Linear-fractional programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:22, 28 May 2009

Latest revision as of 11:52, 20 August 2025

(147 intermediate revisions by 59 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Concept in mathematical optimization}}

{{article issues|intromissing=May 2009|unreferenced=May 2009|wikify=May 2009}}

LinearIn [[mathematical optimization]], '''linear-fractional programming''' ('''LFP''') formally is almosta thegeneralization same asof [[Linearlinear programming]] but(LP). instaedWhereas of linearthe objective function we havein a ratio of two linear fuctions,program subjectis toa [[linear equalityfunctional|linear andfunction]], linearthe inequalityobjective constraints.function Informally,in ifa linear-fractional programmingprogram determinesis thea wayratio toof achievetwo thelinear bestfunctions. outcomeA (suchlinear asprogram maximumcan profitbe orregarded lowest cost) inas a givenspecial mathematical model and given some listcase of requirements represented as linear equations, ina linear-fractional programmingprogram modelin we can achievewhich the bestdenominator (highest)is ratiothe outcome/cost.constant i.e.function highest efficiency1.

Formally, a linear-fractional program is defined as the problem of maximizing (or minimizing) a ratio of [[affine function]]s over a [[polyhedron]],

For example, if in the frame of LP we maximize '''profit = income - cost''' and obtain maximal profit of 100 units (=1100$ of income - 1000$ of cost), then using LFP we can obtain only 10$ of profit which requires only 50$ of investment. Thus, in LP we have efficiency 100$/1000$=0.1, at the same time LFP provides efficiency equal to 10$/50$=0.5.

:<math>

\begin{align}

\text{maximize} \quad & \frac{\mathbf{c}^T \mathbf{x} + \alpha}{\mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{x} + \beta} \\

\text{subject to} \quad & A\mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b},

\end{align}

</math>

where <math>\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n</math> represents the vector of variables to be determined, <math>\mathbf{c}, \mathbf{d} \in \mathbb{R}^n</math> and <math>\mathbf{b} \in \mathbb{R}^m</math> are vectors of (known) coefficients, <math>A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}</math> is a (known) matrix of coefficients and <math>\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}</math> are constants. The constraints have to restrict the [[feasible region]] to <math>\{\mathbf{x} | \mathbf{d}^T\mathbf{x} + \beta > 0\}</math>, i.e. the region on which the denominator is positive.<ref name="CC">{{cite journal |last1=Charnes |first1=A. |last2=Cooper |first2=W. W. |author2-link=William W. Cooper |year=1962 |title=Programming with Linear Fractional Functionals |journal=Naval Research Logistics Quarterly |volume=9 |issue=3–4 |pages=181–186 |doi=10.1002/nav.3800090303 |mr=152370}}</ref><ref name="BV">{{cite book |last1=Boyd |first1=Stephen P. |url=https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/bv_cvxbook.pdf |title=Convex Optimization |last2=Vandenberghe |first2=Lieven |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-83378-3 |page=151 |access-date=October 15, 2011}}</ref> Alternatively, the denominator of the objective function has to be strictly negative in the entire feasible region.

==Motivation by comparison to linear programming==

Linear-fractional programming can be used in the same real-wolrd applications as LP, in various fields of study. Most extensively it is used in business and economic situations, especially in the situations of deficit of financial resources. Also LFP can be utilized for wide range of engineering problems. Some industries that use linear programming models including transportation, energy, telecommunications, and manufacturing

Both linear programming and linear-fractional programming represent optimization problems using linear equations and linear inequalities, which for each problem-instance define a [[feasible set]]. Fractional linear programs have a richer set of objective functions. Informally, linear programming computes a policy delivering the best outcome, such as maximum profit or lowest cost. In contrast, a linear-fractional programming is used to achieve the highest ''ratio'' of outcome to cost, the ratio representing the highest efficiency. For example, in the context of LP we maximize the objective function '''profit&nbsp;=&nbsp;income&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;cost''' and might obtain maximum profit of $100 (=&nbsp;$1100&nbsp;of&nbsp;income&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;$1000 of cost). Thus, in LP we have an efficiency of $100/$1000&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.1. Using LFP we might obtain an efficiency of $10/$50&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.2 with a profit of only $10, but only requiring $50 of investment.

may use LPF as well as LP.

==Transformation to a linear program==

Any linear-fractional program can be transformed into a linear program, assuming that the feasible region is non-empty and bounded, using the '''Charnes–Cooper transformation'''.<ref name="CC" /> The main idea is to introduce a new non-negative variable <math>t </math> to the program which will be used to rescale the constants involved in the program (<math>\alpha, \beta, \mathbf{b}</math>). This allows us to require that the denominator of the objective function (<math>\mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{x} + \beta</math>) equals 1. (To understand the transformation, it is instructive to consider the simpler special case with <math>\alpha = \beta = 0</math>.)

Formally, the linear program obtained via the Charnes–Cooper transformation uses the transformed variables <math>\mathbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}^n</math> and <math>t \ge 0 </math>:

{{uncategorized|date=May 2009}}

:<math>

== References ==

\begin{align}

Erik Bajalinov, Linear-Fractional Programming: Theory, Methods, Applications and Software. «Kluwer Academic Publishers», 2003.

\text{maximize} \quad & \mathbf{c}^T \mathbf{y} + \alpha t \\

\text{subject to} \quad & A\mathbf{y} \leq \mathbf{b} t \\

& \mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{y} + \beta t = 1 \\

& t \geq 0.

\end{align}

</math>

A solution <math>\mathbf{x}</math> to the original linear-fractional program can be translated to a solution of the transformed linear program via the equalities

:<math>\mathbf{y} = \frac{1}{\mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{x} + \beta} \cdot \mathbf{x}\quad \text{and} \quad t = \frac{1}{\mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{x} + \beta}.</math>

Conversely, a solution for <math>\mathbf{y}</math> and <math>t </math> of the transformed linear program can be translated to a solution of the original linear-fractional program via

== Software ==

* [http://www.inf.unideb.hu/~bajalinov/WinGulf/wingulf.html WinGULF] - interactive linear and linear-fractional programming solver with a lot of special options (pivoting, pricing, branching variables etc.).

:<math>\mathbf{x}=\frac{1}{t}\mathbf{y}.</math>

==Duality==

Let the [[duality (optimization)|dual variables]] associated with the constraints <math>A\mathbf{y} - \mathbf{b} t \leq \mathbf{0}</math> and <math>\mathbf{d}^T \mathbf{y} + \beta t - 1 = 0</math> be denoted by <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\lambda</math>, respectively. Then the dual of the LFP above is <ref>{{cite journal|last1=Schaible |first1=Siegfried |title=Parameter-free Convex Equivalent and Dual Programs|journal=Zeitschrift für Operations Research |volume=18 |year=1974 |issue=5 |pages=187–196|doi=10.1007/BF02026600|mr=351464|s2cid=28885670 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Fractional programming&nbsp;I: Duality |last1=Schaible |first1=Siegfried | journal=Management Science |volume=22 |issue=8 |pages=858–867 |year=1976|jstor=2630017|mr=421679|doi=10.1287/mnsc.22.8.858}}</ref>

:<math>

\begin{align}

\text{minimize} \quad & \lambda \\

\text{subject to} \quad & A^T\mathbf{u} + \lambda \mathbf{d} = \mathbf{c} \\

& -\mathbf{b}^T \mathbf{u} + \lambda \beta \geq \alpha \\

& \mathbf{u} \in \mathbb{R}_+^m, \lambda \in \mathbb{R},

\end{align}

</math>

which is an LP and which coincides with the dual of the equivalent linear program resulting from the Charnes–Cooper transformation.

==Properties and algorithms==

The objective function in a linear-fractional problem is both quasiconcave and [[quasiconvex function|quasiconvex]] (hence quasilinear) with a [[monotonicity|monotone]] property, [[pseudoconvex function|pseudoconvexity]], which is a stronger property than [[quasiconvex function|quasiconvexity]]. A linear-fractional objective function is both pseudoconvex and pseudoconcave, hence [[pseudolinear function|pseudolinear]]. Since an LFP can be transformed to an LP, it can be solved using any LP solution method, such as the [[simplex algorithm]] (of [[George B. Dantzig]]),<ref>

Chapter five: {{cite book| last=Craven|first=B. D.|title=Fractional programming|series=Sigma Series in Applied Mathematics|volume=4|publisher=Heldermann Verlag|___location=Berlin|year=1988|pages=145|isbn=978-3-88538-404-5 |mr=949209}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal| last1=Kruk | first1=Serge|last2=Wolkowicz|first2=Henry|title=Pseudolinear programming |journal=[[SIAM Review]]|volume=41 |year=1999 |issue=4 |pages=795–805 |mr=1723002|jstor=2653207|doi=10.1137/S0036144598335259| bibcode=1999SIAMR..41..795K|citeseerx=10.1.1.53.7355}}

</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Mathis|first1=Frank H.|last2=Mathis|first2=Lenora Jane|title=A nonlinear programming algorithm for hospital management |journal=[[SIAM Review]]|volume=37 |year=1995 |issue=2 |pages=230–234|mr=1343214|jstor=2132826|doi=10.1137/1037046|s2cid=120626738 }}

</ref><ref>{{harvtxt|Murty|1983|loc=Chapter&nbsp;3.20 (pp.&nbsp;160–164) and pp.&nbsp;168 and&nbsp;179}}</ref> the [[criss-cross algorithm]],<ref>{{cite journal|title=The finite criss-cross method for hyperbolic programming|journal=European Journal of Operational Research|volume=114|issue=1|

pages=198–214|year=1999 <!-- issn=0377-2217 -->|doi=10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00049-6|first1=Tibor|last1=Illés|first2=Ákos|last2=Szirmai|first3=Tamás|last3=Terlaky|zbl=0953.90055|id=[http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~terlaky/files/dut-twi-96-103.ps.gz Postscript preprint]|citeseerx=10.1.1.36.7090}}</ref> or [[interior-point method]]s.

==Notes==

<references />

==Sources==

*{{cite book|last=Murty|first=Katta&nbsp;G.|author-link=Katta G. Murty|chapter=3.10 Fractional programming (pp. 160–164)|title=Linear programming|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Inc.|___location=New York|year=1983|pages=xix+482|isbn=978-0-471-09725-9|mr=720547}}

==Further reading==

Erik*{{cite book|first=E. B.|last=Bajalinov, |title=Linear-Fractional Programming: Theory, Methods, Applications and Software.| «publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers», |___location=Boston|year=2003.}}

*{{cite book|last=Barros|first=Ana Isabel|title=Discrete and fractional programming techniques for ___location models|series=Combinatorial Optimization|volume=3|publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers|___location=Dordrecht|year=1998|pages=xviii+178|isbn=978-0-7923-5002-6|mr=1626973}}

*{{cite book|last=Martos|first=Béla|title=Nonlinear programming: Theory and methods|publisher=North-Holland Publishing Co.|___location=Amsterdam-Oxford|year=1975|pages=279|isbn=978-0-7204-2817-9|mr=496692}}

*{{cite book|last=Schaible|first=S.|chapter=Fractional programming|pages=495–608|mr=1377091|title=Handbook of global optimization|editor=Reiner Horst and Panos M. Pardalos|

series=Nonconvex optimization and its applications|volume=2|publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers|___location=Dordrecht|year=1995|isbn=978-0-7923-3120-9}}

*{{cite book | last=Stancu-Minasian | first=I. M.| title=Fractional programming: Theory, methods and applications | others=Translated by Victor Giurgiutiu from the 1992 Romanian | series=Mathematics and its applications|volume=409|publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers Group | ___location=Dordrecht | year=1997 | pages=viii+418 | isbn=978-0-7923-4580-0 | mr=1472981 }}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Linear-Fractional Programming}}

[[Category:Optimization algorithms and methods]]

[[Category:Linear programming]]

[[Category:Generalized convexity]]