Talk:Cross-application scripting: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
New?
 
Added the Stub-class banner.
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub}}
 
== New? ==
 
Not really http://aviv.raffon.net/2007/07/10/CrossApplicationScriptingWhoseFaultIsIt.aspx [[Special:Contributions/190.255.85.191|190.255.85.191]] ([[User talk:190.255.85.191|talk]]) 01:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 
== RE: New? ==
 
 
Yes, there was some reference to "Cross Application Scripting" in the past. But basically they refer to different things. The link actually shows a CARF, and not a CAS.
With our research we focused on modern graphics frameworks (GTK, QT) and how it's to change the interface, injecting XML. A new way, a new vulnerability. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.59.137.189|82.59.137.189]] ([[User talk:82.59.137.189|talk]]) 18:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
: nevertheless it is direct evolution from format string vulnerabilities. The technique is als very similar to clickjacking. [[User:Richiez|Richiez]] ([[User talk:Richiez|talk]]) 22:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 
== Notability ==
 
I definitely vote for notable. [[User:Richiez|Richiez]] ([[User talk:Richiez|talk]]) 12:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)