Woohookitty

Revision as of 20:30, 12 February 2006

Latest revision as of 14:19, 9 August 2025

Line 1:

{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"

'''Archives:''' [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive|1]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive2|2]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive3|3]],

|-

[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive4|4]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive5|5]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive6|6]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive7|7]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive8|8]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive9|9]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archivevfd|vfd comments]]

|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by [[User:MiszaBot III|MiszaBot III]]. Any sections older than '''5''' days are automatically archived to [[User talk:Woohookitty/Archive18]]. Archives prior to 16 June 2007 were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

|-

|}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|algo = old(7d)

|archive = User talk:Woohookitty/Archive18

}}

== Cleanup taskforce ==

{{archive box| search=yes |

There is a new article that needs wikifying and NPOV on [[User:Woohookitty/desk|your desk]]. If you don't want it then please pass it along or let me know. Thank you. [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] 00:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive |Jan. to July 2005]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive2 |July to Late Nov 2005]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive3 |Dec 2005 to early Jan 2006]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive4 |Jan 2006 to Early March 2006]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive5 |March 2006 to Late June 2006]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive6 |July 2006 to Sept 2006]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive7 |Sept 2006 to Feb 2007]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive8 |Feb 2007 to mid June 2007]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive9 |Mid June 2007 to mid November 2007]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive10 |Mid November 2007 to March 31st, 2008]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive11 |April 1st, 2008 to September 28th, 2008]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive12 |September 28th, 2008 to March 2nd, 2009]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive13 |March 3rd, 2009 to July 25th, 2009]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive14 |July 26th, 2009 to January 1st, 2010]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive15 |January 1st to September 1st, 2010]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive16 |September 1st, 2010 to July 11th, 2011]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive17 |July 12th, 2011 to June 6th, 2012]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive18 |Current]]

*[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archivevfd |AfD comments]]

== RfA Thanks! ==

}}

<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 4px #6A99B4; background-color: #EDF1E1;">[[Image:Llama head.jpg|left|80px]] Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final <s>vote count</s> consensus of '''(82/1/0)''', which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please [[User_talk:Peruvianllama|spit in my general direction]]. Cheers! --[[User:Peruvianllama|P]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Peruvianllama|ruvianLlama]]^{<small>([[User talk:Peruvianllama|spit]])</small>} 05:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)</div>

== Baseball Featured Article Review ==

== [[George Reeves]] ==

FAR coordinator [[User:Casliber]] has nominated [[Baseball]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Baseball/archive2|featured article review here]]. This is a procedural review of its FA status due to the discovery of socking at its original FAC. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. The [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|instructions for the review process are here]].<p> If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status.

== Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST ==

Unprotecting it, eh? Any bets on how long it will take before that lunatic sock-puppet from Croatia starts vandalizing the page? I'm betting 24 hours, tops. He messed with the talk page less than two days ago. >:( [[User:Wahkeenah|Wahkeenah]] 08:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

{|style="background:#00000; border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"

==anons==

|-

Well, duh I no ''dat'', on account of the gajillion {{tl:test}} messages Ive left. I just meant a registered personal upage... you know. I'm getting more coffee. :P [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]^{[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]} 15:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

|-

| style="padding-left: .6em;" |

[[File:Environmental_impact_of_Wikipedia_logo.jpg|right|100px]]

[[Sure We Can]] and the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City/Environment Task Force|Environment of New York City Task Force]] invite you to join us for:

*[[Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Earth Day-2022-SWC|2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon]] 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

|}

-- [[Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City/Environment Task Force|Environment of New York City Task Force]]

== "List of Gas Stations" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==

== move request ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:List of Gas Stations]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 17#List of Gas Stations]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote -->

== ''The Signpost'': 9 August 2025 ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-08-09}} </div><!--Volume 21, Issue 10--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2025-08-09|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:26, 9 August 2025 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:JPxG/SPS]]) --></div></div>

Would you consider moving [[Rubbergate]] to [[House banking scandal]] per [[Talk:Rubbergate]]? This would involve a deletion prior to move. The desired title is just a redirect, but it has more than one line in the edit history. Thanks. [[User_talk:Derex|Derex]] 19:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1304742102 -->

== "[[:United Kingdom's]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==

== Babe Ruth ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Kingdom%27s&redirect=no United Kingdom's]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 9#United Kingdom's}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:A1Cafel|A1Cafel]] ([[User talk:A1Cafel|talk]]) 03:14, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm posting this message on you Talk Page either because you've contributed to the article [[Babe Ruth]], or because you've edited other baseball or sports related articles. I've recently completed a revision of this article at [[Babe Ruth/rewrite]]. If you have the time, I'd appreciated it if you'd compare the articles and leave any feedback you might have on the rewrite discussion page. I'd like to reach a consensus before makeing major changes to the main article. Thanks for your help. --[[User:Djrobgordon|djrobgordon]] 20:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

== S-Protect on Ted Kennedy article ==

The s-protect on the Ted Kennedy article was very much needed - and very much appreciated. Thank you! --[[User:Astanhope|AStanhope]] 04:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti]]==

A final decision has been published in this case.

For the arbitration committee. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 18:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

== Answer to question ==

He has many times posted post in the middle of my posts and distrupted the contex of the posts makeing my original posts unreadable. So when i say stop posting in the middle of my posts i mean stop posting in the middle of my posts.

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 07-02-06 22.10 CET

It cant be ok because it is extremly hard to see what is what, he has posted in the middle of my posts so many times with so many diffrent things that even I find it hard to see what is what so it cant be ok. Just take a look for your self and see if you can follow the line and figure out who has written what.

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 07-02-06 22.15 CET

I dont believe when you say that you have no problems figuering out what is what because i am haveing major truble and i wrote alot of it!

And all of this could have been avoided if he would have just posted after my posts not inside them. But if that is ok then I will also post in the middle of his posts with a question ofcurse. I will do exactly to him as he has done to me.

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 07-02-06 22.25 CET

== [[Costa Rica presidential elections, 2006]] ==

Thanks, just went to unprotect and found you already had... --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)} 21:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

== [[Neuro-linguistic programming]] ==

You are a mentor! Please familiarize yourself with the case and conflict. I've posted notices to the article's talk page and AN. You may want to introduce yourself to all the parties (though that's a lot). Again, thank you. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 10:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

:My condolances and best wishes for your success. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Now that the mentors have been listed, I am taking that article off my watch list unless otherwise requested. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]^{[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]} 10:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

===Mediator section===

It's locked, so I can't add it in, but I wanted to mention that if you look in the archives, Headly Down DID accept my mediation. It's the entry that starts off "Hmm. Well your cred seems to check out...". As a neutral party, I'm not making any judgements here, but I do feel it important to mention that Headly did accept my mediation. If I can offer my advice: In my time dealing with that thread, I found out that the sides are so firmly entrenched that neither one wants to accept anything by the other side as acceptable. Further, some of the participants (most notably the NLP opponents) deem any mediator or administrator's pointing out policy violations such as personal attacks to be "biased". I strongly believe that a heavy hand is going to be needed to solve this issue, or at least some big gun administrator powers that I didn't have access to (nor would have right to use as a mediator due to conflict of interest.) Cheers, I'll be monitoring the thread myself. [[User:Swatjester|<font color="red">&rArr;</font>]] [[User_talk:Swatjester|<font face="Euclid Fraktur"><font color="black">SWAT</font><font color="goldenrod">Jester</font></font>]] [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]] [[Special:Contributions/Swatjester|<small>^Ready</small>]] [[RSTA|<small>Aim</small>]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Terrorism|<small>_Fire!</small>]] 00:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

==[[Bosnian Genocide]]==

Is there a specific reason [[Bosnian Genocide]] was unprotected. Since none of the disputes have been resolved, you're just inviting further edit/revert wars.[[User:Zvonko|Zvonko]] 21:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't know if you read over the discussion page but none of the disputed issues have been resolved. I don't think unprotestion was a wise decision.[[User:Zvonko|Zvonko]] 21:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

==Thanks once again==

Good work on the poker-stub sorting mate. Appreciate the help as always. [[User:Essexmutant|Essexmutant]] 14:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

==Protection no longer needed==

The consensus on [[Cartesian materialism]] is that the protection is no longer needed. There is no reason to think that the edit war will resume once protection is lifted. [[User:Alienus|Alienus]] 17:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

:Thank you. [[User:Alienus|Alienus]] 22:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

== Subwayjack ==

I received an email from [[User:Subwayjack|Subwayjack]] asking me to look into his block. From my brief examination of his edit history, I see that he has been quite controversial and has violated Wikipedia policy. But he has expressed a desire to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia. Perhaps a shorter block and some form of dispute resolution are in order. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. &mdash;[[User:Wayward|Wayward]] <small>^{<font color="#6BA800">[[User talk:Wayward|Talk]]</font>}</small> 22:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

=={{user|Squiggyfm}}==

Potentially explosive sock, reaching the point where it might become ''really'' hard to deal with, either that or it'll become bored and start making legal threats, like it's past incarnations did--[[User:152.163.100.69|152.163.100.69]] 04:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

== Hmm... ==

Who's that handsome man? &middot; [[User:Katefan0|'''Katefan0''']]^{[[User talk:Katefan0|(scribble)]]}/<small>[[User:Katefan0/Poll|poll]]</small> 14:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

:Indeed! :)--[[User:Sean Black|Sean Black]] ^{<font color="#FC0FC0">[[User_talk:Sean Black|(talk)]]</font>} 18:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

==SuperDeng's comments==

===Favourism===

If you allow any person to change things on the eastern front page just because they are your friends and then after the changes still keep the page locked I will report you for favourism. Who are you to say ok you can post but you cant. Either everyone is affected by the locking of the page or none is affected, allowing some people to post and some not to post is favourism.

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 11-02-06 12.00 CET

First of all it is absolut fact and your constant threats of blocking me and actually doing so irritates me. what if i were to threaten you after every post would that make you happy? Just because you are an admin does not give you the right to threaten me every 15 min.

The exact friend is this person and this is what you wrote to your friend

I would suggest listing what you want on the talk page and adding the {{Editprotected}} tag. Someone will come by and make the changes you want. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 23:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

the friend is this person [[Constanz]]

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 11-02-06 12.15 CET

Just because your friend posses a high level of knowledge in the topic does not give you the right to favourise him.

[[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 11-02-06 12.35 CET

=== I didnt call anyone an idoit i said the statemnet was idotic===

If someone tells something that is not true that is a lie. If you say a lie you are a lier.

And I brought up this before that that person attacked me, I just stated absolut facts the attack by that person were these.

"Obviously you have never been in the military. It's not like picking up a machinegun. Please tell me what good it is to capture an expensive howitzer only to find the crew destroyed the sights before running away. Please tell us how many hours of mainteance per day it takes to keep a tank battalion operational. I guess the effort both sides spent on providing ordnance units, recovery tractors, repair units, and so forth was wasted. You don't have the slightest notion what you are writing about."

You dont see them as attacks because you even added the " :: " next to them. But I see them as attacks so before you block me, know this.

-Equipment changed hands.

-All the statements are bullshit not only did thousand of tanks change hands so did many pices of artilery.

-Yes some guns did get tampered with but most didnt a good vast majority didnt.

The problem is unlocking the page. Nothing else matters. You do not actively take part in the disscussion as much as you could but yet you are the one who keeps the page locked. But that dosent matter what matters is that we have a page locked and a nice test page that could replace it. It would be so very simple if you would just go and study some world war 2 history compare the locked paged and the test pest and you yourself actively add to the suggestions to what is wrong with the test page so that the page would get unlocked.

([[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 11:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC))

=== Well it would be better to strive for correctnes not agreement ===

That said and more importnaly, if you could use your Admin powers to find out who wrote the part of the eastern front in this article [[Red Army]] That would help alot. Because who ever it was and how many they were they or he/she really hit the nail on the head.

([[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 12:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC))

Maybe later must eat now or will die, and dont you ever sleep if you are in america isnt it like late night early morning there.

([[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 12:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC))

== NLP ==

Yes, we take the mentorship to apply to all pages you feel are reasonably related. While the mentorship remedy (apparently) didn't use the "or a related page" wording, the probation remedy you're enforcing does. Also, a point on mentorship: While it would be great if you all got invovled in some mediation and helped this out, that's not exactly what we envisioned. This conflict has already seen failed mediations, so it went to arbitation. If you see the need to protect the article, it's probably better to just ban the offenders from the article. Edit wars and protection were what happened before arbitration. Now they need to either develop a steep learning curve or find a new hobby. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 05:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

== Wikipedia is interesting but highly susceptable to abuse ==

A few people can manipulate this Wikipedia project to control particular areas to say whatever they want, but not on the basis of reasoned debate, but because of persistency. This a type of persistency is usually associated with an interest in the subject matter over and above an intellectual interest.

The anonymous input is an open door to abusive practices. Vested interests in a subject matter can turn the matter over to staff persons who as part of their job manipulate the internet web sites relating to the subject matter of economic or political importance to them.

Wikipedia is just another site that is highly susceptable to such manipulation. Everyone should be able to participate; but where there is a vested interest that is affected, that vested interest will dominate the subject, not out of reasoned debate, but out of persistence.

[[User:66.91.203.81|66.91.203.81]] 10:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

== Anselm of Canterbury ==

Thank you. I would appreciate it if it could be unprotected in 48 to 72 hours, after the two edit warriors come off of block. It is just an edit war between gay activists and orthodox Catholics, both of whom are polite but stubborn. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] 11:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

== Re: Thank you ==

Hey there, no problem -- I'm just trying to do my bit to keep wp clean and accessible to everyone :) I am on vacation for the moment and work is looking busy for the next week or so -- but when I am back I will help you (and Splash) keep that page clean. Take care, [[User:Novacatz|novacatz]] 13:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

==Cleanup Taskforce==

I added [[Person Centred Planning]] to [[User:Woohookitty/Desk|your desk]]. [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] 18:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

== This will give you a laugh ==

[[User talk:JzG#Vadalism]] (sic), part of Pat's latest crusade to have a referenced source for every fact on the project, including, apparently, the existence of a 2006 Winter Olympics :-D [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] ^{[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]}/_{[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]} [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 19:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

:Oh fuck me, he's only gone and nominated the medal tables from every single Olympic games since 1872 for deletion as uncited! You couldn't make it up. [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympic games medal count]] [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] ^{[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]}/_{[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]} [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 20:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

::Feel free to perform a speedy keep early closure on that. [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] ^{[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]}/_{[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]} [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 20:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)