Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samuelsen: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:30, 23 January 2006

Latest revision as of 05:05, 3 March 2023

(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)

Line 1:

:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]] that '''did not succeed'''. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>

===[[User:Samuelsen|Samuelsen]]===

'''Final (3/1011/4) endingended <nowiki>1709:30</nowiki>09, 2823 January 2006 (UTC)'''

'''[{{fullurl:<nowiki>Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samuelsen</nowiki>|action=edit}} Vote here] '''

'''(3/10/4) ending <nowiki>17:30</nowiki> 28 January 2006 (UTC)'''

{{User|Samuelsen}} – Has made invaluable contributions to the fight of vandalism in articles related to Norway, upholds objectivity and does not engage in heated arguments. Trustworthy, however mysterious. [[User:Eddideigel|Eddi]] <small>([[User talk:Eddideigel|Talk]])</small> 22:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:'' <strike>I accept. --[[User:Samuelsen|Samuelsen]] 12:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)</strike> I withdraw. --[[User:Samuelsen|Samuelsen]] 09:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may vote. Nominees should not vote for themselves. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]] for more.-->

'''Support'''

Line 15:

#'''Oppose''' 35 wikipedia namespace edits over a three year span is not good, needs more exprience. The answer for the questions is very small also. If you work on AFD's and other wikispace projects, you get my support in a few months. --[[User:Aranda56|Jaranda]] [[User_talk:Aranda56|^{wat's sup}]] 17:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' per Jaranda. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 18:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' He needs better answers to the questions below and I also agree with Jaranda. --[[user:Anonymous editor|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">'''a.n.o.n.y.m'''</fontspan>]] ^{[[user talk:Anonymous editor| ''t'']]} 18:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' Per Jaranda, low project edits, 35 User_talk edits over 3 years, Terse answers to questions gives little more to go on. e.g. Question 1, many non-admins are extremely effective in fighting vandalism. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{([[User_talk:Pgk|<fontspan colorstyle="color:mediumseagreen;">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</fontspan>]])} 18:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. I'd also like to see much more project involvement along with a much higher use of edit summaries. However, please don't let these negative votes discourage you. [[User:PS2pcGAMER|PS2pcGAMER]] ([[User talk:PS2pcGAMER|talk]]) 01:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. Not enough experience outside of article editing, most of this type of work can be done by anyone. [[User:Xaosflux|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF9933"; face="font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype; font-size:larger;"><big>xaosflux</big></font></bspan>]] ^{[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<fontsup colorstyle="color:#00FF00;">Talk</fontsup>]]}<fontspan colorstyle="color:#888888;">/</font><subspan>[[Wikipedia:Counter Vandalism Unit|<fontsub colorstyle="color:#666666;">CVU</fontsub>]]</sub> 03:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. That's an impressive length-of-service, and I suppose if he's going to go bad it'd have happened already. But that's not the same as being reasonably-versed in how non-article stuff works, which is what admin work is mostly. Clearly trusted at no.wiki, but en.wiki is not the same (I wouldn't expect to made an admin on no.wiki, after all). Answers to questions are very poor indeed, showing either a lack of real interest, or a lack of understanding about what is expected in an RfA and what it is ''possible'' to offer in the answers; the latter may well extend from not having experience of such possibilities. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small>^{[[User talk:Splash|talk]]}</small> 04:35, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' as per Xaosflux and Anonymous editor. [[User:Eluchil|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#6B6E85;">Eluchil</fontspan>]] 07:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. same as above[[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 15:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' as above. --[[User:Naconkantari|NaconKantari]] ([[User_talk:Naconkantari|話]])|([[Special:Emailuser/Naconkantari|郵便]]) 17:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. To little time. I know you have been here for 3 years but not enough time being around the community. — [[User:SWD316Moe Epsilon|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF0000;">SM</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#EE0000;" >Wo</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#DD0000;">De</font><font color="CC0000">3</font><font color="BB0000">1</font><font color="AA0000">6</fontspan>]] ^{[[User talk:SWD316Moe Epsilon|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#0000FF;">talk to mε</fontspan>]]}^{[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="00FF00">e</font>]]} 00:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

'''Neutral'''

Line 29:

# Fact that he is an admin at Norwegian wiki with mostly project edits drives me here instead of oppose. Still, seems not very active on both no.wikipedia.org and here; will not flat out oppose due to obvious trust from Norwegian wiki (from which this is a whole different animal), and it's not a question of ready or not; just don't understand why he needs adminship here. -- [[User:Jjjsixsix|Jjjsixsix]] ^{([[User talk:Jjjsixsix|talk]])}/_{([[Special:Contributions/Jjjsixsix|contribs]])} <small>@</small> 19:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Neutral''' as per Jjjsixsix. --[[User:Merovingian|King of All the Franks]] 03:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#[[User:NSLE|NSL]][[WPWikipedia:EAEsperanza|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green">E]]</fontspan>]] _{([[User_talk:NSLE|T]]+[[Special:Contributions/NSLE|C]])} 07:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

'''Comments'''

Line 64:

:'''8.''' What are your greatest frustrations with Wikipedia?

::POV pushers. Reverting simple vandalism is kinda relaxing. Sorting out caped crusaders is not. --[[User:Samuelsen|Samuelsen]] 21:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.''

[[Category:Unsuccessful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]