Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m formating |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 17:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
===[[Clear-flow]]===
:{{la|Clear-flow}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 April 8#{{anchorencode:Clear-flow}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow}}|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 20 ⟶ 26:
::::[[User:Travis810|Travis810]] ([[User talk:Travis810|talk]]) 16:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
::::: You failed to answer the main point - what else is it notable for - has it developed a new processes ? what sets it apart from every other ''liquid waste haulier and disposal contractor'' in the world. [[User:Codf1977|Codf1977]] ([[User talk:Codf1977|talk]]) 16:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
::::::I don't think a company should be included for developing a new process unless it has a large impact and actually makes it of note and gains it coverage within a region. As written in the guidance, it is this notability which gets subjects included on Wikipedia. As said previously this company has come to particular note within the South West of England due to the way it has operated to attract funding to Cornwall and could be seen as a flagship for the region. This in my opinion is what makes it worth having on the site, I feel that it does satisfy your guidelines and think that other people would find this article of use with regard to European funding within the region which is discussed on the main Cornwall page.
::::::[[User:Travis810|Travis810]] ([[User talk:Travis810|talk]]) 08:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as article fails [[WP:ORG]]. [[User:Armbrust|<span style="color:#082567;">Armbrust</span>]] [[User talk:Armbrust|<sup style="color:#E3A857;">Talk</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|<sub style="color:#008000;">Contribs</sub>]] 09:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||