Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheOptionsLab: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sethmethod (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 00:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
===[[TheOptionsLab]]===
:{{la|TheOptionsLab}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheOptionsLab|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 October 5#{{anchorencode:TheOptionsLab}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheOptionsLab}}|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 7 ⟶ 13:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
*'''Delete''' per nomination. An online trading analyst business that makes no claim to [[WP:CORP|historical, technical, or cultural significance]]. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 18:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' A claim '''is''' made of technical significance: "The Options Lab was specifically mentioned by Barron's magazine for its unique approach to analyze ({{sic}}) risks and rewards in options trading." Whether or not the claim is true is not verified. ''[[Barron's (newspaper)|Barrons']]'' online search does reveal a single article result for the phrase "Options Lab"; it is [http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125210378026187515.html here]. However, as a non-subscriber, I don't have access to the full article. Perhaps someone with access to the archives can resolve the dilemma.
*:The link is to an article that supposedly discusses an improvement Fidelity has made to their bond trading capabilities, which seems tangential to this company which touts it's option capabilities. I'm not sure if I can see the entire article, it appears to be oddly truncated. However, even if they are mentioned in the article, it's would hardly be enough to establish notability, I would think. [[User:Ronnotel|Ronnotel]] ([[User talk:Ronnotel|talk]]) 19:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
* '''Delete.''' Per nom. [[User:Saebvn|Saebvn]] ([[User talk:Saebvn|talk]]) 21:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': I found [[WP:CORP|zero]] sources with significant coverage. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 00:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': From this source http://www.investorbrain.com/index.php/site/P15/, you can read the mentioned Barrons' article in full. Make sure do a search on words "The Options Lab", this article was published in Barron’s, September 7, 2009. Title is "Saturday, September 12, 2009 Fidelity Spiffs Up Its Bond System", other notable references include Trader's resource (http://technical.traders.com/Products/display.asp?prodid=545&dbname=internet%5Cinternet&tablename=internet), 01:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sethmethod|Sethmethod]] ([[User talk:Sethmethod|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sethmethod|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><small>— [[User:Sethmethod|Sethmethod]] ([[User talk:Sethmethod|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sethmethod|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Weak Delete''' - Aside from the Barrons' article, I don't see sufficient [[Wikipedia:CORP#Primary_criteria|depth of coverage]] of multiple reliable sources to warrant keeping it. If kept, it needs to be updated appropriately. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Artlovesyou|Artlovesyou]] ([[User talk:Artlovesyou|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Artlovesyou|contribs]]) 05:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Delete''' One incidental mention in a Barrons article is not sufficient to establish notability. [[User:Figureofnine|Figureofnine]] ([[User talk:Figureofnine|talk]]) 15:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||