Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Off The Chart Radio: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mysekurity (talk | contribs) →[[Off The Chart Radio]]: respectfully deleted |
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (12x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 4:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was respectfully '''deleted'''. -[[User:Mysekurity|<
===[[Off The Chart Radio]]===
Line 10:
*Sorry, I was going to do more to this page when i had the chance. I'm new to Wikipedia so i'm sorry if i've done something wrong.
*:No problem [[User:Ian13|Ian]]<small>[[User_talk:Ian13|13]]</small> 18:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
* '''Speedy''' as spam. [[User:Ian13|Ian]]<small>[[User_talk:Ian13|13]]</small> 18:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
*Ok. i've updated the page to contain more than just a link to the website.
: '''Comment''' The major problem with your article is that you fail to say why [[Off the Chart Radio]] is notable in any way. You launch into a month by month history of a year old station but fail to tell us why we should care at all about it, the reader doesn't have any reason to keep reading unless they are pretty big fans of the station already (and they'd have to be big fans to want to deal with this kind of detail). Provided that the station is notable (verified through third parties, news articles, people outside of its broadcast area talking about it), you would need to clean up this article. I'd suggest a discussion of the format, the broadcast area, it's audience, then some of the shows. If you want to talk about the history, unless a lot of interesting things are happening (which it doesn't seem) it can be summed up in a few paragraphs (when it started and why, and then what it's up to today). [[User:DeathThoreau|DeathThoreau]] 17:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
<
*...green eggs. '''Delete'''. — <b><i>[[User:Freakofnurture/|<span style="color: #006000;" title="User:Freakofnurture">F<small>REAK OF</small> N<small>UR<sub>x</sub>TURE</small></span>]]</i> <small>(<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Freakofnurture&action=edit§ion=new <span style="color: #006000;" title="User talk:Freakofnurture">TALK</span>]</span>)</small></b> 16:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - seems non-notable to me. --'''[[User:Cyde|Cyde Weys]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:Cyde|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Cyde|contribs]]</span></sup> 20:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
|