Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 Java earthquake: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
===[[1994 Java earthquake]]===
:{{la|1994 Java earthquake}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 Java earthquake|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 October 16#{{anchorencode:1994 Java earthquake}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994 Java earthquake}}|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 7 ⟶ 13:
*'''Keep''' So 250 deaths isn't significant in your view. As notable as they come. [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]) 11:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' 250 deaths would make it newsworthy! If that happened today, it would probably get a spot on the frontpage under ITN. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<
*'''Keep''' This earthquake has met the suggested criteria for notable earthquakes. [[User:Qrfqr|Qrfqr]] ([[User talk:Qrfqr|talk]]) 13:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' This ''is'' significant enough, per above. '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 14:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per above. [[User:Diego Grez|Diego Grez]] ([[User talk:Diego Grez|talk]]) 15:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
* '''Snow Keep''' for a challenge so terrible that it verges on the disruptive. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 16:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' per [[User:Mikenorton/Earthquake notability guidelines|this proposed guideline]], which the consensus seems to show is reasonable, and for which I happen to agree. In this case, the [[WP:SNOW|consensus is overwhelming]] for a keep of this 7+ earthquake; there were over 250 deaths, it was an unusually shallow subduction earthquake, and an odd slow-moving [[tsunami]] was generated. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Clearly very notable. [[User:RapidR|RapidR]] ([[User talk:RapidR|talk]]) 17:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Events|list of Events-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)</small>
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||