Tiptoety

Revision as of 10:24, 2 May 2012

Latest revision as of 18:27, 1 June 2017

(89 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)

Line 432:

:Yeah, if there are no active local 'crats then you can just request a rename on the Stewards Noticeboard. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 04:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

==missing noticeboard==

== AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ==

Hi Tiptoety, seems there is no admin-noticeboard on Meta (hint, hint), so I needed to pick one. You should keep an eye on (or block directly) [[User:Lady Gaga 2012]], who seems to be the same account on Commons, which was used this morning for a short spree of vandalism and sort-of death-threats[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lady_Gaga_2012]. Regards. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 10:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

:Dealt with (& "missing board" has been found :)) --[[User:Herbythyme|<font color="green">Herby</font>]] <b>^{<small><span style="color:#90F">[[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]]</span></small>}</b> 10:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

::Thanks Herby. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 16:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

== OTRS and WS ==

I WILL HAVE SEX WITH YOU!

Gday mate. Within OTRS, are the rights for Wikisource generic for the sisterhood, or are they specific for each language? Or is there a bit of both? Just trying to phrase my request to community properly. As I am in there daily, I may as well check the extra queue, and at the moment there is no one overtly saying what is going on in that space. Alternatively, are you able to review what has been happening in that space, about who is actioning the area, and what the traffic levels have been? Thx. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 02:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

:Or should I be digging around on the OTRS wiki for this info? — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:90%;">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 02:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

::No, there are no special "Wikisource rights", all Wikisource related tickets are held in the Sister Projects queue. Yes, I can check to see the activity level of the queue, who is responding to tickets, etc. And yes, this would be better handled on the OTRS-wiki. Best, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 06:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

== OTRS rights ==

Can you give me ipblock-exempt on OTRS? [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Billinghurst/Archives/2012#Global_ipexempt This] shows a bit of light, but not much (I have global-ipblock-exempt set, but that evidently does not work on OTRS wiki). Thanks! [[User:SpeedyGonsales|SpeedyGonsales]] ([[User talk:SpeedyGonsales|talk]]) 14:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

:Global blocks should not affect OTRS-wiki. Are you unable to edit? If so, would you please email me the block message that you receive when you try and edit? Thanks, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 06:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

:: Mail sent. If you are sure that global blocks should not affect OTRS-wiki, maybe you should submit a bug on bugzilla to set OTRS-wiki to ignore global blocks. Just a suggestion. [[File:Smiley.svg|20px]] [[User:SpeedyGonsales|SpeedyGonsales]] ([[User talk:SpeedyGonsales|talk]]) 21:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

:::Hm, after a little bit of testing I appear to be wrong. I have enabled IPBE on your account and will file a bugzilla. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 22:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

== Cupco ==

[[User:Michaeldsuarez/Sockpuppetry#Weltoners]] &ndash; I've mentioned you in a sockpuppetry investigation that I'm working on. Remember [[Meta:Requests_for_CheckUser_information/Archives/2012#James_Salsman]]? I believe that that person is back as "Cupco". --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 23:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

: Dear Ty, I know the above suggests a continuation of past cross-wiki socking. At the same time, the user in question is engaged in productive disussion about Meta topics on wikimedia-l. It would be helpful to have some of those discussions here directly on Meta, rather than intermediated through that list. What do you think about allowing the user to edit, while regularly checking for and blocking socks (i.e., otherwise treating the account and related CU use as though it were blocked)? <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small></span> 01:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

::I am certainly willing to discuss the possibility of allowing Salsman to edit here if he agreed to some conditions. I'm a little confused when you say "allowing the user to edit, while regularly checking for and blocking socks." Are you suggesting that even if he continues to sock, we just block those accounts and do not reblock the master?

::Michaeldsuarez, I'll take a look at the evidence you have posted. Thanks, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 06:33, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

:::There isn't really any need anymore. The Cupco account has already been dealt with: [[en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dualus/Archive#03_October_2012]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&page=User%3ACupco]. That enwiki SPI page also shows that Salsman created a few sockpuppets after the Cupco account was blocked. [[en:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_120#Economics_graph_removed_from_several_articles|This discussion]] featured a few IP addresses used by Cupco / Salsman. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 13:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

:::: Do you have conditions in mind? <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small></span> 00:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25901#p25901 &ndash; [[:en:User:2010_SO16]] might be one of Salsman's more recent accounts, but I'm not 100% sure. 2010_SO16 didn't edit as long as Cupco did, so there's less evidence for me to find. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 01:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&page=User%3A2010_SO16 &ndash; Confirmed. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 12:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

::Yes, that account is {{likely}} here as well and as such has been blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 06:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

← Sj: I would be happy with conditions regarding no socking on any Wikimedia project and refraining from using Meta to publicly or privately (via email) engage in making/distributing/administering any type of survey (generally construed). Additionally, his account is subject to having a CheckUser performed on it at any time. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 07:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

: Thank you. That seems reasonable, though unlikely to be followed. <span style="background-color:white;color:#bbb;">&ndash;[[User:Sj|SJ]]<small>&nbsp;[[User Talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f90;">talk</font>]]&nbsp;</small></span> 10:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

== Completely unhelpful attacking against other users, needs a PERMANENT pause. ==

Repeated insults against ARBCOM: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=521380464#Statement_by_Fut.Perf. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=521380464#Statement_by_Fut.Perf.]

== Deletion of [[ang:1865]] ==

Hello! Why did you delete the page [[ang:1865]]? It wasn't empty as far as I can tell. [[User:PiRSquared17|<b style="color:#f90;font-family:Arial">πr²</b>]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|<b style="color:#0f3;font-family:Arial">''t''</b>]] • [[Special:Contributions/PiRSquared17|<b style="color:#03f;font-family:Arial">''c''</b>]]) 20:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

==Report==

Hi, Tiptoety. I'm reporting recent situation of [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_CheckUser_information&diff=prev&oldid=4849863 this issue]. [[:diq:Karber:Calanor|User:Calanor]] [https://diq.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=X%C4%B1susi:Qeyd&page=Karber%3ACalanor&type=block was unblocked] in Zazaki Wikipedia on 12 March 2013 by [[:diq:Karber:Mirzali]], because there is no absolute proof that he/she is one of the sockpuppets of [[:diq:Karber:Erdemaslancan|Erdemaslancan]]. His/her multiple accounts ([[:diq:Karber:Arde|User:Arde]], [[:diq:Karber:Newos|User:Newos]]) will not be unblocked. Thank you. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 13:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

== Bureaucrat discussion ==

Hello. A [[Meta:Requests for adminship/Nemo bis (removal)/Bureaucrat discussion|bureaucrat discussion]] has been opened to decide the outcome of [[Meta:Requests for adminship/Nemo_bis (removal)|this request for de-adminship]]. It is opened for more than three days now and it has only received one comment so far. If you could please pass by and leave your comments over there it would be really appreciated. Best regards.

:<small>&mdash;&nbsp;Delivered via [[Global message delivery]] on behalf of [[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]], 15:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)</small>

<!-- EdwardsBot 0390 -->

== [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Single User Login finalisation announcement|Forced user renames coming soon for SUL]] ==

<div class="mw-content-ltr">

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to [//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&group=page-Single+User+Login+finalisation+announcement%2FPersonal+announcement&filter=&action=page translate and review the notification] that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames.

You may also want to help with the pages [[m:Rename practices]] and [[m:Global rename policy]].

Thank you, [[m:User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 16:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

</div>

<!-- EdwardsBot 0441 -->

== [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Single User Login finalisation announcement|Forced user renames coming soon for SUL]] ==

<div class="mw-content-ltr">

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to [//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&group=page-Single+User+Login+finalisation+announcement%2FPersonal+announcement&filter=&action=page translate and review the notification] that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames.

You may also want to help with the pages [[m:Rename practices]] and [[m:Global rename policy]].

Thank you, [[m:User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 16:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

</div>

<!-- EdwardsBot 0441 -->

== Just curious ==

why on earth should a [[User:Finnrind/tatry|subpage]] I deleted 4 years ago now become a spam target :) Can't even remember what I used that space for, some draft spamlink-investigation? All the best, [[User:Finnrind|Finn Rindahl]] ([[User talk:Finnrind|talk]]) 20:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

:Yeah, you used it for a spamlink investigation. Looks like some random IP came along and recreated it with a spamlink of their own. ;-) [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 03:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for closing and processing [[Meta:Requests for adminship/Varnent]]. --[[User:Varnent|Varnent]] ([[User talk:Varnent|talk]])^{([[User:Varnent#Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure|COI]])} 18:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

:You are welcome. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 23:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for removing the block and for the advice! I have already removed the additional details from the user page.--

[[User:Blessinvarkey|Blessinvarkey]] ([[User talk:Blessinvarkey|talk]])

:You're welcome. Happy editing, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 03:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

== [[Requests for comment/Wikimedia Commons]] ==

Hi, Tiptoety, I noticed you had closed in 2012 one of the [[requests for comment]] pages that I had taken an interest in. I believe that the closure of this particular requests for comment subpage should be undone, as the close was premature in light of the multiple interwiki conflicts pointed out by John Vandenberg, and I think we should discuss how to resolve such conflicts with each large Wikimedia wiki before implementing the interwiki change in the bug request. To engage in discussion with them mean we need to reopen the RFC subpage and allow them to comment about how best to resolve this matter. Do you think you could reverse your decision and reopen the subpage? [[User:TeleComNasSprVen|TeleComNasSprVen]] ([[User talk:TeleComNasSprVen|talk]]) 01:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

:You have my permission to reopen the RFC. Best, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 01:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

::I read your comment, Tiptoety, as a permission, not as an actual approval, based on what he has called "legitimate reason for reopening." John Vandenberg had addressed the issue TCNSV raised, both in the original RfC, and then recently, on Feb 2, prior to your "permission." Procedurally, reopening an RfC closed over two years ago is not a great idea. If there is a remaining issue, it can be discussed, and, if necessary, a new RfC opened, with reference to the old one and notice on Talk of the old RfC. Discussion, however, would bring out what was already clear two years ago, and that should have been more abundantly clear, from response to TCNSV on [[Bugzilla:4676]]. In any case, I reclosed the RfC, by reverting him, with comment on Talk, and TCNSV has continued to argue that reopening was the right thing to do, ignoring the actual issue, a supposed conflict with hiwiki, long ago resolved. If you disagree with my reclosure, please revert me. No action is needed, but I thought you should be notified, since TCNSV is citing your approval. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

:::Hi Abd. Yes, I was giving permission to revert if the reverting user felt it was justified (as in, I would not edit war over the edit). That said, I closed the RfC for a reason and I still stand by that closure. Personally, I have no stake in this decision. I'll go with whatever is decided. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 03:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

== Usurpation Request (SUL) ==

Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}, my request [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Changing_username#None_.28SUL_request.29_.E2.86.92_Abhinav here] has been lingering since 7 June, while most of my requests on other wikiprojects have already been accepted. I understand this is not very urgent, but I request you to please look into this sometime soon. Thank you. [[User:D abhi|D abhi]] ([[User talk:D abhi|talk]]) 19:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{Done}} - Apologies about the delay. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 19:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

== Rename request ==

Hi Tiptoety. My request too, has not been answered ([[Meta:Changing_username#Novice7_.E2.86.92_Ryoga_Godai|link]]). I can understand that you might be busy, but it's been almost a month since I made that request. Would you be able to look into it? Thanks [[User:Novice7|Novice7]] ([[User talk:Novice7|talk]]) 13:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{Done}} - Apologies about the delay. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 17:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

::Thanks. [[User:Ryoga Godai|Ryoga Godai]] ([[User talk:Ryoga Godai|talk]]) 13:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

== [[Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/ERDINC|ERDINC for ADMIN]] ==

Hallo, könntest du mich supporten! LG ERDINC [[https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:ERDINC]]

== An important message about renaming users ==

<div class="mw-content-ltr">

Dear Tiptoety,

I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide [[mw:SUL finalisation|single-user login finalisation]] (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at [[m:Global rename policy|the global rename policy]], a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called [[m:Global renamers|Global renamers]]. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the [[m:SRGP|requests for global permissions]] page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to [[:m:SRUC|the request page for a global rename]].

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the [[m:SUL|Help:Unified login]] page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for [[m:Talk:Global renamers|global renamers]]. You can also contact me on [[m:User talk:Keegan (WMF)|my talk page on meta]] if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time.

-- [[m:User:Keegan (WMF)|Keegan (WMF)]] [[m:User talk:Keegan (WMF)|talk]] 18:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

<small>--This message was sent using [[m:MassMessage|MassMessage]]. Was there an error? [[m:Talk:MassMessage|Report it!]]</small>

</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Keegan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Keegan_(WMF)/MassMessage/Crats&oldid=9637985 -->

== Mailing list for global renamers ==

Dear global renamer,

We have created a mailing list for us to allow easy communication. Please subscribe [[mail:global-renamers|here]] and [[Special:emailuser/Savh|send me]] or [[Special:EmailUser/Trijnstel|Trijnstel]] an email to confirm it is you requesting it. Additionally, you might be interested to know of the existance of the {{channel|wikimedia-rename}} IRC channel where you are welcome to join. Should you have any questions, feel free to use my talk page.

Cordially,

[[User:Savh|'''S'''a]][[User talk:Savh#header|vh]][[:es:User:Savh|^ñ]] 15:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

<!-- Message sent by User:Savh@metawiki using the list at http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Savh/Grenamers&oldid=10012440 -->

==Bad situation in the Bashkir Wikipedia. ==

Hello!

Bad situation in the Bashkir Wikipedia.

Admin removed significant articles.

October 14, 2014 have been removed (action administrator Ҡатнашыусы:Саган (https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%A0%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8B%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8B:%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD )):

• Ҡалып:Рәсәйҙен банктары, Template:50 largest Russian banks https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%A0%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%BF:%D0%A0%D3%99%D1%81%D3%99%D0%B9%D2%99%D0%B5%D0%BD_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B

• Гиннесс, Guinness

• Өфө Фәнни Үҙәге https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D3%A8%D1%84%D3%A9_%D0%A4%D3%99%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D2%AE%D2%99%D3%99%D0%B3%D0%B5

• Рәсәй Һаҡлыҡ Банкыһы Sberbank of Russia https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D3%99%D1%81%D3%99%D0%B9_%D2%BA%D0%B0%D2%A1%D0%BB%D1%8B%D2%A1_%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%8B%D2%BB%D1%8B

• ВТБ банкыһы, VTB https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%91_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%8B%D2%BB%D1%8B

• Газпромбанк ‎

• Chevron ‎ https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron

and etc.

These articles have been a number of copies of the English articles. Deleting articles administrators Bashkir wikipedia happen very often. Under the guise of Wikipedia, they also engage in fundraising (http://www.bashinform.ru/news/658297/?sphrase_id=191289 ).

Help put an end to bad Admin - make a section of the Bashkir wikipedia really free!

[[User talk:Ayratayrat]]

October, 18 2014

:{{ping|Ayratayrat}} Such discussions do not belong on the user talk page in meta. The baWP community is self-regulating, and initially concerns should be raised at the wiki. If you are wishing to bring this to the notice of stewards, then you should utilise [[Stewards' noticeboard]] though than just saying that there is a problem there will need to be specific issues. If you believe that there are concerns about abuse of the Terms of Use, or abuse of fundraising, then you should put together some specific text and let [[user:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe]] know on his talk page. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 05:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

:: Ok. This user is a little earlier contacted me by e-mail, without informing that parallel decided to inform all in the world about their offense. In my opinion (FYI), no abuse of the Terms of Use, and no abuse of fundraising. See relevant links:

::* [[:ba:Ҡатнашыусы_менән_һөйләшеү:Саган#Удаление страниц|discussion in ba-wp]] (in Russian) -- my request to [[:ba:user:Саган]] and answers from three ba-wp users.

::* [[User:Kaganer/email discussion with User:Ayratayrat|email request from User:Ayratayrat to User:Kaganer and subsequent discussion]] (2014-10-17 - 2014-10-19, in Russian)

::--[[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]] ([[User talk:Kaganer|talk]]) 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

*'''Thank you for your comment!'''I appreciate your help. ([[User talk:Ayratayrat|Ayratayrat talk]]) 13:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

* To have stormy passages with [[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]]. He posted without the permission of e-mails to the network. '''[[User:Kaganer/email discussion with User:Ayratayrat|email request from User:Ayratayrat to User:Kaganer and subsequent discussion]] (2014-10-17 - 2014-10-19, in Russian)'''. ([[User talk:Ayratayrat|Ayratayrat talk]]) 10:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

== Invitation to the CentralNotice-admins list ==

Hi! This bulk email is to let you know about a mailing list used to communicate bug reports and new features in CentralNotice, and to facilitate conversations between the admins. This message is being sent to you because you have the privileges to use the CentralNotice admin interface.

If you use CentralNotice to post or modify notices, please consider joining the list by visiting this page and subscribing yourself:

https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/centralnotice-admins

Thanks,

[[mw:User:Adamw|Adam Wight]] ([[mw:User talk:Adamw|talk]])

00:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Fundraising Tech,

Wikimedia Foundation

<!-- Message sent by User:Awight (WMF)@metawiki using the list at http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Awight_(WMF)/MassMessageTargets/SomeMetaAdmins&oldid=10364199 -->

== help pls ==

Hi; I am a student in Başkent University. ip 212.156.67.30 is used by Başkent Üniversitesi in Turkey. But it was blocked in Turkish wikipedia for unlimited time. block begins: 23:15, 6 Feb. 2011. Since that time whole university can not make any edits in Turkish wikipedia. We university students want to edit turkish wikipedia. Local adminstrators say they are very angry with an old time user and they dont unblock th i.p. and they punish a whole university. It has been a long time and probably the person that makes them angry is graduate by now. Thank you for help.

== Happy new year 2015! ==

[[File:Happy New Year 2015.png|500px|Happy New Year 2015]]

Happy New Year to you Dear {{PAGENAME}} --[[User:Grind24|Grind24]] ([[User talk:Grind24|talk]]) 23:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

== clarification ==

Due to recent events that had nothing to do with me I was again directed by email to that stupid [[w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DanielTom|"investigation"]] at Wikipedia, that came to the trivial "finding" that my brother at the time lived in the same house as me, and ridiculously claimed that he was my sock even though I had already said who he was way before the "investigation"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=548542565]:

::'' ''If'' you still aren't convinced that my IP edits show that I am Portuguese, please check, e.g., the article in the Portuguese Wikipedia "Pedro Cosme Vieira" (which is obviously written in Portuguese). It was '''my brother (Diogo Tomé)''' who created that article, but he asked for my help to improve it, which I did...''

And if you went to that article you would see it was created by "User:Diogotome". So the only "sock" I allegedly had, User:Diogotome, is quite obviously not mine, but my brother's account, that he created in '''2009''', with his real name (Diogo Tomé). Who could I fool with this? If you have OTRS access, you may also find ticket 2013070410010677 interesting (although I believe that ticket should be deleted, I had no idea I was writing to OTRS at the time, and that all sorts of threatening anonymous nutcases had access to it). ~ [[User:DanielTom|DanielTom]] ([[User talk:DanielTom|talk]]) 12:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

: By the way, in that "investigation", [[w:User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] (the admin that blocked me) identified me as "Daniel Tomé who placed 34th in the [http://www.eurogofed.org/results/world/wagc2012.htm tournament]." My question: what does have to do with the SPI? Why is it relevant what place I took for Portugal in that World Go tournament in 2012? And I never said on Wikipedia, or on any wiki, which place I took there (even though I am proud of it, it was the best result in my country's history). That page aimed at clearly identifying me personally just to attack me, and because I was (and am) blocked there I never had the chance to respond to any of it, which is a complete disgrace. ~ [[User:DanielTom|DanielTom]] ([[User talk:DanielTom|talk]]) 12:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

:Hi DanielTom, I hope things are going well. I'm afraid that I am not familiar with the previous SPI you were subject to. With regards to the Miszatomic case, I know that an editor mentioned your name. I believe this was a simple misreading of the situation, as some of Miszatomic's socks contained usernames similar to yours. As I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Miszatomic&diff=prev&oldid=644492620 mentioned], there is no evidence to suggest that you and Miszatomic are one in the same. I hope this was the answer you were looking for, as I don't really see a questioned posed above. Best, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 22:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

:: Sorry, apparently I got irritated upon seeing that silly page again. Usually I pretend it doesn't exist, for my own mental sanity. Thanks for wishing me well. ~ [[User:DanielTom|DanielTom]] ([[User talk:DanielTom|talk]]) 23:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

== precautionary block ==

You blocked [[Special:Contributions/Pina618|Contributions/Pina618]], [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3APina618 block log], with summary: ''Abusing multiple accounts: William Pina, per CheckUser''. Pina618 has no edits, globally, and registering an account is not abuse, unless the user is globally banned, which is not the case with William Pina in his various incarnations. Because Pina618 cannot edit meta except as block evasion, the block does no harm here; however, globally, and right now on SRG, the existence of this block can be an argument for further blocks, and, most seriously, a global lock, even without any disruption. This shuts the door on a possible cooperative path, and generally can cause disruption that was not necessary, because it forces the user to anonymity, wasting a lot of time, then, in block enforcement. The user has "competency issues," and sometimes this is a function of age. People mature and learn.

So what to do? I recommend block log annotation so that the block record shows that it is precautionary, not a result of abuse of the account. I'd recommend a note on the user talk page, inviting the user to edit non-disruptively on wikis where he is not blocked. This has worked in the past with some users. I will place the note if you approve. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 16:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

:Yes, the block was placed based on solid CheckUser evidence and was not based on behavior caused by that single account, but instead on behavior of the account's operator. I see nothing wrong with offering them a second chance. I have no problems with you doing what you feel is appropriate. Best, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

::Thanks. I'll place a note or notes. The user should not be locked, would be the major point, and he's not locked. If not locked, that could allow him to start up on a wiki where William Pina is not blocked. Because William Pena is blocked here, Pina618 could not legitimately edit here anyway; I would not give the operator a second chance *here,* not yet. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

::[[User talk:Pina618]] and [[User talk:William Pina]]. These things have maybe a 10% success rate, they are mostly ignored, but one never can tell. No harm, I hope. If Pina shows up on Wikiversity, we can handle him; if he does show, the chances are very good he will be helped and we will gain a productive user. It happens. Thanks. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 21:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

== Similar usernames ==

I think we can be a little freer in our hand in granting requests for names the software flags as similar to other names already registered but not (very) active [so many account names are bedblocked at enwiki]; especially when they are trying to get off of a suffixed username.

I'm talking specifically about this request: [[Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/15427/view]], those similar usernames are inactive and probably won't cause any confusion. If it does, it can always be looked at in future but I don't think it will present any problems at least in this current case and we should probably proceed with the request.

This issue probably deserves some wider discussion, but I really prefer not to have it on the global renamers mailing list. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] 15:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

:Hi [[User:Xeno|xeno]]. I agree with you to a point. In that specific request, the only real identifying feature that distinguishes the requested username from the other ones is a period. (Something that I don't believe should be allowed in usernames anyways, but that is a different discussion). Personally, I would like to see something a little more unique, like a "-" between Scott and C.

:If you would like to process the request, I certainly won't make a fuss. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 21:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

== [[m:Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Initial notice to OTRS volunteers|Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December]] ==

''This is a message from the [[m:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]]. [[m:Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Initial notice to OTRS volunteers|Translations]] are available.''

[[File:Wikimedia Foundation logo - vertical (2012-2016).svg|right|150px]]

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new [[m:Access to nonpublic information policy|"Access to nonpublic information policy"]] on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the [[m:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information|required confidentiality agreement]]. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. '''OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.'''

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: [[m:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign|Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign]]

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please [[m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign|visit this talk page]] or email me (gvarnum{{@}}wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,<br />

Gregory Varnum ([[m:User:GVarnum-WMF|User:GVarnum-WMF]]), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the [[m:User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] 21:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC) • [[m:Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Initial notice to OTRS volunteers|Translate]] • [[m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign|Get help]]

<!-- Message sent by User:GVarnum-WMF@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy/OTRS&oldid=13742672 -->

== Enjoy ==

Thanks for all the work over all the years. Enjoy your RL, and other extra-curricular duties. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 09:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Thanks for your wonderful help! Take care... [[User:Tropicalkitty|Tropicalkitty]] ([[User talk:Tropicalkitty|talk]]) 22:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Thanks for the hard work over these years.—[[User:Teles|Teles]] «[[User talk:Teles|<span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em gray">'''Talk to me'''</span>]] ˱<small>_{[[Special:Contributions/Teles|C]] [[Special:Log/Teles|L]] [[Special:Emailuser/Teles|@]] [[sulutil:Teles|S]]}</small>˲» 01:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)