last2=Prescott |first2=E. |year=1997|title=Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation|url=http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/451.pdf|journal=Journal of Money, Credit and Banking|volume=29|issue=1|pages=1–16|doi=10.2307/2953682|jstor=2953682|s2cid=154995815}}</ref>
== Etymology ==
 
Economists, historians, political economists, and sociologists have adopted different perspectives in their analyses of capitalism and have recognized various forms of it in practice. These include ''[[Laissez-faire#Capitalism|laissez-faire]]'' or [[Free_market#Capitalism|free-market capitalism]], [[state capitalism]], and [[welfare capitalism]]. Different forms of capitalism feature varying degrees of [[free market]]s, [[State ownership|public ownership]],<ref name="gregorystuart">{{cite book|last1=Gregory |first1=Paul |last2=Stuart |first2=Robert |title=The Global Economy and its Economic Systems |publisher=South-Western College Publishing|year=2013|isbn=978-1-285-05535-0|page=107|quote=Real-world capitalist systems are mixed, some having higher shares of public ownership than others. The mix changes when privatization or nationalization occurs. Privatization is when property that had been state-owned is transferred to private owners. [[Nationalization]] occurs when privately owned property becomes publicly owned.}}</ref> obstacles to free competition, and state-sanctioned [[Social policy|social policies]]. The degree of [[Competition (economics)|competition]] in [[Market (economics)|markets]] and the role of [[Market intervention|intervention]] and [[Regulatory economics|regulation]], as well as the scope of state ownership, vary across different models of capitalism.<ref name="Modern Economics 1986, p. 54">{{cite book|title=Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics|edition=3|year=1986|pages=54}}</ref><ref name=Bronk2000>{{cite magazine |last=Bronk |first=Richard |title=Which model of capitalism|url=http://oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/345/Which_model_of_capitalism_.html |url-status=live |magazine=OECD Observer|publisher=OECD|year=2000|volume=1999 |issue=221–222 |pages=12–15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180406200423/http://oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/345/Which_model_of_capitalism_.html |archive-date=6 April 2018 |access-date=6 April 2018}}</ref> The extent to which different markets are free and the rules defining private property are matters of politics and policy. Most of the existing capitalist economies are [[Mixed economy|mixed economies]] that combine elements of free markets with state intervention and in some cases [[economic planning]].<ref name="Stilwell">{{cite book |last=Stilwell |first=Frank |author-link=Frank Stilwell (economist) |title=Political Economy: the Contest of Economic Ideas |edition=1st |publisher=Oxford University Press|___location=Melbourne|year=2002}}</ref>
The etymology of the word '''capital''' has roots in the trade and ownership of animals. The [[Latin]] root of the word '''capital''' is ''capitalis'', from the [[Proto-Indo-European language|proto-Indo-European]] ''kaput'', which means "head", this being how wealth was measured. The more heads of cattle, the better. The terms ''chattel'' (meaning goods, animals, or slaves) and even ''cattle'' itself also derive from this same origin.
 
Capitalism in its modern form emerged from [[agrarianism]] in England, as well as [[Mercantilism|mercantilist]] practices by European countries between the 16th and 18th centuries. The [[Industrial Revolution]] of the 18th century established [[Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|capitalism as a dominant mode of production]], characterized by factory work, and a complex [[Division of labour|division of labor]]. Through the process of [[globalization]], capitalism spread across the world in the 19th and 20th centuries, especially before [[World War I]] and after the end of the [[Cold War]]. During the 19th century, capitalism was largely unregulated by the state, but became more regulated in the post–[[World War II]] period through [[Keynesian economics|Keynesianism]], followed by a return of more unregulated capitalism starting in the 1980s through [[neoliberalism]].
The lexical connections between animal trade and economics can also be seen in the names of many currencies and words about money: fee (''faihu''), rupee (''rupya''), buck (a deerskin), pecuniary (''pecu''), stock (''livestock''), and peso (''pecu'' or ''pashu'') all derive from animal-trade origins.
 
== Etymology ==
[[Image:Thackeray_william.jpg|150px|thumb|right|The first known use of the word "capitalism" was by novelist William Thackeray in 1854]]
The term "capitalist", meaning an owner of [[Capital (economics)|capital]], appears earlier than the term "capitalism" and dates to the mid-17th century. "Capitalism" is derived from ''capital'', which evolved from {{lang|la|capitale}}, a late [[Latin]] word based on {{lang|la|caput}}, meaning "head"—which is also the origin of "[[Personal property|chattel]]" and "[[cattle]]" in the sense of movable property (only much later to refer only to livestock). {{lang|la|Capitale}} emerged in the 12th to 13th centuries to refer to funds, stock of merchandise, sum of money or money carrying interest.<ref name=Braudel1979>{{cite book|last=Braudel |first=Fernand |author-link=Fernand Braudel |title=The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century|publisher=Harper and Row|date=1979}}</ref>{{rp|232}}<ref name="OED-93">[[James Murray (lexicographer)|James Augustus Henry Murray]]. "Capital". [https://archive.org/details/oedvol02 A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles]. ''Oxford English Press''. {{abbr|Vol.|Volume}} 2. p. 93.</ref> By 1283, it was used in the sense of the capital assets of a trading firm and was often interchanged with other words—wealth, money, funds, goods, assets, property and so on.<ref name=Braudel1979/>{{rp|233}}
The first use of the word ''"Kapitalist"'', "capitalist" was in the [[Communist Manifesto]] in [[1848]] by Marx and Engels, however, "kapitalismus," the german word for "capitalism" was not used. The first use of the word "capitalism" is by novelist [[William Makepeace Thackeray|Thackeray]] in [[1854]], by which he meant ownership of a large amount of capital. In [[1867]] [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon|Proudhon]] used the term "capitalist" to refer to owners of capital, and Marx and Engels refer to the "capitalist form of production" ("''kapitalistische Produktionsform''") and in ''[[Das Kapital]]'' to ''"Kapitalist"'', "capitalist" (meaning a private owner of capital). By the early [[20th century]] the term had become widespread, as evidenced by [[Max Weber]]'s use of the term in his ''[[The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]]'' in [[1904]], and [[Werner Sombart]]'s [[1906]] ''Modern Capitalism''. The [[Oxford English Dictionary|OED]] cites the use of the term "private capitalism" by [[Karl Daniel Adolf Douai]], German-American [[socialism|socialist]] and [[abolitionism|abolitionist]] in the late [[19th century]], in an [[1877]] work entitled "Better Times", and a citation by an unknown author in [[1884]] in the pages of [[Pall Mall]] magazine.
 
The ''Hollantse ({{langx|de|holländische}}) Mercurius'' uses "capitalists" in 1633 and 1654 to refer to owners of capital.<ref name=Braudel1979/>{{rp|234}} In French, [[Étienne Clavier]] referred to ''capitalistes'' in 1788,<ref>E.g., "L'Angleterre a-t-elle l'heureux privilège de n'avoir ni Agioteurs, ni Banquiers, ni Faiseurs de services, ni Capitalistes ?" in [Étienne Clavier] (1788) ''De la foi publique envers les créanciers de l'état : lettres à M. Linguet sur le n° CXVI de ses annales'' [https://books.google.com/books?id=ESMVAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA19 p. 19] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319071130/http://books.google.com/books?id=ESMVAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA19 |date=19 March 2015 }}</ref> four years before its first recorded English usage by [[Arthur Young (writer)|Arthur Young]] in his work ''Travels in France'' (1792).<ref name="OED-93" /><ref>Arthur Young. [https://archive.org/details/travelsduringye03youngoog ''Travels in France''].</ref> In his ''[[Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]]'' (1817), [[David Ricardo]] referred to "the capitalist" many times.<ref>Ricardo, David. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. 1821. John Murray Publisher, 3rd edition.</ref> English poet [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]] used "capitalist" in his work ''Table Talk'' (1823).<ref>Samuel Taylor Coleridge. [https://books.google.com/books?id=ma-4W-XiGkIC Tabel ''The Complete Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200223123202/https://books.google.com/books?id=ma-4W-XiGkIC |date=23 February 2020 }}. p. 267.</ref> [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] used the term in his first work, ''[[What is Property?]]'' (1840), to refer to the owners of capital. [[Benjamin Disraeli]] used the term in his 1845 work ''[[Sybil (novel)|Sybil]]''.<ref name="OED-93" /> [[Alexander Hamilton]] used "capitalist" in his [[Report on Manufactures|Report of Manufactures]] presented to the United States Congress in 1791.
Under the [[Marxist theory]] of [[ideology]], a dominant economic class is believed to have its own ideology serving its class interests. The ideology of the "capitalist class" or [[bourgeois]] also came to be known as "capitalism", giving the word another meaning. This usage has been adopted outside of Marxist circles, and today many economic liberals self-describe as "capitalists", even if they are not personally involved in business investment.
 
The initial use of the term "capitalism" in its modern sense is attributed to [[Louis Blanc]] in 1850 ("What I call 'capitalism' that is to say the appropriation of capital by some to the exclusion of others") and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1861 ("Economic and social regime in which capital, the source of income, does not generally belong to those who make it work through their labor").<ref name=Braudel1979/>{{rp|237}} [[Karl Marx]] frequently referred to the "[[Capital (Marxism)|capital]]" and to the "capitalist mode of production" in ''[[Capital: Critique of Political Economy|Das Kapital]]'' (1867).<ref>{{cite book |last=Saunders |first=Peter |date=1995 |title=Capitalism |publisher=[[University of Minnesota Press]] |page=1}}</ref><ref name=":0">MEW, 23, & Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Erster Band-Verlag von Otto Meissner (1867)</ref> Marx did not use the form ''capitalism'' but instead used [[Capital (Marxism)|capital]], ''capitalist'' and ''capitalist mode of production'', which appear frequently.<ref name=":0" /><ref>The use of the word "capitalism" appears in ''Theories of Surplus Value'', volume II. ToSV was edited by Kautsky.</ref> Due to the word being coined by socialist critics of capitalism, economist and historian [[Robert Hessen]] stated that the term "capitalism" itself is a term of disparagement and a misnomer for [[Individualism#Economic individualism|economic individualism]].<ref>Hessen, Robert (2008) "Capitalism", in Henderson, David R. (ed.) ''The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics'' p. 57</ref> [[Bernard Harcourt]] agrees with the statement that the term is a misnomer, adding that it misleadingly suggests that there is such a thing as "[[Capital (economics)|capital]]" that inherently functions in certain ways and is governed by stable economic laws of its own.<ref>Harcourt, Bernard E. (2020) ''For Coöperation and the Abolition of Capital, Or, How to Get Beyond Our Extractive Punitive Society and Achieve a Just Society'', Rochester, NY: Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-672, p. 31</ref>
==Capitalist theory==
 
In the [[English language]], the term "capitalism" first appears, according to the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' (OED), in 1854, in the novel ''[[The Newcomes]]'' by novelist [[William Makepeace Thackeray]], where the word meant "having ownership of capital".<ref name="OED-94">[[James Murray (lexicographer)|James Augustus Henry Murray]]. "Capitalism" p. 94.</ref> Also according to the OED, [[Carl Adolph Douai]], a [[German Americans|German American]] [[Socialism|socialist]] and [[Abolitionism in the United States|abolitionist]], used the term "private capitalism" in 1863.
Capitalism is contrasted with [[feudalism]], where government claims ownership of the land of private operators, and then grants titles to fuedal lords who collect rent from the operators. In capitalist theory, unowned land becomes owned by an individual arriving upon it and operating it (e.g. cultivating it) and then may only by transferred by sale or gift rather than government seizure. Capitalism also contrasts with [[socialism]], where the means of production are owned and used by the state; and with [[communism]], where the means of production are owned and used by the community collectively.
 
Other terms sometimes used for capitalism are:
Some emphasize the private ownership of [[capital (economics)|capital]] as being the essence of capitalism, or emphasize of the importance of a [[free market]] as a mechanism for the movement and accumulation of capital, while others measure capitalism through class analysis (i.e., class structure of society, relations between the [[proletariat]] and the [[bourgeois]]). Some note the growth of a [[International trade|global market]] system.
* [[Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|Capitalist mode of production]]<ref>{{cite book |last=Mandel |first=Ernst |author-link=Ernst Mandel |title=An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9Jd1sIMJ0C&pg=PA24 |year=2002 |publisher=Resistance Books|isbn=978-1-876646-30-1 |page=24 |access-date=29 January 2017 |archive-date=15 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215160137/https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9Jd1sIMJ0C&pg=PA24 |url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Economic liberalism]]<ref>{{cite journal |title=Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism |last=Werhane |first=P. H. |journal=The Review of Metaphysics |volume=47 |year=1994 |issue=3}}</ref>
* Free enterprise<ref name="rogetfreeenterprise">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Free enterprise |encyclopedia=Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus |edition=Third |publisher=Philip Lief Group |date=2008}}</ref>{{page needed|date=July 2021}}
* Free enterprise economy<ref name="britannica" />
* [[Free market]]<ref name="rogetfreeenterprise" />{{page needed|date=July 2021}}
* Free market economy<ref name="britannica" />
* ''[[Laissez-faire]]''<ref name=Barrons>{{cite book |title=Barrons Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms |date=1995 |page=74}}</ref>
* [[Market economy]]<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/market%20economy |title=Market economy |dictionary=Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary}}</ref>
* Profits system<ref>{{cite book |last=Shutt |first=Harry |title=Beyond the Profits System: Possibilities for the Post-Capitalist Era |publisher=[[Zed Books]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-84813-417-1}}</ref>{{page needed|date=July 2021}}
* Self-regulating market<ref name="rogetfreeenterprise" />{{page needed|date=July 2021}}
 
== Definition ==
Others focus on the application of the market to human [[labor]]. Still others, such as Hayek, note the [[self-organization|self-organizing]] character of economies which are not centrally-planned by government. Many, such as Adam Smith, point to what is believed to be the value of individuals pursuing their [[self-interest]] as opposed to altruistically working to serve the "public good."
There is no universally agreed upon definition of capitalism; it is unclear whether or not capitalism characterizes an entire society, a specific type of social order, or crucial
components or elements of a society.<ref name="wolf">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Wolf |first=Harald |editor1-last=Ritzer |editor1-first=George|title=Capitalism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Social Theory|pages=76–80|date=2004 |publisher=Sage Publications|isbn=978-1-4522-6546-9}}</ref> Societies officially founded in opposition to capitalism, such as the [[Soviet Union|Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]] (U.S.S.R), and the [[People's Republic of China]], have sometimes been argued to actually exhibit characteristics of capitalism.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Howard |first1=M.C. |last2=King |first2=J.E. |title='State Capitalism' in the Soviet Union |journal=History of Economics Review |date=January 2001 |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=110–126 |doi=10.1080/10370196.2001.11733360 |s2cid=42809979 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10370196.2001.11733360 |language=en |issn=1037-0196|url-access=subscription }}</ref> [[Nancy Fraser]] describes usage of the term "capitalism" by many authors as "mainly rhetorical, functioning less as an actual concept than as a gesture toward the
need for a concept".<ref name=harris>{{cite journal|last1=Harris|first1=Neal|last2=Delanty|first2=Gerard|title=What is capitalism? Toward a working definition |journal=Social Science Information|year=2023|volume=62|issue=3|pages=323–344|doi=10.1177/05390184231203878 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Scholars who are uncritical of capitalism rarely actually use the term "capitalism".<ref name="delacroix">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Delacroix |first=Jacques |editor1-last=Ritzer |editor1-first=George |title=Capitalism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Social Theory|date=2007 |publisher=Wiley|doi=10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc004 |isbn=978-1-4051-2433-1|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc004|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Some doubt that the term "capitalism" possesses valid scientific dignity,<ref name="wolf"/> and it is generally not discussed in [[mainstream economics]],<ref name="harris"/> with economist [[Daron Acemoglu]] suggesting that the term "capitalism" should be abandoned entirely.<ref>{{cite book |last=Acemoglu |first=Daron |date=2017 |editor1-last=Frey |editor1-first=Bruno S.|editor2-last = Iselin|editor2-first = David |title=Economic Ideas You Should Forget |publisher=Springer|pages=1–3 |chapter=Capitalism|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8_1 |isbn=978-3-319-47457-1|chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8_1}}</ref> Consequently, understanding of the concept of capitalism tends to be heavily influenced by opponents of capitalism and by the followers and critics of Karl Marx.<ref name="delacroix"/>
 
== History ==
Many of these theories call attention to various [[economics|economic]] practices that became institutionalized in [[Europe]] between the [[16th century|16th]] and [[19th century|19th]] centuries, especially involving the right of individuals and groups of individuals acting as "legal persons" (or [[corporations]]) to buy and sell [[capital good]]s, as well as [[Land (economics)|land]], [[labor]], and [[money]] (see [[finance]] and [[credit]]), in a [[free market]] (see [[trade]]), and relying on the state for the enforcement of [[private property]] rights rather than on a system of feudal protection and obligations.
{{Main|History of capitalism}}
[[File:Jacopo Pontormo 055.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|[[Cosimo de' Medici]] (pictured in a 16th-century portrait by [[Pontormo]]) built an international financial empire and was one of the first [[Medici bank]]ers.]]
[[File:Augsburg - Markt.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|[[Augsburg]], the centre of early capitalism<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Behringer |first1=Wolfgang |contribution=Core and Periphery: The Holy Roman Empire as a Communication(s) Universe |title=The Holy Roman Empire, 1495–1806 |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |___location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-960297-1 |pages=347–358|url=https://perspectivia.net/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/pnet_derivate_00004689/behringer_core.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://perspectivia.net/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/pnet_derivate_00004689/behringer_core.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live |access-date=7 August 2022}}</ref>]]
 
Capitalism, in its modern form, can be traced to the emergence of agrarian capitalism and mercantilism in the early [[Renaissance]], in city-states like [[Florence]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2009/04/16/cradle-of-capitalism |title=Cradle of capitalism |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |date=16 April 2009 |access-date=9 March 2015 |archive-date=18 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118055643/http://www.economist.com/node/13484709 |url-status=live}}</ref> [[Capital (economics)|Capital]] has existed incipiently on a small scale for centuries<ref name="WarburtonDavid">{{cite book |last=Warburton |first=David |title=Macroeconomics from the beginning: The General Theory, Ancient Markets, and the Rate of Interest |___location=Paris |publisher=Recherches et Publications |date=2003 |pages=49}}</ref> in the form of merchant, renting and lending activities and occasionally as small-scale industry with some wage labor. Simple [[commodity]] exchange and consequently simple commodity production, which is the initial basis for the growth of capital from trade, have a very long history. During the [[Islamic Golden Age]], [[Arabs]] promulgated capitalist economic policies such as free trade and banking. Their use of [[Indo-Arabic numerals]] facilitated [[bookkeeping]]. These innovations migrated to Europe through trade partners in cities such as Venice and Pisa. Italian [[mathematicians]] traveled the Mediterranean talking to Arab traders and returned to popularize the use of Indo-Arabic numerals in Europe.<ref name="Koehler, Benedikt">{{cite book |last=Koehler |first=Benedikt |title=Early Islam and the Birth of Capitalism |quote=In Baghdad, by the early tenth century a fully-fledged banking sector had come into being... |pages=2 |publisher=[[Lexington Books]] |date=2014}}</ref>
Due to the vagueness of the term, debates and controversies have emerged. In particular, there is contention on whether capitalism is an actual system, or an ideal, i.e. on whether it has actually been implemented in particular economies, or if not, then to what degree capitalism exists in them (see ''[[mixed economy]]''). From a historic point of view, there is an argument on whether capitalism is specific to a particular era or geographic region or if it is a universally valid system that may exist throughout various times and spaces. Some interpret capitalism as a purely economic system; others however contend that capitalism is a political, social, and cultural system as well. Debate also rages about the characteristics of capitalism: is it [[Justice|fair]]; is it [[rationality|rational]]; is it a coherent concept?
 
=== Agrarianism ===
==History of capitalism==
The economic foundations of the feudal agricultural system began to shift substantially in 16th-century England as the [[manorial system]] had broken down and land began to become concentrated in the hands of fewer landlords with increasingly large estates. Instead of a [[serf]]-based system of labor, workers were increasingly employed as part of a broader and expanding money-based economy. The system put pressure on both landlords and tenants to increase the productivity of agriculture to make profit; the weakened coercive power of the [[aristocracy]] to extract peasant [[Excess supply|surpluses]] encouraged them to try better methods, and the tenants also had incentive to improve their methods in order to flourish in a competitive [[labor economics|labor market]]. Terms of rent for land were becoming subject to economic market forces rather than to the previous stagnant system of custom and feudal obligation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brenner |first1=Robert |title=The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism |journal=[[Past & Present (journal)|Past & Present]] |date=1 January 1982 |issue=97 |pages=16–113 |doi=10.1093/past/97.1.16 |jstor=650630}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://monthlyreview.org/1998/07/01/the-agrarian-origins-of-capitalism |title=The Agrarian Origins of Capitalism |access-date=17 December 2012 |date=July 1998 |archive-date=11 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191211183143/https://monthlyreview.org/1998/07/01/the-agrarian-origins-of-capitalism/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
''Main article: [[History of capitalism]]''
 
=== Mercantilism ===
* [[Emergence of early capitalism]]
{{Main|Mercantilism}}
* [[Capitalism in the nineteenth century]]
[[File:Lorrain.seaport.jpg|left|thumb|A painting of a French seaport from 1638 at the height of [[mercantilism]]]]
* [[Capitalism in the twentieth century]]
[[File:Lord Clive meeting with Mir Jafar after the Battle of Plassey.jpg|left|thumb|[[Robert Clive]] with the [[Nawabs of Bengal]] after the [[Battle of Plassey]] which began the British rule in [[Bengal Presidency|Bengal]]]]
* [[Capitalism in the twenty-first century]]
The economic doctrine prevailing from the 16th to the 18th centuries is commonly called [[mercantilism]].<ref name=GSGB>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9Jd1sIMJ0C |title=An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory |date= 2002 |publisher=Resistance Books|via=[[Google Books]] |isbn=978-1-876646-30-1 |access-date=27 August 2016 |archive-date=11 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161211173733/https://books.google.com/books?id=Pf9Jd1sIMJ0C |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Burnham">{{cite book |last=Burnham |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Burnham |title=Capitalism: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2003}}</ref> This period, the [[Age of Discovery]], was associated with the geographic exploration of foreign lands by merchant traders, especially from England and the [[Low Countries]]. Mercantilism was a system of trade for profit, although commodities were still largely produced by non-capitalist methods.<ref name="Scott" /> Most scholars consider the era of merchant capitalism and mercantilism as the origin of modern capitalism,<ref name="Burnham"/><ref name="Encyclopædia Britannica 2006">''Encyclopædia Britannica'' (2006)</ref> although [[Karl Polanyi]] argued that the hallmark of capitalism is the establishment of generalized markets for what he called the "fictitious commodities", i.e. land, labor and money. Accordingly, he argued that "not until 1834 was a competitive labor market established in England, hence industrial capitalism as a social system cannot be said to have existed before that date".<ref>{{cite book |last=Polanyi |first=Karl |author-link=Karl Polanyi |title=The Great Transformation |publisher=[[Beacon Press]] |___location=Boston |date=1944 |pages=87}}</ref>
 
England began a large-scale and integrative approach to mercantilism during the [[Elizabethan Era]] (1558–1603). A systematic and coherent explanation of balance of trade was made public through [[Thomas Mun]]'s argument ''England's Treasure by Forraign Trade, or the Balance of our Forraign Trade is The Rule of Our Treasure.'' It was written in the 1620s and published in 1664.<ref>{{cite book |first1=David |last1=Onnekink |first2=Gijs |last2=Rommelse |title=Ideology and Foreign Policy in Early Modern Europe (1650–1750) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M1QdbzdTimsC&pg=PA257 |year=2011 |publisher=[[Ashgate Publishing]] |page=257 |isbn=978-1-4094-1914-3 |access-date=27 June 2015 |archive-date=19 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319130220/http://books.google.com/books?id=M1QdbzdTimsC&pg=PA257 |url-status=live}}</ref>
==History of theory of capitalism==
''Main article: [[History of theory of capitalism]]''
 
European [[merchant]]s, backed by state controls, subsidies and [[monopoly|monopolies]], made most of their profits by buying and selling goods. In the words of [[Francis Bacon]], the purpose of mercantilism was "the opening and well-balancing of trade; the cherishing of manufacturers; the banishing of idleness; the repressing of waste and excess by sumptuary laws; the improvement and husbanding of the soil; the regulation of prices...".<ref>Quoted in {{cite book |first=George |last=Clark |title=The Seventeenth Century |___location=New York |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |date=1961 |page=24}}</ref>
Most theories of what has come to be called capitalism developed in the [[18th century]], [[19th century]] and [[20th century]], for instance in the context of the [[industrial revolution]] and [[New imperialism|European imperialism]] (e.g. [[Anders Chydenius|Chydenius]], [[Adam Smith|Smith]], [[David Ricardo|Ricardo]], [[Karl Marx|Marx]]), [[The Great Depression]] (e.g.[[John Maynard Keynes|Keynes]]) and the [[Cold war]] (e.g. [[Friedrich Hayek|Hayek]], [[Milton Friedman|Friedman]]). These theorists characterise capitalism as an economic system in which capital is owned by private individuals (sometimes referred to as "capitalists") and economic decisions are determined in a market - that is, by trades that occur as a result of agreement between buyers and sellers; where a market mentality and [[Entrepreneur|entrepreneurial]] spirit exists; and where specific, legally enforceable, notions of [[property]] and [[contract]] are instituted. Such theories typically try to explain why capitalist economies are likely to generate more economic growth than those subject to a greater degree of governmental intervention (see [[economics]], [[political economy]], [[laissez-faire]]).
 
After the period of the [[proto-industrialization]], the [[British East India Company]] and the [[Dutch East India Company]], after massive contributions from the [[Mughal Bengal]],<ref name="Prakash">[[Om Prakash (historian)|Om Prakash]], "[http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3447600139/WHIC?u=seat24826&xid=6b597320 Empire, Mughal]", ''History of World Trade Since 1450'', edited by [[John J. McCusker]], vol. 1, Macmillan Reference USA, 2006, pp. 237–240, ''World History in Context''. Retrieved 3 August 2017</ref><ref name="ray">{{cite book |first=Indrajit |last=Ray |year=2011 |title=Bengal Industries and the British Industrial Revolution (1757–1857) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CHOrAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA57 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=57, 90, 174 |isbn=978-1-136-82552-1 |access-date=20 June 2019 |archive-date=29 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160529021839/https://books.google.com/books?id=CHOrAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}</ref> inaugurated an expansive era of commerce and trade.<ref name=Banaji>{{cite journal |last=Banaji |first=Jairus |year=2007 |title=Islam, the Mediterranean and the rise of capitalism |journal=Journal of Historical Materialism|volume=15 |pages=47–74 |doi=10.1163/156920607X171591 |url=http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15983/1/Islam%20and%20capitalism.pdf |access-date=20 April 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180329015002/http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15983/1/Islam%20and%20capitalism.pdf |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="britannica2">{{cite book |title=Economic system:: Market systems |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/178493/economic-system/61117/Market-systems#toc242146 |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |year=2006 |access-date=4 January 2009 |archive-date=24 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090524075921/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/178493/economic-system/61117/Market-systems#toc242146 |url-status=live}}</ref> These companies were characterized by their [[colonialism|colonial]] and [[Expansionism|expansionary]] powers given to them by nation-states.<ref name="Banaji" /> During this era, merchants, who had traded under the previous stage of mercantilism, invested capital in the East India Companies and other colonies, seeking a [[return on investment]].
In his [[1765]] book ''[[The National Gain]]'', [[Anders Chydenius]], a [[Finnish]] parlamentarian, became the first to propose freedom of trade and industry and the principles of [[liberalism]], 11 years before [[Adam Smith]] in ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'' ([[1776]]).
 
=== Industrial Revolution ===
[[Image:Anders Chydenius.jpg|133px|thumb|[[Anders Chydenius]] was first to propose free trade and industry and to lay out the principles of liberalism in 1765, eleven years before Adam Smith]]
{{Main|Industrial Revolution}}
[[Image:Adam Smith.jpg|133px|thumb|Yet, [[Adam Smith]] became more famous as the intellectual father of capitalism]]
[[File:Maquina vapor Watt ETSIIM.jpg|thumb|The [[Watt steam engine]], fuelled primarily by [[coal]], propelled the [[Industrial Revolution]] in [[United Kingdom|Britain]].<ref>Watt steam engine image located in the lobby of the Superior Technical School of Industrial Engineers of the [[Technical University of Madrid|UPM]]{{clarify|date=April 2016}} ([[Madrid]]).</ref>]]
In the mid-18th century a group of economic theorists, led by [[David Hume]] (1711–1776)<ref>{{cite book |last=Hume |first=David |author-link=David Hume |title=Political Discourses |url=https://archive.org/details/McGillLibrary-125702-2590 |___location=Edinburgh |publisher=A. Kincaid & A. Donaldson |year=1752}}</ref> and [[Adam Smith]] (1723–1790), challenged fundamental mercantilist doctrines—such as the belief that the world's wealth remained constant and that a state could only increase its wealth at the expense of another state.
 
During the [[Industrial Revolution]], [[industrialists]] replaced merchants as a dominant factor in the capitalist system and effected the decline of the traditional handicraft skills of [[artisan]]s, guilds and [[journeyman|journeymen]]. Industrial capitalism marked the development of the [[factory system]] of manufacturing, characterized by a complex [[division of labor]] between and within work process and the routine of work tasks; and eventually established the domination of the [[Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|capitalist mode of production]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burnham |first1=Peter |author1-link=Peter Burnham |year=1996 |chapter=Capitalism |editor1-last=McLean |editor1-first=Iain |editor2-last=McMillan |editor2-first=Alistair |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8JkyAwAAQBAJ |series=Oxford Quick Reference |edition=3 |___location=Oxford |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |publication-date=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-101827-5 |access-date=14 September 2019 |quote=Industrial capitalism, which Marx dates from the last third of the eighteenth century, finally establishes the domination of the capitalist mode of production. |archive-date=27 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727163404/https://books.google.com/books?id=8JkyAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}</ref>
The conception of what constitutes capitalism has changed significantly over time, as well as varying depending on the political perspective and analytical approach taken. [[Adam Smith]]'s advocacy of [[economic liberalism]] focused on the role of enlightened self-interest (the "invisible hand") and the role of [[specialisation]] in making capital accumulation efficient. Some proponents of capitalism (like [[Milton Friedman]], [[Ayn Rand]] and [[Alan Greenspan]]) emphasize the role of [[free market]]s, which they claim promote [[cooperation]] between individuals, innovation, economic growth, as well as [[liberty]]. For many (like [[Immanuel Wallerstein]]), capitalism hinges on the elaboration of an economic system in which [[good (economics)|goods]] and [[service]]s are traded in [[market]]s, and capital goods belong to non-state entities, onto a global scale. For others (like [[Karl Marx]]), it is defined by historically unprecedented social relations resulting from the creation of a [[labor market]] in which most people have to sell their [[labor-power]] in order to survive. As Marx argued (see also [[Hilaire Belloc]]), capitalism is also distinguished from other market economies with private ownership by the concentration of the means of production in the hands of individuals. The economists of the [[Austrian School]] expound that an economy that is not planned or guided by governmental authority will be superior in efficiency and organization due to the phenomenon of [[self organization]]. Many others use capitalism as a synonym for a [[market economy]].
 
Industrial Britain eventually abandoned the [[protectionist]] policy formerly prescribed by mercantilism. In the 19th century, [[Richard Cobden]] (1804–1865) and [[John Bright]] (1811–1889), who based their beliefs on the [[Manchester capitalism|Manchester School]], initiated a movement to lower [[tariffs]].<ref name="laissezf">{{cite web |title=Laissez-faire |url=http://www.bartleby.com/65/la/laissezf.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202050426/http://www.bartleby.com/65/la/laissezf.html |archive-date=2 December 2008}}</ref> In the 1840s Britain adopted a less protectionist policy, with the 1846 repeal of the [[Corn Laws]] and the 1849 repeal of the [[Navigation Acts]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burnham |first1=Peter |author1-link=Peter Burnham |year=1996 |chapter=Capitalism |editor1-last=McLean |editor1-first=Iain |editor2-last=McMillan |editor2-first=Alistair |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8JkyAwAAQBAJ |series=Oxford Quick Reference |edition=3 |___location=Oxford |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |publication-date=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-101827-5 |access-date=14 September 2019 |quote=For most analysts, mid- to late-nineteenth century Britain is seen as the apotheosis of the laissez-faire phase of capitalism. This phase took off in Britain in the 1840s with the repeal of the Corn Laws, and the Navigation Acts, and the passing of the Banking Act. |archive-date=27 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727163404/https://books.google.com/books?id=8JkyAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}</ref> Britain reduced tariffs and [[import quota|quotas]], in line with David Ricardo's advocacy of [[free trade]].
==Characteristics of capitalist economies==
 
=== Modernity ===
A set of broad characteristics are generally agreed on by both advocates and critics of capitalism. These are a [[private sector]], [[private property]], free enterprise, [[profit]], unequal distribution of [[wealth]], competition, [[self-organization]] (or ''[[catallaxy]]''), the existence of [[markets]] (including the [[labor market]]) and the pursuit of [[self-interest]].
[[File:McKinley Prosperity.jpg|thumb|upright|The [[gold standard]] formed the financial basis of the international economy from 1870 to 1914.]]
 
Broader processes of [[globalization]] carried capitalism across the world. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, a series of loosely connected market systems had come together as a relatively integrated global system, in turn intensifying processes of economic and other globalization.<ref name="SAGE Publications">{{cite book |year=2007 |last1=James |first1=Paul |author-link=Paul James (academic) |last2=Gills |first2=Barry |title=Globalization and Economy, Vol. 1: Global Markets and Capitalism |url=https://www.academia.edu/4199690 |publisher=[[SAGE Publications]] |___location=London |page=xxxiii}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Impact of Global Capitalism on the Environment of Developing Economies |url=http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/93716/1/04_Osariyekemwen%20Igiebor.pdf |journal=Impact of Global Capitalism on the Environment of Developing Economies: The Case of Nigeria |pages=84 |access-date=31 July 2020 |archive-date=20 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200320071239/http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/93716/1/04_Osariyekemwen%20Igiebor.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> Late in the 20th century, capitalism overcame a challenge by [[Planned economy|centrally-planned economies]] and is now the encompassing system worldwide,<ref name="britannica">{{cite book |title=Capitalism |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/93927/capitalism |date=10 November 2014 |access-date=24 March 2015 |archive-date=29 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629021539/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/93927/capitalism |url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfn|Fulcher|2004|p=99}} with the [[mixed economy]] as its dominant form in the industrialized Western world.
An economy with a large amount of intervention - which may include state ownership of some of the means of production - in combination with some free market characteristics is sometimes referred to as a ''[[mixed economy]]'', rather than a capitalist one. [http://economics.about.com/od/howtheuseconomyworks/a/mixed_economy.htm] If intervention occurs to such a degree that it overwhelms private decision, such an economy is often referred to as [[statist]]. Some economists, such as [[Milton Friedman]], oppose all or almost all such state control over an economy. However, such distinctions are disputed. By some definitions, all of the economies in the [[developed world]] are capitalist, or as mixed economies based in capitalism. Others see the world integrated into a global capitalist system, and even those nations which today resist capitalism, operate within a globalized capitalist economy.
 
[[Industrialization]] allowed cheap production of household items using [[economies of scale]], while rapid [[population growth]] created sustained demand for commodities. The [[imperialism]] of the 18th-century decisively shaped globalization.<ref name="SAGE Publications" /><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Thomas |first1=Martin |last2=Thompson |first2=Andrew |date=1 January 2014 |title=Empire and Globalisation: from 'High Imperialism' to Decolonisation |journal=The International History Review |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=142–170 |doi=10.1080/07075332.2013.828643 |s2cid=153987517 |issn=0707-5332|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Globalization and Empire |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/47230635.pdf |journal=Globalization and Empire |access-date=31 July 2020 |archive-date=23 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063531/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/47230635.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Europe and the causes of globalization |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7045619.pdf |journal=Europe and the Causes of Globalization, 1790 to 2000 |access-date=31 July 2020 |archive-date=7 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171207091124/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7045619.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref>
=== Private ownership of the means of production ===
[[Image:Dairycattle2173.JPG|thumb|right|200px|Cattle on an Amish dairy farm]]
[[Image:Moyer Factory Post Card 1910-1915.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Private ownership of the means of production is an essential characteristic of capitalism]]
An essential characteristic of capitalism is the institution of rule of law in establishing and protecting private property, including, most notably, private ownership of the [[means of production]]. Private property was embraced in some earlier systems legal systems such as in ancient Rome [http://www.libertystory.net/LSBIGSTORIESROMANPROPERTYLAW.htm], but protection of these rights was sometimes difficult, especially since Rome had no police [http://nefer-seba.net/essays/roman-police.php]. Such and other earlier system often forced the weak to accept the leadership of a strong patron or lord and pay him for protection. It has been argued that a strong formal property and legal system made possible a) greater independence; b) clear and provable protected ownership; c) the standardization and integration of property rules and property information in the country as a whole; d) increased trust arising from a greater certainty of punishment for cheating in economic transactions; e) more formal and complex written statements of ownership that permitted the easier assumption of shared risk and ownership in companies, and the insurance of risk; f) greater availability of loans for new projects, since more things could be used as collateral for the loans; g) easier and more reliable information regarding such things as credit history and the worth of assets; h) an increased fungibility, standardization and transferability of statements documenting the ownership of property, which paved the way for structures such as national markets for companies and the easy transportation of property through complex networks of individuals and other entities. All of these things enhanced economic growth.
 
After the [[First Opium War|First]] and [[Second Opium War]]s (1839–60) by [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|Britain]] and [[France]] and the completion of the [[British people|British]] conquest of India by 1858 and the [[French people|French]] conquest of [[Africa]], [[Polynesia]] and [[Indochina]] by 1887, vast populations of Asia became consumers of European exports. Europeans colonized areas of Africa and the Pacific islands. Colonisation by Europeans, notably of Africa by the British and French, yielded valuable natural resources such as [[rubber]], [[diamonds]] and [[coal]] and helped fuel trade and investment between the European imperial powers, their colonies and the United States:
Capitalism is often contrasted to [[socialism]] in that besides embracing private property in terms of personal possessions, it supports private ownership of the means of production. Those who support capitalism often credit the lack of control over the means of production by government as crucial to maximizing economic output. [[Ludwig von Mises]], in ''Liberalism'', says that the "history of private ownership of the means of production coincides with the history of the development of mankind from an animal-like condition to the highest reaches of modern civilization." [http://www.mises.org/liberal/ch2sec1.asp] In all modern economies some of the means of production are owned by the state, however an economy is not considered capitalism unless the bulk of ownership is private. Some characterize those that have a mixture of state and private ownership as "[[mixed economy|mixed economies]]."
 
{{blockquote|The inhabitant of London could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea, the various products of the whole earth, and reasonably expect their early delivery upon his doorstep. Militarism and imperialism of racial and cultural rivalries were little more than the amusements of his daily newspaper. What an extraordinary episode in the economic progress of man was that age which came to an end in August 1914.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/tr_show01.html |title=Commanding Heights: Episode One: The Battle of Ideas |publisher=[[PBS]] |date=24 October 1929 |access-date=31 July 2010 |archive-date=30 March 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100330093746/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/tr_show01.html |url-status=live}}</ref>}}
Many governments extend the concept of private property to ideas, in the form of "[[intellectual property]]." It has been argued that the introduction of the [[patent]] system was a crucial factor behind the rapid development and widespread use of new technology and [[memes]] during and following the industrial revolution. [http://depts.washington.edu/~teclass/mit/khanSokoloff.pdf]. Some oppose the establishment of intellectual property as being counterproductive or coercive. Others argue that some intellectual property rights may be too rigid or constraining to innovation, favoring weaker protections.
 
From the 1870s to the early 1920s, the global financial system was mainly tied to the [[gold standard]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Eichengreen|first=Barry|author-link=Barry Eichengreen|date=6 August 2019|title=Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System|edition=3rd|publisher=[[Princeton University Press]]|doi=10.2307/j.ctvd58rxg|isbn=978-0-691-19458-5|s2cid=240840930 |lccn=2019018286}}{{page needed|date=December 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Eichengreen|first1=Barry|author-link=Barry Eichengreen|last2=Esteves|first2=Rui Pedro|date=2021|editor1-last=Fukao|editor1-first=Kyoji|editor2-last=Broadberry|editor2-first=Stephen|editor2-link=Stephen Broadberry|section=International Finance|title=The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|volume=2: ''1870 to the Present''|pages=501–525|isbn=978-1-107-15948-8}}</ref> The United Kingdom first formally adopted this standard in 1821. Soon to follow were [[United Province of Canada|Canada]] in 1853, [[History of Newfoundland and Labrador|Newfoundland]] in 1865, the United States and Germany (''[[de jure]]'') in 1873. New technologies, such as the [[telegraph]], the [[transatlantic telegraph cable|transatlantic cable]], the [[radiotelephone]], the [[steamship]] and [[railway]]s allowed goods and information to move around the world to an unprecedented degree.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nber.org/papers/w7195 |last1=Bordo |first1=Michael D. |author1-link=Michael D. Bordo |last2=Eichengreen |first2=Barry |author2-link=Barry Eichengreen |last3=Irwin |first3=Douglas A. |title=Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hundred Years Ago? |series=NBER |number=Working Paper No. 7195 |date=June 1999|doi=10.3386/w7195 }}</ref>
=== Free market ===
The notion of a "[[free market]]" where all economic decisions regarding transfers of money, goods, and services take place on a voluntary basis, free of coercive influence, is commonly considered to be an essential characteristic of capitalism. Some individuals contend, that in systems where individuals are prevented from owning the means of production (including the profits), or coerced to share them, not ''all'' economic decisions are free of coercive influence, and, hence, are not free markets. In an ideal free market system none of these economic decisions involve coercion. Instead, they are determined in a decentralized manner by individuals trading, bargaining, cooperating, and competing with each other. In a free market, government may act in a defensive mode to forbid coercion among market participants but does not engage in proactive interventionist coercion. Nevertheless, some authorities claim that capitalism is perfectly compatible with interventionist [[authoritarian]] governments, and/or that a free market can exist without capitalism (see [[market socialism]]).
 
In the United States, the term "capitalist" primarily referred to powerful businessmen<ref>{{Cite book |last=Andrews |first=Thomas G. |title=Killing for Coal: America's Deadliest Labor War |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-674-03101-2 |___location=Cambridge |page=64 |author-link=Thomas G. Andrews (historian)}}</ref> until the 1920s due to widespread societal skepticism and criticism of capitalism and its most ardent supporters.
A legal system that grants and protects property rights provides property owners the entitlement to sell their property in accordance to their own valuation of that property; if there are no willing buyers at their offered price they have the freedom to retain it. According to standard capitalist theory, as explained by Adam Smith in ''Wealth of Nations'', when individuals make a trade they value what they are purchasing more than they value what they are giving in exchange for a commodity. If this were not the case, then they would not make the trade but retain ownership of the more valuable commodity. This notion underlies the concept of mutually-beneficial trade where it is held that both sides tend to benefit by an exchange.
 
[[File:NY stock exchange traders floor LC-U9-10548-6.jpg|thumb|The New York [[stock exchange]] [[trading room|traders' floor]] (1963)]]
[[Image:CME.JPG|200px|thumb|left|The [[Chicago Mercantile Exchange]]. A free market consists of voluntary trade without interventionist regulation. Prices, for example, are determined by trade rather than by government.]]
In regard to pricing of goods and services in a free market, rather than this being ordained by government it is determined by trades that occur as a result of price agreement between buyers and sellers. The prices buyers are willing to pay for a commodity and the prices at which sellers are willing to part with that commodity are directly influenced by [[supply and demand]] (as well as the quantity to be traded). In abstract terms, the price is thus defined as the equilibrium point of the demand and the supply curves, which represent the prices at which buyers would buy (and sellers sell) certain quantities of the good in question. A price above the equilibrium point will lead to oversupply (the buyers which to buy less goods at that price than the sellers are willing to produce), while a price below the equilibrium will lead to the opposite situation. When the price a buyer is willing to pay coincides with the price a seller is willing to offer, a trade occurs and price is determined.
 
Contemporary capitalist societies developed in the West from 1950 to the present and this type of system continues throughout the world—relevant examples started in the [[United States in the 1950s|United States after the 1950s]], [[Trente Glorieuses|France after the 1960s]], [[Spanish miracle|Spain after the 1970s]], [[Economy of Poland|Poland after 2015]], and others. At this stage most capitalist markets are considered{{by whom|date=July 2021}} developed and characterized by developed private and public markets for equity and debt, a high [[standard of living]] (as characterized by the [[World Bank]] and the [[International Monetary Fund|IMF]]), large institutional investors and a well-funded [[banking system]]. A significant [[managerial class]] has emerged{{when|date=July 2021}} and decides on a significant proportion of investments and other decisions. A different future than that envisioned by Marx has started to emerge—explored and described by [[Anthony Crosland]] in the United Kingdom in his 1956 book ''[[The Future of Socialism]]''<ref>{{cite book |last=Crosland |first=Anthony |title=The Future of Socialism |publisher=Jonathan Cape |year=1956 |___location=United Kingdom}}{{page needed|date=December 2023}}</ref> and by [[John Kenneth Galbraith]] in North America in his 1958 book ''[[The Affluent Society]]'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Galbraith |first=John Kenneth |title=The Affluent Society |publisher=[[Houghton Mifflin]] |year=1958 |___location=United States}}{{page needed|date=December 2023}}</ref> 90 years after Marx's research on the state of capitalism in 1867.<ref>{{cite book |last=Shiller |first=Robert |title=Finance and The Good Society |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |year=2012 |___location=United States}}{{page needed|date=December 2023}}</ref>
However, not everyone believes that a free or even a relatively-free market is a good thing. One reason proffered by many to justify economic intervention by government into what would otherwise be a free market is [[market failure]]. A [[market failure]] is a case in which a market fails to efficiently provide or allocate goods and services (for example, a failure to allocate goods in ways some see as socially or morally preferable). Some believe that the lack of "perfect information" or "perfect competition" in a free market is grounds for government intervention (see ''[[perfect competition]]''). Other situations or activities often perceived as problems with a free market may appear, such [[monopoly|monopolies]], [[monopsony|monopsonies]], information inequalities (e.g. [[insider trading]]), or [[price gouging]]. Wages determined by a free market mechanism are also commonly seen as a problem by those who would claim that some wages are unjustifiably low or unjustifiably high. Another critique is that free markets usually fail to deal with the problem of [[externality|externalities]], where an action by an agent positively or negatively affects another agent without any compensation taking place. The most widely known externality is [[pollution]]. More generally, the free market allocation of resources in areas such as health care, unemployment, wealth inequality, and education are considered market failures by some. Also, governments overseeing economies typically labeled as capitalist have been known to set mandatory ''[[price floor|price floors]]'' or ''[[price ceiling|price ceilings]]'' at times, thereby interfering with the free market mechanism. This usually occurred either in times of crises, or was related to goods and services which were viewed as strategically important. [[Electricity]], for example, is a good that was or is subject to price ceilings in many countries. Many eminent economists have analysed market failures, and see governments as having a legitimate role as mitigators of these failures, for examples through regulation and compensation schemes.
 
The [[Post–World War II economic expansion|postwar boom]] ended in the late 1960s and early 1970s and the economic situation grew worse with the rise of [[stagflation]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Barnes |first=Trevor J. |title=Reading economic geography |publisher=[[Blackwell Publishing]] |isbn=978-0-631-23554-5 |page=127 |year=2004}}</ref> [[Monetarism]], a modification of [[Keynesian economics|Keynesianism]] that is more compatible with ''laissez-faire'' analyses, gained increasing prominence in the capitalist world, especially under the years in office of [[Ronald Reagan]] in the United States (1981–1989) and of [[Margaret Thatcher]] in the United Kingdom (1979–1990). Public and political interest began shifting away from the so-called [[Collectivism and individualism|collectivist]] concerns of Keynes's managed capitalism to a focus on individual [[choice]], called "remarketized capitalism".{{sfn|Fulcher|2004|p=}}
[[Image:MiltonFriedmanBook.JPG|150px|thumb|right|Nobel economist [[Milton Friedman]] is a noted advocate of free markets]]
However, some economists, such as [[Nobel prize]]-winning economist [[Milton Friedman]] as well as those of the [[Austrian School]], oppose intervention into free markets. They argue that government should limit its involvement in economies to protecting freedom rather than diminishing it for the sake of remedying "market failure." They tend to regard the notion of market failure as a misguided contrivance wrongly used to justify coercive government action to further various political agendas, such as [[egalitarian]] goals. These economists believe that government intervention creates more problems than it is supposed to solve --as well-meaning as some of these interventions may be. [[Laissez-faire]] advocates do not oppose monopolies unless they maintain their existence through coercion to prevent competition (see ''[[coercive monopoly]]''), and often assert that monopolies have historically only developed ''because'' of government intervention rather than due to a lack of intervention. They may argue that [[minimum wage]] laws cause unnecessary unemployment, that laws against insider trading reduce market efficiency and transparency, or that government-enforced price-ceilings cause shortages. While economists tend to offer pragmatic arguments, some individuals put forth moral justifications for opposing coercion in favor of free markets.
 
The end of the [[Cold War]] and the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]] allowed for capitalism to become a truly global system in a way not seen since before [[World War I]]. The development of the [[neoliberal]] global economy would have been impossible without the fall of [[communism]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Gerstle |first=Gary |author-link=Gary Gerstle |date=2022 |title=The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era |url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-neoliberal-order-9780197519646?cc=us&lang=en& |___location= |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=10–12, 149 |isbn=978-0-19-751964-6|quote=The collapse of communism, then, opened the entire world to capitalist penetration, shrank the imaginative and ideological space in which opposition to capitalist thought and practices might incubate, and impelled those who remained leftists to redefine their radicalism in alternative terms, which turned out to be those that capitalist systems could more, rather than less, easily manage. This was the moment when neoliberalism in the United States went from being a political movement to a political order.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Bartel |first=Fritz |date=2022 |title=The Triumph of Broken Promises: The End of the Cold War and the Rise of Neoliberalism |url=https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674976788 |___location= |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |pages=5–6, 19 |isbn=978-0-674-97678-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Greene|first1=Julie|authorlink1= Julie Greene (historian)|date=April 2020|title=Bookends to a Gentler Capitalism: Complicating the Notion of First and Second Gilded Ages|url=|journal=[[The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era]] |volume=19 |issue=2 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|pages=197–205|doi=10.1017/S1537781419000628|pmc= |pmid= |access-date= |name-list-style=vanc}}</ref>
Some believe that free markets and capitalism are not synonymous, arguing that particular aspects of capitalist entitlement or property enforcement violate the ability of individuals to trade in the absence of coercion. Others dismiss the whole idea of "free markets", claiming that markets are exploitative or coercive in essence. For example, some say that wages set by a free market rather than by government decree is exploitative since capitalists have appropriated private ownership of resources, thereby putting individuals in a position to accept low wages in order to survive. However, many believe that decreases in wage rates are the result of the same thing as deflation in any other market: the price of labor falls due to either a lower demand for labor or a larger supply thereof.
 
Harvard Kennedy School economist Dani Rodrik distinguishes between three historical variants of capitalism:<ref>{{citation |last=Rodrik |first=Dani |title=Capitalism 3.0 |date=2009 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46mtqx.23 |work=Aftershocks |volume= |pages=185–193 |editor-last=Hemerijck |editor-first=Anton |publisher=[[Amsterdam University Press]] |jstor=j.ctt46mtqx.23 |isbn=978-90-8964-192-2 |access-date=14 January 2021 |editor2-last=Knapen |editor2-first=Ben |editor3-last=van Doorne |editor3-first=Ellen}}</ref>
[[Financial markets]], though some of these markets are far from being free due to heavy regulation, allow the large scale, standardized, and easy trading of [[debt]], [[foreign exchange]], and ownership of companies. ''See'' [[finance capitalism]]. Similar changes have taken place for products from [[agriculture]], [[mining]], and [[energy]] production. Standardized markets have even appeared for [[pollution]] rights and for the prediction of future events like future [[weather]] and political elections.
* Capitalism 1.0 during the 19th century entailed largely unregulated markets with a minimal role for the state (aside from national defense, and protecting property rights);
* Capitalism 2.0 during the post-World War II years entailed Keynesianism, a substantial role for the state in regulating markets, and strong welfare states;
* Capitalism 2.1 entailed a combination of unregulated markets, globalization, and various national obligations by states.
 
==== Relationship to democracy ====
Markets have, of course, existed throughout human history. Hunter-gatherers used to exchange their goods in [[barter]]. The appearance of money in [[Ancient history|Antiquity]] facilitated exchanges, permitting the flowering of trade fairs in the [[Middle Ages]]. Nevertheless, many regulations existed, and the influence of the [[guild]]s prevented truly free markets. In modern economies, governments likewise do not allow unfettered market operation in many areas, but the price restrictions are much smaller than those imposed by guilds.
The relationship between [[democracy]] and capitalism is a contentious area in theory and in popular political movements.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Milner |first1=Helen V |title=Is Global Capitalism Compatible with Democracy? Inequality, Insecurity, and Interdependence |journal=[[International Studies Quarterly]] |date=2021 |volume=65 |issue=4 |pages=1097–1110 |doi=10.1093/isq/sqab056 |doi-access=free}}</ref> The extension of adult-male [[suffrage]] in 19th-century Britain occurred along with the development of industrial capitalism and [[representative democracy]] became widespread at the same time as capitalism, leading capitalists to posit a causal or mutual relationship between them. However, according to some authors in the 20th-century, capitalism also accompanied a variety of political formations quite distinct from liberal democracies, including [[fascism|fascist]] regimes, [[Absolute monarchy|absolute monarchies]] and [[One-party state|single-party states]].<ref name="Burnham" /> [[Democratic peace theory]] asserts that democracies seldom fight other democracies, but others suggest this may be because of political similarity or stability, rather than because they are "democratic" or "capitalist". Critics argue that though economic growth under capitalism has led to democracy, it may not do so in the future as [[authoritarian]] régimes have been able to manage economic growth using some of capitalism's competitive principles<ref>{{cite magazine |first=Gady |last=Epstein |title=The Winners And Losers in Chinese Capitalism |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/gadyepstein/2010/08/31/the-winners-and-losers-in-chinese-capitalism/ |magazine=[[Forbes]] |access-date=28 October 2015 |archive-date=5 November 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151105210914/http://www.forbes.com/sites/gadyepstein/2010/08/31/the-winners-and-losers-in-chinese-capitalism/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=The rise of state capitalism |url=https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/01/21/the-rise-of-state-capitalism |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |access-date=24 October 2015 |issn=0013-0613 |archive-date=15 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200615124603/https://www.economist.com/leaders/2012/01/21/the-rise-of-state-capitalism |url-status=live}}</ref> without making concessions to greater [[political freedom]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Mesquita |first=Bruce Bueno de |url=http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20050901faessay84507/bruce-bueno-de-mesquita-george-w-downs/development-and-democracy.html |title=Development and Democracy |date=September 2005 |access-date=26 February 2008 |work=[[Foreign Affairs]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080220154505/http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20050901faessay84507/bruce-bueno-de-mesquita-george-w-downs/development-and-democracy.html |archive-date=20 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Siegle |first1=Joseph |last2=Weinstein |first2=Michael |last3=Halperin |first3=Morton |date=1 September 2004 |title=Why Democracies Excel |url=http://www.mafhoum.com/press7/212S28.pdf |journal=[[Foreign Affairs]] |volume=83 |issue=5 |pages=57 |doi=10.2307/20034067 |jstor=20034067 |access-date=26 August 2018 |archive-date=12 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412055541/http://www.mafhoum.com/press7/212S28.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref>
 
Political scientists [[Torben Iversen]] and [[David Soskice]] see democracy and capitalism as mutually supportive.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Iversen |first1=Torben |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv4g1r3n |title=Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century |last2=Soskice |first2=David |date=2019 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |jstor=j.ctv4g1r3n |isbn=978-0-691-18273-5}}</ref> [[Robert Dahl]] argued in ''On Democracy'' that capitalism was beneficial for democracy because economic growth and a large middle class were good for democracy.<ref name=":0a">{{cite book |last=Dahl |first=Robert A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZG4JEAAAQBAJ |title=On Democracy |date=2020 |publisher=[[Yale University Press]] |isbn=978-0-300-25799-1 |language=en}}</ref> He also argued that a market economy provided a substitute for government control of the economy, which reduces the risks of tyranny and authoritarianism.<ref name=":0a" />
=== Profit ===
[[Image:Profit&Loss.jpeg|200px|thumb|The pursuit of [[profit]] is one characteristic of capitalism]]
 
In his book ''[[The Road to Serfdom]]'' (1944), [[Friedrich Hayek]] (1899–1992) asserted that the free-market understanding of [[economic freedom]] as present in capitalism is a requisite of [[political freedom]]. He argued that the market mechanism is the only way of deciding what to produce and how to distribute the items without using coercion. [[Milton Friedman]] and [[Ronald Reagan]] also promoted this view.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pryor |first1=Frederic L. |title=Capitalism and freedom? |journal=Economic Systems |date=2010 |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=91–104 |doi=10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.09.003}}</ref> Friedman claimed that centralized economic operations are always accompanied by [[political repression]]. In his view, transactions in a market economy are voluntary and the wide diversity that voluntary activity permits is a fundamental threat to repressive [[political leader]]s and greatly diminishes their power to coerce. Some of Friedman's views were shared by [[John Maynard Keynes]], who believed that capitalism was vital for freedom to survive and thrive.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Friedrich |last=Hayek |author-link=Friedrich Hayek |title=The Road to Serfdom |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=154 |issue=3911 |pages=473–474 |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |year=1944 |isbn=978-0-226-32061-8 |bibcode=1944Natur.154..473C |doi=10.1038/154473a0 |s2cid=4071358}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Bellamy |first=Richard |title=The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-521-56354-3 |page=60}}</ref> [[Freedom House]], an American [[think-tank]] that conducts international research on, and advocates for, democracy, political freedom and [[human rights]], has argued that "there is a high and statistically significant correlation between the level of political freedom [[Freedom in the World|as measured by Freedom House]] and economic freedom [[Index of Economic Freedom|as measured by the Wall Street Journal/Heritage Foundation survey]]".<ref>{{cite book |first=Adrian |last=Karatnycky |title=Freedom in the World: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties |publisher=[[Transaction Publishers]] |date=2001 |isbn=978-0-7658-0101-2 |page=11}}</ref>
The pursuit and realization of [[profit]] is an essential characteristic of capitalism. Profit is derived by selling a product for more than the cost required to produce or acquire it. Some consider the pursuit of profit to be the essence of capitalism. Sociologist and economist, Max Weber, says that "capitalism is identical with the pursuit of profit, and forever renewed profit, by means of conscious, rational, capitalistic enterprise." However, it is not a unique characteristic for capitalism, some hunter-gatherers practiced profitable barter and monetary profit has been known since antiquity. Opponents of capitalism often protest that private owners of capital do not remunerate laborers the full value of their production but keep a portion as profit, claiming this to be exploitative. However, defenders of capitalism argue that when a worker is paid the wage for which he agreed to work, there is no exploitation, especially in a free market where no one else is making an offer more desirable to the worker; that "the full value of a worker's production" is based on his work, not on how much profit is created, something that depends almost entirely on factors that are independent of the worker's performance; that profit is a critical measure of how much [[value]] is created by the production process; that the private owners are the ones who should decide how much of the profit is to be used to increase the compensation of the workers (which they often do, as bonuses); and that profit provides the capital for further growth and innovation.
 
In ''[[Capital in the Twenty-First Century]]'' (2013), [[Thomas Piketty]] of the [[Paris School of Economics]] asserted that inequality is the inevitable consequence of economic growth in a capitalist economy and the resulting [[Wealth concentration|concentration of wealth]] can destabilize democratic societies and undermine the ideals of social justice upon which they are built.<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Thomas Piketty |last=Piketty |first=Thomas |date=2014 |title=Capital in the Twenty-First Century |publisher=[[Belknap Press]] |isbn=978-0-674-43000-6 |page=571}}</ref>
=== Self interest ===
[[Image:Ayn_Rand1.jpg|150px|thumb|left|[[Ayn Rand]] was probably the most outspoken advocate of the role of [[self-interest]] in capitalism]]
 
States with capitalistic economic systems have thrived under political regimes deemed to be authoritarian or oppressive. [[Singapore]] has a successful open market economy as a result of its competitive, business-friendly climate and robust rule of law. Nonetheless, it often comes under fire for its style of government which, though democratic and consistently one of the least corrupt,<ref>{{cite web |title=Transparency International Corruption Measure 2015 |url=https://www.transparency.org/country/#SGP |website=Transparency International Corruption Measure 2015 – By Country / Territory |publisher=Transparency International |access-date=20 September 2016 |archive-date=31 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331114640/http://www.transparency.org/country/#SGP |url-status=dead}}</ref> operates largely under a one-party rule. Furthermore, it does not vigorously defend freedom of expression as evidenced by its government-regulated [[Censorship in Singapore|press]], and its penchant for upholding laws protecting ethnic and religious harmony, judicial dignity and personal reputation. The private (capitalist) sector in the People's Republic of China has grown exponentially and thrived since its inception, despite having an authoritarian government. [[Augusto Pinochet]]'s [[Military dictatorship of Chile (1973–1990)|rule in Chile]] led to economic growth and high levels of inequality<ref>[[Naomi Klein|Klein, Naomi]] (2008). ''[[The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism]].'' [[Picador (imprint)|Picador]]. {{ISBN|0-312-42799-9}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=PwHUAq5LPOQC&pg=PA105 p. 105] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319071518/http://books.google.com/books?id=PwHUAq5LPOQC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA105 |date=19 March 2015 }}.</ref> by using authoritarian means to create a safe environment for investment and capitalism. Similarly, [[Suharto]]'s authoritarian reign and [[Indonesian mass killings of 1965–66|extirpation]] of the [[Communist Party of Indonesia]] allowed for the expansion of capitalism in [[Indonesia]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Farid |first=Hilmar |date=2005 |title=Indonesia's original sin: mass killings and capitalist expansion, 1965–66 |journal=[[Inter-Asia Cultural Studies]] |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=3–16 |doi=10.1080/1462394042000326879 |s2cid= 145130614}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Robinson |first=Geoffrey B. |date=2018 |title=The Killing Season: A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965–66 |url=https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11135.html |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |page=177 |isbn=978-1-4008-8886-3 |access-date=1 August 2018 |archive-date=19 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419011656/https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11135.html |url-status=live}}</ref>
The pursuit of self-interest is commonly regarded as playing an essential role in capitalism. Many writers, such as [[Adam Smith]] and [[Ayn Rand]], point to what they believe to be the benefit of individuals trading for their [[self-interest]] rather than ''altruistically'' attempting to serve the "public good." Smith, widely considered to be the intellectual father of capitalism, says in ''[[Wealth of Nations]]'': "By pursuing his own interest [an individual] frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good." Ayn Rand, probably the most outspoken advocate of the role of self-interest in capitalism, says in ''Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal'': "America's abundance was created not by public sacrifices to the common good, but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes." Nobel-economist [[Milton Friedman]] also embraces the role of self-interest in capitalism. In his famous article ''The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits'', as he asserts that business has no [[social responsibility]] other than to increase profits and refrain from engaging in "deception or fraud." He maintains that when business seeks to maximize profits, while respecting the guidelines of a [[free market]] by not defrauding or deceiving, it almost always incidentally does what is good for society. Friedman does not argue that business should not help the community but that it may indeed be in the long-run self-interest of a business to "devote resources to providing amenities to [the] community..." in order to "generate goodwill" and thereby increase profits. Some, including some supporters of capitalism, dislike the focus on self-interest. For example, self-described "free market libertarian" founder and CEO of [[Whole Foods Market]], [[John Mackey (businessman)|John Mackey]], claims in an article in ''Reason'' magazine that he is serving customers and society out of "love" rather than self-interest while he boasts the profitability of his company in that article. (''[http://www.reason.com/0510/fe.mf.rethinking.shtml Rethinking the Social Responsibility of Business]'', [[Reason magazine]] October 2005).
 
The term "capitalism" in its modern sense is often attributed to [[Karl Marx]].<ref name="Scott">{{cite book |title=Industrialism: A Dictionary of Sociology |last=Scott |first=John |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title="capitalism, n.2". OED Online |url=http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/27454?rskey=ZVI1hr&result=2&isAdvanced=false |access-date=19 January 2013 |archive-date=23 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063611/https://www.oed.com/start;jsessionid=A9CBE07460C68ED291D7D6CDCE84A1B1?authRejection=true&url=%2Fview%2FEntry%2F27454%3Frskey%3DZVI1hr%26result%3D2%26isAdvanced%3Dfalse |url-status=live}}</ref> In ''[[Das Kapital]]'', Marx analyzed the "[[Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|capitalist mode of production]]" using a method of critique that later became known as [[Marxism]]. However, while Marx did discuss capitalism extensively, he used the term "capitalism" less frequently than "capitalist mode of production." His collaborator, [[Friedrich Engels]], played a significant role in popularizing the term in more political interpretations of their work. In the 20th century, supporters of the capitalist system often replaced the term "capitalism" with phrases such as "free enterprise" or "private enterprise" to avoid its negative connotations. Similarly, the term "capitalist" was sometimes substituted with "[[investor]]" or "[[Entrepreneurship|entrepreneur]]" to emphasize productive roles rather than passive wealth accumulation.<ref name="Williams 1983 51">{{cite book |last=Williams |first=Raymond |title=Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=1983 |isbn=978-0-19-520469-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/keywordsvocabula00willrich/page/51 51] |chapter=Capitalism |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/keywordsvocabula00willrich/page/51}}</ref>
=== Private enterprise ===
In capitalist economies, a predominant proportion of productive capacity has belonged to [[companies]], in the sense of for-profit organizations. This include many forms of organisations that existed in earlier economic systems, such as [[sole proprietorship]]s and [[partnerships]]. Non-profit organizations existing in capitalism include [[cooperative]]s, [[credit unions]] and [[communes]].
 
== Characteristics ==
More unique to capitalism is the form of organization called [[corporation]], which can be both for-profit and non-profit. This entity can act as a virtual person in many matters before the law. This gives some unique advantages to the owners, such as [[limited liability]] of the owners and perpetual lifetime beyond that of current owners.
{{further|Perspectives on capitalism by school of thought}}
In general, capitalism as an economic system and mode of production can be summarized by the following:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft3n39n8x3&chunk.id=d0e1212&toc.id=&brand=ucpress |title=Althusser and the Renewal of Marxist Social Theory |access-date=24 March 2015 |archive-date=2 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402094835/http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft3n39n8x3&chunk.id=d0e1212&toc.id=&brand=ucpress |url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Capital accumulation]]:<ref name=ch32>{{cite book|url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch32.htm |title=Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I |chapter=Thirty Two |first=Karl |last=Marx |author-link=Karl Marx |access-date=24 March 2015 |via=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |archive-date=21 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221104326/https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch32.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> production for profit and accumulation as the implicit purpose of all or most of production, constriction or elimination of production formerly carried out on a common social or private household basis.<ref name=xxx31 />
* [[Production (economics)|Commodity production]]: production for exchange on a market; to maximize [[exchange-value]] instead of [[use-value]].
* Exchange of goods or services, can be enabled by [[contract]]s.<ref name="y015">{{cite book | last=Goldberg | first=Victor P. | title=The Oxford Handbook of Capitalism | chapter=Contracts | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=21 November 2012 | isbn=978-0-19-539117-6 | doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391176.013.0010 | pages=250–274}}</ref> Exchange of services can be in form of [[wage labor]].{{sfn|Steinfeld|2009|p=3}}
* [[Private ownership]] of the means of production.<ref name="Modern Economics 1986, p. 54" />
* The [[investment]] of money to make a profit.{{sfn|Fulcher|2004|p=14}}
* The use of the [[price mechanism]] to allocate resources between competing uses.<ref name="Modern Economics 1986, p. 54" />
* Economically efficient use of the [[factors of production]] and raw materials due to maximization of value added in the production process.<ref>{{cite book|title=Capitalism: A complete understanding of the nature and value of human economic life |last=Reisman |first=George |year=1998 |isbn=0-915463-73-3 |publisher=Jameson Books}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=History of Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective |last1=Hunt |first1=E.K. |last2=Lautzenheiser |first2=Mark |year=2014 |publisher=PHI Learning |isbn=978-0-7656-2599-1}}</ref>
* Freedom of capitalists to act in their self-interest in managing their business and investments.<ref>{{cite book|title=Capitalism: A complete understanding of the nature and value of human economic life |last=Reisman |first=George |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-915463-73-2 |publisher=Jameson Books}}</ref>
* Capital suppliance by "the single owner of a firm, or by [[shareholder]]s in the case of a [[joint-stock company]]."<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |title=The Desk Encyclopedia of World History |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-7394-7809-7 |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=Edmund |___location=New York |pages=111–112}}</ref>
 
=== Market ===
A special form of corporation is a corporation owned by [[shareholders]] who can sell their [[shares]] in a market. One can view shares as converting company ownership into a commodity - the ownership rights are divided into units (the shares) for ease of trading in them. Such share trading first took place widely in Europe during the 17th century and continued to develop and spread thereafter. When company ownership is spread among many shareholders, the shareholders generally have votes in the exercise of authority over the company in proportion to the size of their share of ownership.
In free market and ''[[laissez-faire]]'' forms of capitalism, markets are used most extensively with minimal or no regulation over the pricing mechanism. In mixed economies, which are almost universal today,{{sfn|Fulcher|2004|p=58}} markets continue to play a dominant role, but they are regulated to some extent by the state in order to correct [[market failure]]s, promote [[social welfare]], conserve [[natural resource]]s, fund [[military|defense]] and [[public safety]] or other rationale. In [[State capitalism|state capitalist]] systems, markets are relied upon the least, with the state relying heavily on [[state-owned enterprises]] or indirect economic planning to accumulate capital.
 
Competition arises when more than one producer is trying to sell the same or similar products to the same buyers. Adherents of the capitalist theory believe that competition leads to innovation and more affordable prices. [[Monopoly|Monopolies]] or [[cartels]] can develop, especially if there is no competition. A monopoly occurs when a firm has exclusivity over a market. Hence, the firm can engage in [[rent seeking]] behaviors such as limiting output and raising prices because it has no fear of competition.
To a large degree, authority over productive capacity in capitalism has resided with the owners of companies. Within legal limits and the financial means available to them, the owners of each company can decide how it will operate. In larger companies, authority is usually delegated in a hierarchical or [[bureaucracy| bureaucratic]] system of [[management]].
 
Governments have implemented legislation for the purpose of preventing the creation of monopolies and cartels. In 1890, the [[Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890|Sherman Antitrust Act]] became the first legislation passed by the United States Congress to limit monopolies.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopoly.asp|title=Monopoly|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|date=24 November 2003|work=Investopedia|access-date=2 March 2017|language=en-US|archive-date=22 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222204011/http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopoly.asp|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[Image:Rotterdam 16.03.05 fortis.jpg|200px|thumb|left|A bank in [[Rotterdam]]: Banks act as merchants of money and suppliers of capital in capitalist economies.]]
 
=== Wage labor ===
Importantly, the owners receive some of the profits or proceeds generated by the company, sometimes in the form of [[dividends]], sometimes from selling their ownership at higher price than their initial cost. They may also re-invest the profit in the company which may increase future profits and value of the company. They may also liquidate the company, selling all of the equipment, land, and other assets, and split the proceeds between them. The price at which ownership of productive capacity sells is generally the maximum of either the [[net present value]] of the expected future stream of profits or the value of the assets, net of any obligations. There is therefore a financial incentive for owners to exercise their authority in ways that increase the productive capacity of what they own. Various owners are motivated to various degrees by this incentive -- some give away a proportion of what they own, others seem very driven to increase their holdings. Nevertheless the incentive is always there, and it is credited by many as being a key aspect behind the remarkably consistent growth exhibited by capitalist economies. Meanwhile, some critics of capitalism claim that the incentive for the owners is exaggerated and that it results in the owners receiving money that rightfully belongs to the workers, while others point to the fact that the incentive only motivates owners to make a profit - something which may not necessarily result in a positive impact on society. Others note that in order to get a profit in a non-violent way, one must satisfy some need among other persons that they are willing to pay for. Also, most people in practice prefer to work for and buy products from for-profit organizations rather than to buy from or work for non-profit and communal production organizations which are legal in capitalist economies and which anyone can start or join.
{{Main|Wage labor}}
Wage labor, usually referred to as paid work, paid employment, or paid labor, refers to the [[socioeconomics|socioeconomic]] relationship between a [[workforce|worker]] and an [[employment|employer]] in which the worker sells their labor power under a formal or informal [[employment contract]].{{sfn|Steinfeld|2009|p=3}} "All labor contracts were/are designed legally to bind a worker in one way or another to fulfill the labor obligations the worker has undertaken. That is one of the principal purposes of labor contracts." These transactions usually occur in a [[labour economics|labor market]] where [[wage]]s or [[salary|salaries]] are [[market economy|market-determined]].{{sfn|Deakin|Wilkinson|2005}}
 
In exchange for the money paid as wages (usual for short-term work-contracts) or salaries (in permanent employment contracts), the work product generally becomes the [[work for hire|undifferentiated property]] of the employer. A wage laborer is a person whose primary means of income is from the selling of their labor in this way.<ref>{{cite book|page=278|title=Concise Dictionary of Economics|isbn=978-93-5057-032-6|publisher=V&S Publishers|year=2013|author=Editorial Board|chapter=W}}</ref>
When starting a [[business]], the initial owners or investors typically provide some money (the [[Capital (economics)|capital]]) which is used by the business to buy or [[lease]] some means of production. For example, the enterprise may buy or [[lease]] a piece of land and a building; it may buy machinery and hire workers ([[Labour (economics)|labor-power]]), or the capitalist may provide the labor himself. The commodities produced by the workers become the property of the capitalist ("capitalist" in this context refers to a person who has capital, rather than a person who favors capitalism), and are sold by the workers on behalf of the capitalist or by the capitalist himself. The money from sales also becomes the property of the capitalist. The capitalist pays the workers a portion of this profit for their labor, pays other overhead costs, and keeps the rest. This profit may be used in a variety of ways, it may be consumed, or it may be used in pursuit of more profit such as by investing it in the development of new products or technological innovations, or expanding the business into new geographic territories. If more money is needed than the initial owners are willing or able to provide, the business may need to borrow a limited amount of extra money with a promise to pay it back with interest. In effect, it may rent more capital.
 
=== EconomicProfit growthmotive ===
{{Main|Profit motive}}
One of the primary objectives in a social system in which commerce and property have a central role is to promote the growth of capital. The standard measures of growth are Gross Domestic Product or [[Gross Domestic Product|GDP]], capacity utilization, and 'standard of living'.
The [[profit motive]], in the theory of capitalism, is the desire to earn income in the form of profit. Stated differently, the reason for a business's existence is to turn a profit.<ref>
Compare:
The ability of capitalist economies to sustainably increase and improve their stock of capital was central to the argument which [[Adam Smith]] advanced for a free market setting production, price and resource allocation. It has been argued that GDP per capita was essentially flat until the industrial revolution and the emergence of the capitalist economy, and that it has since increased rapidly in capitalist countries [http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/region/04-05/essay.cfm][http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/TCEH/1998_Draft/World_GDP/Estimating_World_GDP.html]. It has also been argued that a higher GDP per capita promotes a higher standard of living, including the adequate or improved availability of food, housing, clothing, health care, reduced working hours and freedom from work for children and the elderly. These are reduced or unavailable if the GDP per capita is too low, so that most people are living a marginal existence.
{{cite book
| last1 = Duska
Economic growth is, however, not universally viewed as an unequivocal good. The downside of such growth is referred to by economists as the 'externalization of costs' (see [[externality]]). Among other things, these effects include pollution, the disruption of traditional living patterns and cultures, the spread of pathogens, wars over resources or market access, and the creation of underclasses.
| first1 = Ronald F.
| year = 1997
| chapter = The Why's of Business Revisited
| title = Contemporary Reflections on Business Ethics
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=dANmdJHsqu0C
| series = Issues in Business Ethics
| volume = 23
| ___location = Dordrecht
| publisher = Springer Science & Business Media
| publication-date = 2007
| page = 41
| isbn = 978-1-4020-4984-2
| access-date = 8 July 2019
| quote = In microeconomics courses, profit maximization is frequently given as the goal of the firm. ... In microeconomics, profit maximization functions largely as a theoretical goal, with economists using it to prove how firms behave rationally to increase profit. Unfortunately, it ignores many real-world complexities.
}}
</ref> The profit motive functions according to [[rational choice theory]], or the theory that individuals tend to pursue what is in their own best interests. Accordingly, businesses seek to benefit themselves and/or their shareholders by maximizing profit.
 
In capitalist theoretics, the profit motive is said to ensure that resources are being allocated efficiently. For instance, [[Austrian economist]] [[Henry Hazlitt]] explains: "If there is no profit in making an article, it is a sign that the labor and capital devoted to its production are misdirected: the value of the resources that must be used up in making the article is greater than the value of the article itself".<ref>Hazlitt, Henry. "The Function of Profits". ''Economics in One Lesson''. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Web. 22 April 2013.</ref>
In defense of capitalism, liberal philosopher [[Isaiah Berlin]] has claimed that all of these ills are neither unique to capitalism, nor are they its inevitable consequences.
 
Socialist theorists note that, unlike mercantilists, capitalists accumulate their profits while expecting their profit rates to remain the same. This causes problems as earnings in the rest of society do not increase in the same proportion.<ref>"What is capitalism" ''Australian Socialist'' https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.818838886883514</ref>
See also the "Sustainability" section below.
 
=== EconomicPrivate mobilityproperty ===
{{Main|Private property}}
One of the key markers of entrepreneurial economies and 'growth' in a society is its economic mobility, defined as the existence of large changes in the make-up of its socio-economic strata. This is manifested as the occurrence of large fluctuations in the various [[decile]]s or [[quintiles]] of income and wealth among the population, and the existence of large changes over a person's lifetime in relation to their real earning power. In standard economics, a capitalist system provides more opportunities for an individual to rise faster in the world by entering new professions or establishing a business venture. The instability of economic strata is contrasted with traditional [[feudal]] or [[tribal]] societies, which are considered to have more stable wealth relationships, and with the [[egalitarianism]] that exists in socialist societies, which distribute more of their wealth in the form of social benefits and therefore reduce income mobility, particularly among those who own capital and wish to trade it.
The relationship between the [[State (polity)|state]], its formal mechanisms, and capitalist societies has been debated in many fields of social and political theory, with active discussion since the 19th century. [[Hernando de Soto (economist)|Hernando de Soto]] is a contemporary Peruvian economist who has argued that an important characteristic of capitalism is the functioning state protection of property rights in a formal property system where ownership and transactions are clearly recorded.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/03/desoto.htm|title=The mystery of capital|author=Hernando de Soto|access-date=26 February 2008|archive-date=8 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080208180121/http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/03/desoto.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
According to de Soto, this is the process by which physical assets are transformed into capital, which in turn may be used in many more ways and much more efficiently in the market economy. A number of Marxian economists have argued that the [[inclosure act]]s in England and similar legislation elsewhere were an integral part of capitalist [[primitive accumulation]] and that specific legal frameworks of private land ownership have been integral to the development of capitalism.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch27.htm|title=Capital, v. 1. Part VIII: primitive accumulation|author=Karl Marx|access-date=26 February 2008|archive-date=3 March 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080303162047/http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch27.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=N.F.R. Crafts |title=Enclosure and labor supply revisited |journal=Explorations in Economic History |issue=2 |date=April 1978 |pages=172–183 |doi=10.1016/0014-4983(78)90019-0 |volume=15}}</ref>
However, the existence of large fluctuations in income deciles does not always represent income mobility - with individuals receiving regular wage increases over their working lives and then retiring, such fluctuations alone do not show that there is 'mobility' ''per se''. Moreover, it is argued by many labor economists that wage instability represents the transfer of risk to workers and particular sectors of the economy such as agriculture, and away from the holders of capital.
 
Private property rights are not absolute, as in many countries the state has the power to seize private property, typically for public use, under the powers of [[eminent ___domain]].
=== Self-organization ===
[[Image:f_hayek.jpg|150px|thumb|right|[[Friedrich Hayek]] advocated allowing an economy to [[self-organization|self-organize]], maintaining that government cannot access or coordinate the widespread distribution of information possessed by millions of individuals.]]
While a great deal of planning is undertaken among individual companies and other organisations in capitalist economies, few significant mechanisms for imposing overall direction are available to governments. There is also a scarcity of reliable predictive tools and foreknowledge of how an economy is likely to behave or perform more than a year or two into the future. While most transactions may be planned and agreed by the actors involved, many society-wide phenomena that emerge from the markets and its transactions are often not planned, predicted, approved or authorised by anyone. Nevertheless, such an economic system can organize itself into a complex system without an external guidance or planning mechanism. This phenomenon is called "[[self-organization]]." [[Friedrich Hayek]] coined the term "[[catallaxy]]" as a market where "spontaneous order" emerges when no centralized control source (government) overrides decisions of individuals pursuing their own ends. However, in all large-scale modern economies the State conducts a degree of [[planned economy|centralized economic planning]] (using such tools as allowing the country's [[central bank]] to set base [[interest rates]]), ostensibly as an attempt to improve efficiency, attenuate cyclical volatility, and further particular social goals.
 
=== Market competition ===
Some economists use [[chaos theory]] to argue that it is impossible to make accurate long-term economic predictions. They view the decentralized nature of economic planning and development that occurs in capitalism as one of its greatest strengths, arguing that it permits many solutions to be tried, and that real-world competition generally finds a good solution to emerging challenges. This is opposed to the [[central planning]] approach to the running of a society, which often selects inappropriate solutions as a result of faulty forecasting. One possible example is the experience in Somalia where the previously regulated telecommunications industry is reported to be "thriving" now that, and reportedly because, the country lacks a government. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4020259.stm]
{{Main|Competition (economics)}}
In capitalist economics, market competition is the rivalry among sellers trying to achieve such goals as increasing profits, market share and sales volume by varying the elements of the [[marketing mix]]: price, product, distribution and promotion. Merriam-Webster defines competition in business as "the effort of two or more parties acting independently to secure the business of a third party by offering the most favourable terms".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://m-w.com/dictionary/competition |title=Definition of COMPETITION |access-date=24 March 2015 |archive-date=4 July 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080704114809/http://m-w.com/dictionary/competition |url-status=dead}}</ref> It was described by [[Adam Smith]] in ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'' (1776) and later economists as allocating productive [[resource]]s to their most highly valued uses<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |first=George J. |last=Stigler |author-link=George J. Stigler |date=2008 |title=competition |dictionary=[[The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics]] |edition=2nd |url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000261&q=competition&topicid=&result_number=6 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150215032134/http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_C000261&q=competition&topicid=&result_number=6 |archive-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> and encouraging [[x-efficiency|efficiency]]. Smith and other [[classical economist]]s before [[Antoine Augustin Cournot|Antoine Augustine Cournot]] were referring to price and non-price rivalry among producers to sell their goods on best terms by bidding of buyers, not necessarily to a large number of sellers nor to a market in final [[Economic equilibrium|equilibrium]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |first=Mark |last=Blaug |author-link=Mark Blaug |date=2008 |title=Invisible hand |dictionary=[[The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics]] |edition=2nd |volume=4 |page=565 |url=http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_I000220&edition=current&q=Invisible%20hand&topicid=&result_number=1 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605204024/http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_I000220&edition=current&q=Invisible%20hand&topicid=&result_number=1 |archive-date=5 June 2013}}</ref> Competition is widespread throughout the [[market process]]. It is a condition where "buyers tend to compete with other buyers, and sellers tend to compete with other sellers".<ref name=ewot2014 /><!-- p. 102 --> In offering goods for exchange, buyers competitively bid to purchase specific quantities of specific goods which are available, or might be available if sellers were to choose to offer such goods. Similarly, sellers bid against other sellers in offering goods on the market, competing for the attention and exchange resources of buyers. Competition results from [[scarcity]], as it is not possible to satisfy all conceivable human wants, and occurs as people try to meet the criteria being used to determine allocation.<ref name=ewot2014>{{cite book |last1=Heyne |first1=Paul |last2=Boettke |first2=Peter J. |last3=Prychitko |first3=David L. |title=The Economic Way of Thinking |date=2014 |publisher=Pearson |isbn=978-0-13-299129-2 |pages=102–106 |edition=13th}}<!--|access-date=24 December 2014 --></ref>{{rp|105}}
 
In the works of Adam Smith, the idea of capitalism is made possible through competition which creates growth. Although capitalism had not entered mainstream economics at the time of Smith, it is vital to the construction of his ideal society. One of the foundational blocks of capitalism is competition. Smith believed that a prosperous society is one where "everyone should be free to enter and leave the market and change trades as often as he pleases."<ref name="W.W. Norton">{{cite book |last1=Warsh |first1=David |title=Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations |date=2007 |publisher=[[W.W. Norton]] |page=42}}</ref> He believed that the freedom to act in one's self-interest is essential for the success of a capitalist society. In response to the idea that if all participants focus on their own goals, society's well-being will be water under the bridge, Smith maintains that despite the concerns of intellectuals, "global trends will hardly be altered if they refrain from pursuing their personal ends."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lippit |first1=Victor |title=Capitalism |date=2005 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |___location=ProQuest |page=2}}</ref> He insisted that the actions of a few participants cannot alter the course of society. Instead, Smith maintained that they should focus on personal progress instead and that this will result in overall growth to the whole.
Capitalist economies typically contain numerous companies, and people are free to enter into many different types of arrangement with each other. Such an economy reacts to technological change, new discoveries and other developments through continual readjustments in the relationships which exist among companies and individuals. In this way the economy's control mechanisms and how information flows through it evolve over time, and are characterised by a kind of "survival of the fittest" selection and evolution process which is not dissimilar to that exhibited in natural systems and their component relationships.
 
Competition between participants, "who are all endeavoring to justle one another out of employment, obliges every man to endeavor to execute his work" through competition towards growth.<ref name="W.W. Norton"/>
Ancient [[Rome]] and China under the [[Song dynasty]] are examples of societies that had some of the characteristics of capitalism, like no feudal [[fiefs]], (weak) property rights, economic growth, and for their times advanced technology. It is much debated why these societies did not have their own "industrial revolution" and thus achieve industrial capitalism in the modern sense. It has been suggested that these states formed monopolies in their parts of the world with very limited competition from other states. The ruling class then become complacent and the successful institutions were overturned in order to enrich certain special interest groups. Much innovation has historically taken place when there where many competing states, like in the city states of ancient [[Greece]] and [[renaissance]] [[Italy]].
 
=== Economic growth ===
Analysis of the [[Network|networks]] of connections and arrangements in the economy has shown a degree of similarity to other networks such as phone systems or the Internet. [http://www.theyrule.net/] contains examples of networks of company board members. Networks of customer links and monetary flows exhibit similar characteristics.
{{further|Economic growth}}
 
[[Economic growth]] is a characteristic tendency of economies.<ref name=joff>{{cite journal|title=The root cause of economic growth under capitalism |journal=[[Cambridge Journal of Economics]] |year=2011 |issue=5 |pages=873–896 |first=Michael |last=Joff |volume=35 |quote=The tendency for capitalist economies to grow is one of their most characteristic properties. |doi=10.1093/cje/beq054}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Baumol |first1=William J. |title=The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism |date=2004 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |___location=Princeton |isbn=9780691116303}}</ref> However, capitalist economies may experience fluctuations in growth that cannot be accounted for by demographic or technological changes. These fluctuations, which involve sustained periods of economic growth and recession, are referred to as business cycles in macroeconomics. Economic growth is measured as growth in investment, economic output, and economic consumption per capita. Changes in hours of employment on their own are not considered as a factor of economic growth.<ref name=Hodrick1997/>
=== Which economies are "capitalist"? ===
[[Image:CapitalismUnknownIdeal.JPG|150px|thumb|right|As exemplified by the title of this book, some do not believe that capitalism has been fully implemented.]]
Some believe that it is inaccurate to call any or some of the major industrialized economies "capitalist" because of the level of government intervention. For example, some assert that the market in the United States of America is significantly less than &quot;free", and that therefore it is more appropriately termed a ''[[mixed economy]]'' that is merely skewed more toward capitalism than most national economies, rather than being a true representation of capitalism. Still others might say that the U.S. economy is capitalist, but the U.K. economy is a "mixed economy," and so on, depending upon their perception of how much economic freedom exists in those locales.
 
=== As a mode of production ===
A similar classification, associated largely with the [[Austrian school]] of economics, regards most present economic systems as a perversion of capitalism, sometimes called [[crony capitalism]], and envisages a de-cronied capitalist ideal. Similarly, some use the phrase "[[laissez-faire capitalism]]" to distinguish between "ordinary capitalism," believing that there is a difference. Others find the phrase "laissez-faire capitalism" redundant, pointing out that the common definition of capitalism explicitly refers to trade occurring in a "free market".
{{further|Mode of production}}
The capitalist mode of production refers to the systems of organising production and distribution within capitalist [[society|societies]]. Private money-making in various forms (renting, banking, merchant trade, production for profit and so on) preceded the development of the capitalist mode of production as such.
 
The term capitalist mode of production is defined by [[Private property|private ownership]] of the [[means of production]], extraction of [[surplus value]] by the owning class for the purpose of [[capital accumulation]], [[Wage labour|wage-based labor]] and, at least as far as [[Commodity|commodities]] are concerned, being [[Market economy|market-based]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/c/a.htm#capitalism |title=Capitalism |publisher=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |access-date=8 July 2011 |author=Encyclopedia of Marxism at marxism.org |archive-date=7 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507154837/https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/c/a.htm#capitalism |url-status=live}}</ref>
Many Greens, Marxists and anti-Globalists agree that the governments in capitalist societies, that is to say; societies where a capitalist class is the ruling class, are not serving in the role of protecting "the free market", but would go on to say that these governments are, in fact, acting to protect the owners of capital and corporations as their first priority. Voluble leftist [[Noam Chomsky]] says that "''There's nothing remotely like capitalism in existence. To the extent there ever was, it had disappeared by the 1920s or '30s''." (interview with Detroit Metro Times). Libertarians and other free-market advocates may also share this opinion regarding some or all of the major economies. However, in the 18th century in America, production and distribution of goods were regulated by government ministries. Also, government subsidies were granted to agriculture. Economic intervention continued throughout the 19th century.
 
Capitalism in the form of money-making activity has existed in the shape of merchants and money-lenders who acted as intermediaries between consumers and producers engaging in [[simple commodity production]] (hence the reference to "[[merchant capitalism]]") since the beginnings of civilisation. What is specific about the "capitalist mode of production" is that most of the inputs and outputs of production are supplied through the market (i.e. they are commodities) and essentially all production is in this mode.<ref name="Modern Economics 1986, p. 54" /> By contrast, in flourishing feudalism most or all of the factors of production, including labor, are owned by the feudal ruling class outright and the products may also be consumed without a market of any kind, it is production for use within the feudal social unit and for limited trade.<ref name=ch32 /> This has the important consequence that, under capitalism, the whole organisation of the production process is reshaped and re-organised to conform with economic [[bounded rationality|rationality as bounded]] by capitalism, which is expressed in price relationships between inputs and outputs (wages, non-labor factor costs, sales and profits) rather than the larger rational context faced by society overall—that is, the whole process is organised and re-shaped in order to conform to "commercial logic". Essentially, capital accumulation comes to define economic rationality in capitalist production.<ref name=xxx31>{{cite web|url=http://www.dsp.org.au/node/31 |title=The contradictions of capitalism – Democratic Socialist Perspective |publisher=dsp.org.au |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150406094810/http://www.dsp.org.au/node/31 |archive-date=6 April 2015}}</ref>
Proponents of the world-system perspective suggest that the whole globe has been incorporated into a single capitalist world-economy. Even though a state (such as Cuba) may be socialist, it works in relation to a much larger, overarching capitalist world-economy.
 
A society, region or [[nation]] is capitalist if the predominant source of incomes and products being distributed is capitalist activity, but even so this does not yet mean necessarily that the capitalist mode of production is dominant in that society.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Capitalism|url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capitalism.asp|access-date=14 February 2022|website=Investopedia|language=en}}</ref>
Mainstream economists, for their part, admit that the present economic systems have diverged from earlier forms labeled "capitalism", but many believe that some of the modern economies are still best described as being "capitalism".
 
[[Mixed economy|Mixed economies]] rely on the nation they are in to provide some goods or services, while the free market produces and maintains the rest.<ref name=":1" />
==Criticisms of capitalism==
 
=== Unequal distributionRole of wealth and incomegovernment ===
Government agencies regulate the standards of service in many industries, such as airlines and broadcasting, as well as financing a wide range of programs. In addition, the government regulates the flow of capital and uses financial tools such as the interest rate to control such factors as inflation and unemployment.<ref>"Capitalism." World Book Encyclopedia. 1988. p. 194.</ref>
''Main article: [[Economic inequality]]''
 
== Supply and demand ==
It is reasonable to expect that some disparity in wealth and income among individuals would exist in a capitalist system as this is determined through market forces rather than by centralized governmental authority. Some view a significant disparity and concentration of wealth to be problem and that such is endemic to capitalism, while others do not have such egalitarian concerns. Some opponents of capitalism assert that there should be no inequality in wealth and earnings among individuals commensurate to their inheritance, skills, abilities or efforts. Defenders of capitalism respond that since free market capitalism distributes wealth and earnings among individuals commensurate to their inheritance, skills, abilities and efforts, it provides inherent incentives for human beings to hone their skills, improve their abilities, and make strong efforts to meet the needs of each other, incentives that are missing or significantly less present in any other type of economic/political system.
{{Main|Supply and demand}}
[[File:Supply-and-demand.svg|thumb|upright=1.15|The economic model of supply and demand states that the price P of a product is determined by a balance between production at each price (supply S) and the desires of those with [[purchasing power]] at each price (demand D): the diagram shows a positive shift in demand from D<sub>1</sub> to D<sub>2</sub>, resulting in an increase in price (P) and quantity sold (Q) of the product.]]
In capitalist economic structures, supply and demand is an [[economic model]] of [[price determination]] in a [[Market (economics)|market]]. It postulates that in a [[perfect competition|perfectly competitive market]], the [[unit price]] for a particular [[Good (economics)|good]] will vary until it settles at a point where the quantity demanded by consumers (at the current price) will equal the quantity supplied by producers (at the current price), resulting in an [[economic equilibrium]] for price and [[Output (economics)|quantity]].
 
The "basic laws" of [[Supply (economics)|supply]] and [[demand]], as described by David Besanko and Ronald Braeutigam, are the following four:<ref name="besanko-and-braeutigam-2010">{{cite book |last1=Besanko |first1=David |last2=Braeutigam |first2=Ronald |year=2010 |title=Microeconomics |publisher=[[Wiley (publisher)|Wiley]] |edition=4th}}</ref>{{rp|37}}
====Excessive inequality====
# If demand increases (demand curve shifts to the right) and supply remains unchanged, then a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.
# If demand decreases (demand curve shifts to the left) and supply remains unchanged, then a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
# If demand remains unchanged and supply increases (supply curve shifts to the right), then a surplus occurs, leading to a lower equilibrium price.
# If demand remains unchanged and supply decreases (supply curve shifts to the left), then a shortage occurs, leading to a higher equilibrium price.
 
=== Supply schedule ===
Other critics argue that inequality may be necessary but that the distribution of wealth and earnings is unfair, dysfunctional, or immoral in capitalism. In the capitalist economies, the distributions of earnings and, especially, of wealth are concentrated and skewed to the right. In the US, the shares of earnings and wealth of the households in the top 1 percent of the corresponding distributions are 15 percent and 30 percent, respectively [http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~vr0j/papers/maxrefin.pdf].
A supply schedule is a table that shows the relationship between the price of a good and the quantity supplied.<ref name="Boundless Economics 2017">{{cite web |title=Supply |website=Boundless Economics |date=13 June 2017 |url=https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-economics/chapter/supply/ |access-date=27 October 2021}}</ref>
 
=== Demand schedule ===
Some critics note that there are very few people who are twice as tall as average, or who can run twice as fast, or have twice as high an IQ. Some critics argue that the fact capitalism doesn't distribute wealth in a similar fashion means that something is fundamentally wrong with the system. Supporters argue that human contributions vary much more than humans vary in height or IQ (as can be illustrated, for example, by comparing the contributions of an arsonist and an inventor/producer of antibiotics).
A demand schedule, depicted graphically as the [[demand curve]], represents the amount of some [[Good (economics)|goods]] that buyers are willing and able to purchase at various prices, assuming all determinants of demand other than the price of the good in question, such as income, tastes and preferences, the price of [[substitute good]]s and the price of [[complementary good]]s, remain the same. According to the [[law of demand]], the demand curve is almost always represented as downward sloping, meaning that as price decreases, consumers will buy more of the good.<ref name="axes">Unlike most [[Graph of a function|graphs]], supply & demand curves are plotted with the independent variable (price) on the vertical axis and the dependent variable (quantity supplied or demanded) on the horizontal axis.</ref>
 
Just like the supply curves reflect [[marginal cost]] curves, demand curves are determined by [[marginal utility]] curves.<ref>{{cite web|title=Marginal Utility and Demand |url=http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=marginal+utility+and+demand |access-date=9 February 2007 |archive-date=6 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061106121422/http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=marginal+utility+and+demand |url-status=live}}</ref>
Critics also note that there are many people who have no wealth. If wealth followed a a bell shaped curve ([[standard normal distribution]]), as many other human characteristics and it might be surmised people's ability to be productive, then there should be very few people with no wealth. Supporters might argue that human productivity and especially the tendency to save wealth is not bell-shaped.
 
=== Equilibrium ===
An untamed capitalist system may have inherent biases favoring those who already possess greater resources. For example, rich people can give their children a better education and inherited wealth. This can create or even increase large differences in wealth between people who do not differ in ability or effort. There are some data supporting this, like that in the US 43.35% of the Forbes 400 richest individuals were already rich enough at birth to qualify. [http://www.faireconomy.org/press/archive/Pre_1999/forbes_400_study.html], or a study that indicates that in the US wealth, race, and schooling are important to the inheritance of economic status, but IQ is not a major contributor and the genetic transmission of IQ is even less important [http://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/intergen.pdf]. On the other hand, at least some of the difference in wealth between people of equal ability may be explained by that some people voluntarily, maybe because they see other things as more valuable, make life choices that make them earn or save less than other people with the same ability. Defenders respond that since 30.1% of the individuals on the Forbes list of the 400 richest did not inherit great wealth (meaning they did not inherit at least $1 million in assets) this shows that even such people can gain the very highest level of wealth in capitalist economies. For opposing views of IQ and income, see [[IQ]]. There are also some data indicating that income inequality for the world as a whole is diminishing, see below in "Marxist critique of capitalism".
{{further|Economic equilibrium}}
In the context of supply and demand, economic equilibrium refers to a state where economic forces such as [[supply and demand]] are balanced and in the absence of external influences the ([[:wikt:equilibrium|equilibrium]]) values of economic variables will not change. For example, in the standard text-book model of [[perfect competition]] equilibrium occurs at the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal.<ref>{{cite book |author-link=Hal Varian |first=Hal R. |last=Varian |title=Microeconomic Analysis |edition=Third |publisher=Norton |___location=New York |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-393-95735-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/microeconomicana00vari_0}}</ref> Market equilibrium, in this case, refers to a condition where a market price is established through competition such that the amount of goods or services sought by [[Law of supply and demand|buyers]] is equal to the amount of goods or services produced by [[Law of supply and demand|sellers]]. This price is often called the competitive price or [[market clearing]] price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes.
 
=== Partial equilibrium ===
Supporters argue that a problem with using "distribution of wealth" as a standard to measure economic systems is that such a standard can produce seemingly irrational judgments. Under the "distribution of wealth" standard, a system where everyone has nothing is judged as equal to a system where everyone has enormous wealth since the distribution of wealth in the two systems is equal. The claim is made that capitalist economics are not [[zero-sum]] games and that more wealth for most people is actually "created" through innovation, entrepreneurship and risk-taking. Rewards for this may cause a necessary inequality. Regarding the inheritance of wealth, this may be necessary so that the most productive people continue to do productive work and save money when they get older. Thus, people who see uneven wealth distribution as a lesser or unavoidable problem tend to argue that if inequality leads to higher average wealth and higher wealth and income for most people, then wealth inequality may be acceptable. Several [[peer-reviewed]] studies show that the relative income share of the poorest do not decrease with higher [[economic freedom]], but their absolute income increases. For example, one study found that the poorest 10% earn $823 per year in the quintile of nations with the lowest economic freedom, but earn $6877 per year in the quintile of nations with the highest economic freedom. [http://www.ratioinstitutet.nu/pdf/wp/nb_efi.pdf][http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dmustard/courses/e4450/Grubel.pdf][http://www.cato.org/research/articles/vas-0109.html][http://www.freetheworld.com/2004/efw2004ch1.pdf].
{{Main|Partial equilibrium}}
Partial equilibrium, as the name suggests, takes into consideration only a part of the market to attain equilibrium. Jain proposes (attributed to [[George Stigler]]): "A partial equilibrium is one which is based on only a restricted range of data, a standard example is price of a single product, the prices of all other products being held fixed during the analysis".<ref>{{cite book |last=Jain |first=T.R. |title=Microeconomics and Basic Mathematics |year=2006 |publisher=VK Publications |___location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-87140-89-4 |page=28 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fUUoFwco2Z8C }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
 
=== History ===
Some advocates of capitalism may partly agree with the critics but think that the problem can be resolved with solutions like [[progressive taxation]], [[wealth tax]], and/or [[inheritance tax]]. They note that such taxes are already implemented in most capitalist states. The best extent of such taxes and how much inequality there should be is much discussed and researched, but these variables can be changed without abandoning capitalism.
According to Hamid S. Hosseini, the "power of supply and demand" was discussed to some extent by several early Muslim scholars, such as fourteenth century [[Mamluk]] scholar [[Ibn Taymiyyah]], who wrote: "If desire for goods increases while its availability decreases, its price rises. On the other hand, if availability of the good increases and the desire for it decreases, the price comes down".<ref name=Hosseini>{{cite book |title=A Companion to the History of Economic Thought |chapter=Contributions of Medieval Muslim Scholars to the History of Economics and their Impact: A Refutation of the Schumpeterian Great Gap |last=Hosseini |first=Hamid S. |editor1-last=Biddle |editor1-first=Jeff E. |editor2-last=Davis |editor2-first=Jon B. |editor3-last=Samuels |editor3-first=Warren J. |year=2003 |publisher=Blackwell |___location=Malden, Massachusetts |isbn=978-0-631-22573-7 |doi=10.1002/9780470999059.ch3 |pages=28–45 [28 & 38]}} (citing Hamid S. Hosseini, 1995. "Understanding the Market Mechanism Before Adam Smith: Economic Thought in Medieval Islam," ''History of Political Economy'', Vol. 27, No. 3, 539–561).</ref>
 
[[File:AdamSmith.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|left|[[Adam Smith]]]]
Other points of view on capitalism's unequal wealth distribution include:
[[John Locke]]'s 1691 work ''Some Considerations on the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest and the Raising of the Value of Money''<ref>John Locke (1691) [http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/locke/contents.htm ''Some Considerations on the consequences of the Lowering of Interest and the Raising of the Value of Money''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150324135856/https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/locke/contents.htm |date=24 March 2015 }}</ref> includes an early and clear description{{primary source inline|date=February 2022}} of supply and demand and their relationship. In this description, demand is [[Economic rent|rent]]: "The price of any commodity rises or falls by the proportion of the number of buyer and sellers" and "that which regulates the price... [of goods] is nothing else but their quantity in proportion to their rent".
* Pro-Capitalist:
**[[Robert Nozick]] has argued that no condition of perfect equality could be maintained for very long. If all agents possess the same amount of wealth, they will immediately begin investing it in different ventures which will pay off to varying degrees. But if voluntary economic exchange is seen as leaving both parties (since both would not be trading unless the outcome of the trade was mutually beneficial), even if the resulting distribution is not even, it is better than if there were no trading.
** Lack of established property rights force the poor to operate in extralegal markets, keeping them from unlocking the capital in their assets. When only the politically privileged can leverage capital, the division between formally and informally owned property is an unbalancing barrier to the benefits of a modern market economy.
** Wealth tends to be directed toward individuals in proportion to how productive they are in terms of creating and providing goods and services that others value, therefore the possibility of becoming wealthier than others can be seen as an incentive to benefit society. A limit on freedom of individuals to reap a disproportionate amount of wealth would dampen incentive. Technological progress would stagnate, and, as a result, the standard of living would suffer.
**The inequality of consumption is far less than the inequality in wealth, since there is no way most of the wealthy could consume all their wealth. To the extent that they consume their wealth, they are redistributing it to others. To the extent that they are not consuming it, they are generally either managing it to create more wealth or giving it away.
** Many rich give significantly to [[charity]] (see also [[philanthropist]]). Some argue that charity is more efficient than state welfare.
** The economist [[Thomas Sowell]] has attributed factors such as geography, climate, culture, and natural resources as contributing factors to inequality inside of and between nations.
** The income share of the poorest 10% do not decrease with higher economic freedom but the absolute income of the 10% poorest, prosperity, economic growth, democracy, and freedom from corruption increase, see [http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/press.cfm Economic freedom index].
 
[[David Ricardo]] titled one chapter of his 1817 work ''[[Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]]'' "On the Influence of Demand and Supply on Price".<ref name=Humphrey>Thomas M. Humphrey, 1992. "Marshallian Cross Diagrams and Their Uses before Alfred Marshall", ''Economic Review'', Mar/Apr, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, pp. [http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_review/1992/pdf/er780201.pdf 3–23] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121019100824/http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_review/1992/pdf/er780201.pdf |date=19 October 2012 }}.</ref>
* Anti-Capitalist:
In ''Principles of Political Economy and Taxation'', Ricardo more rigorously laid down the idea of the assumptions that were used to build his ideas of supply and demand.
** The capitalists gather their wealth by [[exploitation|exploiting]] the workers. A worker is not paid the entire produce of his labor, as the employer retains a portion as profit. Profiting in this way tends to further enrich those with capital while not significantly enhancing the material well-being of workers. This perpetuates concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.
** Wealth and unequal distribution can create social problems (such as higher [[crime]] rates). These problems affect both poor and rich.
** Government interference in markets can be skewed to benefit the wealthy. In particular, wealthy people have the financial means and incentives to influence or corrupt government officials and to lobby for favourable legislation.
** Many people have little wealth left over after living expenses, so they can't make it grow quickly.
** Persistent long-term inequality of wealth undermines the motivation of the poor to improve their stance.
** Wealthy people save relatively more than poor people. Hence some economists believe that an unequal distribution of wealth undermines an economy's mass buying power, effectively leading to lower aggregate sales, reduced wealth production, unemployment and crises. (see [[Keynes]]) Economists, however, argue that saving is also necessary in an economy, since it provides the means for investment into new technologies and processes.
** Wealth is defined and judged incorrectly, in many different ways. In particular, people may attach value to things for seemingly irrational reasons (sentimental value). Some may also value spiritual development more than material wealth.
** The wealthy may not put their wealth to productive use. For example, they may buy land just to deny access to it to others, for personal or environmental reasons. Other critics of capitalism, however, would ask whether or not capitalistic production narrowly-defined is a good thing, especially if it is seen as damaging the environment, and such an action of denial may be seen as the lesser of two evils.
 
In his 1870 essay "On the Graphical Representation of Supply and Demand", [[Fleeming Jenkin]] in the course of "introduc[ing] the diagrammatic method into the English economic literature" published the first drawing of supply and demand curves therein,<ref>A.D. Brownlie and M.F. Lloyd Prichard, 1963. "Professor Fleeming Jenkin, 1833–1885 Pioneer in Engineering and Political Economy", ''Oxford Economic Papers'', 15(3), p. 211.</ref> including [[comparative statics]] from a shift of supply or demand and application to the labor market.<ref>Fleeming Jenkin, 1870. "The Graphical Representation of the Laws of Supply and Demand, and their Application to Labour", in Alexander Grant, ed., ''Recess Studies'', Edinburgh. Ch. VI, pp. 151–185. Edinburgh. Scroll to chapter [https://books.google.com/books?id=NC5BAAAAIAAJ link] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716052536/https://books.google.com/books?id=NC5BAAAAIAAJ |date=16 July 2020 }}.</ref> The model was further developed and popularized by [[Alfred Marshall]] in the 1890 textbook ''[[Principles of Economics (Marshall)|Principles of Economics]]''.<ref name="Humphrey" />
=== Employment/unemployment ===
Since individuals typically earn their incomes from working for companies whose requirements are constantly changing, it is quite possible that at any given time not all members of a country's potential work force will be able to find an employer that needs their labor. This would be less problematic in an economy in which such individuals had unlimited access to resources such as land in order to provide for themselves, but when the ownership of the bulk of its productive capacity resides in relatively few hands, most individuals will be dependent on employment for their economic well-being. It is typical for true capitalist economies to have rates of [[unemployment]] that fluctuate between 3% and 15%. Some economists have used the term "[[natural rate of unemployment]]" to describe this phenomenon.
 
== Types ==
Depressed or stagnant economies have been known to reach unemployment rates as high as 30%, while events such as military mobilization (a good example is that of [[World War II]]) have resulted in just 1-2% unemployment, a level that is often termed "full employment". Typical unemployment rates in Western economies range between 5% and 10%. Some economists consider that a certain level of unemployment is necessary for the proper functioning of capitalist economies. Equally, some politicians have claimed that the "natural rate of unemployment" highlights the inefficiency of a capitalist economy, since not all its resources -- in this case human labor -- are being allocated efficiently.
There are many variants of capitalism in existence that differ according to country and region.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hall |first1=Peter A. |last2=Soskice |first2=David |title=Varieties Of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage |date=20 September 2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press, U.S.A. |isbn=0-19-924775-7}}</ref> They vary in their institutional makeup and by their economic policies. The common features among all the different forms of capitalism are that they are predominantly based on the private ownership of the means of production and the production of goods and services for profit; the market-based allocation of resources; and the accumulation of capital.
 
They include [[advanced capitalism]], corporate capitalism, finance capitalism, free-market capitalism, mercantilism, state capitalism and welfare capitalism. Other theoretical variants of capitalism include [[anarcho-capitalism]], [[community capitalism]], [[humanistic capitalism]], [[neo-capitalism]], [[state monopoly capitalism]], and [[technocapitalism]].
Some [[libertarian]] economists, such as [[Henry Hazlitt]], argue that higher unemployment rates are in part the result of [[minimum wage]] laws, as well as in part the result of misguided [[monetary policy]], and are not inevitable in a capitalist economy. In "[[Economics in One Lesson]]", Hazlitt argues that if the value of the work of some potential employees is lower than the minimum wage, it would penalise the employer to employ them. Accordingly, if the value of the productive capacity of a given employee is worth less to the employer than the minimum wage, that person will become unemployed, and therefore unemployment will exist whenever the legal minimum wage exceeds the true economic value of the least productive members of the [[labor pool]]. Likewise, if the amount of money a person can obtain on [[welfare]] approaches or equals what they could make by working, that person's incentive to work will be reduced.
 
=== Advanced ===
Some unemployment is voluntary, such as when a potential job is turned down because the unemployed person is seeking a better job, is voluntarily living on savings, or has a non-wage-earning role, such as in the case of a traditional [[homemaker]]. Some measures of employment disregard these categories of unemployment, counting only people who are actively seeking work and have been unable to find any.
{{Main|Advanced capitalism}}
Advanced capitalism is the situation that pertains to a society in which the capitalist model has been integrated and developed deeply and extensively for a prolonged period. Various writers identify [[Antonio Gramsci]] as an influential early theorist of advanced capitalism, even if he did not use the term himself. In his writings, Gramsci sought to explain how capitalism had adapted to avoid the revolutionary overthrow that had seemed inevitable in the 19th century. At the heart of his explanation was the decline of raw coercion as a tool of class power, replaced by use of [[civil society]] institutions to manipulate public ideology in the capitalists' favour.<ref>Lears, T.J. Jackson (1985) "The Concept of Cultural Hegemony"</ref><ref>Holub, Renate (2005) ''Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism''</ref><ref>[[Carl Boggs|Boggs, Carl]] (2012) ''Ecology and Revolution: Global Crisis and the Political Challenge''</ref>
 
[[Jürgen Habermas]] has been a major contributor to the analysis of advanced-capitalistic societies. Habermas observed four general features that characterise advanced capitalism:
=== Marxist critique of capitalism ===
# Concentration of industrial activity in a few large firms.
# Constant reliance on the state to stabilise the economic system.
# A formally democratic government that legitimises the activities of the state and dissipates opposition to the system.
# The use of nominal wage increases to pacify the most restless segments of the work force.<ref>Habermas, 1988: 37, 75.</ref>
 
=== Corporate ===
''Main article: [[Marxism]], [[Category:Marxist theory]]''
{{Main|Corporate capitalism}}
{{See also|Crony capitalism|State monopoly capitalism}}
Corporate capitalism is a free or mixed-market capitalist economy characterized by the dominance of hierarchical and bureaucratic corporations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Barnett |first=H C |date=January 1981 |title=Crime and Delinquency |url=https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/corporate-capitalism-corporate-crime |journal=[[Office of Justice Programs]]}}</ref>
 
=== Finance ===
[[Image:YoungerMarx.JPG|150px|thumb|left|[[Karl Marx]] saw the existence of capital as the source of social ills]]
{{Main|Finance capitalism}}
Marxists define [[capital (economics)|capital]] as "a social, economic relation" between people (rather than between people and things). In this sense they seek to abolish capital. They believe that private ownership of the means of production enriches capitalists (owners of capital) at the expense of workers ("the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer"), and that this is the cause of social ills. Supporters of capitalism counter this criticism by claiming that ownership of productive capacity provides motivation to owners to increase productive capacity and so generally increase the average material wealth ("we all get richer"). Opponents of capitalism counter this by pointing out the unchanged after-tax income of the poorest quintile of the U.S. population during the last two decades. While at the same time the average income and especially the income of the rich have increased. [http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=5324&amp;sequence=0]. According to &quot;United for a Fair Economy,&quot; in 1982 CEOs of major corporations in the U.S. earned 42 times the annual wages of the average worker; in 2002 the ratio stood at 282:1 [http://www.faireconomy.org/press/2004/CEOPayRatio_pr.html]. Supporters of capitalism point out that the percentage of people in developing countries living below $1 per day have halved in only twenty years, especially in countries like China that have embraced capitalism [http://www.worldbank.org/research/povmonitor/]. Life expectancy has almost doubled in the developing world since WWII and the gap to the developed world is starting to close [http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=2429]. Looking at the world as a whole and not only the U.S. shows that income inequality is in fact diminishing [http://www.columbia.edu/~xs23/papers/worldistribution/NYT_november_27.htm].
{{See also|Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)}}
Finance capitalism is the subordination of processes of [[Production (economics)|production]] to the accumulation of [[money]] profits in a [[financial system]]. In their critique of capitalism, [[Marxism]] and [[Leninism]] both emphasise the role of [[Financial capital|finance capital]] as the determining and [[ruling-class]] interest in capitalist society, particularly in the [[Crisis of capitalism|latter stages]].<ref>[[Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]] [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ch03.htm ibid. Finance Capital and the Finance Oligarchy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402214909/https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ch03.htm |date=2 April 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://monthlyreview.org/2009/10/01/monopoly-finance-capital-and-the-paradox-of-accumulation/|title= Monopoly-Finance Capital and the Paradox of Accumulation |first1=John Bellamy |last1=Foster |author1-link=John Bellamy Foster |first2=Robert W. |last2=McChesney |author2-link=Robert W. McChesney |date=1 October 2009 |magazine=[[Monthly Review]] |access-date=27 August 2016 |archive-date=28 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160828081218/http://monthlyreview.org/2009/10/01/monopoly-finance-capital-and-the-paradox-of-accumulation/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
 
[[Rudolf Hilferding]] is credited with first bringing the term finance capitalism into prominence through ''Finance Capital'', his 1910 study of the links between German trusts, banks and monopolies—a study subsumed by [[Vladimir Lenin]] into ''[[Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]]'' (1917), his analysis of the imperialist relations of the great world powers.<ref>Frederic Jameson, 'Culture and Finance Capital', in ''The Jameson Reader'' (2005) p. 257</ref> Lenin concluded that the banks at that time operated as "the chief nerve centres of the whole capitalist system of national economy".<ref>Quoted in E.H. Carr, ''The Bolshevik Revolution 2'' (1971) p. 137</ref> For the [[Comintern]] (founded in 1919), the phrase "dictatorship of finance capitalism"<ref>Quoted in F.A Voight, ''Unto Caesar'' (1938) p. 22</ref> became a regular one.
Marxists believe that capitalism allows capitalists &mdash; the owners of capital &mdash; to [[Exploitation#Marxian_theory|exploit]] workers. The private ownership of the means of production is seen as a restriction on freedom, whereas supporters of capitalism believe that private ownership is essential to enriching society as well as preserving personal freedom. Marxists also argue that capitalism has inherent contradictions that will inevitably lead to its collapse. Capitalism is seen as just one stage in the evolution of the economy of a society.
 
[[Fernand Braudel]] would later point to two earlier periods when finance capitalism had emerged in human history—with the Genoese in the 16th century and with the Dutch in the 17th and 18th centuries—although at those points it developed from commercial capitalism.<ref>C. J.Calhoun/G. Derluguian, ''Business as Usual'' (2011) p. 57</ref>{{request quotation|date=December 2016}} [[Giovanni Arrighi]] extended Braudel's analysis to suggest that a predominance of finance capitalism is a recurring, long-term phenomenon, whenever a previous phase of commercial/industrial capitalist expansion reaches a plateau.<ref>Jameson, pp. 259–260</ref>
Marxists also often argue that the structure of capitalism necessarily leads to unjust exploitation of workers, regardless of whether or not the political system is one of an bourgeois democracy. For this reason Marxists typically emphasise the capitalist economic system of Western countries rather than the democratic political system. A capitalist system is an economic system - although often associated with democratic political systems, they are independent from each other. Capitalist systems have often functioned under unelected governments: the classic case is the [[United Kingdom]], where less than 20% of adult males could vote prior to [[1885]], and women did not receive the vote until [[1918]].[http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/diary/historylesson.htm] Some recent examples include [[Hong Kong]], [[Singapore]], and [[Chile]] under the rule of General [[Pinochet]]. It is also argued by Marxists that governments espousing [[fascist]] (or "[[national socialist]]") rhetoric do not make substantive changes to the capitalist economies when they assume power.
 
=== Free market ===
In [[mainland China]] differences in terminology sometimes confuse and complicate discussions of [[Chinese economic reform]]. Under [[Chinese Marxism]], which is the official state ideology, capitalism refers to a stage of history in which there is a class system in which the proletariat is exploited by the bourgeoisie. In the official Chinese ideology, China is currently in the primary stage of [[socialism with Chinese characteristics]]. However, because of [[Deng Xiaoping]]'s dictum to [[seek truth from facts]], this view does not prevent China from undertaking policies which in the West would be considered capitalistic including employing wage labor, increasing unemployment to motivate those who are still working, transforming state owned enterprises into joint stock companies, and encouraging the growth of the joint venture and private capitalist sectors.
{{Main|Free-market capitalism}}
{{See also|Laissez-faire}}
A capitalist free-market economy is an economic system where prices for goods and services are set entirely by the forces of [[supply and demand]] and are expected, by its adherents, to reach their point of [[Economic equilibrium|equilibrium]] without intervention by government policy. It typically entails support for highly [[Competition (economics)|competitive markets]] and [[private ownership]] of the [[means of production]].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Jahan |first1=Sarwat |last2=Saber Mahmud |first2=Ahmed |title=What Is Capitalism? |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/Series/Back-to-Basics/Capitalism |website=[[International Monetary Fund]]}}</ref> ''Laissez-faire'' capitalism is a more extensive form of this free-market economy, but one in which the role of the state is limited to protecting [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Laissez-faire |url=https://www.britannica.com/money/laissez-faire |website=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]}}</ref> In [[Anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalist]] theory, property rights are protected by private firms and market-generated law. According to anarcho-capitalists, this entails property rights without statutory law through market-generated tort, contract and property law, and self-sustaining private industry.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Anarcho-capitalism |url=https://www.britannica.com/money/anarcho-capitalism |website=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Perumal J. |first=Prashanth |date=13 December 2023 |title=Understanding the debates around anarcho-capitalism |url=https://www.thehindu.com/specials/text-and-context/understanding-the-debates-around-anarcho-capitalism/article67631934.ece |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213083528/https://www.thehindu.com/specials/text-and-context/understanding-the-debates-around-anarcho-capitalism/article67631934.ece |archive-date=13 December 2023 |website=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref>
 
[[Fernand Braudel]] argued that free market exchange and capitalism are to some degree opposed; free market exchange involves [[Perfect information|transparent]] public transactions and a large number of [[Perfect competition|equal competitors]], while capitalism involves a small number of participants using their capital to control the market via private transactions, control of information, and limitation of competition.<ref name=Braudel1977>{{cite book |last1=Braudel |first1=F. |author-link=Fernand Braudel |last2=Ranum |first2=P.M. |last3=Ranum |first3=P.P. |title=Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism |publisher=[[Johns Hopkins University Press]] |series=Johns Hopkins symposia in comparative history |year=1977 |isbn=978-0-8018-1901-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1eVdAAAAIAAJ |access-date=6 April 2022 |pages=47–63}}</ref>
=== Capitalism in decline or on the rise? ===
Citing the ideal of a [[free market]], many consider an economy with lower taxes, smaller government and fewer regulations to be more capitalistic. If government spending is used as a gauge of government expansion, the last century saw a very large increase in the role of government in Western countries. Combined U.S. government spending increased from 3-4% of GDP to 33% flattening somewhat since 1983 when the sharp upward trend was broken during President Ronald Reagan's term. An average for 16 industrial nations jumped from 8% of GDP to 45%. ''Non-defense'' spending in the U.S. as a percentage of net income increase from 11.5% in 1945 to 30% in 1983, remaining stable through 2003 (some exclude defense spending when gauging government expansion). Compliance with more regulations is increasingly costly [http://mwhodges.home.att.net/intl-spend.htm][http://mwhodges.home.att.net/regulation.htm]. Thus it can be argued that the degree of capitalism has seen a remarkable ''decline'' in Western nations. However, since 1983 the percentage of non-defense government spending in the U.S. has stabilised, leading some such as Milton Friedman to express some hope that the tide may reverse toward more capitalism [http://www.hooverdigest.org/051/friedman.html]. Alan Greenspan, in a speech in 2005, expressed his belief that "free-market capitalism" is being rediscovered through deregulation after a period of stifling regulation brought about by Keynesian economics. [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,16849-1823177,00.html]
 
=== Mercantile ===
One explanation for this is that the Western nations have increasingly averted or regulated various market failures such as pollution, health care, unemployment, wealth inequality, and education. Supporters of less state interference, such as [[libertarians]], [[neoliberals]], and financial [[conservatives]], would instead argue that the regulations restrict competition, that the taxes go to the special interest groups with the most political clout, and that the almost constantly expanding governments do things less efficiently than the private sector.
{{Main|Mercantilism}}
{{See also|Protectionism}}
[[File:Microcosm of London Plate 049 - Lloyd's Subscription Room edited.jpg|thumb|The subscription room at [[Lloyd's of London]] in the early 19th century]]
Mercantilism is a nationalist form of early capitalism that came into existence approximately in the late 16th century. It is characterized by the intertwining of national business interests with state-interest and imperialism. Consequently, the state apparatus is used to advance national business interests abroad. An example of this is [[European colonization of the Americas|colonists living in America]] who were only allowed to trade with and purchase goods from their respective mother countries (e.g., United Kingdom, France and Portugal). Mercantilism was driven by the belief that the wealth of a nation is increased through a positive balance of trade with other nations—it corresponds to the phase of capitalist development sometimes called the [[primitive accumulation of capital]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mercantilism |url=https://www.britannica.com/money/mercantilism |website=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]}}</ref>
 
=== SustainabilitySocial ===
{{Main|Social market economy}}
{{See also|Nordic model}}
A social market economy is a free-market or mixed-market capitalist system, sometimes classified as a [[coordinated market economy]], where government intervention in price formation is kept to a minimum, but the state provides significant services in areas such as social security, health care, unemployment benefits and the recognition of [[labor rights]] through national [[collective bargaining]] arrangements.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Müller-Armack |first=Alfred |date=28 July 2006 |title=The Social Market Economy as an Economic and Social order |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00346767800000020 |journal=[[Taylor & Francis]]|doi=10.1080/00346767800000020 |url-access=subscription }}</ref>
 
This model is prominent in Western and Northern European countries as well as Japan, albeit in slightly different configurations. The vast majority of enterprises are privately owned in this economic model. Rhine capitalism is the contemporary model of capitalism and adaptation of the social market model that exists in continental Western Europe today.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Rhenish Capitalism |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100418483 |website=[[Oxford University Press]]}}</ref>
An economic system that causes strong economic growth may inevitably have a large effect on the environment. Some question the continued [[sustainability]] of this, arguing that many aspects of the environment have been degraded since the industrial revolution. Defenders of capitalism note the many environmental disasters in communist states. Yet this argument constitutes an evasion more than a defense. While it may be true that state-communist governments in economic competition with capitalism tended to mindlessly ape its industrial processes, sometimes producing more environmentally destructive results, it hardly lets capitalism off the hook.
 
=== State ===
Some defenders note that many aspects of the environment in developed nations have improved recently, after the dangers of certain pollutants have become known. Examples include greatly reduced emissions of [[chlorofluorocarbons]] affecting the [[ozone layer]], removal of [[lead]] from gasoline and other products, greatly improved cleaning of emissions from fossil fuel power plants, and much stricter control of emissions into rivers, lakes, and oceans. However, some leading [[conservation]] organizations such as the [[WWF]] and The [[United Nations Environment Programme]] argue that the impact of humanity on Earth is continually increasing. They in 2004 jointly reported that "humanity's Ecological Footprint grew by 150% between 1961 and 2000" and that most of this growth occurred in the 27 wealthiest countries of the world, in other words, the leading capitalist countries [http://www.panda.org/news_facts/publications/general/livingplanet/lpr04.cfm]]. Critics note that the statistical methods used in calculating [[Ecological Footprint]] have been criticized and some find the whole concept of counting how much land is used to be flawed, arguing that there is nothing intrinsically negative about using more land to improve living standards. [http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pl?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tinbergen.nl%2Fdiscussionpapers%2F98105.pdf;h=repec:dgr:uvatin:19980105][http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume1/v1i1a2print.html]
{{Main|State capitalism}}
State capitalism is a capitalist market economy dominated by state-owned enterprises, where the state enterprises are organized as commercial, profit-seeking businesses. The designation has been used broadly throughout the 20th century to designate a number of different economic forms, ranging from state-ownership in market economies to the command economies of the former [[Eastern Bloc]]. According to Aldo Musacchio, a professor at Harvard Business School, state capitalism is a system in which governments, whether democratic or autocratic, exercise a widespread influence on the economy either through direct ownership or various subsidies. Musacchio notes a number of differences between today's state capitalism and its predecessors. In his opinion, gone are the days when governments appointed bureaucrats to run companies: the world's largest state-owned enterprises are now traded on the public markets and kept in good health by large institutional investors. Contemporary state capitalism is associated with the [[East Asian model of capitalism]], [[dirigisme]] and the economy of Norway.<ref>{{cite news |last=Musacchio |first=Aldo |url=http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/802 |title=Economist Debates: State capitalism: Statements |newspaper=The Economist |access-date=20 June 2012 |archive-date=16 July 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716050641/http://economist.com/debate/days/view/802 |url-status=live }}</ref> Alternatively, [[Merriam-Webster]] defines state capitalism as "an economic system in which private capitalism is modified by a varying degree of government ownership and control".<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/state%20capitalism State capitalism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703131303/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/state%20capitalism |date=3 July 2015 }}. [[Merriam-Webster]]. Retrieved 7 July 2015.</ref>
 
In ''Socialism: Utopian and Scientific'', [[Friedrich Engels]] argued that state-owned enterprises would characterize the final stage of capitalism, consisting of ownership and management of large-scale production and communication by the [[Capitalist state|bourgeois state]].<ref>{{cite web |first=Frederick |last=Engels |author-link=Friedrich Engels |url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch03.htm |title=Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 3) |publisher=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |access-date=8 January 2014 |archive-date=9 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200509191523/https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch03.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> In his writings, [[Vladimir Lenin]] characterized the economy of Soviet Russia as state capitalist, believing state capitalism to be an early step toward the development of [[socialism]].<ref>V.I. Lenin. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1921/apr/21.htm The Tax in Kind] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907043921/https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1921/apr/21.htm |date=7 September 2015 }}. ''Lenin's Collected Works'', 1st English ed., Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1965, vol. 32, pp. 329–365.</ref><ref>V.I. Lenin. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1922/nov/14b.htm To the Russian Colony in North America] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150618071802/https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1922/nov/14b.htm |date=18 June 2015 }}. ''Lenin Collected Works'', Progress Publishers, 1971, Moscow, vol. 42, pp. 425c–427a.</ref>
This view, however, does not recognize [[biodiversity]] as an intrinsic good. [[Monoculture]], paving and other human activities reduce the amount of earth's surface available to support diverse communities of life.
 
Some economists and left-wing academics including [[Richard D. Wolff]] and [[Noam Chomsky]], as well as many Marxist philosophers and revolutionaries such as [[Raya Dunayevskaya]] and [[C.L.R. James]], argue that the economies of the former [[Soviet Union]] and Eastern Bloc represented a form of state capitalism because their internal organization within enterprises and the system of wage labor remained intact.<ref>[http://www.hetsa.org.au/pdf/34-A-08.pdf "State capitalism" in the Soviet Union] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728140836/https://www.hetsa.org.au/pdf/34-A-08.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.hetsa.org.au/pdf/34-A-08.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live |date=28 July 2019 }}, M.C. Howard and J.E. King</ref><ref>[[Noam Chomsky]] (1986). [http://www.chomsky.info/articles/1986----.htm The Soviet Union Versus Socialism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924051230/http://www.chomsky.info/articles/1986----.htm |date=24 September 2015 }}. ''Our Generation''. Retrieved 9 July 2015.</ref><ref>[[Richard D. Wolff]] (27 June 2015). [http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/31567-socialism-means-abolishing-the-distinction-between-bosses-and-employees Socialism Means Abolishing the Distinction Between Bosses and Employees] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180311070639/http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/31567-socialism-means-abolishing-the-distinction-between-bosses-and-employees |date=11 March 2018 }}. ''[[Truthout]].'' Retrieved 9 July 2015.</ref><ref>{{cite web|first1=Raya |last1=Dunayevskaya |author-link1=Raya Dunayevskaya |date=1941 |url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/dunayevskaya/works/1941/ussr-capitalist.htm |title=The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is a Capitalist Society |website=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191207212742/https://www.marxists.org/archive/dunayevskaya/works/1941/ussr-capitalist.htm |archive-date=7 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first1=C.L.R. |last1=James |author-link1=C.L.R. James |first2=Raya |last2=Dunayevskaya |author-link2=Raya Dunayevskaya |first3=Grace Lee |last3=Boggs |author-link3=Grace Lee Boggs |date=1950 |url=https://libcom.org/files/State%20capitalism%20and%20world%20revolution%20-%20CLR%20James.pdf |title=State Capitalism and World Revolution |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200619014753/https://libcom.org/files/State%20capitalism%20and%20world%20revolution%20-%20CLR%20James.pdf |archive-date=19 June 2020}}</ref>
Supporters of capitalism argue that in many cases environmental problems are greatest when a common exists and there is no clear owner. See [[Tragedy of the commons]], [[Free market environmentalism]], and a proposal to have [http://user.intersatx.net/jc/gaia.html natural resource wealth owned by all people equally]. Defenders of capitalism also note that world population has greatly expanded due to higher living standards since the industrial revolution. However, this growth is declining due to the [[demographic transition]] and the world population is expected to stabilize at nine billion.
 
The term is not used by [[Austrian School]] economists to describe state ownership of the means of production. The economist [[Ludwig von Mises]] argued that the designation of state capitalism was a new label for the old labels of state socialism and planned economy and differed only in non-essentials from these earlier designations.<ref>{{cite book|first=Ludwig |last=Von Mises |author-link=Ludwig Von Mises |title=Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis |publisher=LibertyClassics |place=Indianapolis |year=1979 |isbn=978-0-913966-63-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/socialismeconomi00vonm |access-date=31 May 2007 |quote=The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state. Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism—until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name. The most recent slogan is 'State Capitalism.' It is not commonly realized that this covers nothing more than what used to be called Planned Economy and State Socialism, and that State Capitalism, Planned Economy, and State Socialism diverge only in non-essentials from the "classic" ideal of egalitarian Socialism. |url-access=registration}}</ref>
Yet many environmentalists have long argued that the real dangers are due to the world's current social institutions that they claim promote environmentally irresponsible consumption and production. Under what they call the "grow or die" imperative of capitalism, they claim there is little reason to expect hazardous consumption and production practices to change in a timely manner. They also claim that markets and states invariably drag their feet on substantive environmental reform, and are notoriously slow to adopt viable sustainable technologies. [http://www.social-ecology.org/article.php?story=20031118113538865][http://www.monthlyreview.org/1200jbf.htm]. [[Immanuel Wallerstein]], referring to the [http://www.pbs.org/itvs/openoutcry/talkback.html externalization of costs] as the "dirty secret" of capitalism, claims that there are built-in limits to ecological reform, the costs of doing business in the world capitalist economy are ratcheting upward because of deruralization and democratization, he therefore sees no exit from our dilemnas within the framework of the capitalist world-system.[http://fbc.binghamton.edu/iwecol.htm]
 
=== Political ===
Strong economic growth also requires increasingly greater amounts of natural resources and energy and some question whether this can continue in the future. Those arguing for continued growth note that numerous past predictions of shortages have failed since new technology has continuously allowed exploitation of previously unavailable resources. That this continues in the future is of critical importance, especially for energy which may face a peak in fossil fuel production. Since 1970, each 1% increase in world GDP has yielded a 0.64% increase in energy consumption. See [[Future energy development]].
{{Main|Political capitalism}}
Political capitalism or Politically oriented capitalism is a term coined by [[Max Weber]] in his 1921 book ''[[Economy and Society]]'' to describe monetary profit-making through non-market means.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Vahabi |first=Mehrdad |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-17674-6 |title=Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism |date=2023 |publisher=SpringerLink |isbn=978-3-031-17673-9 |page=XV |language=en |chapter=Prologue |doi=10.1007/978-3-031-17674-6}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Krieger |first1=Tim |last2=Meierrieks |first2=Daniel |date=2016-12-01 |title=Political capitalism: The interaction between income inequality, economic freedom and democracy |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0176268016302282 |journal=European Journal of Political Economy |volume=45 |pages=115–132 |doi=10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.10.005 |issn=0176-2680|hdl=10419/125138 |hdl-access=free |url-access=subscription }}</ref> In 2015 [[Randall G. Holcombe]] described political capitalism as an [[economic system]] in which the sharp distinction between [[State (polity)|states]] and [[Market (economics)|markets]] is blurred.'''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Holcombe |first=Randall |date=2015-03-20 |title=Political Capitalism as a Distinct Economic System |url=https://www.masterresource.org/political-capitalism/political-capitalism/ |access-date=2025-04-21 |website=Master Resource |language=en}}</ref>'''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Holcombe |first=Randall G. |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/political-capitalism/668D714DEEA375AF686E479535E1876A |title=Political Capitalism: How Economic and Political Power Is Made and Maintained |date=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-47177-0 |series=Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society |___location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/9781108637251}}</ref>
 
=== Welfare ===
=== Human rights violations, imperialism, and democracy ===
{{Main|Welfare capitalism}}
{{See also|Economic interventionism|Mixed economy}}
Welfare capitalism is capitalism that includes social welfare policies. Today, welfare capitalism is most often associated with the models of capitalism found in Central and Northern Europe such as the [[Nordic model]], [[social market economy]] and Rhine capitalism. In some cases, welfare capitalism exists within a mixed economy, but welfare states can and do exist independently of policies common to mixed economies such as [[state interventionism]] and extensive regulation.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Esping-Andersen |first=Gøsta |title=[[The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism]] |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |year=1990 |isbn=9780691028576}}</ref>
 
A mixed economy is a largely market-based capitalist economy consisting of both private and public ownership of the means of production and [[economic interventionism]] through macroeconomic policies intended to correct [[market failure]]s, reduce unemployment and keep inflation low. The degree of intervention in markets varies among different countries. Some mixed economies such as France under [[dirigisme]] also featured a degree of [[Indicative planning|indirect economic planning]] over a largely capitalist-based economy.
Critics of capitalism argue that ills caused by capitalism include [[imperialism]], [[poverty]], [[oppression]], [[exploitation]] and abuse of [[human rights]]. They point to lack of [[democracy]], systematic violence against political opponents, participation in coups which have placed dictators in power (for example in [[Chile]] under the regime of [[Pinochet]], Argentina with its [[dirty war]]); and large scale [[democide]] (like in the [[Congo Free State]]). Some argue that capitalism thrives on an uneven and exploitative relationship between wealthy nations (see [[Core-Periphery Theory]]) who force regime or system changes in poor countries which are only beneficial to them, often through exploitative wars (like the [[Opium wars]] or the [[Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945)|Sino-Japanese War]]), or coup d'etats in democratic countries that refuse to privatize exploitation of their natural resources (e.g. Chile, 1973). Many of these violations occurred during a time period and in states sometimes considered being more capitalist than today since the government share of the economy was much smaller. (However, U.S and European support of multinational-friendly capitalist dictatorships in Latin America and Africa lasted until the mid 1980s.)
 
Most modern capitalist economies are defined as mixed economies to some degree<ins>,</ins> however French economist [[Thomas Piketty]] stated in 2013 that capitalist economies might shift to a much more ''laissez-faire'' approach in the near future.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Piketty |first=Thomas |title=Le capital au XXIe siècle |year=2013 |isbn=978-2-02-108228-9 |pages=799, 800 |language=fr |chapter=Repenser l'impôt progressif sur le revenu |publisher=Éditions du Seuil |trans-chapter=To rethink income tax progressivity |quote=Si cette régressivité fiscale au sommet de la hiérarchie sociale devait se confirmer et s'amplifier à l'avenir, [...] il est bien évident qu'une telle sécession fiscale des plus riches [avec les autres classes] est potentiellement extrêmement dommageable pour le consentement fiscal dans son ensemble [qui] s'en trouve amoindri [...]. Il est vital pour l'État social moderne que le système fiscal qui le sous-tend conserve un minimum de progressivité. |trans-quote=If tax regressivity on top of the social hierarchy may settle in and escalate in the future, it is obvious that such a tax secession between the richest and the other classes will be highly harmful towards the agreement over the taxation system which will weaken. It is essential for the modern social system that the taxation system preserve a sort of tax progressivity.}}</ref>
Some argue that capitalism initially started with a massive accumulation of capital by imperialist countries like England through the theft of natural resources and exploitation of slave labor from large parts of Asia, Africa and the Americas which spurred the industrial revolution.
 
=== Eco-capitalism ===
Proponents of capitalism argue that these problems have been widespread through all of human history, including in states characterized as socialist such as in [[Cambodia]] under Pol Pot. Some claim that these practices are not consistent with the principles of capitalism even though they have existed in nations or in the colonies of nations (commonly or loosely) labeled as capitalist. They deny that many of the colonies had capitalist economic systems and claim that their economies mostly continued to be feudalistic. Critics of capitalism counter that the nature of capitalism itself is based on uneven power relationships between wealthy nations and the countries they colonize, either militarily (e.g. India in 19th century) or economically (e.g. through IMF structural adjustment programs during the 1980s). In other words, for capitalism to survive, wealthy nations must maintain cheap access to third world natural resources and cheap labor markets, by force if necessary. Though human rights abuses have existed since the beginning of recorded history, they argue, there are essential relationships inherent to the nature of capitalism (which was created by and for the benifit of the rich), that concentrate capital in the hands of the wealthy, generate poverty and create a situation where it is in the best interests of the rich to subjugate the poor, by violence if necessary.
[[Eco-capitalism]], also known as "environmental capitalism" or (sometimes<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/24/b-corps-captalism-for-an-environmentally-endangered-age |title=Green capitalism sometimes also referring to sustainable businesses |first=Oliver |last=Balch |date=24 November 2019 |work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref>) "green capitalism", is the view that [[capital (economics)|capital]] exists in nature as "[[natural capital]]" ([[ecosystem]]s that have [[ecological yield]]) on which all [[wealth]] depends. Therefore, governments should use [[Market (economics)|market-based]] [[policy instruments|policy-instruments]] (such as a [[carbon tax]]) to resolve [[environmental problem]]s.<ref>{{cite web|title=Definition of Eco-Capitalism |url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/eco-capitalism |website=collinsdictionary.com |access-date= 27 November 2015}}</ref>
 
The term "Blue Greens" is often applied to those who espouse eco-capitalism. Eco-capitalism can be thought of as the right-wing equivalent to [[Eco-socialism|Red Greens]].<ref>{{cite web |title=The rise of green capitalism |url=http://roadtoparis.info/top-list/rise-green-capitalism/ |website=roadtoparis.info |access-date=27 November 2015 |archive-date=28 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150428134122/http://roadtoparis.info/top-list/rise-green-capitalism/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{request quotation|date=August 2019}}
A common criticism that Marxists make about Capitalism is that it is only democratic to the Bourgeoisie (the exploitive class that owns the 'means of production') citing examples such as not being able to criticize one's boss out of risk of getting fired and not being able to express their opinions due to lack of funds to afford the means of media. Marxists also criticize capitalism for needing Imperialism (the exportation of capital to other nations) to survive. Due to Capitalism not being a planned economy it inevitably overproduces commodities and overuse resources. This leads it to expand it markets into and drain the resources out of other nations.
 
=== Sustainable capitalism ===
[[Sustainable capitalism]] is a conceptual form of capitalism based upon [[Sustainability|sustainable]] practices that seek to preserve humanity and the planet, while reducing [[Externality|externalities]] and bearing a resemblance of capitalist [[economic policy]]. A capitalistic economy must expand to survive and find new markets to support this expansion.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087226 |chapter=The convergence of sustainable capitalism |title=2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference |pages=1–7 |year=2011 |last1=Mitra |first1=Basavadatta |last2=Gadhok |first2=Saagar |last3=Salhotra |first3=Shivam |last4=Agarwal |first4=Sakshi |isbn=978-1-61284-779-5 |s2cid=31292223 }}</ref> Capitalist systems are often destructive to the environment as well as certain individuals without access to proper representation. However, sustainability provides quite the opposite; it implies not only a continuation, but a [[resource depletion|replenishing of resources]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schweickart |first1=David |title=Is Sustainable Capitalism an Oxymoron? |journal=Perspectives on Global Development and Technology |date=1 January 2009 |volume=8 |issue=2–3 |pages=559–580 |doi=10.1163/156914909X424033 }}</ref> Sustainability is often thought of to be related to [[environmentalism]], and sustainable capitalism applies sustainable principles to economic governance and social aspects of capitalism as well.
 
The importance of sustainable capitalism has been more recently recognized, but the concept is not new. Changes to the current economic model would have heavy social environmental and economic implications and require the efforts of individuals, as well as compliance of local, state and federal governments. Controversy surrounds the concept as it requires an increase in sustainable practices and a marked decrease in current consumptive behaviors.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |title=Sustainable Capitalism and the Pursuit of Well-Being.|last=E.|first=Harrison, Neil|date=1 January 2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-306-21804-7|oclc=866837827}}{{page needed|date=March 2019}}</ref>
Supporters of capitalism emphasize that it was capitalist states that abolished [[slavery]] throughout the world and that it was capitalist states who developed the modern [[democracy|democratic]] system. Critics reply that the major imperialist powers accumulated huge amounts capital through slavery before it was abolished. Furthermore, they argue, slavery was only abolished after it became less expensive to pay wages in industries like mining and agriculture in the colonies. The strong economic growth during capitalism may encourage [[democratisation]], or vice versa. There is debate about whether [[liberal democracy]], in the sense of electoral rights and civil liberties, is a consequence of economic growth [http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/ChapterPDFs/2000_Chapter_2.pdf], a cause of it [http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:WPTnHhUTq5IJ:econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/dev/papers/0212/0212002.pdf], or completely unrelated to it [http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:UxJlj8TGKuoJ:www.be.udel.edu/economics/WorkingPapers/papers/paper2004-03.pdf]. These studies tend to indicate that establishing the rule of law in protecting private property and free markets, rather than mere democratization, is what is most instrumental in generating economic growth.
 
This is a concept of capitalism described in [[Al Gore]] and [[David Blood]]'s manifesto for the [[Generation Investment Management]] to describe a long-term political, economic and social structure which would mitigate current threats to the planet and society.<ref name="genfound">{{Cite web |last1=Gore |first1=Al |last2=Blood |first2=David |title=A Manifesto for Sustainable Capitalism |url=https://www.genfound.org/media/pdf-wsj-manifesto-sustainable-capitalism-14-12-11.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140124005644/https://www.genfound.org/media/pdf-wsj-manifesto-sustainable-capitalism-14-12-11.pdf |archive-date=24 January 2014 |access-date=24 October 2022 |website=Generation Foundation}}</ref> According to their manifesto, sustainable capitalism would integrate the environmental, social and governance ([[Environmental, social and corporate governance|ESG]]) aspects into risk assessment in attempt to limit externalities.<ref name=":0b">{{Cite web|url=https://www.generationim.com/media/pdf-generation-sustainable-capitalism-v1.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.generationim.com/media/pdf-generation-sustainable-capitalism-v1.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live|title=Sustainable Capitalism|access-date=18 February 2017}}</ref> Most of the ideas they list are related to economic changes, and social aspects, but strikingly few are explicitly related to any environmental policy change.<ref name="genfound" />
 
== Capital accumulation ==
One of the very few studies simultaneously examining the relationship among economic freedom (see below), economic development (measured with GDP/capita), and political freedom (measured with the [[Freedom House]] index) found that high economic freedom increases GDP/capita and a high GDP/capita increases economic freedom. A high GDP/capita also increases political freedom but political freedom did not increase GDP/capita. There was no direct relationship either way between economic freedom and political freedom if keeping GDP/capita constant. {{ref|note1}}It should be emphasized, however, that GDP/capita does little to indicate the amount of poverty in a nation if the [[GINI coefficient]], which measures distribution of income, is not taken into account. Countries with the lowest GINI Coefficients tend to be social democracies that don't operate on [[laissez-faire]] capitalist principles, like [[Holland]].
{{Main|Capital accumulation}}
The accumulation of capital is the process of "making money" or growing an initial sum of money through investment in production. Capitalism is based on the accumulation of capital, whereby [[financial capital]] is invested in order to make a profit and then reinvested into further production in a continuous process of accumulation. In Marxian economic theory, this dynamic is called the [[law of value]]. Capital accumulation forms the basis of capitalism, where economic activity is structured around the accumulation of [[Capital (economics)|capital]], defined as investment in order to realize a financial profit.<ref name="Economist definition">{{cite news | title = Economics A–Z: ''Capital'' | url = http://www.economist.com/economics-a-to-z/c#node-21529870 | website = [[economist.com|The Economist]] | access-date = 25 March 2015 | archive-date = 7 August 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170807235225/http://www.economist.com/economics-a-to-z/c#node-21529870 | url-status = live }}</ref> In this context, "capital" is defined as money or a financial asset invested for the purpose of making more money (whether in the form of profit, rent, interest, royalties, capital gain or some other kind of return).<ref name="MIA definition">{{cite web | title = Encyclopedia of Marxism – Glossary of terms: ''Capital'' | url = http://marxists.org/glossary/terms/c/a.htm#capital | website = [[Marxists Internet Archive]] | access-date = 25 March 2015 | archive-date = 18 June 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150618083941/https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/c/a.htm#capital | url-status = live }}</ref>
 
In mainstream [[economics]], [[accounting]] and [[Marxian economics]], capital accumulation is often equated with [[investment (macroeconomics)|investment]] of profit income or savings, especially in [[real vs. nominal in economics|real]] capital goods. The concentration and centralisation of capital are two of the results of such accumulation. In modern [[macroeconomics]] and [[econometrics]], the phrase "[[capital formation]]" is often used in preference to "accumulation", though the [[United Nations Conference on Trade and Development]] (UNCTAD) refers nowadays to "accumulation". The term "accumulation" is occasionally used in [[national accounts]].
 
== Wage labor ==
Latin American intellectuals like [[Eduardo Galeano]] argue that capitalist practices do more to damage democracy in peripheral countries than encourage it. He points to democratically elected leaders like [[João Goulart]], [[Salvador Allende]], and [[Evita Peron]] who were forced out of office by U.S. and European capitalist interests and replaced with military dictators during the 1960s and 1970s. Other people site the current example of the Bush administration's attempt to destabalize the democratically elected leader of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, after he refused to privatize petroleum, to support the argument that democracy is only allowed in poor countries if it serves international capitalist interests.
{{Main|Wage labour}}
[[File:Worker 9.JPG|thumb|An industrial worker among heavy steel machine parts (Kinex Bearings, [[Bytča]], [[Slovakia]], {{Circa|1995}}–2000)]]
Wage labor refers to the sale of [[Labour economics|labor]] under a formal or informal [[employment contract]] to an [[employer]].{{sfn|Steinfeld|2009|p=3}} These transactions usually occur in a [[labour market|labor market]] where [[wage]]s are market determined.{{sfn|Deakin|Wilkinson|2005}}{{sfn|Marx|1990|p=1005}} In Marxist economics, these owners of the means of production and suppliers of capital are generally called capitalists. The description of the role of the capitalist has shifted, first referring to a useless intermediary between producers, then to an employer of producers, and finally to the owners of the means of production.<ref name="Williams 1983 51" /> [[Labor (economics)|Labor]] includes all physical and mental human resources, including entrepreneurial capacity and management skills, which are required to produce products and services. [[Production (economics)|Production]] is the act of making goods or services by applying [[labor power]].<ref>Ragan, Christopher T.S.; Lipsey, Richard G. ''Microeconomics''. 12th Canadian ed. Toronto, Pearson Education, 2008. {{ISBN|978-0-321-31491-8}}</ref><ref>Robbins, Richard H. ''Global problems and the culture of capitalism''. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2007. {{ISBN|978-0-205-52487-7}}</ref>
 
==Other approachesCriticism ==
{{Main|Criticism of capitalism}}
=== Capitalism in political ideologies ===
[[File:Anti-capitalism color— Restored.png|thumb|The [[Industrial Workers of the World]] poster "[[Pyramid of Capitalist System]]" (1911)]]
''Main article: [[Capitalism and related political ideologies]]''
Criticism of capitalism comes from various political and philosophical approaches, including [[anarchist]], [[socialist]], [[religious]] and [[nationalist]] viewpoints.<ref>{{cite book|last=Tormey|first=Simon|title=Anticapitalism|publisher=One World Publications|year=2004|page=10|isbn=978-1-78074-250-2}}</ref> Of those who oppose it or want to modify it, some believe that capitalism should be removed through [[revolution]] while others believe that it should be changed slowly through [[Reformism|political reforms]].<ref>{{cite book|title=Book: Sociology (Boundless)|chapter=16.1C: The Marxist Critique of Capitalism|url=https://socialsci.libretexts.org/@go/page/8462|date=16 December 2020|publisher=LibreTexts|access-date=21 October 2021|quote=Revolutionary socialists believe that capitalism can only be overcome through revolution. Social democrats believe that structural change can come slowly through political reforms to capitalism.}}</ref><ref name="The Cambridge History of Communism p.">{{cite book | editor-last=Pons | editor-first=Silvio | editor-last2=Smith | editor-first2=Stephen A. | title=The Cambridge History of Communism | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=21 September 2017 | isbn=978-1-316-13702-4 | doi=10.1017/9781316137024 | pages=49–73}}</ref>
 
Critiques of capitalism allege that it is inherently [[Exploitation of labour|exploitative]],<ref name="competition">{{cite web|url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/condition-working-class/ch05.htm|title=Competition – The Condition of the Working Class in England|last=Engels|first=Frederick|access-date=10 March 2008}}</ref><ref name="stanfordexploitation">{{Cite web|date=20 December 2001|title=Exploitation|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127091753/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/exploitation/|archive-date=27 November 2020|access-date=26 December 2020|website=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Mattei|first=Clara E.|date=2022 |title=The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism|pages=17–18|url=https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo181707138.html|___location= |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]|isbn=978-0-226-81839-9}}</ref> [[Marx's theory of alienation|alienating]],<ref>"Alienation." Pp. 10. in ''A Dictionary of Philosophy'' (rev. 2nd ed.). 1984.</ref> [[unstable]],<ref name="onfreetrade">{{cite web|url=http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1888/free-trade/index.htm|title=On the Question of Free Trade|last=Engels|first=Frederick|access-date=11 March 2008}}</ref><ref name="isrcrisis">{{cite web|url=http://www.isreview.org/issues/32/crisis_theory.shtml|title=Marx's Theory of Economic Crisis|last=Easterling|first=Earl|publisher=International Socialist Review|access-date=13 March 2008|archive-date=27 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227033442/https://isreview.org/issues/32/crisis_theory.shtml|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[unsustainable]],<ref name="extinction">{{cite book|last=Dawson|first=Ashley|author-link=Ashley Dawson|title=Extinction: A Radical History|date=2016|publisher=[[OR Books]]|url=http://www.orbooks.com/catalog/extinction-by-ashley-dawson/|page=41|isbn=978-1-944869-01-4|access-date=20 August 2016|archive-date=17 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917203814/http://www.orbooks.com/catalog/extinction-by-ashley-dawson/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Nelson |first=Anitra |date=31 January 2024 |title=Degrowth as a Concept and Practice : Introduction |url=https://commonslibrary.org/degrowth-as-a-concept-and-practice-introduction/ |access-date=24 February 2024 |website=The Commons Social Change Library |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future |journal=PNAS Nexus |date=4 April 2024 |volume=3 |issue=4 |doi=10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106 |url=https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/4/pgae106/7638480?login=false |access-date=4 April 2024|pmc=10986754 |last1=Fletcher |first1=Charles |last2=Ripple |first2=William J. |last3=Newsome |first3=Thomas |last4=Barnard |first4=Phoebe |last5=Beamer |first5=Kamanamaikalani |last6=Behl |first6=Aishwarya |last7=Bowen |first7=Jay |last8=Cooney |first8=Michael |last9=Crist |first9=Eileen |last10=Field |first10=Christopher |last11=Hiser |first11=Krista |last12=Karl |first12=David M. |last13=King |first13=David A. |last14=Mann |first14=Michael E. |last15=McGregor |first15=Davianna P. |last16=Mora |first16=Camilo |last17=Oreskes |first17=Naomi |last18=Wilson |first18=Michael |pages=pgae106 |pmid=38566756 }}</ref> and [[Economic efficiency|economically inefficient]]<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BlEpAQAAMAAJ|title=Beyond the Profits System: Possibilities for a post-capitalist era|last=Shutt|first=Harry|date=March 2010|publisher=Zed Books|isbn=978-1-84813-417-1}}</ref><ref name="isrwaste">{{cite web|url=http://www.isreview.org/issues/53/garbage.shtml|title=The Conquest of Garbage|last=Rogers|first=Heather|website=isreview.org|publisher=International Socialist Review (1997)|access-date=13 March 2008|archive-date=10 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510142346/http://www.isreview.org/issues/53/garbage.shtml|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="part6">{{cite web|url=http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~reak/eco100/100_6.htm|title=Monopoly, Imperfect Competition, and Oligopoly|last=Rea|first=K.J.|access-date=11 March 2008|archive-date=12 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100612201706/http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~reak/eco100/100_6.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>—and that it creates massive [[economic inequality]],<ref name="King 2021">{{cite web|last=King|first=Matthew Wilburn|title=Why the next stage of capitalism is coming|website=BBC Future|date=25 May 2021|url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210525-why-the-next-stage-of-capitalism-is-coming|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Ghodsee|first1=Kristen|last2=Orenstein|first2=Mitchell A.|author-link1=Kristen Ghodsee|date=2021|title=Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|page=192|doi=10.1093/oso/9780197549230.001.0001 |isbn=978-0-19-754924-7|quote=Without an accompanying welfare state in which social programs funded by a progressive income tax redistribute from the rich to the poor, capitalism can be a deeply unfair system where a small, well-connected elite captures a majority of the wealth and power, and not necessarily through meritocratic processes.}}</ref> [[commodity|commodifies]] people,<ref name="openDemocracy">{{cite web | title=Commodification: the essence of our time | website=openDemocracy | url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/commodification-essence-of-our-time/ | access-date=21 October 2021 | author= Colin Leys | date = 2 April 2021}}</ref><ref name="Renegade Inc 2019">{{cite web | title=The Commodification of Everything | website=Renegade Inc | date=25 August 2019 | url=http://renegadeinc.com/the-commodification-of-everything/ | access-date=21 October 2021 | author=Daniel Margrain | archive-date=21 October 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211021224916/https://renegadeinc.com/the-commodification-of-everything/ | url-status=dead }}</ref> [[environmental degradation|degrades the environment]],<ref name="extinction" /><ref>{{cite book|last=Hickel|first=Jason|author-link=Jason Hickel|title=Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World |year=2021|publisher=Windmill Books|pages=39–40|isbn=978-1-78609-121-5|quote=It was only with the rise of capitalism over the past few hundred years, and the breathtaking acceleration of industrialization from the 1950s, that on a planetary scale things began to tip out of balance.}}</ref> is [[undemocratic]],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sullivan |first1=Dylan |last2=Hickel|first2=Jason|author-link2=Jason Hickel|date=2023 |title=Capitalism and extreme poverty: A global analysis of real wages, human height, and mortality since the long 16th century|url= |journal=[[World Development (journal)|World Development]]|volume=161 |issue= |article-number=106026 |doi=10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106026|access-date=|doi-access=free|quote=Capitalism is a highly productive system, but it is also undemocratic: decisions about what to produce and how to use surplus are determined by the few who own and control the means of production. For capital, the purpose of production is not primarily to meet human needs, as we might expect in a more democratic system, but rather to extract and accumulate profit.}}</ref><ref name="Merkel pp. 109–128">{{cite journal | last=Merkel | first=Wolfgang | title=Is capitalism compatible with democracy? | journal=Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | volume=8 | issue=2 | date=26 July 2014 | issn=1865-2646 | doi=10.1007/s12286-014-0199-4 | pages=109–128| hdl=10419/270951 | s2cid=150776013 | hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Reich 2009">{{cite web | last=Reich | first=Robert B. | title=How Capitalism Is Killing Democracy | website=Foreign Policy | date=12 October 2009 | url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/12/how-capitalism-is-killing-democracy/ | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Slobodian|first=Quinn |author-link=Quinn Slobodian|date=2023 |title=Crack-Up Capitalism: Market Radicals and the Dream of a World Without Democracy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tIlrEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT10|___location= |publisher=[[Henry Holt and Company|Metropolitan Books]]|page=10 |isbn=978-1-250-75389-2}}
=== Indices of economic freedom ===
</ref> embeds [[uneven and combined development|uneven]] and [[underdevelopment]] between nation states,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Patnaik |first1=Utsa |title='Neo-Marxian' Theories of Capitalism and Underdevelopment: Towards a Critique |journal=Social Scientist |date=1982 |volume=10 |issue=11 |pages=3–32 |doi=10.2307/3516858 |jstor=3516858 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516858 |issn=0970-0293|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Warke |first1=Thomas W. |title=The Marxian Theory of Underdevelopment: A Review Article |journal=The Journal of Developing Areas |date=1973 |volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=699–710 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4190085#:~:text=it%20is%20Lenin%20who%20laid,modern%20Marxian%20theory%20of%20underdevelopment.&text=and%20tends%20to%20perpetuate%20the,masses%20in%20the%20backward%20country.&text=world%20production%20and%20trade%20and,dualisms%20within%20under%2D%20developed%20economies. |issn=0022-037X}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Martins |first1=Carlos Eduardo |title=The Longue Durée of the Marxist Theory of Dependency and the Twenty-First Century |journal=Latin American Perspectives |date=January 2022 |volume=49 |issue=1 |pages=18–35 |doi=10.1177/0094582X211052029 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0094582X211052029 |language=en |issn=0094-582X|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Peck |first1=Jamie |last2=Varadarajan |first2=Latha |title=Uneven Regional Development |journal=International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology |date=6 March 2017 |pages=1–13 |doi=10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0721 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0721 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |isbn=9780470659632 |language=en|url-access=subscription }}</ref> and leads to an erosion of [[human rights]]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Abeles|first=Marc|date=2006|title=Globalization, Power, and Survival: an Anthropological Perspective|url=https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00125880/file/M_Abeles_2006_AQ.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00125880/file/M_Abeles_2006_AQ.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live|journal=Anthropological Quarterly|volume=79|issue=3|pages=484–486|doi=10.1353/anq.2006.0030|s2cid=144220354}}</ref> because of its [[wikt:incentivize|incentivization]] of [[imperialist]] expansion and [[military–industrial complex|war]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Farid|first=Hilmar|date=2005|title=Indonesia's original sin: mass killings and capitalist expansion, 1965–66|journal=[[Inter-Asia Cultural Studies]]|volume=6|issue=1|pages=3–16|doi=10.1080/1462394042000326879|s2cid=145130614}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Blakeley|first=Ruth|date=2009|title=State Terrorism and Neoliberalism: The North in the South|url=http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415462402/|publisher=[[Routledge]]|pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rft8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 4], [https://books.google.com/books?id=rft8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA20 20–23], [https://books.google.com/books?id=rft8AgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA92&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q&f=false 85–96]|isbn=978-0-415-68617-4}}</ref><ref>''Lenin's Selected Works'', Progress Publishers, 1963, Moscow, Volume 1, pp. 667–766</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bevins |first1=Vincent|author-link=Vincent Bevins |title= [[The Jakarta Method|The Jakarta Method: Washington's Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped Our World]]|date=2020 |publisher= [[PublicAffairs]]|pages=240–241 |isbn= 978-1541742406|quote=Maybe, the countries of the developing world would have been able to come together and insist on changing the rules of global capitalism. Perhaps many of these countries would not be capitalist at all.}}</ref>
There are two [[Index of Economic Freedom|Indices of Economic Freedom]] used in economic research, one published by the [[Heritage Foundation]] (a [[neoliberal]] thinktank) and the [[Wall Street Journal]], another published by the [[Fraser Institute]]. Both attempt to measure of the degree of economic freedom in countries, mostly in regard to lack of governmental intervention and private property rights. They use statistics from independent organizations like the [[United Nations]] to score countries in various categories like the size of government, degree of taxes, security of property rights, degree of free trade and size of market regulations. Many peer-reviewed papers have been published using this material on the relationship between capitalism and for example poverty [http://www.freetheworld.com/papers.html]. The more advanced capitalist countries have much higher average income per person, higher income of the poorest 10%, higher life-expectancy, higher literacy, lower infant mortality, higher access to water sources and less corruption. The share of income in percent going to the poorest 10% is the same for both more and less capitalistic countries. [http://www.freetheworld.com/2004/efw2004ch1.pdf]. Other studies have shown similar results [http://www.cato.org/research/articles/vas-0109.html].
 
Other critics argue that such inequities are not due to the ethic-neutral construct of the economic system commonly known as capitalism, but to the ethics of those who shape and execute the system. For example, some contend that Milton Friedman's (human) ethic of 'maximizing shareholder value' creates a harmful form of capitalism,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Stout |first=Lynn |author-link=Lynn Stout |title=The Shareholder Value Myth |publisher=Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-60509-813-5 |___location=San Francisco, CA |pages=15–23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Gelles |first=David |author-link=David Gelles |title=The Man Who Broke Capitalism |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2022 |isbn=978-1-9821-7644-0 |___location=New York |pages=1–13}}</ref> while a [[Millard Fuller]] or John Bogle (human) ethic of 'enough' creates a sustainable form.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fuller |first=Millard |author-link=Millard Fuller|title=The Theology of the Hammer |publisher=Smyth & Helwys Publishing |year=1994 |isbn=1-880837-92-7 |___location=Macon, GA |pages=31–39}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Bogle |first=John |title=Enough |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-470-52423-7 |___location=Hoboken, New Jersey |pages=229–248}}</ref> Equitable ethics and unified ethical decision-making is theorized to create a less damaging form of capitalism.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Knowlton & Hedges |title=Better Capitalism |publisher=Wipf & Stock Publishers |year=2021 |isbn=978-1-7252-8093-9 |___location=Eugene, OR |pages=34–37, 235–242}}</ref> [[Jason Hickel]] and Dylan Sullivan contend that inequality has always and will continue to exist under capitalism because capital accumulation requires access to cheap labor, and lots of it, as without it the system would collapse.<ref name="Monthly Review">{{Cite web |last1=Hickel |first1=Jason |last2=Sullivan|first2=Dylan|date=2023-07-01 |title=Capitalism, Global Poverty, and the Case for Democratic Socialism |url=https://monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/capitalism-global-poverty-and-the-case-for-democratic-socialism/ |access-date=2025-07-22 |website=[[Monthly Review]] |language=en-US|quote=Capital accumulation requires cheap labor, however, and these concessions would have brought capitalism in the core to its knees were it not for the fact that capitalists were able to obtain cheap labor instead in the periphery, through colonial and neocolonial forms of appropriation, which continue to this day.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Hickel|first=Jason|author-link=Jason Hickel|title=Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World |year=2021|publisher=Windmill Books|page=47|isbn=978-1-78609-121-5|quote=But the rise of capitalism also depended on something else. It needed labour. Lots of it, and cheap. [[Enclosure]] solved this problem too. With subsistence economies destroyed and commons fenced off, people had no choice but to sell their labour for wages - not to earn a bit of extra income, as under the previous regime, nor to satisfy the demands of a lord, as under serfdom, but simply in order to survive. They became, in a word, [[proletarians]].}}</ref>
Attempts to decide the importance of the subcomponents of the indices have often yielded contradictory results. However, strong property rights may be particularly important. The economist [[Hernando de Soto (economist)|Hernando de Soto]] has argued that weak property rights, especially for the poor, play a major role in poverty and underdevelopment in developing countries [http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/03/desoto.htm]
[http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/viewMedia.php/prmTemplateID/8/prmID/100]. Many developing countries are now trying to strengthen and simplify their property rights system after the successful application of his ideas in Peru [http://www.ild.org.pe/eng/facts.htm].
 
[[Inheritance]] has been argued to not be a fundamental part of capitalism,<ref name="x107">{{cite journal | last=Haslett | first=D. W. | title=Is Inheritance Justified? | journal=Philosophy & Public Affairs | publisher=Wiley | volume=15 | issue=2 | year=1986 | issn=0048-3915 | jstor=2265382 | pages=122–155 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265382 | access-date=17 August 2024}}</ref> instead part of [[nepotism]].<ref name="e543">{{cite journal | last=Pérez-González | first=Francisco | title=Inherited Control and Firm Performance | journal=American Economic Review | volume=96 | issue=5 | date=1 November 2006 | issn=0002-8282 | doi=10.1257/aer.96.5.1559 | pages=1559–1588}}</ref>
==Notes==
{{note|note1}} {{Journal reference issue | Author=Ken Farr, Richard A. Lord, and J. Larry Wolfenbarger | Title=[http://catoinstitute.org/pubs/journal/cj18n2/cj18n2-5.pdf Economic Freedom, Political Freedom, and Economic Well-Being: A Causality Analysis] | Journal=Cato Journal | Volume=18 | Issue=2 | Year=1998 | Pages=247-262}}
 
== See also ==
{{cols|colwidth=16em}}
{{wikiquote}}
* ''[[A Failure of Capitalism]]''
* Related topics: [[History of Economic Thought]], [[Emergence of early capitalism]], [[Capitalism.org]], [[Distributed resource allocation]], [[Spirit of capitalism]]
* [[Ancient economic thought]]
* Related words: [[capitalist]], [[crony capitalism]] [[capitalist mode of production]]
* [[Bailout Capitalism]]
* Related ideologies: [[anti-capitalism]], [[classical liberalism]] ([[libertarianism]], [[culture of capitalism]], [[minarchism]], [[anarcho-capitalism]]), [[conservatism]] ([[political conservatism]]), [[mercantilism]], [[protectionism]], [[social democracy]] ([[welfare state]], [[liberalism]], [[political liberalism]], [[liberal democracy]]), [[statism]], [[state capitalism]], [[socialism]], [[fascism]], [[communism]], [[libertarian socialism]], [[Democratic Capitalism|democratic capitalism]], [[Marxism]], [[Objectivist philosophy|Objectivism]]
* [[Christian views on poverty and wealth]]
* disambiguation: [[Capitalism (game)]]
* [[Corporatocracy]]
* [[Economic sociology]]
* [[Global financial crisis in September 2008]]
* [[Humanistic economics]]
* [[Invisible hand]]
* [[Late stage capitalism]]
* ''[[Le Livre noir du capitalisme]]''
* [[Peak capitalism]]
* [[Perestroika]]
* [[Post-Fordism]]
* [[Racial capitalism]]
* [[Rent-seeking]]
* [[Self-made man]]
* [[Surveillance capitalism]]
{{colend}}
 
==External linksReferences ==
{{reflist}}
 
== Bibliography ==
* [http://www.adamsmith.org/ Adam Smith Institute] The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market policies.
{{refbegin|30em}}
* [http://reality.gn.apc.org/econ/hayek.htm Information and Economics: A Critique of Hayek]
* {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w_6PqBp64y0C&pg=PA2|title=Capitalism, Ethics and the Paradoxon of Self-Exploitation|last=Bacher|first=Christian|publisher=GRIN Verlag|year=2007|isbn=978-3-638-63658-2|___location=Munich|page=2|access-date=27 June 2015|archive-date=1 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151101095357/https://books.google.com/books?id=w_6PqBp64y0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA2|url-status=live}}
* [http://capitalism.org/ Capitalism.org: The Capitalism Site ]
* {{cite book|last=Boldizzoni|first=Francesco|author-link=Francesco Boldizzoni|title=Foretelling the End of Capitalism: Intellectual Misadventures since Karl Marx|publisher=Harvard University Press|___location=Cambridge, MA|year=2020|isbn=978-0674919327}}
* [http://www.celebratecapitalism.org/bernsteindeclaration/ The Bernstein Declaration] “On the Principles and Possibilities of Capitalism” (from the “Celebrate Capitalism” organization)
* {{cite journal|last= Carsel|first= Wilfred|year= 1940|title= The Slaveholders' Indictment of Northern Wage Slavery|journal= [[Journal of Southern History]]|volume= 6|issue= 4|pages= 504–520|jstor= 2192167|doi= 10.2307/2192167}}
* [http://capitalism.net/ Capitalism.net: A treatise on economics, by George Reisman ]
* {{cite book|title=The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution|last1=Deakin|first1=Simon|author-link1=Simon Deakin|last2=Wilkinson|first2=Frank|author-link2=Frank Wilkinson|publisher=Oxford University Press|___location=Oxford, UK|year=2005|isbn=978-0198152811}}
* [http://austrianforum.com/ The Austrian Forum] - Discussion of Austrian and other economic schools
* {{cite book|title=Business Ethics|url=https://archive.org/details/businessethics00dege|url-access=registration|last=De George|first=Richard T.|publisher=Macmillan|year=1986|isbn=978-0-02-328010-8|___location=New York|page=[https://archive.org/details/businessethics00dege/page/104 104]}}
* [http://libcom.org/library/value-price-and-profit-karl-marx Value, Price and Profit] - Karl Marx on the basic features of capitalism.
* {{cite book|title= Britain's Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya|last= Elkins|first= Caroline|publisher= [[Jonathan Cape]]|year= 2005|isbn= 978-0-224-07363-9|___location= London|author-link= Caroline Elkins}}
* [http://globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=324 In Defense of the Free Market]
* {{cite book|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=ECdb7EjiBnEC|title= Cannibals All! or, Slaves Without Masters|last= Fitzhugh|first= George|publisher= A. Morris|year= 1857|isbn= 978-1-4290-1643-8|___location= Richmond,&nbsp;VA|author-link= George Fitzhugh|access-date= 27 June 2015|archive-date= 18 October 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151018025643/https://books.google.com/books?id=ECdb7EjiBnEC|url-status= live}}
* [http://www.sozialoekonomie.info/Info_Foreign_Languages/info_foreign_languages.htm Social economy: A Market Economy without Capitalism]
* {{cite book|last=Fulcher|first=James|title=Capitalism: A Very Short Introduction|publisher=Oxford University Press|___location=Oxford|year=2004|isbn=978-0192802187|url=https://archive.org/details/capitalismverysh00fulc_0}}
* [http://www.blackmask.com/books18c/prspircap.htm Protestantism and the Rise of Capitalism, by Max Weber]
* {{cite book|title= Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology|last= Graeber|first= David|publisher= Prickly Paradigm Press|year= 2004|isbn= 978-0-9728196-4-0|title-link= Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology}}
* [http://www.mises.org/ The Mises Institute, adherents of the Austrian school]
* {{cite book|title= Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion and Desire|last= Graeber|first= David|publisher= AK Press|year= 2007|isbn= 978-1-904859-66-6}}
* [http://www.freetheworld.com/ The Fraser Institute Index of Economic Freedom]
* {{cite journal|last2= Benoit|first2= Cecilia|year= 2007|title= From Wage Slaves to Wage Workers: Cultural Opportunity Structures and the Evolution of the Wage Demands of the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor, 1880–1900|journal= [[Social Forces]]|volume= 85|issue= 3|pages= 1393–411|doi=10.1353/sof.2007.0037|jstor= 4494978|last1= Hallgrimsdottir|first1= Helga Kristin|s2cid= 154551793}}
* [http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/ The Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom]
* {{cite book|url= https://www.academia.edu/4199690|title= Globalization and Economy, Vol. 1: Global Markets and Capitalism|last2= Gills|first2= Barry|publisher= SAGE Publications|year= 2007|___location= London|last1= James|first1= Paul|author-link= Paul James (academic)|access-date= 17 May 2014|archive-date= 23 September 2020|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063538/https://www.academia.edu/4199690/Globalization_and_Economy_Vol_1_Global_Markets_and_Capitalism_2007_|url-status= live}}
* [http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/capitalism_economy.htm Understanding Capitalism Part I: Capital and Society]
* Krahn, Harvey J., and Graham S. Lowe (1993). ''Work, Industry, and Canadian Society''. 2nd ed. Scarborough, Ont.: Nelson Canada. xii, 430 p. {{ISBN|0-17-603540-0}}
* [http://www.polyarchy.org/essays/english/capitalism.html "Capitalism/Anticapitalism" - On the origin and features of capitalism]
* {{cite book|title= The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology|last2=Urry|first2= John|publisher= Penguin Books|year= 2000|isbn= 978-0-14-051380-6|edition= 4th|___location= London|pages= 36–40|chapter=Capitalism|last1= Lash|first1=Scott|author-link1=Scott Lash|author-link2=John Urry (sociologist)|editor1-first= Nicholas|editor1-last=Abercrombie|editor2-first=Stephen|editor2-last=Hill|editor3-first= Bryan S|editor3-last=Turner|editor3-link=Bryan S. Turner}}
* [http://www.greekshares.com/capitalism.asp Capitalism Basics]
* {{cite book|url= http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/|title= Wage Labour and Capital|last= Marx|first= Karl|year= 1847|author-link= Karl Marx|access-date= 25 March 2015|archive-date= 6 September 2019|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190906075046/https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/|url-status= live}}
* [http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~rcgfrfi/ww/castro/1992-csw.htm ''Capitalism is a Society of Wolves'' by Fidel Castro]
* {{cite book|title= Capital, Volume I|last= Marx|first= Karl|publisher= Penguin Classics|year= 1990|isbn= 978-0-14-044568-8|___location= London|orig-year= 1867|title-link= Capital, Volume I}}
* [http://salsa.babson.edu/Media/FWright.htm Cartoon by Fred Wright critical of capitalism]
* {{cite journal|date= August 2011|title= The Current Crisis and the Essence of Capitalism|url= http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/The-current-crisis-and-the-essence-of-capitalism.php|journal= The Montreal Review|issn= 0707-9656|last1= McCraw|first1= Thomas K.|author-link= Thomas K. McCraw|access-date= 14 August 2011|archive-date= 8 September 2011|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110908122337/http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/The-current-crisis-and-the-essence-of-capitalism.php|url-status= live}}
* [http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/w/x/wxk116/antic/ ''Anti-Capitalism: Modern Theory and Historical Origins'']
* {{cite journal|last= Nelson|first= John O.|year= 1995|title= That a Worker's Labour Cannot Be a Commodity|journal= [[Philosophy (journal)|Philosophy]]|volume= 70|issue= 272|pages= 157–165|doi=10.1017/s0031819100065359|jstor= 3751199|s2cid= 171054136}}
* [http://www.econ.boun.edu.tr/staff/adaman/research/adaman-devine.PDF A Reconsideration of the Theory of Entrepreneurship: a participatory approach - Critique of capitalism]
* {{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_o9p3/page/1|title=Profit Theory and Capitalism|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |year=1983|isbn=978-0-8122-7863-7|___location=Philadelphia|page=[https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_o9p3/page/1 1]|author=Obrinsky, Mark}}
* [http://economics.about.com/od/howtheuseconomyworks/a/mixed_economy.htm "A Mixed Economy: The Role of the Market" from U.S. Department of State] Article from the [[U.S. Department of State]] says the U.S. is a [[mixed economy]]
* {{cite book|title= The Kaiser's Holocaust: Germany's Forgotten Genocide|last2= Erichsen|first2= Casper W.|publisher= [[Faber and Faber]]|year= 2010|isbn= 978-0-571-23141-6|___location= London|last1= Olusoga|first1= David}}
* [http://www.phys.uu.nl/~droop/sheepfoot/what-is-capitalism.mp3 What is Capitalism?] an MP3 of a speech giving a Marxist perspective on the structure of capitalism
* {{cite book|title= The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class|last= Roediger|first= David|publisher= [[Verso Books|Verso]]|year= 2007a|isbn= 978-1-84467-145-8|edition= revised and expanded|___location= London & New York|author-link= David Roediger|orig-year= 1991}}
* [http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,16849-1823177,00.html Alan Greenspan Speech] [[Alan Greenspan]] defends "free market capitalism" in speech to the [[NIAF]] (2005)
* {{cite journal|last= Roediger|first= David|year= 2007b|title= An Outmoded Approach to Labour and Slavery|journal= [[Labour/Le Travail]]|volume= 60|pages= 245–250|jstor= 25149808|author-link= David Roediger}}
* {{cite conference|last=Steinfeld|first=Robert J.|title=Coercion/Consent in Labor|series=Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS) Working Paper No. 66|conference=Theorising Key Migration Debates|at=St Anne's College, Oxford University|publisher=University of Oxford|___location=Oxford, UK|year=2009|url=http://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/Publications/working_papers/WP_2009/WP0966%20Steinfeld.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140301173031/http://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/Publications/working_papers/WP_2009/WP0966%20Steinfeld.pdf|archive-date=1 March 2014|access-date=3 July 2025}}
* {{cite book|title=Europe and the People Without History|last=Wolf|first=Eric R.|publisher=University of California Press|year=1982|isbn=978-0-520-04459-3|___location=Berkeley|author-link=Eric Wolf|title-link=Europe and the People Without History}}
* {{cite book|last=Wood|first=Ellen Meiksins|author-link=Ellen Meiksins Wood|title=The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View|publisher=Verso|___location=London|year=2002|isbn=978-1859843925|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FZPyKjVguVoC}}
* {{cite book|title= Peasant Revolution in Ethiopia: The Tigray People's Liberation Front, 1975–1991|last= Young|first= John|publisher= Cambridge University Press|year= 1997|isbn= 978-0-521-02606-2|___location= Cambridge}}
{{refend}}
 
== Further reading ==
==Extra Reading==
{{refbegin|30em}}
*[[Fernand Braudel|Braudel, Fernand]]. ''Civilization and Capitalism : 15th - 18th Century'' 3 vols.
* [[Gar Alperovitz|Alperovitz, Gar]] (2011). ''America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, and Our Democracy, 2nd Edition.'' Democracy Collaborative Press. {{ISBN|0-9847857-0-1}}.
* [[Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.|Chandler, Alfred D., Jr.]] ''The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business''. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977.
* {{cite book|last1=Altvater |first1=Elmar |last2=Crist|first2=Eileen|last3=Haraway|first3=Donna|author3-link=Donna Haraway|last4=Hartley|first4=Daniel|last5=Parenti|first5=Christian|last6=McBrien|first6=Justin|last7=Moore|first7=Jason|title=Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism|date=2016|publisher=PM Press|isbn=978-1-62963-148-6}}
* [[John Kenneth Galbraith| Galbraith, John Kenneth]]. ''The New Industrial State'', 4th ed., 1985.
* Ascher, Ivan. ''Portfolio Society: On the Capitalist Mode of Prediction.'' Zone Books, 2016. {{ISBN|978-1935408741}}
* [[David Harvey|Harvey, David]]. "The Political-Economic Transformation of Late Twentieth Century Capitalism." In Harvey, David. ''The Condition of Postmodernity''. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1990. ISBN 0631162941
* [[RobertEdward LE. HeilbronerBaptist| HeilbronerBaptist, RobertEdward LE.]] ''The NatureHalf Has Never Been Told: Slavery and Logicthe Making of American Capitalism.'' New York, 1985[[Basic Books]], 2014. {{ISBN|0-465-00296-X}}.
* {{cite book | first = Richard | last = Barbrook | year = 2006 | title = The Class of the New | edition = paperback | publisher = OpenMute | ___location = London | isbn = 978-0-9550664-7-4 | url = http://www.theclassofthenew.net | access-date = 11 June 2019 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180801045453/http://www.theclassofthenew.net/ | archive-date = 1 August 2018 | url-status = dead }}
* [[David S. Landes| Landes, David S.]] ''The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present''. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
* {{cite book|last1= Block |first1= Fred |author1-link= Fred L. Block |last2= Somers |first2= Margaret R. |year= 2014|title= The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique|___location= Cambridge, MA |publisher= Harvard University Press|isbn= 978-0-674-05071-6}}
* [[Karl Marx| Marx, Karl]]. ''Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production'', 3 vol., 1886&#8211;1909; first published in German as ''Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Oekonomie'', 1867&#8211;1894.
* [[Fernand Braudel|Braudel, Fernand]]. ''Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century'', 3 volumes.
* [[Jerry Z. Muller| Muller, Jerry Z.]], "The Mind and the Market - Capitalism in Modern European Thought". New York: Alfred A. Knopf (Random House), 2002
* Callinicos, Alex. "Wage Labour and State Capitalism – A reply to Peter Binns and Mike Haynes", ''International Socialism'', 2nd series, 12, Spring 1979.
* [[Ayn Rand| Rand, Ayn]]. ''Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal'' ISBN 0451147952
* {{cite book |last1=Case |first1=Anne |last2=Deaton |first2=Angus |author-link1=Anne Case |author-link2=Angus Deaton |date=2020 |title=Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism |url=https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691190785/deaths-of-despair-and-the-future-of-capitalism |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |isbn=978-0-691-19078-5 |access-date=6 March 2020 |archive-date=7 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307062358/https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691190785/deaths-of-despair-and-the-future-of-capitalism |url-status=live }}
* [[W.W. Rostow| Rostow, W. W.]] ''The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
* Farl, Erich. "The Genealogy of State Capitalism". In: ''International'' London, vol. 2, no. 1, 1973.
* [[Murray Rothbard| Rothbard, Murray]]. ''Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles'', (2 volumes.) [[1962]].
* {{cite book |last=Fisher|first=Mark |author-link=Mark Fisher|date=2009 |title=[[Capitalist Realism|Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?]]|___location= |publisher= [[John Hunt Publishing]]|isbn=978-1-84694-317-1}}
* [[Adam Smith| Smith, Adam]]. ''An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations'', 1776.
* Gough, Ian. ''[http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=558 State Expenditure in Advanced Capitalism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207145856/http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=558 |date=7 February 2012 }}'' New Left Review.
* [[Jürgen Habermas|Habermas, J.]] [1973] ''[[Legitimation Crisis]]'' (eng. translation by T. McCarthy). Boston, Beacon. [https://books.google.com/books?id=3WFy6vsyLNEC From Google books] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151120102451/https://books.google.com/books?id=3WFy6vsyLNEC |date=20 November 2015 }}; [https://web.archive.org/web/20090714123532/http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/undergraduate/introsoc/legitcri.html excerpt].
* {{cite book | last = Harvey | first = David | author-link = David Harvey | title = Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism | publisher= Oxford University Press| year = 2014 | isbn = 978-0-19-936026-0}}
* [[Louis Hyman|Hyman, Louis]] and [[Edward E. Baptist]] (2014). ''American Capitalism: A Reader.'' Simon & Schuster. {{ISBN|978-1-4767-8431-1}}.
* {{cite book |last1=Ingham |first1=Geoffrey |title=Capitalism: With a New Postscript on the Financial Crisis and Its Aftermath |date=2008 |publisher=[[Polity Press]] |___location=Cambridge |isbn=9780745636481}}
* {{cite book | year= 2007 | last1= James | first1= Paul | author-link= Paul James (academic) | last2= Patomäki | first2= Heikki | title= Globalization and Economy, Vol. 2: Global Finance and the New Global Economy | url= https://www.academia.edu/4211923 | publisher= SAGE Publications | ___location= London | access-date= 28 January 2018 | archive-date= 23 September 2020 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063542/https://www.academia.edu/4211923/Globalization_and_Economy_Vol_2_Global_Finance_and_the_New_Global_Economy_2007_ | url-status= live }}
* {{cite book | year= 2007 | last1= James | first1= Paul | author-link= Paul James (academic) | last2= Palen | first2= Ronen | title= Globalization and Economy, Vol. 3: Global Economic Regimes and Institutions | url= https://www.academia.edu/4251331 | publisher= Sage Publications | ___location= London | access-date= 28 January 2018 | archive-date= 23 September 2020 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063542/https://www.academia.edu/4251331/Globalization_and_Economy_Vol_3_Global_Economic_Regimes_and_Institutions_2007_ | url-status= live }}
* {{cite book | year= 2007 | last1= James | first1= Paul | author-link= Paul James (academic) | last2= O'Brien | first2= Robert | title= Globalization and Economy, Vol. 4: Globalizing Labour | url= https://www.academia.edu/4303461 | publisher= Sage Publications | ___location= London | access-date= 28 January 2018 | archive-date= 23 September 2020 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063543/https://www.academia.edu/4303461/Globalization_and_Economy_Vol_4_Globalizing_Labour_2007_ | url-status= live }}
* Jameson, Fredric (1991). ''[[Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]''.
* {{cite book |last1=Kocka |first1=Jürgen |author-link=Jürgen Kocka |title=Capitalism: A Short History |date=2016 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |___location=Princeton |isbn=978-0691165226}}
* Kotler, Philip (2015). ''Confronting Capitalism: Real Solutions for a Troubled Economic System.'' AMACOM. {{ISBN|978-0814436455}}
* Mandel, Ernest (1999). ''Late Capitalism.'' {{ISBN|978-1859842027}}
* {{cite book | last = Mander | first = Jerry | author-link = Jerry Mander | title = The Capitalism Papers: Fatal Flaws of an Obsolete System | publisher= Counterpoint | year = 2012 | isbn = 978-1-61902-158-7}}
* Marcel van der Linden, ''Western Marxism and the Soviet Union''. New York, Brill Publishers, 2007.
* Mayfield, Anthony. "Economics", in his ''On the Brink: Resource Depletion, Debt Collapse, and Super-technology'' ([Vancouver, B.C., Canada]: On the Brink Publishing, 2013), pp.&nbsp;50–104.
* {{cite book|last1= Musacchio |first1= Aldo |last2= Lazzarini |first2= Sergio G. |year= 2014|title= Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond|___location= Cambridge, MA |publisher= Harvard University Press|isbn= 978-0-674-72968-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Newitz|first=Annalee|title=Pretend We're Dead: Capitalist Monsters in American Pop Culture|date=2006|publisher=Duke University Press|___location=Durham, NC|isbn=978-0-8223-3745-4|url=https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/1045/Pretend-We-re-DeadCapitalist-Monsters-in-American|access-date=26 October 2016|archive-date=26 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161026234517/https://www.dukeupress.edu/Pretend-Were-Dead/|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nitzan|first1=Jonathan |author-link1=Jonathan Nitzan|last2=Bichler|first2=Shimshon |author-link2=Shimshon Bichler|date=2009 |title=[[Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder]]|url= |___location= |publisher=[[Routledge]]|page= |isbn=978-0-415-49680-3}}
* Panitch, Leo, and Sam Gindin (2012). ''The Making of Global Capitalism: the Political Economy of American Empire''. London, Verso. {{ISBN|978-1-84467-742-9}}.
* {{cite book|last= Piketty |first= Thomas |author-link= Thomas Piketty |year= 2014|title= Capital in the Twenty-First Century|___location= Cambridge, MA |publisher= [[Belknap Press]]|isbn= 978-0-674-43000-6 |title-link= Capital in the Twenty-First Century}}
* {{cite book|last= Piketty |first= Thomas |year= 2020|title=Capital and Ideology|___location= Cambridge, MA |publisher= Belknap Press|isbn=978-0-674-98082-2|title-link= Capital and Ideology }}
* [[Karl Polanyi|Polanyi, Karl]] (2001). ''[[The Great Transformation (book)|The Great Transformation]]: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time.'' [[Beacon Press]]; 2nd ed. {{ISBN|0-8070-5643-X}}
* {{cite book|title= Capitalism: A complete understanding of the nature and value of human economic life|last=Reisman|first= George|year= 1998|isbn= 978-0-915463-73-2
|publisher =Jameson Books}}
* [[Jay W. Richards|Richards, Jay W.]] (2009). ''Money, Greed, and God: Why Capitalism is the Solution and Not the Problem''. New York: [[HarperOne]]. {{ISBN|978-0-06-137561-3}}
* [[Paul Craig Roberts|Roberts, Paul Craig]] (2013). ''The Failure of Laissez-faire Capitalism: towards a New Economics for a Full World''. Atlanta, Ga.: Clarity Press. {{ISBN|978-0-9860362-5-5}}
* [[William I. Robinson|Robinson, William I.]] ''Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity.'' Cambridge University Press, 2014. {{ISBN|1-107-69111-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Schram |first=Sanford F. |title=The Return of Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy |year=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-return-of-ordinary-capitalism-9780190253011?cc=us& |isbn=978-0-19-025302-8 |access-date=12 February 2017 |archive-date=23 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923063546/https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-return-of-ordinary-capitalism-9780190253011?cc=us&lang=en& |url-status=live }}
* Hoevet, Ocean. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120603131601/http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/pal2.pdf "Capital as a Social Relation"] (New Palgrave article)
* [[Werner Sombart|Sombart, Werner]] (1916) ''Der moderne Kapitalismus. Historisch-systematische Darstellung des gesamteuropäischen Wirtschaftslebens von seinen Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart.'' Final edn. 1916, repr. 1969, paperback edn. (3 vols. in 6): 1987 Munich: dtv. (Also in Spanish; no English translation yet.)
* {{cite book |last1=Sonenscher |first1=Michael |title=Capitalism: The Story behind the Word |date=2022 |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |___location=Princeton |isbn=9780691237206}}
* [[Ben Tarnoff|Tarnoff, Ben]], "Better, Faster, Stronger" (review of [[John Tinnell]], ''The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weisner, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things'', University of Chicago Press, 347 pp.; and [[Malcolm Harris]], ''Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World'', Little, Brown, 708 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXX, no. 14 (21 September 2023), pp.&nbsp;38–40. "[Palo Alto is] a place where the [United States'] contradictions are sharpened to their finest points, above all the defining and enduring contradictions between [[democracy|democratic principle]] and antidemocratic practice. There is nothing as American as celebrating [[social equality|equality]] while subverting it. Or as [[California]]n." (p.&nbsp;40.)
* {{cite book | last = Wallerstein| first = Immanuel | author-link = Immanuel Wallerstein | title = Historical Capitalism | publisher= [[Verso Books]] | year = 1983 | isbn = 978-0-86091-761-8}}
* {{cite book | last = Wolff | first = Richard D. | author-link = Richard D. Wolff | title = Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism | publisher= [[Haymarket Books]] | year = 2012 | isbn = 978-1-60846-247-6}}
* {{cite book | last = Wolf | first = Martin | author-link = Martin Wolf | title = The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism | publisher = [[Random House]] | year = 2023 | isbn = 9780241303429}}
{{refend}}
 
== External links ==
[[Category:Social philosophy]]
[[Category:{{Commons category|Capitalism]]}}
{{EB1922 Poster}}
[[Category:Human societies]]
{{Wikiquote}}
[[Category:Economic ideologies]]
{{Wiktionary}}
* {{In Our Time|Capitalism|p00545kv|Capitalism}}
* [https://www.britannica.com/topic/capitalism Capitalism] at ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' Online.
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/features/capitalism-and-its-discontents.html Selected Titles on Capitalism and Its Discontents] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180123134446/http://www.hup.harvard.edu/features/capitalism-and-its-discontents.html |date=23 January 2018 }}. [[Harvard University Press]].
{{library resources box|by=no|onlinebooks=no|others=no|about=yes|label=Capitalism}}
 
{{Aspects of capitalism}}
[[ar:رأسمالية]]
{{navboxes
[[bg:Капитализъм]]
|list=
[[ca:Capitalisme]]
{{Political ideologies}}
[[cs:Kapitalismus]]
{{Political philosophy}}
[[da:Kapitalisme]]
{{Marxist & Communist phraseology}}
[[de:Kapitalismus]]
{{Western culture}}
[[et:Kapitalism]]
}}
[[es:Capitalismo]]
 
[[eo:Kapitalismo]]
{{Portal bar|Capitalism|Companies|Law|Liberalism|Politics}}
[[fa:سرمایه‌داری]]
{{authority control}}
[[fr:Capitalisme]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Capitalism}}
[[gl:Capitalismo]]
[[Category:Capitalism| ]]
[[id:Kapitalisme]]
[[itCategory:CapitalismoBanking]]
[[Category:Business]]
[[he:קפיטליזם]]
[[Category:Economic ideologies]]
[[lt:Kapitalizmas]]
[[Category:Economic liberalism]]
[[hu:Kapitalizmus]]
[[nlCategory:KapitalismeFinance]]
[[Category:Production economics]]
[[ja:資本主義]]
[[noCategory:KapitalismeProfit]]
[[Category:Western culture]]
[[nn:Kapitalisme]]
[[pl:Kapitalizm]]
[[pt:Capitalismo]]
[[ru:Капитализм]]
[[sk:Kapitalizmus]]
[[fi:Kapitalismi]]
[[sv:Kapitalism]]
[[th:ทุนนิยม]]
[[zh:资本主义]]