Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of development estimation software: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:00, 2 June 2011

Latest revision as of 16:16, 21 February 2023

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 10:

:{{la|Comparison of development estimation software}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of development estimation software|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 May 17#{{anchorencode:Comparison of development estimation software}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

:({{Find sources|Comparison of development estimation software}})

Contested PROD. Original reasoning was '''Not need only three notable software items. See also link is sufficient.'''. Article also has no sources and so qualifies as [[WP:OR]]. [[User:ArcAngel|<span style='color: #ffb612;background-color: #1e1e1e;'><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;ArcAngel&nbsp;&nbsp;</b></span>]] [[User talk:ArcAngel|(talk)]] </span>) 03:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Line 25:

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

*'''Comment''' Only 1 entry in this list now has its own article. [[User:ArcAngel|<span style='color: #ffb612;background-color: #1e1e1e;'><b>&nbsp;&nbsp;ArcAngel&nbsp;&nbsp;</b></span>]] [[User talk:ArcAngel|(talk)]] </span>) 04:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' This looks like unsourced OR to me. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] ^{''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''} 15:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>