Talk:Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Books |needs-infobox-cover=yes}}
{{WikiProject Psychology}}
}}
 
==[Untitled]==
I am unsure of how to categorize this page, for the reason that i believe it to be [[heuristic]], yet [[neuroheuristic]] more over, and there really is no category for this. I may have to create one later. I have also left things unfinished, such as footnotes or notation. I don't know how to do that yet, and will learn shortly. Wiki help pages said I can just toss the info on, and someone will come and fix it. As long as pages numbers and where i got it from are noted.
 
[[User:SynergeticMaggot|Zos]] 19:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 
 
not bad but umm, i dont think its appropriate to put this in neuroscience at all (pseudoscience if anything.) Is there a category for cognitive development? evolutionary psychology? new age/occult books? Also wouldn't this fall under the grounds of semiotics? And no, I haven't even read the book.
Line 8 ⟶ 14:
Oh also, theres a bit of a super geeky pun on the front page, "help improve the human biocomputer by expanding it"! (I love it!)
[[User:Universal Logic|Universal Logic]] ([[User talk:Universal Logic|talk]]) 07:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:It's more [[:Category:Philosophy of mind]]. And easier to categorize as a book. Since 'human biocomputer' is really only used by Lilly, it's impossible to properly source as a concept, so I've moved it to the book title. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 22:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)