Talk:Extended Enterprise Modeling Language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:18, 30 July 2009

Latest revision as of 21:24, 20 November 2024

(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=

{{WPBS|

{{WikiProject Computing|class=Start|importance=|software=yes|software-importance=}}

{{WikiProject Business & Economics|class=b|importance=low}}

{{SysWikiProject ratingSystems |class=start|importance=mid |field=Enterprise modelling }}

}}

== The EEML Subarticles merged here ==

HiWith Ithis just[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=258198259&oldid=249761240 mergededit] the following three subarticles were merged here, and redirected each to their own chapter here:

* [[Goal Modelling]]

* [[Goal modeling in EEML]]

Line 42:

:::::::Thanks for the details, I could only use some. Now I think you do could correct mistakes. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 12:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

== EEML is (un)related to UEML ==

The Unified Enterprise Modelling Language (UEML) redirects to EEML but, to my knowledge, they are unrelated developments. See [[http://www.uemlwiki.org uemlwiki.org]] (which is maintained by me) for the background of UEML.

At least the redirections from UEML to EEML should be removed. I also offer to contribute a separate page on UEML based on the (free-for-all) materials on the Wiki. If I do not hear otherwise, I will proceed to do so in a few days.

[[User:Alopdahl|Alopdahl]] ([[User talk:Alopdahl|talk]]) 15:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

:Hi Andreas. Writing a separate article about the [[Unified Enterprise Modelling Language]] seems like a good idea. I will be glad to give you a hand, when ever needed. Now I didn't make the initial redirect, see ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unified_Enterprise_Modelling_Language&action=history here]'', but I did write the current history section, which claims UEML is an further development of EEML, which I read in François Vernadat (2002). Now you claim UEML and EEML are unrelated. But even in [http://www.uemlwiki.org/ uemlwiki.org] the page on the background states:

::''It developed and demonstrated a common abstract syntax and exchange format, which incorporated three important industrial European enterprise modelling languages: EEML (EXTERNAL 2000), GRAI (Doumeingts, Vallespir, Zanettin & Chen 1992) and IEM (Jochem & Mertins 1999). ''

:So it seems to me they are not that unrelated. Both seems a product of EU funding, and if I am not mistaken the developement of UEML started after EEML was developed. Some people seemed to be om both development teams, but this is just a guess. On the other end your the expert here, and I am just an outsider (My effort here is part of my attempt to get a PhD started in this field).

:One remark which could be helpfull. You are planning to use the material of the uemlwiki.org, which you claim is free-for-all. At the wiki itself I couldn't find any disclaimer, which explains the terms of use. In Wikipedia this is often a source of trouble. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 21:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks for your comments and apologies for overstating my point. I was trying to argue that UEML is quite different from EEML today, as it tries to solve another type of problem. But "unrelated" is too strong, I agree.

::I will proceed to draft a UEML page in a few days. I will re-write to avoid terms of use problems. It would be great if you can look over and improve afterwards. [[User:Alopdahl|Alopdahl]] ([[User talk:Alopdahl|talk]]) 06:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

:::Ok thanks for explaining. I would advice you to start a draft version in your own userspace/sandbox first. Things work a little different around here, and an article like [http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informasjonssystem Informasjonssystem] wouldn't hold here, because of notability issues, see [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. In short: Wikipedia articles here need to be build on reliable third party sources, if they are around. Now I all seen they are present, and there are several other people involved in its development of which I recently wrote an article. So eventually there won't be a problem. If you create that draft, I can explain some more. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 07:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

== Copy-paste registration ==

* In this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=249754328&oldid=231457013 edit] the [[Goal modeling in EEML ]] article was merged here.

* In this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=249756069&oldid=249754328 edit] the [[Goal-oriented Requirements Language]] article was merged here.

* In this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=249758379&oldid=249756956 edit] the [[Goal Modelling]] article was merged here.

-- [[User:Mdd|Mdd]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 20:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Extended Enterprise Modeling Language]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=704925290 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070316081650/http://www.idi.ntnu.no:80/emner/tdt4250/pensum/EEML2005-autumn2005.doc to http://www.idi.ntnu.no/emner/tdt4250/pensum/EEML2005-autumn2005.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier;">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 13:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)