Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flex programming language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
[[Flex_programming_language]]: Closing debate. Result was "delete".
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. Two editors have suggested that the article be redirected to [[Flex lexical analyzer]], but this seems unreasonable as [[Flex lexical analyzer]] is not (from what I gather from the article) a programming language. So why redirect a programming language of any kind to it? Just because of a similiarity in the name? That seems sub-optimal. Consequently, I am interpreting the redirect votes as "delete". If you have valid reasons why I should reconsider, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. [[User:Extreme Unction|<fontb facestyle="font-family:arial, helvetica"; color=":#ff0000;"><b><i>Ξxtreme</i></b></font> <fontspan colorstyle="color:#006688"; face="font-family:arial, helvetica;">Unction</fontspan>]]|<fontspan facestyle="font-family:arial, helvetica"; font-size="0:x-small;"><sub>[[User talk:Extreme Unction|yakkity yak]]</sub></fontspan> 13:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 
===[[Flex_programming_language]]===
Line 11:
*'''Delete'''. Not notable, at least yet. They have over 2000 downloads but I found no mention of actual external use. Written by two people, used just in small company (alsoft isn't well known brand), no revolutionary features claimed. The article and Czech variant [http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flex] were created by one of language authors. Do not redirect to the parser as it is misleading. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 23:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' --[[User:Egg|Egg]] <small>[[User talk:Egg|&#9993;]]</small> 01:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Flex lexical analyzer]]. It is very rare for a proprietary computer language to have any real influence on the world at large; Visual Basic, Applescript, and similar OS or API-specific scripting languages are probably the only significant exceptions. (Consider [[RebolREBOL]] -- it seems to be targeted at the same audience as Perl or Python, but it has no visibility to speak of, at least partly because it's proprietary.) [[User:Haikupoet|Haikupoet]] 05:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' – This isn't well known language, but it has some interesting ideas and I have read some articles about them. I don't use it (it doesn't work on my platform and I prefer mainstream languages), but I don't agree that it is completely insignificant. --[[User:Petr.adamek|Petr.adamek]] 10:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' Not notable. [[User:Tom.k|Tom.k]] 10:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' per Haikupoet. [[User:OwenX|Owen&times;]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>&#9742;</big>]] 21:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>