Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Questions for the candidate: second answer |
m Fix Linter errors. More needed. Leaving font tags for bots. |
||
| (177 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #f5fff5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a '''successful''' [[wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]]. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it</strong>.[[Category:Successful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]''
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter|Fluffernutter]]===
'''Final (152/0/0); ended 16:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC) <span style="text-shadow:grey .2em .2em .2em;">···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]]<sup>[[WP:HIJCS|?]]</sup> · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WikiProject Japan</span>]]!</small></span> 16:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)''' <!-- Template:finaltally -->
====Nomination====
Line 40 ⟶ 42:
:'''7b.''' For the purposes of this question, assume you have a conflict of interest with subject X. If you spot something problematic in that subject - for example, a disruptive user - and you feel that an administrative action should be taken, where would you go for assistance? Possible examples would be IRC, ANI, a friendly administrator, a completely uninvolved administrator, the article talk page... etc. All of these are appropriate places, I'm just interested in where you'd go ''first''.
::'''A:'''The proper answer to this question depends quite a lot on what, exactly, the situation is, with regard to the type of conflict of interest I have (is it an article associated with my job, where good hygiene is to stay clear but I don't feel passionate? is it an article in which I've been involved in disputes? is it an article that's ideologically important to me?), the type of misbehavior I observe (a user adding "PENIS!" would get very different treatment than, say, someone subtly POV pushing), and the urgency of the situation (has someone violated the BLP policy on a contentious article, such that not acting immediately would be legally dangerous, or is it just someone who wants to change the facts in a paragraph and is arguing loudly on the talk about it?).<p>Those things said, I'll try to give you a general answer based on what you've said. In an area where I have a COI, where I observe problematic conduct that is not an emergency, my first inclination would be to judge whether interacting with the user in question on their talk or the article talk would be useful. Is it possible that a gentle warning, or just some calm engagement and discussion, can help the issue? I feel I would be safely within the bounds of COI to do these things, disclosing my COI to the editor if it was potentially relevant. If my feeling was that one-on-one interaction with me would not be helpful, or if the behavior was immediately disruptive, or if my COI was such that it would not be proper for me to engage on the relevant issue, the next step would be to get further administrator input. As you say, there are a number of venues available for this, but in a case where my handling of the issue could be viewed as problematic due to a COI, the proper step would be to be as transparent as possible and either contact, on-wiki, an uninvolved administrator whom I knew to be neutral with regard to both me and the issue at hand (if I still felt that it was an issue that could be resolved by someone working with the user in question), or post to ANI (if the issue was large, highly problematic, or a hot-topic).</p>
:::I'm not sure I follow this altogether. Do you have a conflict of interest regarding penises? [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 23:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC).
::::Please, don't [[Psychological projection|project]] on this RFA candidate. <big>[[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:deeppink">'''Lara'''</span>]]</big> 00:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
;Additional question from [[User:Sp33dyphil|Sp33dyphil]]
:'''8.''' May I ask, of all the nicknames, why did you choose a sandwich?
::'''A:''' I have fond childhood memories of fluffernutter sandwiches in my bagged lunches at school. Fluffernutters were always way better to find in there than, say, [[peanut butter and jelly|PB&J]] or [[egg salad]]! It's perhaps a bit strange to name myself after a sandwich, but probably no stranger than the stories many people have behind their nicks :)
;Additional question from [[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red; 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em"> Wifione </span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sub style="font-size: 60%">.......</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> Leave a message</sup>''']]
:'''9.''' I appreciate you have gained experience in gnomish work. Yet, I should wish to understand your response to the following situations. Assume you are the administrator responsible for closing the following discussions/nominations. Comment on how you will handle each closure.
::''9a.'' An AfD of a BLP, which has been relisted twice, has found no comments or !votes. How will you close it once 21 days have passed post the initial nomination?
:::'''A:''' The answer to this depends, to some extent, on the reason the article was listed at AfD. Our BLP policy does allow for summary deletions (which is what the decision to delete an article whose AfD had not reached a consensus to delete could be viewed as), but only in cases where the article is problematic on BLP grounds. An article which was proposed as essentially an attack page, as being sourced entirely to non-reliable sources where this cannot be easily remedied, or an article which had privacy issues would be within administrator discretion to summarily delete; an article that was proposed for reading spammily would not. The former, I would be correct to close as a delete; the latter would be more apppopriately closed as no consensus.
::''9b.'' Ten days post a BLP being prodded, the only source added has been a clearly unreliable primary source. How will you close this BLP Prod?
:::'''A:''' This is actually an easy call. Our BLPPROD policy states that a BLPROD is sticky unless and until the article has had a ''reliable'' source added to it backing up at least one of the statements made about the LP in the article. If the source added is patently unreliable, as you say, and/or a primary source (which [[WP:BLPSPS]] tells us is not acceptable as the sole basis for a BLP), as you also say, then the PROD has not been deactivated by the addition of the source, and I would delete at the end of ten days as usual.
::''9c.'' An administrator, who has relisted an AfD twice, closes the AfD himself/herself. What part of our CoI guideline might this closure contravene, if it does at all?
:::'''A: ''' The call of whether or not relisting an AfD constitutes a COI falls mostly under [[WP:INVOLVED]], which allows for actions taken "purely in an administrative role, or [an administrator] whose prior involvement are minor or obvious edits which do not speak to bias." I would argue that the relisting of an AfD is a purely administrative action, and a minor one at that, and thus the administrator who relisted an AfD would have no reason to not also be the administrator who closed the AfD.
;Additional questions from [[User:LikeLakers2|LikeLakers2]]
:'''10a.''' Do you think that [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] should get a yearly 1 minute/1 second block? Why/Why not?
::'''A:'''
:'''10b.''' Can I be sure I can trust you with administrator powers? Or will I be forced to {{tlx|trout}} you without prior warning?
::'''A:'''
:'''10c.''' Jimbo Wales goes <s>apeshit</s> crazy without warning and bans [[User:Legobot|Legobot]]. What do you do?
::'''A:'''
:'''10d.''' Are you planning on taking over the world? If so, explain why.
::'''A:'''
;Additional questions from [[User:Albacore|Albacore]]
:'''11''' Explain how you would verify that an IP is an open proxy since you plan on working in AIV.
::'''A''' Well, I know how to dig up instructions for this sort of thing (in this case, I quickly found [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/Guide_to_checking_open_proxies|this page]], which gives a pretty good outline of the process), and I could quote them back to you, but frankly server/IP tech is not my area, and I wouldn’t be the one I’d want to see handling such a thing if it came up. I would probably gather some evidence that the editing patterns are odd - is it a mix of blatant vandalism and non-vandalism, are the edits coming in at uneven times, does it seem to be vandalizing within disparate topic areas, are there multiple IPs that appear to be "tag-teaming" an article with similar vandalism? - block the IP temporarily if it’s continuing to vandalize, and then find another user, perhaps via [[WP:OP]], who I knew to be technically-inclined and pass that information off to them to investigate and/or act on.
;<s>Additional very required question from [[User talk:Pilif12p|Pilif12p]]</s>
:<s>'''12''' How many [[fluffernutter]]s will you eat if you pass in this RfA? [[User talk:Pilif12p|Pilif]][[Special:Contributions/Pilif12p|12p]] 21:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)</s>
::<s>'''A'''</s>
;Additional questions from [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]]
:'''13''': In what cases would you block editors as vandalism only accounts?
::'''A:''' A vandalism-only account is, in a pleasantly circular fashion, an account that's used only for vandalism. A vandalism only ''account'' (as distinct from a vandal IP, which is not locked into a particular person, is likely to change, and thus can't really be labelled "vandalism-only") should be blocked indefinitely when it becomes clear that they have no intention of contributing constructively. This could be after the full four warnings, if there seems to be some hope of redemption, or it could be after as few as one or two edits, if the vandalism is egregious.
:'''14''': Do you think that there are some situations where editors can be called stupid or told to f off? Like if the other editor is edit warring or posting on someone's talk page when they were told not too?
::'''A:''' No, there is never any circumstance in which it's acceptable to call another editor stupid or tell them to 'f off'. We are a collegial environment, and interactions here should be in good faith and without [[ad hominem]] attacks.
:'''15''': What is your opinion on IPs being allowed to edit?
::'''A:''' I think IP editing should be allowed. Despite the amount of IP vandalism we get, we get just as much, if not more, constructive content from IPs, and at a time where we're trying to maintain our numbers, putting up barriers to entry like "you must register to fix this typo" is a problematic approach.
;Additional question from [[User:Σ|Σ]]
:'''16.''' You mentioned that you would like to work with protected edit requests. A 2 month old request to a highly visible template has gained much support and no opposition in for not editing it. Nobody other than the user who proposed the edit understands the mass of parser functions and magic words he wishes to add, though the user claims that adding the code will do no harm. No other admin is willing to edit the page, so what do you do?
::'''A:'''
====General comments====
Line 55 ⟶ 102:
*Stats are now [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter|on the talk page]]. [[User:Logan|Logan]] <sub>[[User_talk:Logan|Talk]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Logan|Contributions]]</sup> 16:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
*Why is Fluffernutter being asked so many joke questions? SRSLY GUYZ. <small>'''[[User:Jorgenev#top|jorgenev]]'''</small> 06:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
*Some of these questions are bizarre and frankly ridiculous - is there something in the air at the moment? [[User:Brookie|'''<span style="color:#000888;">Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! </span>''']] [[User talk:Brookie|<sup>(Whisper...)</sup>]] 10:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
**See related discussion on the talkpage. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 14:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
=====Support=====
Line 69 ⟶ 119:
#'''Enthusiastic Support''' Not only is Fluffernutter the best gnome I've personally seen on Wikipedia, she has a rare knack for breaking down [[Special:LongPages]] into more manageable daughter articles, and has been a (much needed) calming voice of sanity in the en.wikipedia IRC channel for years. I couldn't think of a more qualified candidate for adminship than Fluffernutter! —[[User:NickDupree|NickDupree]] ([[User talk:NickDupree|talk]]) 17:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Very well-qualified. Good luck!--[[User:EdwardZhao|EdwardZhao]] ([[User talk:EdwardZhao|talk]]) 17:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No concerns '''[[User:Jebus989|<
#'''Support''' - Everything looks good to me. [[User:The Utahraptor|<
#'''Support''' as nom. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 17:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Why not? -'''[[User:Fastily|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#4B0082'><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Fastily|<span style = 'color:#4B0082'>(TALK)</span>]]</small></sup> 17:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - Having known Fluff for several months now, mostly off-wiki, I am confident that she will make a fine administrator. I trust her with a lot of my own personal information, as she is someone I feel comfortable confiding in about personal matters, so I have no doubt she can be trusted with both the tools and sensitive information (also shown by OTRS access) that comes with adminship. Also, she invested a great amount of money and time to travel from the US to Israel for Wikimania (for which she was a speaker), which indicates to me how seriously she views the project and her work within it. <big>[[User talk:Jennavecia|<span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:deeppink">'''Lara'''</span>]]</big> 18:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Puffin|<
#'''Support''' - Fully qualified. <span style='color:black'><
#'''Support:''' I can think of no one more qualified for the tools. [[User:Topher385|Topher385]] ([[User talk:Topher385|talk]]) 18:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per my observation of work at OTRS and per a short review of randomly selected contributions. I'm sure that both within and outside of OTRS requests, she will make constructive use of the tools. --[[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 19:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' no brainer. [[User:PumpkinSky|<
#'''Strong support''' - An excellent candidate for a mop. [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 20:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Hey! You [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFluffernutter&action=historysubmit&diff=440658041&oldid=440654504 forgot to tell me] you were up for Admin! Harumph. Well, I'm crashing your party anyway to support. [[Image:Smiley_head_happy.svg|19px]] – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup> 20:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#:lol, I'm sorry, I've been so het up about just getting my feet under me on this that I forgot to send up the bat signal! [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 20:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' sure. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<
#'''Support''' in January, Fluffernutter helped resolve a slightly heated (if extremely minor) conflict at [[St. Bernard (dog)]]; the assistance was hugely helpful, and looking through the last several months of contributions this seems to be a pattern. Wholehearted support. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|<
#'''Om nom nom''' <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<
#'''About bloody time!''' [[User:HJ Mitchell|<
#'''Support'''. Fluffernutter has my support here, and I apologise for any problems my question may have caused. In hindsight, it was inappropriate, although I meant no harm from it. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|The Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Message me]]) 23:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Absolutely, get a new mop ready. '''[[User:Ronhjones|<span style="border:1px solid black; color:
# Sure, happy to support. <
# How could anyone not support? Pile on support {{=)|grin}} <span style="background-color:silver;color:black;">[[User:Egg Centric|Egg]] [[User_talk:Egg Centric|Centric]]</span> 00:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' well-rounded, well-qualified--[[User:Hokeman|Hokeman]] ([[User talk:Hokeman|talk]]) 00:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''support '''in no wat dimmed by any query from my fellow <s>tool</s>...er Arb [[User:Elen of the Roads|Elen of the Roads]] ([[User talk:Elen of the Roads|talk]]) 00:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 00:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
# Fluffernutter is one of those editors who quietly goes about making the encyclopedia better; we can never have too many admins of that variety. From what I've seen of her participation at AfD and other forums, and her excellent copyediting, she'll continue being a gentle voice of reason as a sysop. Best of luck. [[User talk:Sonia|<
# '''Support''' Yes please! From my limited IRC interactions with Fluffernutter and the work I've seen, there's no reason for me to oppose! —<span style="font-family:trebuchet ms">'''[[User:M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">James</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">Talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/M.O.X|<span style="color:#003366">Contribs</span>]])</sup> • 10:19am''' •</span> 00:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
# This may be the only time when my comment includes the words "thought she was an admin already". I have had the pleasure of meeting her in person and discussing wiki-issues, and she has been as sensible off-line as she is on-wiki. [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 00:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Line 103 ⟶ 153:
#I <3 flufflernutters! (And fluffernutter the user, of course.) <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 04:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#Well suited for this role. [[User:Townlake|Townlake]] ([[User talk:Townlake|talk]]) 05:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a good all-rounder. [[User:Minimac|<
#'''Support''' Why not? --[[User:Bsadowski1|Bsa]][[User talk:Bsadowski1|dow]][[Special:Contributions/Bsadowski1|ski1]] 09:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No problems here. (I do like peanut butter and jam sandwiches, but we don't seem to have marshmallow creme over here so I can't sample a fluffermutter...) [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 11:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#
#'''Of course''', intelligent, reasonable, able to remain calm in heated situations, knows her way around the 'pedia...I can only wonder why she never ran for adminship sooner! [[user:OohBunnies!|<sup><small><
#'''Support'''. Without hesitation. My main reasons may be somewhat different from other people's, in that I don;t particularly indulge in edit-counting, or numbers of GA's, FA's, and so on. We need all sorts, and we need trustworthy allsorts, and the allsorts working in lower-profile areas need mops for those areas, too. I particularly like the way FLuffernutter interacts with others; not afraid to tell it how it is, but in an inherently clueful, reasoned, rational and non-confrontational kind of way. When I stalk contribs (watch out, y'all - I admitted to being a stalker!) I focus on people's interactions with each other. It helps me know them better. I've yet to see anything in this background which would give me any distrust in Fluffernutter's ability to wield the mop. [[User:ThatPeskyCommoner| <span style="color:#003300; font-family: cursive;">'''Pesky'''</span>]] ([[User talk:ThatPeskyCommoner|<span style="color:#336600;">talk</span>]] …[[Special:Contributions/ThatPeskyCommoner|''stalk!'']]) 13:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''', of course. No concerns here, simply why not? '''''[[User:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|DARTH SIDIOUS 2]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2|Contact]])</sup> 14:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Line 115 ⟶ 165:
#'''Support''': Fluffernutter has a perfect understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. [[User:Joe Chill|Joe Chill]] ([[User talk:Joe Chill|talk]]) 15:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — No concerns. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' <small>I was concerned that the stats on this RfA's talk page showed so few pages extensively edited, and the [[Whoopi Goldberg]] edits seemed all to be reverts and two minor moves. However, the user page displays some serious content contributions. Why don't they appear on the page stats?</small> Good editor with good content contributions. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<
#:<small>Probably because I preview a lot in my big edits, so a whole article copyedit or rewrite would tend to show up as 1-3 edits, while vandalism reversion is one edit at a time that adds up over years. Stupid good-watchlist-hygiene, minimizing mah stats! [[User:Fluffernutter|A fluffernutter is a sandwich!]] ([[User talk:Fluffernutter|talk]]) 17:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)</small>
#'''Support''' An extremely skilled editor, apply to deal with difficult editing problems, and will find good use for the tools. Should also be an exceptionally good aeven-handed and sensible administrator. I, like several of the others above, know her in person, and, like them, it only adds to the strength of my recommendation. The more things she is able to do at Wikipedia, the better the encyclopedia will be. In fact, I've mentioned her work as an example of how much can be done here, in trying to recruit and encourage new editors. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 21:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' a sense of humour, a couple of GAs and good communication skills are a plus. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 21:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Seems well equipped...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 23:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. If Courcelles supports then I support. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 02:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC).
#Yes. ~'''[[User:Red Rover112|<span style="color:red;">Red Rover</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Red Rover112|Talk to me!]])</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Red Rover112|contribs]]</small> 02:49, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Bejinhan|<span style="color:#8000FF;">Bejinhan</span>]] [[User talk:Bejinhan|<span style="color:#FF00FF;">talks</span>]] 02:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Yes, please. I've seen her around a good bit on IRC, and her contributions are very good. Additionally, the sense of humor will probably work to her favor; it's good to be able to approach things with a humorous attitude. <span style="font-family: Georgia">– [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small></span> 03:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – Deserves for admin chair.[[User:Bill william compton|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#009900"><sup></sup> — Bill william compton</font></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Bill william compton|<span style="color:#000000;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 03:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#Thought you were already a sandwich...I mean an administrator. In all seriousness, great editor and will make a fine sysops. [[User:Calmer Waters|<span style="color:black">'''''Calmer'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Calmer Waters|<span style="color:Blue">'''''Waters'''''</span>]] 04:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Hired'''. Have fun with your new mop! Thanks for reviewing [[WP:AFC|articles for creation]], by the way. It's a thankless task. — [[User talk:CharlieEchoTango|CharlieEchoTango]] 07:13, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:TBloemink|TBloemink]] ([[User talk:TBloemink|talk]]) 09:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SNOWFIGHT!!!--[[User:Cerejota|Cerejota]] ([[User talk:Cerejota|talk]]) 09:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' without hesitation. In my capacity as an administrator and volunteer, not as an employee action. - [[User Talk:Philippe|<span style="font-family:Papyrus, sans-serif; color:#775ca8;">Philippe</span>]] 11:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC) [[Image:Beatrix in New York.jpg|right|250px]]
#This seems to be of the "Duh!" variety. Give her a mop and the t-shirt already! [[User:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">'''Striker'''</span><span style="color:#330099;">'''force'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">Talk</span>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor_review/Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">Review me!</span>]]</sup> 11:33, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# Fluffernutter is great, though in disclaimer I've hung out with her a bit so maybe I'm biased... :-) [[User:Jdforrester|James F.]] [[User talk:Jdforrester|(talk)]] 12:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# I think the number of people making jovial comments in their supporting - the vast majority of those in this section, I would wager - is a testament to her accessibility and her friendliness. Also quite telling is the lack of opposes thus far. Fluffernutter, to use an American cliché, covers all the bases here; by being both obviously competent and willing to work in challenging domains and, at the same time, retaining a lighthearted sense of humour in her work, she will undoubtedly be able to stem disputes, judge and explain her perception of consensus in certain scenarios, and, most importantly, not go stark raving insane when it comes to the less glamorous aspects of mop-wielding. I should also note the financial expense she has suffered for the project - her journey to Wikimania was, to my knowledge, done purely from her own pocket. If that is not a serious commitment to this project, I do not know what is. All the best. — [[User talk:Fox|Joseph '''Fox''']] 13:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# I am not at all sure that it is good for a candidate to be completely unopposed, but I can see nothing that warrants anything other than support. Bah, humbug etc. [[User:Ben MacDui|<span style="color:#6495ED;">Ben</span>]] [[User talk:Ben MacDui|<span style="color:#C154C1;">Mac</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Ben MacDui|<span style="color:#228B22;">Dui</span>]] 14:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#Don't see why not. –[[User:BuickCenturyDriver|BuickCentury]][[User talk:BuickCenturyDriver|Driver]] 15:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I had the pleasure of watching Fluffernutter present at Wikimania. She has the sort of judgment I like seeing in administrators. [[User talk:Harej|''hare'']] '''j''' 15:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Sensible editor. Giving her the admin tools will be a net positive to the project.--[[User:Sodabottle|Sodabottle]] ([[User talk:Sodabottle|talk]]) 16:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Has my full support as someone with brains and common sense and will easily be a net gain for the community if she has the mop. Therefore meets the most important requirements to be an admin and should get it. [[User:Jamesofur|James of UR]] ([[User talk:Jamesofur|talk]]) 16:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''', clueful enough! <span style="font-family:Arial;"> [[User:PeterSymonds|<span style="color:#02e;">Peter</span><b style="color:#02b;">Symonds</b>]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|<span style="color:#02e;">talk</span>]])</span> 17:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Definitely. <font face="Palatino Linotype"><big>'''[[User:Smithers7|<span style="color:black;">smithers</span>]]''' - [[User talk:Smithers7|<span style="color:black;">talk</span>]]</big></font> 19:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Excellent answers to questions, clearly very intelligent, clearly an ideal temperament, clearly dedicated to the project, clearly an ideal candidate. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 21:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Has no issues. [[User:Wayne Slam|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkblue">Wayne</span>''']][[User talk:Wayne Slam|'''<span style="color:darkBlue">Slam</span>''']] 22:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Good contributions. Sensible. [[User:Axl|<span style="color:#808000;">'''Axl'''</span>]] <span style="color:#3CB371;">¤</span> [[User talk:Axl|<span style="color:#808000; font-size:smaller;">[Talk]</span>]] 23:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''', an excellent candidate. --[[User:Taelus|Taelus]] ([[User talk:Taelus|talk]]) 23:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
#I have nothing but good impressions of her and her work. <span style="font-family:Lucida Calligraphy;">[[User:LadyofShalott|<span style="color:#ee3399;">Lady</span>]]<span style="color:#0095c6;">of</span>[[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<span style="color:#442288;">Shalott</span>]]</span> 00:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''. Well-qualified candidate, well-rounded experience, good answers to questions, no concerns. (Plus she beat me at Wiki-Jeopardy at the last year's New York wikiconference.) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 01:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A name associated only with positive things here. [[User:Cullen328|'''<span style="color:green;">Cullen</span>'''<sup style="color:purple;">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:blue;">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 01:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Wizardman|<span style="color:#030">'''''Wizardman'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User:Wizardman/Operation Big Bear|<span style="color:#600">Operation Big Bear</span>]]</sub> 03:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#[[User:Wifione|'''<span style="color: red; 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em"> Wifione </span>''']] [[User talk:Wifione|'''<sub style="font-size: 60%">.......</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> Leave a message</sup>''']] 04:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' Level-headed, experienced, and would be a great asset to the community. '''[[User:SMasters|SMasters]]''' ([[User talk:SMasters#top|talk]]) 04:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Adequate tenure, clean block log, no indications of assholery. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 05:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' I'm still very new here, so I've mainly interacted with Fluffernutter on IRC, and while that "doesn't count" for the purposes of this vote, it has shown me a person echoed in the many comments of support here. Fluffster is an excellent channel op; she's skilled at cooling down potential conflicts and has a good sense of humor while avoiding snark and personal disdain. What has strongly impressed me on-wiki is her handling of the Harold Covington controversy. Here is a true BLP bucket of snakes: a clearly notable subject who has threatened legal action against Wikipedia. An editor stubs his page. Instead of merely trying to soothe the arguing parties (worthy enough in itself), Fluffster takes the more difficult step of carefully vetting all the sources point-by-point, while saving a re-write/revert for an editor at a later date to let the issue cool off. This shows someone willing to do the difficult, behind the scenes tasks, someone who leads with careful work instead of a desire to amp the drama or vindicate an opinion about a page's notability. Wikipedia couldn't do better. [[User:Snardbafulator|Snardbafulator]] ([[User talk:Snardbafulator|talk]]) 08:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - an excellent candidate and good answers above - give the lady a mop! [[User:Brookie|'''<span style="color:#000888;">Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! </span>''']] [[User talk:Brookie|<sup>(Whisper...)</sup>]] 08:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Excellent.--[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 10:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Excellent contributions to the project. Deserves to be an admin -- [[User:Marek69|<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Marek</span>]]<small>.</small>[[Special:Contributions/Marek69|<small><span style="color:Blue;">69</span></small>]][[User_talk:Marek69|<small><span style="color:Green;"><sup>'' talk''</sup></span></small>]] 10:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' bumped into this fine lady a few times, especially on IRC, and always found her knowledgable and good humoured. Besides the fact I've never eaten [[Marshmallow creme|Marshmallow fluff]], let alone a [[fluffernutter]], I am confident that a support vote here is the right one. (And who am I to complain about odd names, eh?) [[User:Worm That Turned|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font color="#000">'''''Worm'''''<sup>TT</sup></font></span>]] <span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> ([[User Talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) 12:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:Mato|Mato]] ([[User talk:Mato|talk]]) 12:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:green">Cbrown1023</span>]]''' '''<small>[[User talk:Cbrown1023|<span style="color:#002bb8">talk</span>]]</small>''' 15:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''', has a good head on shoulders. And without that username, I'd never have known what a fluffernutter was. Not to mention anyone who has a doppelgänger account in IPA must be a good choice. [[WP:100]]! [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 15:57, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Has never yet deleted the Main Page, and is unlikely to do so in future.--[[User:Pharos|Pharos]] ([[User talk:Pharos|talk]]) 16:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''': All contributions have improved Wikipedia in some way and any problems dealt with in a calm and careful manner. There is absolutely no reason not to give [[User:Fluffernutter|Fluffernutter]] the remaining tools to make this easier. --[[User:Mrmatiko|Mrmatiko]] ([[User talk:Mrmatiko|talk]]) 17:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#As long as I can eat her later. [[User:The ed17|Ed]] <sup>[[User talk:The ed17|[talk]]] [[WP:OMT|[majestic titan]]]</sup> 17:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No reason why not. [[User:Monty845|<span style="color:green;">Monty</span>]][[User talk:Monty845|<small><sub style="color:#A3BFBF;">845</sub></small>]] 18:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I've known this user for a long time, and all our interactions have been positive (even when our opinion has differed). I see nothing that concerns me in contribs, and I liked the answers to questions above. Fluffernutter, this RfA looks like a ringing endorsement; please be cautious with your new tools, and please continue being kind and friendly, especially to new users, as I know you have thus far. Best, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 18:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' What can I say? The woman knows that a Fluffernutter is a sandwich, that's qualification enough for me! [[User:Atomician|Atomician]] ([[User talk:Atomician|talk]]) 19:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Fantastic member of the community, no issues supporting this! - <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">[[User:methecooldude|Rich<span style="color:Red;">(MTCD)</span>]]</span><sup>[[User talk:methecooldude|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Methecooldude|C]]|[[Special:EmailUser/methecooldude|E-Mail]]</sup> 20:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Yup. [[User:Snottywong|<b style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 0.4em,#5a0 -0.2em -0.2em 0.4em,#0a0 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;color:#ddd">—SW—</b>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snottywong|chat]]</small></sup> 20:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Sure, no concerns here. - [[User:JuneGloom07|<span style="color:Purple; font-family:'Arial';">'''JuneGloom'''</span>]] [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<span style="color:Green; font-family:'Times New Roman';">Talk</span>]] 21:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I'm not sure why I'm supporting a sandwich for adminship, but... <small>(just kidding, Fluffernutter is awesome and will be a great admin)</small> [[User:Logan|Logan]] <sub>[[User_talk:Logan|Talk]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Logan|Contributions]]</sup> 22:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#About time. [[User:Blurpeace|<span style="color:#002BB8;">'''Blurpeace'''</span>]] 22:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Always nice to have friends with power tools. Also per my philosophy that if someone can be trusted with OTRS access they can be trusted with pretty much any other rights we've got. [[User:Sven Manguard|<span style="color:#207004;">'''<big>S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</span>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><span style="color:#F0A804;">'''Wha?'''</span></small>]] 22:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A number of your supporters make me a touch hesitant, but your record looks good so I won't hold it against you.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 22:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#Let's go ahead and '''crush this user's soul under the burden of adminship'''. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 22:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Yah!''' <3 [[User talk:Pilif12p|Pilif]][[Special:Contributions/Pilif12p|12p]] 22:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' – An excellent candidate. She would do well with the tools. [[User:Acps110|Acps110]] <sup>([[User talk:Acps110|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Acps110|contribs]])</sup> 00:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Outstanding candidate. – [[User:Athaenara|Athaenara]] [[User talk:Athaenara| ✉ ]] 00:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I have seen nothing but fine work from this editor. May this RfA go down unanimously unopposed! -- [[User:OlEnglish|<span style="font-size:x-large;">œ</span>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 01:16, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Superman Strong Support'''. I know <s>Chaotic Butterfly</s> Flutternutter on IRC, and she is a very nice person. I would not be suprised if she created a page with a vandalism1 warning, while simultaneously also offering a plate of {{#ifexist: WikiCookies | [[WikiCookies]] | WikiCookies }} to that vandal, as a welcoming present. [[User:LikeLakers2|LikeLakers2]] ([[User talk:LikeLakers2|talk]]) 03:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. No concerns at all. [[User:Eeekster|Eeekster]] ([[User talk:Eeekster|talk]]) 03:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I have nothing but good things to say about this user. Worked with them for years and always a pleasure to work with. [[User:Zscout370]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Zscout370|(Return Fire)]]</sup></small> 04:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. See no reason to think Fluffernutter will abuse the tools. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jayjg|<small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</small>]]</sup> 05:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Looks good! [[User:Enti342|<span style='font-family:;color:#00CC00'><big>Enti342</big></span>]] [[User_talk:Enti342|<span style='font-family:;COLOR:#336600'><small> MEMO</small></span>]] 05:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ''<B>-- [[User:RP459|<span style="color:DarkBlue">RP459</span>]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:RP459|<span style="color:DarkGreen">Talk</span>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/RP459|<span style="color:#660000">Contributions</span>]]</sub> 14:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; competent, hardworking, and can be trusted with the tools. [[User:Bobrayner|bobrayner]] ([[User talk:Bobrayner|talk]]) 20:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Consistently demonstrates responsible virtues, good content, named after a sammich. <span id="sig" style="border: 1px solid; background-color:black">[[User:IShadowed|'''<span style="color:#87F717;"> IShadowed </span>''']][[User talk:IShadowed|<span style="color:#800000; background-color:black"> ✰ </span>]]</span> 00:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Sure! --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 00:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - no concerns here.--[[User:Unionhawk|Unionhawk]] <sup>[[User talk:Unionhawk|Talk]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:EmailUser/Unionhawk|E-mail]]</sup> 01:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
# One of the best candidates I have seen. --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color:green;">My Talk</span>]] 02:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
# I have looked for every reason in the wiki world to oppose this candidate (because I am bitter) and all I can find are reasons to '''support'''. [[User:My76Strat|My76Strat]] ([[User talk:My76Strat|talk]]) 02:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Secret|Secret]] <sup>[[User talk:Secret|account]]</sup> 04:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Worse disagreement I've had with her was that she hated veggies, while I loved meat. If that's the worse I have on someone... <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|contribs]] / [[WP:PHYS|physics]] / [[WP:WBOOKS|books]]}</span> 04:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I knew Fluffernutter is a friendly person but wasn't familiar with her contributions until I did the research for this RfA, including a comprehensive review of her talk page contributions. My conclusions: She is consistently [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chappaquiddick_incident&diff=prev&oldid=435688695 diplomatic], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christine_%28novel%29&diff=prev&oldid=250295735 invites feedback from others], provides good [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Willamette_River/GA1 thorough] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tri-state_water_dispute&diff=prev&oldid=430515657 feedback], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:LaVonne_Salle%C3%A9&diff=prev&oldid=404651900 admits mistakes]. She has civilly handled discussions about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stephen_King&diff=prev&oldid=212382299 recentism] and [[WP:SPOILER]]. She has enormous [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dublin_Philharmonic_Orchestra&diff=prev&oldid=430126997 patience] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Horacio_Guti%C3%A9rrez&diff=prev&oldid=436681348 newbies], and keeps cool in the face of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Catfish_%28film%29&diff=prev&oldid=387978964 personal attacks] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vere_Bird,_Jr./GA1&diff=prev&oldid=437719465 unhelpful feedback]. She is skilled at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harold_Covington&diff=prev&oldid=442371102 finding] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_common_misconceptions&diff=prev&oldid=400133711 reliable] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Watson_%28computer%29&diff=prev&oldid=403253127 sources]. She occasionally [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Mousetrap&diff=prev&oldid=389545951 makes] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Cain%27t_Say_No&diff=prev&oldid=283843215 errors] and gets [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Mousetrap&diff=prev&oldid=325616680 frustrated], but that just shows she's human. I have only minor disagreements (e.g. she's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harold_Covington&diff=prev&oldid=440719424 more conservative] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship%2FFluffernutter&action=historysubmit&diff=444817162&oldid=444812180 with BLP] than I am, and I'd like to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Pendragons&diff=prev&oldid=242516035 make sure she's familiar] with [[Wikipedia:Link rot]]). [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 05:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#::'''Comment''' Derrick, this is an exceptionally well-researched comment, and it reflects well on you, and it also reflects well on on Fluffernutter. Thank you for doing the work. [[User:Cullen328|'''<span style="color:green;">Cullen</span>'''<sup style="color:purple;">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:blue;">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 05:45, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#::'''Comment''' On the last matter (link rot), I've worked closely with Fluffernutter and wrote a [https://gist.github.com/1070553 custom AWB module] to help her do reflist fixing quicker and easier. The link Dcoetzee provided was from 2008, and I can point out that Fluffernutter has been working on WikiGnome tasks related to reflists and footnotes and is more than competent to understand link rot and other issues to do with referencing. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 08:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#::'''Comment''' Yes, this is exactly the kind of stuff I was referring to in my support up above! I've seen so much of this excellent style of interaction ... but of course Dcoetzee has put in the effort to provide all the nice links :o) Ta, Derrick! Beautifully illustrated. [[User:ThatPeskyCommoner| <span style="color:#003300; font-family: cursive;">'''Pesky'''</span>]] ([[User talk:ThatPeskyCommoner|<span style="color:#336600;">talk</span>]] …[[Special:Contributions/ThatPeskyCommoner|''stalk!'']]) 02:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#Why not? -'''''[[User:Porchcorpter|Porch corpter]]''''' <span style="font-size:12px;">([[User talk:Porchcorpter|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Porchcorpter|contribs]])</span> 09:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I haven't had any interaction with Fluffernutter before so I was waiting to !vote on this one. The links pointed out by [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] really show that Fluffernutter is a perfect candidate for adminship. Plus, I'm hungry. [[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']] [[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Ryan Vesey|<small>Review me!</small>]] 18:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Looked around at this users edits and could not find a reason not to.—<font face="Segoe Print">[[User talk:Theda|<span style="color:#00CED1;">'''Theda'''</span>]]</font> 22:37, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Did a great GA review, for example: [[Talk:Willamette River/GA1]]. [[User:Jsayre64|<font style="font-family:Rockwell"><b>Jsayre64</b></font>]] [[User talk:Jsayre64|<font style="font-family:Rockwell"><b>(talk)</b></font>]] 04:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''' With the unanimous support from the community, I'll make an absolute fool of myself if I do otherwise. [[User:Sp33dyphil|<small><b style="background:HotPink;color:white;">Sp33dyphil</b></small>]] ''<sup>"[[User talk:Sp33dyphil|Ad]] [[User:Sp33dyphil/Master plan|astra]]"</sup>'' 07:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Super strong support''' Thought you we're already an admin! --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 16:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' er Pharos. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] ([[User talk:Agathoclea|talk]]) 19:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — I like sandwiches. [[User:Master&Expert|'''<span style="color:Blue">Master&</span>'''<span style="color:#00FFFF">Expert</span>]] ([[User talk:Master&Expert|<span style="color:purple">Talk</span>]]) 22:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' meets my admin requirements (I've heard of them and I believe them to be at least vaguely sensible).©[[User:Geni|Geni]] 22:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No opposition for 6 days. I'll keep the support going.--[[User:1966batfan|1966batfan]] ([[User talk:1966batfan|talk]]) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' wholeheartedly. [[User:Paul Erik|<span style="font-family:Comic sans MS;">Paul Erik</span>]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Paul Erik|<span style="color:blue;">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Paul Erik|<span style="color:green;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup></small> 23:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User talk:Mabdul|<b style="font-family:Courier New; display:inline; border:#009 1px dashed; padding:1px 6px 2px 7px; white-space:nowrap; color:#000000; font-size:smaller;">mabdul</b>]] 00:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''- Rationale of opposes to date is unconvincing. [[User:Dru of Id|Dru of Id]] ([[User talk:Dru of Id|talk]]) 05:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per deCoetzee and a hundred and something others. Great nom, great answers. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 06:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#Thoroughly impressed with your track record. I'm not particularly fond of [[Beefsteak (banquet)|tags on a good article]], but since the article's obscure, I guess it's understandable. '''[[User:Ceranthor|<span style="color:#4682B4; font-family:Optima;">ceran</span>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<span style="color:#4682B4; font-family:Optima;">''thor''</span>]] 07:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' From the diffs that Dcoetzee has so kindly provided, and from the answers to the questions posed, I believe that Fluffernutter would make an excellent admin. I am more than willing to add my support. [[User:Thistheman|<span style="font-family:'Verdana'; color:Burgundy;">Thistheman</span>]] 07:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Absolutely not'''...''obviously'' evading the world domination question. I give an F. Epic Fail.--[[User:Sallicio|This user supports world domination...and sandwiches]][[User talk:Sallicio|<sup><math>\color{Red} \oplus</math></sup>]] 09:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Damn you, peer pressure! Honestly though, looks like a good candidate and will serve the community well. Plus, you know, "OMG, a girl running for adminship!!!!!" {{=)|wink}} Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #35628F">Why</span>]]''' 10:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Most definitely. [[User:Cindamuse|<span style="color:navy; font-family:Tahoma;">Cind.</span>]]<span style="color:purple; font-family:Tahoma;">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|<span style="color:purple;">amuse</span>]] (Cindy)</span> 15:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
=====Oppose=====
Line 126 ⟶ 273:
#
<!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts.
:''The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this nomination]] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||