Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROCK Linux: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Black Kite (talk | contribs) Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. Unsourced, claims no notability, even the source found by Sckessey is just a passing mention - and even that source says it's a "lesser known distro".
===[[ROCK Linux]]===
Line 20:
*'''unexceptional, go away.''' Delete this stuff. We do not need articles on every single distro kit, even if it gets references, why is the subject important? [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 00:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||