Content deleted Content added
→JavaLobby reference: new section |
Assessment: Books, Software, +banner shell (Stub), +Java (Low) (Rater) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 4 November 2010 (UTC) | result = '''no consensus''' | page = Thinking in Java }}
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=Stub |1=
{{WikiProject Books}}
{{WikiProject Software}}
{{WikiProject Java |importance=Low}}
}}
== JavaLobby reference ==
IMHO [http://www.javalobby.org/articles/thinking-in-java/ this review] is really questionable, at least because it has an obviously affiliate link to Amazon, and therefore is inherently biased (it also provides an incentive to write a review merely to get affiliate revenues, which makes it ineligible for [[WP:N]] purposes). I'm going to remove it unless explanation why it can/should be considered reliable is provided. [[User:Ipsign|Ipsign]] ([[User talk:Ipsign|talk]]) 15:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Per comment of [[User:AQFK]] on [[Wikipedia:Reliable Sources/Noticeboard]], this review is a user-submitted one to a Web2.0 site w/o editorial oversight and therefore doesn't qualify as [[WP:RS]]. Accordingly, I will remove it. [[User:Ipsign|Ipsign]] ([[User talk:Ipsign|talk]]) 06:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
| |||