Talk:Fixed-point lemma for normal functions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 07:15, 31 August 2011 edit Arthur Rubin (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 130,168 edits →Limit Ordinal Definition: WP:BRD ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 20:32, 11 March 2024 edit undo Jlwoodwa (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 106,316 edits →Proof that normal functions commute with suprema: unsigned
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: {{~~maths~~WikiProject ~~rating~~banner shell\|class=Start\|~~priority=Low\|field=foundations}}~~ {{WikiProject Mathematics\|priority=Low}} }} == Limit Ordinal Definition == Line 8 ⟶ 9: :Per [[WP:BRD]], the status of the article before you started editing it should be used until consensus is obtained; i.e., zero is '''not''' a [[limit ordinal]]. — [[User:Arthur Rubin\|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin\|(talk)]] 07:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC) == Proof that normal functions commute with suprema == It seems like this should be proven, since the Fixed-point lemma is then just a corollary of that fact. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TheKing44\|TheKing44]] ([[User talk:TheKing44#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheKing44\|contribs]]) 00:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)</small>