Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
d |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 10:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
===[[Cisco Network Analysis Module]]===
:{{la|Cisco Network Analysis Module}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 8#{{anchorencode:Cisco Network Analysis Module}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 15 ⟶ 21:
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—<
*'''Delete'''. Not only is this advertising, but it makes no attempt to show historical or technical importance, and this software with "6000 customers" is only going to be of interest to a small number of people. Yes, there are [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|many other software articles]] that ought to be deleted as well. In the fullness of time, we may get around to them. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 23 ⟶ 29:
However, this auto-reply of "Delete" without even understanding the article reflects very poorly on the admins. Isn't that the point of Wikipedia of "Educating someone" ? [[User:Ash1932|Ash1932]] ([[User talk:Ash1932|talk]]) 21:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:NuclearWarfare|<
'''i'm sure this deserves a sentence somewhere''' but we don't need an article on it. get rid of it. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])
*'''Delete''' I cant find independent significant coverage of this [[User:Power.corrupts|Power.corrupts]] ([[User talk:Power.corrupts|talk]]) 10:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|