Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
QuentinvBot (talk | contribs)
m 3 requests archived
 
Line 1:
{{ {{TNTN|steward request}}
|shortcut = SRCU
|archive = /{{#time:Y-m}}
|text = {{dynamite|title=:Steward requests/Checkuser/Introduction}}
|uselang = {{int:lang}} }}
|backlog = none<!--none/some/backlogged-->
}}
__TOC__
== Requests ==
=== de.wiktionary: Suspicion of sockpuppetry (Udo T. & WitzigeWitwe) ===
<!-- bof -->
{{status|done}}
<!--New requests go AT THE BOTTOM of the page, not here!-->
I suspect that the accounts "Udo T." and "WitzigeWitwe" are operated by the same person, which constitutes a violation of the '''sockpuppetry policy'''.
 
My suspicion is based on the following observations:
=== Caroline Rossini@pt.wikipedia ===
# '''Ghost-like behavior of "WitzigeWitwe":''' The account "WitzigeWitwe" only appears and becomes active when the account "Udo T." is involved in a contentious discussion. "WitzigeWitwe" does not engage in article editing but exclusively participates in discussions, seemingly to support "Udo T.'s" position. She has not made any productive contributions; her contributions are exclusively on talk pages.
{{CU request
# '''Sudden and focused activity:''' The edit [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/WitzigeWitwe history of "WitzigeWitwe"] shows long periods of inactivity, followed by bursts of activity focused solely on ongoing discussions. This is particularly evident in the discussions for [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Diskussion:Halteverbot "Halteverbot"], [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Diskussion:Stoppschild "Stoppschild"], and [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Diskussion:Fahrlehrer "Fahrlehrer"].
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
# '''Coordinated behavior and escalation:''' The discussions on "Stoppschild" and "Halteverbot" show a clear pattern. "Udo T." begins with short, dismissive comments, and shortly after, "WitzigeWitwe" appears with long, well-argued posts that systematically dismantle the opposing viewpoint. This behavior escalated in the "Fahrlehrer" discussion, where both users resorted to personal attacks and borderline harassment, comparing the other user to a "parking warden" and "Sheldon Cooper."
|language code = pt
# '''Suspicious timing and self-incrimination:''' In the "Stoppschild" discussion, "Udo T." preemptively accused "VerkehrRecht" of being a sockpuppet (*"Ich werde das Gefühl nicht los, dass da eine Person mit 2 Benutzerkonten jongliert"*). This tactic is a common strategy to deflect suspicion.
|project shortcut= w
# '''Critical evidence from an old discussion:''' On the "Fahrlehrer" discussion page, "WitzigeWitwe" made a claim about a "Fahrspur" discussion that took place in 2024. This is highly suspicious, as the account "WitzigeWitwe" was not active at that time. "Udo T." was, however, vocal in his complaints about this very discussion. The knowledge of this specific old dispute strongly suggests that the two accounts are the same person.
|user name1 = Caroline Rossini
# '''Administrative Intervention:''' An administrator ("Peter") deleted the contribution by "WitzigeWitwe" that contained this revealing, unproven claim. The edit log for this action is visible in the page history of the "Fahrlehrer" discussion, but the content of the edit is hidden from regular users. This official action shows a clear violation of the project's rules. Please use your rights to view the deleted content and confirm this.
|user name2 = Peveratt
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos]], [[:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos]], [[:pt:Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar]] and [[:pt:Wikipédia:Esplanada/geral/Resposta a "Wikipédia esquema novo" (6fev2012)]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Suspeito que Caroline Rossini e Peveratt são mesmas pessoas. Eles editam sempre no mesmo local das discussões dos wikipedistas (citados no "discussion"): páginas em votação, propostas e principalmente às respostas suspeitas aos usuários nas discussões. Ao consultar o histórico das edições, editaram, achei algumas inconsistências, a mais recente é de (22 de fevereiro) e horários semelhantes. Vejam abaixo (em português).<br>'''Translate to English''': I suspect that Caroline Rossini and Peveratt are the same people. They edit in the same place in discussions of Wikipedians (cited in "discussion") pages on the ballot proposals and especially the responses to suspicious users in discussions. When you see the history of the editions, edited, I found some inconsistencies, is the latest (February 22) and a similar time. See below (in Portuguese).
;Peveratt
:14h46min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
;Caroline Rossini
:14h33min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida)
;Peveratt
:14h03min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul)
;Caroline Rossini
:13h24min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuário(a) Discussão:189.111.22.222
:13h20min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuária:Caroline Rossini ? (última alteração)
;Peveratt
:12h53min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul)
:12h47min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
:12h46min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
:12h42min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (nova se(c)ção: Incluir "(desambiguação)" não é vandalismo)
:12h39min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
:12h38min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos
;Caroline Rossini
:06h07min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:189.117.206.208 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Não Empurra Que É Pior}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) (última alteração)
:06h00min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Trem Urbano de Lima (Desfeita a edição 29022001 de 190.232.245.219 s-fontes) (última alteração)
:06h00min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Trem Urbano de Lima (Desfeita a edição 29022019 de 190.232.245.219)
:05h55min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:186.196.176.26 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Escândalo da Administração da Roseana Sarney}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) (última alteração)
:03h33min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 N Usuário(a) Discussão:177.113.166.98 (nova página: {{subst:bv-av|Meredith Bergmann}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) (última alteração)
:03h09min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Usuário(a) Discussão:177.83.67.12 (última alteração)
:02h58min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida)
:02h51min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio (Polyethylen)
:02h50min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio
;Peveratt
:02h49min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 m Cidreira (moveu Cidreira para Cidreira (desambiguação): Existe São Paulo (desambiguação) Nirvana (desambiguação) Nova Iorque (desambiguação) e outras Se é assim esse artigo também pode ser Cidreira (desambiguação) Pois a Cidade de Cidreira...)
;Caroline Rossini
:02h42min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Outros pedidos (Mais uma conta adormecida)
;Peveratt
:02h32min de 22 de fevereiro de 2012 Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul)
Uma curiosidade: a conta Caroline Rossini é a mais antiga e Peveratt foi criada recentemente e ainda se passa por IPs.<br>'''Translate to English''': A curiosity: the account Caroline Rossini is the oldest and Peveratt was created recently and still goes on IPs. [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 19:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
}}
 
''The community's stance:''
{{Confirmed}}:
The community's stance: Local administrators have not taken action, as "Udo T." is a long-standing user with a strong presence in the community. My attempts to complain about "Udo T." have been unsuccessful, leaving the option to contact the Stewards as the only remaining course of action.
*Caroline Rossini
*John Alan Alves da Silva
*Cyphorhinus Uradus
*Jorge Luiz Thais Martins
*O Mestre P-Sião
*Wet12
*Caroline Rossini
*Rubber Ducky
*Tomate Atômico
*Draftholds
*Hum Milhão
*Katzeirms
*São Silvestre
*Cachorro Louco
*Pepita Negra
*WikiLord
*Semiramis Marx
*J.Cajuru
*Gerson Nunes Pereira
*Thulsa Subotai
*Tomate Atômico
*Pé Espalhado
*Ilha de Vera Cruz
*Veloster
 
Thank you for your assistance. {{unsigned|VerkehrRecht|2025-08-21T07:30:33}}
:{{Unrelated}}: Peveratt
--[[User:Shizhao|Shizhao]] ([[User talk:Shizhao|talk]]) 07:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
::Oh great, it was almost the cluster I found some days ago and I had no time to fulfill an investigation. --[[User:Vituzzu|Vituzzu]] ([[User talk:Vituzzu|talk]]) 10:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
:::Vituzzu, fiz essa mesma pergunta [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&diff=prev&oldid=3481606 aqui,] e a discussão foi arquivada. Depois que ocorreu verificação, aconteceu grande efeito: votações de páginas para exclusão tiveram resultados modificados e que alguns desses usuários tiveram estatuto de reversor e auto-reversor removidos. Quando for no dia 1º de março, vou colocar outra verificação pra você.<br>'''Translate to English''': Vituzzu, made ​​this same question here, and the discussion has been archived. After checking what happened, great effect happened: votes for deletion page results had changed and that some of these users had auto-reverser and reverser status' removed. When the March 1, I'll put another check for you. [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
::::CheckUser is not for fishing??????????????????? [[User:Caroline Rossini|Caroline Rossini]] ([[User talk:Caroline Rossini|talk]]) 16:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
:::::Alguém pode bloquear a conta Caroline Rossini e entre outras verificadas no Meta???<br>'''Translate to English''': Someone can lock the account and Caroline Rossini and others checked in Meta? [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 23:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 
;Further observations
=== 胡雪岩之思@zh.wikipedia ===
Since my initial request, my suspicion has been further solidified by additional observations. On August 19, 2025, I made a minor but important [https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vierte_Verordnung_%C3%BCber_Ausnahmen_von_den_Vorschriften_der_Fahrerlaubnis-Verordnung&diff=prev&oldid=258955610 correction] to the German Wikipedia article "Vierte Verordnung über Ausnahmen von den Vorschriften der Fahrerlaubnis-Verordnung," changing the spelling from 'Fahrlehrererlaubnis' to the correct 'Fahrlehrerlaubnis'.
{{CU request
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = 胡雪岩之思
|user name2 = 纯纯夏子
|user name3 = 天外飞仙子
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion =
|reason = Those users continue attempting to remove AfD templates for [[:zh:王宏佳]], [[:zh:张雨乔]] and [[:zh:道晖芝]], which looks like trying to bypass 3RR limits. [[User:Mys_721tx|Mys_721tx]]([[User_talk:Mys_721tx|talk]]) 00:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
}}
:{{confirmed}} '''''<font color="#9966CC">[[User:Fr33kman|fr33k]]</font><font color="navy">[[:m:User talk:Fr33kman|man]]</font>''''' 01:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 
Interestingly, "WitzigeWitwe" had previously and finally agreed with the correct spelling in the Wiktionary discussion, and "Udo T." had also stopped arguing the point. This temporary consensus, however, was short-lived. Just one day later, on August 20, 2025, my correction was [https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vierte_Verordnung_%C3%BCber_Ausnahmen_von_den_Vorschriften_der_Fahrerlaubnis-Verordnung&diff=prev&oldid=259010636 reverted] by "WitzigeWitwe". The edit summary explicitly referred to the 'Fahrlehrererlaubnis' Wiktionary entry that "Udo T." had aggressively created to strengthen his false thesis and, as it appears, to provoke me.
=== Karyne Lira Dias@pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = Karyne Lira Dias
|user name2 = WikiGT
|user name3 = Jancen sergio
|user name4 = Duduzimm
|user name5 = Kascyo
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = After the result of [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3511801#Caroline_Rossini.40pt.wikipedia this check] one more account [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia:Pedidos_a_administradores/Discuss%C3%A3o_de_bloqueio/P%C3%A9_Espalhado&diff=29113838&oldid=29113658 revealed itself], so it's possible that there's more socks out there. The other four raised suspicion due to edit patterns similar to [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3511801#Caroline_Rossini.40pt.wikipedia Caroline Rossini], mainly on Articles for Deletion. --[[User:Viniciusmc|viniciusmc]] ([[User talk:Viniciusmc|talk]]) 21:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
}}
* Related requests:
:*[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-01#Lacerda_Bhahia.40pt.wikipedia Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia]
:*[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-09#Biahh_Peresh.40pt.wikipedia Biahh Peresh@pt.wikipedia]
:*[http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3511801#Caroline_Rossini.40pt.wikipedia Caroline Rossini@pt.wikipedia]<br/>
--[[User:Viniciusmc|viniciusmc]] ([[User talk:Viniciusmc|talk]]) 22:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 
This incident is crucial. It proves that "WitzigeWitwe" was initially used to resolve the conflict and to save face for "Udo T.". However, the action on Wikipedia shows that both accounts are operated by the same person, who then switched back to the aggressive persona of "Udo T.". The fact that the "WitzigeWitwe" account was used for this revert suggests a mix-up of the accounts in the heat of the moment, indicating that the intention was to perform the revert under the identity of "Udo T.". This new evidence directly links their activities and exposes a concerted pattern of behavior to enforce a single, unified viewpoint.
:{{Confirmed}}
[[User:VerkehrRecht|VerkehrRecht]] ([[User talk:VerkehrRecht|talk]]) 02:15, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
:*'''group1''': Kascyo, Thallison Keiton
:*'''group2''': Duduzimm, KIBCRU
:*'''group3''': WikiGT, Mareshenrique
:*'''group4''': PolyDisneyeNick,Jancen sergio
 
==== Comment of Udo T. ====
:{{Possible}}: group1, group2, group3, group4, Karyne Lira Dias, [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3511801#Caroline_Rossini.40pt.wikipedia after the result of check]
I'm fully in favour of the stewards carrying out this check and already looking forward to [[User:VerkehrRecht|VerkehrRecht]]'s apology.
--[[User:Shizhao|Shizhao]] ([[User talk:Shizhao|talk]]) 07:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
::Hy Shizhao! At ptwiki, we're having a little bit of trouble trying to guess what that "Possible" means and, 'cause of it, we'd like to have some expert opinion. Those users you listed in paired groups should be considered as related to Karyne (and, through her, to the enormous sock farm you guys just uncovered) or as innocent bystanders to be proven guilty by a thorough behavioral analysys? Thx for the help. [[User:jbribeiro1|José Luiz]] <sup> [[User talk:Jbribeiro1|talk]]</sup> 01:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
:::From a technical point, these users is {{Possible}}. These users use lot of dynamic IP, eachWith groupkind toregards useand a differentgrin IPon range,my UAsface... is:o) a small part of the same--[[User:ShizhaoUdo T.|ShizhaoUdo T.]] ([[User talk:ShizhaoUdo T.|talk]]) 0114:5640, 2924 FebruaryAugust 20122025 (UTC)
::::UAs? [[User:jbribeiro1|José Luiz]] <sup> [[User talk:Jbribeiro1|talk]]</sup> 02:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
:::::I beg your pardon, Shizhao, but perhaps I did not make myself clear before: What do you mean by ''"UAs is a small part of the same"''? Thanks again. [[User:jbribeiro1|José Luiz]] <sup> [[User talk:Jbribeiro1|talk]]</sup> 23:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
* I didn't check Udo T. as I don't think there was sufficient evidence. I did check WitzigeWitwe who is {{confirmed}} as the same account owner as {{u|Lian Ju Chi}}. Insufficient technical evidence to determine the "master" in this case. – [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|talk]]) 15:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::UA => UserAgent--[[User:Shizhao|Shizhao]] ([[User talk:Shizhao|talk]]) 01:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::Oh dear, now he'll probably never give up...;o) --[[User:Udo T.|Udo T.]] ([[User talk:Udo T.|talk]]) 15:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
 
=== Guru2001Fumikas Sagisavas@ptzh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = done
|language code = ptzh
|project shortcut = w
|user name1 = Guru2001Fumikas Sagisavas
|user name2 = Al LemosCaradhrasAiguo
|discussion = [[:w:zh:Special:PermaLink/88870975|w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Fumikas_Sagisavas]]
|user name3 = Emerson Almeida
|reason = F and C was blocked as sockpuppet based on evidence found on enwiki, F currently requesting block appeal in zhwiki, rejecting C is their sockpuppet. Requesting CU to check the relationship between both accounts, thanks. [[User:Aqurs1|<span style="color:#87CEEB;"><small>aqurs</small></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Aqurs1|🍧]] 15:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
|user name4 = Luizpuodzius
|user name5 = Peacekeeper
|user name6 = Tigre do oeste
|user name7 = Dominator
|user name8 = Dornicke
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[:w:pt:Discussão:A Privataria Tucana]], [[:w:pt:Discussão:Governo Lula]], [[:w:pt:Discussão:Partido da Imprensa Golpista]] and others<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Guru2001 is currently eternal blocked for consistent edit war, original research, POV and personal attack. Other accounts edit similarly, in similar articles, they are used to force his point of view. Guru2001 is dodging his eternal punishment. Note that some accounts very little editing, some were one year without issue and suddenly return policy on items of interest to the user, to support the likely another account of himself. [[Special:Contributions/189.106.34.16|189.106.34.16]] 20:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
}}
::I want to do an addendum: all these accounts above are disruptive. Attempt to subvert the system of Wikipedia, try to put data with non-reliable sources, they try to discredit reliable sources as not to be. Prevent other editors move in the articles, watch for anyone tamper with their version of the article. They fight with everyone, never come into consensus, always cause problems. [[Special:Contributions/186.205.20.49|186.205.20.49]] 00:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
:Note neither of English Wikipedia's blocks of two users are based on CheckUser evidence. Both are only blocked as suspected sockpuppets. [[User:GZWDer|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer|talk]]) 16:51, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{declined}} Please log in to request checkuser. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
:::I request this request be done on behalf of the Ip. Tough I think some accounts are not related with each other, (Dornicke and Luizpuodzius seem to be different people) there is certainly enough evidence to do the check. (and there is no way to know without a check if one of them is related to Guru). [[User:Chicocvenancio|Chico]] ([[User talk:Chicocvenancio|talk]]) 00:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Ryreson81@zh.wikipedia ===
:Guru2001 & Peacekeeper are {{stale}}
:Al Lemos, Emerson Almeida, Dornicke, and Luizpuodzius are {{unrelated}}
:Dominator {{possible}} match to Genaron
:Tigre do oeste {{possible}} match to Jazzista, Artjodo, and Jebelmir
:Waiting for second review given my new experience. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
:: Looks okay from my side. &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="background: #f2f2f2; border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; font-family: Courier New;">[&nbsp;[[User:Wikitanvir|Tanvir]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User talk:Wikitanvir|Talk]]&nbsp;]</span> 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
::: Please confirm all the possible interconnections between these users. [[Special:Contributions/189.106.124.34|189.106.124.34]] 12:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
::::Just for the record: the IP who requested this check has been blocked dozens of times of editing in the Portuguese Wikipedia for vandalism, uncivil behavior, etc. He became such a a problem that a proposal of insight block for this IP has been made [http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Pedidos_a_administradores/Discuss%C3%A3o_de_bloqueio/189.106.111.9], with large support from the community, including administrators. He also has made a death threat against me [http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Esplanada/geral/Amea%C3%A7a_de_morte_(18nov2011)]. [[User:Dornicke|Dornicke]] ([[User talk:Dornicke|talk]]) 06:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|project shortcut = w
|user name1 = RightpeopleRyreson81
|user name2 = SpecialgoodMapleLeaf2025
|discussion = [[:w:zh:Special:PermaLink/88883086|w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/JustinHK1002]]
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|reason = Ryreson81 was suspected as a sockpuppet in zhwiki, as a local SPI clerk I believe the evidence are not strong enough to proof their relationship (FYI suspected main account are JustinHK1002 & Louischen88888). However, during the SPI process, Ryreson81 admited they have abused sockpuppets, for those involved in vandalism they chose to not disclosed them, instead claiming 'Omg20070524, Terrance2025 and MapleLeaf2025' are their socks. O and T don't seems to have unstaled data. Requesting check between Ryreson81 and MapleLeaf2025, and check sleepers if possible, thanks. [[User:Aqurs1|<span style="color:#87CEEB;"><small>aqurs</small></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Aqurs1|🍧]] 15:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
|discussion = [[:zh:Wikipedia:Puppet|Puppets]],[[:zh:User talk:Rightpeople]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles. [[:zh:Wikipedia:Puppet|Puppets]] may be created to evade three-revert rule ([[:zh:WP:3RR|3RR]]). --[[User:Gakmo|Gakmo]] ([[User talk:Gakmo|talk]]) 01:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
}}
=== Junaidhussainbjp@hi.wikipedia ===
:{{unrelated}} '''''<font color="#9966CC">[[User:Fr33kman|fr33k]]</font><font color="navy">[[:m:User talk:Fr33kman|man]]</font>''''' 01:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Kuailong@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = not done<!--don't change this line-->
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = Kuailong
|user name2 = Youssarin
|user name3 =
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[zh:wp:AIV]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Youssarin added many blog information to the article to destroy the article, and Kuailong did the same thing, Youssarin is suspected to be puppet of Kuailong, so they should be checked. thank you :) --[[User:Pangyanice|Pangyanice]] ([[User talk:Pangyanice|talk]]) 11:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
:I believe it is current practice that requests have to be made by registered users, please log in. <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 11:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::Kuailong is a long term contributor who happened to do the same thing in a edit/reverting war on one article. No other overlap besides edits on that particular article. [[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] ([[User talk:Bencmq|talk]]) 16:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::: That is not only a edit/reverting war,but also a serious Vandalism, because what they added was huge blog information, just like advertisements. --[[User:Pangyanice|Pangyanice]] ([[User talk:Pangyanice|talk]]) 21:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
::::I do not see any reason to CU anybody in this case. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]] ([[User talk:Ruslik0|talk]]) 17:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = not done
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = Jancen sergio
|user name2 = Lacerda Bhahia
|user name3 = Chucknurres
|user name4 = 31Julho1985
|user name5 = Joaquim C. Sousa
|user name6 = CAPGIGANTE
|user name7 = Jonathan Baltazar
|user name8 = Jolielegal
|user name9 = Vini Santilou
|user name10 = WikiGT
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado|Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Solicito verificação completa de todas as contas citadas por entender que há forte suspeita que sejam mesmos usuários, como ocorreu em recentes revelações das duas checagens de fevereiro de 2012. Todos os usuários editam sobre assuntos sobre a Cidade de Curitiba (desde bairros até clubes de futebol). Antes, eu achava que Lacerda Bhahia era responsável pela criação das contas, mas sugiu de quem começou foi Jancen sergio. Sugiro também verificação de grupo de usuários bloqueados ou não, se tem alguma ligação:<br>'''Translate to English''': Request full verification of all accounts listed on the understanding that there is strong suspicion that they are users, as occurred in recent revelations of the two checks in February 2012. All users edit on matters about the City of Curitiba (from neighborhoods to football clubs). Before, I thought Lacerda Bhahia was responsible for creating the accounts, but who came Jancen sergio was started. I also suggest checking user group blocked or not, if you have any link:
# {{srcu|Caroline Rossini|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|WikiLord||pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Pepita Negra|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Veloster|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Maranhense|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Xaxa2009|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Davidescorpiao|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Gustavo neto|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Bruno-ban|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|R.ANDRETTA|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Umberto Bottura|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Luizpsouza|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Luizpuodzius|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|LuizM|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Cruzados Sulistas|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Katzeirms|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Márcia da Silva Katzeir|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Lacerdão da Bahia|pt|w}}
# {{srcu|Mar França|pt|w}}
[[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
Inclua outro ('''Translate to English''': Add another): {{srcu|Camtasia|pt|w}}. [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 19:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
::@stew, please read the advice I left on section below...” [[user:Teles#top|'''T'''<sub>e</sub><small>le</small><sup>s</sup>]] ([[User talk:Teles|<font color="#EC2300">'''T'''</font>]] <sub>[[Special:Emailuser/Teles|@]] [[Special:Log/Teles|L]] [[Special:Contributions/Teles|C]] [[sulutil:Teles|S]]</sub>) 20:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:::{{not done}} per Teles. -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 20:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== 186.205.20.49@pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = not done
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = 186.205.20.49
|user name2 = Emerson Almeida
|user name3 = Luizpuodzius
|user name4 = Dornicke
|user name5 = Peacekeeper
|user name6 = Tigre do oeste
|user name7 = Al Lemos
|user name8 = Dominator
|user name9 = DanteCan
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado|Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Solicito verificação completa de todas as contas citadas, [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABruno_Leonard&diff=3515045&oldid=3461457 após suspeita postada pelo IP na minha discussão] por entender que há forte suspeita que este IP tenha envolvimento nesses usuários, que por vez tenha alguma ligação deles no Rio de Janeiro.<br>'''Translate to English''': Request full verification of all accounts listed after suspected posted by IP in my discussion to understand that there is strong suspicion that this IP has involvement in these users, which in turn has a link of them in Rio de Janeiro. [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
::I really recommend to the steward that read this request to do not accept it. Not enough reason to check was shown here IMO. It is just fishing.” [[user:Teles#top|'''T'''<sub>e</sub><small>le</small><sup>s</sup>]] ([[User talk:Teles|<font color="#EC2300">'''Talk'''</font>]]) [[Deceased_editors#Pietro_Roveri|<font color="black">███</font>]] 16:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
:::As Teles said above, you did not gave any valid reason to check these accounts. Plus I doubt that somebody here is ready to establish a link between the accounts of contributors and the IP they used. Please remember that {{fishing}}. Regards, -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 19:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== 189.106.124.34@pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = not done
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = 189.106.124.34
|user name2 = 186.205.20.49
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[user talk:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] and [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado|Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Pé Espalhado]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Solicito verificação completa de IPs citados, [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABruno_Leonard&diff=3515045&oldid=3461457 após suspeita postada pelo IP na minha discussão] por entender que há forte suspeita que este IP tenha envolvimento nesses usuários, que por vez tenha alguma ligação de usuários do Rio de Janeiro:<br>'''Translate to English''': Request full verification IPs cited after suspected posted by IP in my discussion to understand that there is strong suspicion that this IP has involvement in these users, which in turn has a link users of Rio de Janeiro:
# 189.106.124.34 [http://www.utrace.de/?query=189.106.124.34 Utrace] e/and [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=189.106.124.34&blocks=true&lang=en Tool Server]
# 186.205.20.49 [http://www.utrace.de/?query=186.205.20.49 Utrace] e/and [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=186.205.20.49&blocks=true&lang=en Tool Server]
[[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] ([[User talk:Bruno Leonard|talk]]) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
:I would recommend the same as Teles in another request (above), and i'd also recommend to ignore all requests from this user from now on. Just my two cents. [[User:Castelobranco|<font color="#778899" face="Verdana" size="2">CasteloBranco</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Castelobranco|<font color="#00008b">msg</font>]]</sup> 18:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
::{{not done}} per above. -- [[User:Quentinv57|Quentinv57]] [[User talk:Quentinv57|<small><sup>(talk)</sup></small>]] 19:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Thongkaka ===
{{status|done}}
* {{srcu|Thongkaka28|mw}}
* {{srcu|Thongkaka50|mw}}
Trijnstel has recently CU'ed some accounts on [[:mw:|MediaWiki.org]], and locked Thongkaka28, Thongkaka27, Thongkaka26 and Thongkaka45. Today, Thongkaka50 spammed on that project. Please consider checking that account and blocking its underlying IP (perhaps globally). Thanks, [[User:Mathonius|Mathonius]] ([[User talk:Mathonius|talk]]) 10:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
{{done}} blocked in MWW. --[[User:Jyothis|Jyothis]] ([[User talk:Jyothis|talk]]) 12:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
*As an addition to this, I globally locked all known Thongkaka* accounts + some other confirmed socks. I can't globally block an IP address or range. Please keep reporting any new Thongkaka accounts. Thanks in advance for your effort! Kind regards, [[User:Trijnstel|Trijnstel]] ([[User talk:Trijnstel|talk]]) 12:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 
*A new account: {{srcu|Thongkaka52|mw}}. [[User:Mathonius|Mathonius]] ([[User talk:Mathonius|talk]]) 18:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
:{{done}}--[[User:Vituzzu|Vituzzu]] ([[User talk:Vituzzu|talk]]) 18:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
=== Quintinense@commons and pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|language code = pthi
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = RcandreJunaidhussainbjp
|user name2 = Higor DouglasJunaidHussainbjp2
|user name3 = DiegoAlvesBarbosaJunaidhussainbjp33
|user name4 = Marcus Luccas
|user name5 = Raimundo57br
|user name6 = Deletista
|user name7 = Carnatiba
|user name8 = Sambalagoas
|user name9 = Keptauto
|user name10 = Carnaval9
 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion =
|discussion = [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Rcandre]] [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/DiegoAlvesBarbosa]] [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Raimundo57br]] [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Higor Douglas/1]]
|reason = I have observed cross-wiki spamming occurring across several accounts. Request for checkuser has been submitted to find any additional accounts involved in this activity. 🪶-[[User:Tanbiruzzaman|<span style="font-family:monospace;color:#006400;letter-spacing:1px;">TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN</span>]] ([[User talk:Tanbiruzzaman|💬]]) 22:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
|reason = All are being discussed as possibly being socks/meatpuppets of Quintinense. Marcus Luccas is his latest sock that survived for a long time. Higor Douglas is a confirmed (and confessed) meatpuppet of Quintinense. All others (besides the suspected) are confirmed recent sock with just a few edits. Please also include [[:commons:User:Quintinense]] in the check, as he has recent and more numerous edits there. Also, beware of past checks indicating possible or inconclusive results for some of these accounts [[Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01#Higor Douglas@pt.wikipedia]], [[Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01#Raimundo57br@pt.wikipedia]] [[User:Chicocvenancio|Chico]] ([[User talk:Chicocvenancio|talk]]) 20:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC) (edited for spelling)
}}
* The following, most mentioned, some not, are {{confirmed}} to be the same user: Deletista, Carnatiba, Keptauto, Sambalagoas, Sepmreavanteuimpério, Vembaixada, Loggosul, Carnaval9
* Comparison between the abovementioned complex and the other five users mentioned, and to those five amongst themselves does not lead to anything conclusive. Most of the pairs would be {{unlikely}} based on back-and-forth jumping of ip addresses (might still be the same person on different devices of course). I'll go after the Commons CU later, if someone else would like to do that, be my guest though. This has already taken much more time than I was planning to spend :-( - [[User:Andre Engels|Andre Engels]] ([[User talk:Andre Engels|talk]]) 15:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== ArikamaI@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = not done
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = ArikamaI
|user name2 = 繁花落葉
|user name3 = Naiveandsilly
|user name4 = Miroir
 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[:zh:Wikipedia:Puppet|Puppet]],[[:zh:User talk:ArikamaI]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles. [[:zh:Wikipedia:Puppet|Puppets]] may be created to evade three-revert rule ([[:zh:WP:3RR|3RR]]). --[[User:Rightpeople|Rightpeople]] ([[User talk:Rightpeople|talk]]) 04:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
:If you could write your own reasons and not copy and paste exactly from [[User:Gakmo]]'s request (the one about you) above. [[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] ([[User talk:Bencmq|talk]]) 04:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
::because this is a same problem, but those users continue attempting to remove link and information, eg: [[:zh:點解阿Sir係阿Sir]], [[:zh:名媛望族]]etc.....therefore I need your help,thanks!--[[User:Rightpeople|Rightpeople]] ([[User talk:Rightpeople|talk]]) 04:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:::Not done at this time. A revert war is not a reason to run checkuser. If there is evidence of sock puppets, then the admins should bring that issue forward. This is a local issue and there are [//zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8&group=sysop plenty of admins] available to sort this out at zhwiki. [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 18:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Onetseneed@zh.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = done
|language code = zh
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = Onesetneed
|user name2 = Angleasked
|user name3 = Uponhelpdd
|user name4 = Limitsouls
|user name5 = Moneygiven
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[zh:WP:LTA/KellyMok]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = Based on the contributions these users made, they are most likely sockpuppets of KellyMok. See the enormous amount of users this person created for vandalism: [[:w:zh:User:Miroir/TVB項目破壞者]] (over 200!), and previous requests including: [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&action=submit#Citedcloud.40zh.wikipedia Citedcloud@zh.wikipedia], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2012-02#Turereporter.40zh.wikipedia_2 Turereporter@zh.wikipedia2], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2012-02#Turereporter.40zh.wikipedia Turereporter@zh.wikipedia], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser/2011-10#Yeungtezman.40zhwiki Yeungtezman@zhwiki] etc. If they are confirmed to be sockpuppets of KellyMok, please block them immediately. Is it possible to create a bot to automatically undo all the edits by the sockpuppets (since the edits done by all the hundreds of accounts are almost all the same)? [[User:Miroir|Miroir]] ([[User talk:Miroir|talk]]) 12:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
::I can confirm that Onesetneed, Angleasked, Uponhelpdd, Limitsouls, Moneygiven are all at two IPs, and would be considered associated. To note that there are also significant numbers of other blocked accounts at these IP addresses. I will leave these accounts to your management. Other stewards have already taken action against the IP addresses though I have tightened the block due to the existing circumventions. [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 13:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
:::Noting that the request says to block confirmed accounts, now done. [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 13:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
::::Thanks a lot, [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]]!! --[[User:Miroir|Miroir]] ([[User talk:Miroir|talk]]) 13:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 
=== Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
|status = done
|language code = pt
|project shortcut= w
|user name1 = Arthur Chevailier
|user name2 = Jordan Michael
|user name3 =
<!-- Max 10 users -->
|discussion = [[w:pt:Jardins do Museu de York]], [[w:pt:Estátua Bassetki]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
|reason = The user Chevailier Arthur created the page and after the lock is editing the Michael Jordan with the same pattern. Michael Jordan is blocked by default behavior, but would like a confirmation.[[User:Érico Júnior Wouters|Érico Júnior Wouters]] ([[User talk:Érico Júnior Wouters|talk]]) 21:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
}}
***The following accounts are {{confirmed}} to be related to each other:
***:Jordan Michael <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Arthur Chevailier <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Olávio Teixeira <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Frodo Bolseiro
***:Pararatibum
***:Cinthia gabrielle0
***:Peregrin blocked
***:Carl Carvalho
***:Willer Mack <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Paulo salomao
***:Liragabriel
***:Legal Fiel
***:Bilau6
***:Bilau5 <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Evil land
***:Olhares Daqui pra Nos
***:Kamilaaah
***:Arthur Fontaine <small>(already blocked)</small>
***:Robert77
***--[[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] ([[User talk:Bencmq|talk]]) 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 
== See also == <!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE -->
{{/Archivefooter}}
* Archives:
** [[Requests for Special:MyLanguage/CheckUser information/Archives/2006policy|2006CheckUser policy]].
** 2007: [[Requests for CheckUser information/Archives/2007-01|01]], [[Requests for CheckUser information/Archives/2007-07|07]].
** 2008: [[Requests for CheckUser information/Archives/2008-01|01]], [[/2008|03]].
** 2009: [[/2009-01|01]], [[/2009-02|02]], [[/2009-03|03]], [[/2009-04|04]], [[/2009-05|05]], [[/2009-06|06]], [[/2009-07|07]], [[/2009-08|08]], [[/2009-09|09]], [[/2009-10|10]], [[/2009-11|11]], [[/2009-12|12]].
** 2010: [[/2010-01|01]], [[/2010-02|02]], [[/2010-03|03]], [[/2010-04|04]], [[/2010-05|05]], [[/2010-06|06]], [[/2010-07|07]], [[/2010-08|08]], [[/2010-09|09]], [[/2010-10|10]], [[/2010-11|11]], [[/2010-12|12]].
** 2011: [[/2011-01|01]], [[/2011-02|02]], [[/2011-03|03]], [[/2011-04|04]], [[/2011-05|05]], [[/2011-06|06]], [[/2011-07|07]], [[/2011-08|08]], [[/2011-09|09]], [[/2011-10|10]], [[/2011-11|11]], [[/2011-12|12]]
** 2012: [[/2012-01|01]]
* [[CheckUser policy]].
{{-}}
{{RF}}