Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:52, 31 October 2009

Latest revision as of 14:54, 2 April 2022

(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 10:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

===[[Cisco Network Analysis Module]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}

:{{la|Cisco Network Analysis Module}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 OctoberNovember 258#{{anchorencode:Cisco Network Analysis Module}}|View log]])</noinclude>

:({{findsources|Cisco Network Analysis Module}})

Article about a networking product which has no notability, only sources are from Cisco's own website, also the majority of content reads like an advert. [[User:QueenCake|QueenCake]] ([[User talk:QueenCake|talk]]) 18:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Line 15 ⟶ 21:

<hr style="width:50%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<font colorspan style= "color:orange;">'''JForget''' </fontspan>]] 22:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</span> 13:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete'''. Not only is this advertising, but it makes no attempt to show historical or technical importance, and this software with "6000 customers" is only going to be of interest to a small number of people. Yes, there are [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|many other software articles]] that ought to be deleted as well. In the fullness of time, we may get around to them. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

* Either the admins are not reading the article, or I am doing a real poor job in explaining the concept. First, this is *not* a software - it is a hardware based offering and has added on a virtual platform recently. Second, this is not a product that you would use in your home - it is used by large enterprises and service providers globally. Finally, your reference to "6000 customers" is in poor spirit - if you have not heard about it, is exactly why I put in the article. This product has been around since 2000 and is the only integrated service management offering by Cisco. Can you please tell me which exact statement in the article is advertising? I took great pains to make it factual. I am happy to change it further. You have a valid point on historical references - and I will dig up historical information and post that here.

However, this auto-reply of "Delete" without even understanding the article reflects very poorly on the admins. Isn't that the point of Wikipedia of "Educating someone" ? [[User:Ash1932|Ash1932]] ([[User talk:Ash1932|talk]]) 21:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

<hr style="width:50%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:NuclearWarfare|<b style="color:navy;">NW</b>]] ''([[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk</span>]])'' 00:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

'''i'm sure this deserves a sentence somewhere''' but we don't need an article on it. get rid of it. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])

*'''Delete''' I cant find independent significant coverage of this [[User:Power.corrupts|Power.corrupts]] ([[User talk:Power.corrupts|talk]]) 10:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>