Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Phi Lambda: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m typo |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''NO CONSENSUS'''. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 00:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
===[[Sigma Phi Lambda]]===
Non-notable fraternity. Article self-nominates, in part, by the line "Famous Alumnae: None". [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 14:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 12:
*'''weak keep''' it's a national sorority with 17 chapters. That seems notable enough. (Also note that I did some cleanup work on the page since it was nominated - it's more leible now). -- [[User:Bachrach44|Bachrach44]] 15:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': [[Special:Contributions/128.227.8.179|128.227.8.179]] removed the AFD notice in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sigma_Phi_Lambda&diff=33850444&oldid=33849985 this edit]. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 16:08, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per Bachrach44 [[User:Jcuk|Jcuk]] 16:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. I'm not that familiar with these sorts of organisations, but surely just because they have no famous alumnae doesn't make it non-notable. The rest of the article seems OK to keep now.[[User:Evil Eye|Evil Eye]] 16:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' as with the others before. [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid"> Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:Just zis Guy, you know?|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Just zis Guy, you know?|[C]]]</sub> [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] ''[[User:Just zis Guy, you know?/AfD|AfD?]]'' 22:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' per above + no valid reason given for deletion. Picture has to go obviously. -- [[User:JJay|JJay]] 02:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Very Weak Keep''' per Bachrach44, '''Delete''' the picture. -- [[User:Thesquire|Thesquire]] <small>([[User_talk:Thesquire|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Thesquire|contribs]])</small> 04:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': [[WP:BAI]] lists this as a bad article to create. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 03:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||