Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Please do not delete this information on an important programming language which is widely used. One may certainly imporve the article, however, letting it disappear in nirvana is not fair. I'm going to try ASAP. BTW I'm neither affiliated nor otherwise involved in this matter (just a user).
{{oldafdfull |date1 = 12 February 2011 (UTC) |page1 = Pure (programming language) |date2=27 February 2011 |page2=Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination)}}▼
▲{{
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |software=y |software-importance=Low}}
}}
* The LLVM 3.0 release notes will reference Pure if anyone wants to add it as citation somewhere http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html [[User:Snaphat|snaphat]] ([[User talk:Snaphat|talk]]) 02:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
== Sieve of Eratosthenes ==
In the examples section, the code given as the "sieve of Eratosthenes" does not appear to be a true sieve of Eratosthenes. It looks more like a Turner's sieve -- a simpler but computationally far less efficient algorithm. [[Special:Contributions/174.27.229.215|174.27.229.215]] ([[User talk:174.27.229.215|talk]]) 00:50, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
== Proposed merge ==
Unless anyone objects, I'm going to complete the merge I proposed in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (3rd nomination)]]. Tagging AfD participants: [[User:HyperAccelerated]], [[User:IntGrah]], [[User:JPxG]], [[User:Adam_Sampson]]. Not going to do a formal [[WP:MERGEPROP]] because I can never remember all the steps. [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 23:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] '''Oppose''' I think [[Prolog]] would be a better example to cite rather than Pure in the article on [[rewriting]]. Perhaps there are yet better examples. [[User:IntGrah|IntGrah]] ([[User talk:IntGrah|talk]]) 23:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] Your proposal sounds good to me. But I'd agree with IntGrah that Prolog is a much better-known example, so I'd add it as another example rather than replacing existing ones. [[User:Adam Sampson|Adam Sampson]] ([[User talk:Adam Sampson|talk]]) 03:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
:Sorry for the late response. I'm fine with this. I'll redirect this page to [[rewriting]] and add a sentence about the Pure programming language. You are free to make amendments to what is said about the language in that article, but it appears that there's several opinions that all agree that this should no longer exist as a standalone article. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 18:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
| |||