Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between iTap and T9 (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Babajobu|Babajobu]] 05:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
===[[Differences between iTap and T9]]===
Was tagged for speedy deletion by [[User:Walter Görlitz]] as being a repost of deleted content (see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between iTap and T9]]) but it's different than the earlier version. Bringing it to AfD instead. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color: #33C;">howch</span>]][[
* '''Delete''' And this is encyclopædic because…? [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 20:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. It is not encyclopedic. It is more of an instruction manual than anything else.--[[User:Kungfuadam|Adam]] [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Kungfuadam|talk]])</sup> 20:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. iCouldCareLess about T9 or iTap.--[[User:Mitsukai|<
*'''Keep'''. iTap and T9 are probably the two most deployed phone entry systems. A side by side reference comparison can be a useful tool for choosing between them (proof is, there are other good side-by-side product comparisons in Wikipedia). I'd say merge with [[predictive text]] or expand with comparisons to the other existing systems - maybe with a table format. [[User:Diego Moya|Diego Moya]] 21:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per Avi. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 18:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' I actually think this article, iTap and T9 should be merged into one article, perhaps something like 'mobile phone input methods'. This way the two stubs and this offshoot could actually be a useful and robust article instead of little blurbs.[[User:Pdurland|Pdurland]] 19:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||