Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/DG: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:30, 12 January 2006

Latest revision as of 23:15, 4 February 2023

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 17:

# '''Would you be terrific, in your post?''' [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 02:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

#: Absolutely. There is no doubt about it, to be certain. [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 02:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

# '''Blah blah blither blather ArbCom?''' [[User:Andrevan|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:mediumblue;">Andre</fontspan></b>]] ([[User_talk:Andrevan|<fontspan colorstyle="color:royalblue;">talk</fontspan>]]) 02:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

#: I beg to differ on that issue, Andre. Respectfully. [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 02:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

# '''What is your stance on the affirmative action taxation of gay marriage in the crack-addicted aborted baby military occupying Eurasian prostitution embezzlement organized crime church tort schools, and how will this affect your ability to arbitrate as effectively and ineffectively as you can and cannot?''' -[[User:Silence|Silence]] 06:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Line 150:

I am inviting all candidates, including Improv, to expand on this theme on their questions pages. Do you agree that this is a cause for concern as we move into 2006? How do you see the role of the arbitration committee in interpreting the interpretation of Wikipedia policy in the light of this concern? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 20:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

::No, I wasn't aware that this was one of Wikipedia's most major problems, and I don't believe it is too much of a cause for concern. Why do you care? [[User:DG|D.]] &#91;&#91;User_talk:DG&#124;G.]] 01:32, 22 January 2006 (UTC)