Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{Userspace draft|source=ArticleWizard|date={{Subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{Subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}} {{Subst:Nul|<==do not change this line it will set the date automatic...' |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: url, issue, volume. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Matching (graph theory) | #UCB_Category 25/48 |
||
(54 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
The '''weapon target assignment problem''' ('''WTA''') is
▲The '''weapon target assignment problem''' is one of the fundamental [[combinatorial optimization]] problems in the branch of [[Optimization (mathematics)|optimization]] or [[operations research]] in [[mathematics]]. It consists of finding an optimal assignment of a group of weapons of potentially various types to a set of targets.
:There are a number of weapons and a number of targets. The weapons are of type <math> i = 1, \ldots, m </math>. There are <math> W_{i} </math> available weapons of type <math>i</math>. Similarly, there are <math> j = 1, \ldots, n </math> targets, each with a value of <math> V_{j} </math>. Any of the weapons can be assigned to any target. Each weapon type has a certain probability of destroying each target, given by <math> p_{ij} </math>.
▲In its most general form, the problem is as follows:
Both static and dynamic versions of WTA can be considered. In the static case, the weapons are assigned to targets once. The dynamic case involves many rounds of assignment where the state of the system after each exchange of fire (round) is considered in the next round. While the majority of work has been done on the static WTA problem, recently the dynamic WTA problem has received more attention.
== Algorithms and generalizations ==▼
==Example==▼
In spite of the name, there are nonmilitary applications of the WTA. The main one is to search for a lost object or person by heterogeneous assets such as dogs, aircraft, walkers, etc. The problem is to assign the assets to a partition of the space in which the object is located to minimize the probability of not finding the object. The "value" of each element of the partition is the probability that the object is located there.
==Formal mathematical definition==
The
:<math>\min \sum_{j = 1}^n \left ( V_{j}\prod_{i = 1}^m q_{ij}^{x_{ij}} \right )</math>
subject to the constraints▼
:<math>x_{ij}\ge 0\text{ and integer for }i = 1,
Where the variable <math>x_{ij}</math> represents the assignment of as many weapons of type <math>i</math> to target <math>j</math> and <math>q_{ij}</math> is the probability of survival (<math> 1 - p_{ij} </math>). The first constraint requires that the number of weapons of each type assigned does not exceed the number available. The second constraint is the integral constraint.
Notice that minimizing the expected survival value is the same as maximizing the expected damage.
▲== Algorithms and generalizations ==
An exact solution can be found using [[branch and bound]] techniques which utilize [[relaxation (approximation)]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Andersen |first1=A.C. |last2=Pavlikov |first2=K. |last3=Toffolo |first3=T.A.M. |year=2022 |title=Weapon-Target Assignment Problem: Exact and Approximate Solution Algorithms |journal=Annals of Operations Research |volume=312 |issue=2 |pages=581–606 |doi=10.1007/s10479-022-04525-6|url=https://findresearcher.sdu.dk/ws/files/204132463/WTA.pdf }}</ref> Many [[heuristic algorithm]]s have been proposed which provide near-optimal solutions in [[polynomial time]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ahuja |first1=Ravindra K. |last2=Kumar |first2=Arvind |last3=Jha |first3=Krishna C. |last4=Orlin |first4=James B. |year=2007 |title=Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Weapon-Target Assignment Problem |journal=Operations Research |volume=55 |issue=6 |pages=1136–1146 |doi=10.1287/opre.1070.0440}}</ref>
▲==Example==
▲subject to the constraints
A commander has 5 tanks, 2 aircraft, and 1 sea vessel and is told to engage 3 targets with values 5, 10, and 20. Each weapon type has the following success probabilities against each target:
::{| class="wikitable"
▲:<math>\sum_{j\in T}x_{ij}=1\text{ for }i\in A, \, </math>
|-
|-
| Tank || 0.3 || 0.2 || 0.5
▲:<math>x_{ij}\ge 0\text{ for }i,j\in A,T. \, </math>
|-
| Aircraft || 0.1 || 0.6 || 0.5
|-
| Sea Vessel || 0.4 || 0.5 || 0.4
|}
One feasible solution is to assign the sea vessel and one aircraft to the highest valued target (3). This results in an expected survival value of <math> 20(0.6)(0.5)= 6 </math>. One could then assign the remaining aircraft and 2 tanks to target #2, resulting in expected survival value of <math> 10 (0.4)(0.8)^2 = 2.56 </math>. Finally, the remaining 3 tanks are assigned to target #1 which has an expected survival value of <math> 5 (0.7)^3 = 1.715 </math>. Thus, we have a total expected survival value of <math> 6 + 2.56 + 1.715 = 10.275 </math>. Note that a better solution can be achieved by assigning 3 tanks to target #1, 2 tanks and sea vessel to target #2 and 2 aircraft to target #3, giving an expected survival value of <math> 5(0.7)^3 +10(0.5)(0.8)^2 + 20(0.5)^2 = 9.915 </math>.
==See also==
*[[Stable marriage problem]]▼
*[[Auction algorithm]]
*[[Closure problem]]
*[[Generalized assignment problem]]
*[[Linear bottleneck assignment problem]]
*[[Quadratic assignment problem]]
▲*[[Stable marriage problem]]
== References ==▼
{{Reflist}}▼
== Further reading ==
* {{cite book
| authorlink =
| first =
|author2=T. L. Magnanti |author3=J. B. Orlin
| title =
| publisher =
| isbn =
}}
[[Category:Combinatorial optimization]]
[[Category:Matching (graph theory)]]
[[Category:
▲== References ==
▲{{Reflist}}
|