Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tool Integration Language (TIL): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Tool Integration Language (TIL). (TW) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. clear consensus after the relisting '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 04:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
===[[Tool Integration Language (TIL)]]===
:{{la|Tool Integration Language (TIL)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tool Integration Language (TIL)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November
:({{Find sources|Tool Integration Language (TIL)}})
Very specialised modelling language. Article was deleted once for lack of notability. The reference now added does little to improve the situation. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC) — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 10:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
* '''Delete''' Does not meet general notability. Single-purpose account and conflict of interest potential. Seems the usual sad case of a poor new user not being familiar with guidelines. Article created on the first edit of [[Special:Contributions/Mattbiehl|Mattbiehl]], who has only made edits on this article and one talking about it. The first author of the one reference is Matthias Biehl. Clearly the title does not comply with conventions (the trailing acronym in parens). An article on [[tool integration language]] might stand a better chance of survival. That is, an article on the general topic as indicated by the lower case title. It could, for example, cite the [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=664351 paper here] from 20 years ago on the subject, and give others up to and including the 2011 one on similar subjects. We generally do not consider subjects of a single student paper as notable, but wait until at least one other independent source at least mentions it. Perhaps userfy if the editor is willing to come up to speed with policy? [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 18:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 02:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
* '''Delete''' - Non-notable Computer progamming (?) language. I'm sure it exists, just isn't notable enough for an article. --[[User:Madison-chan|Madison-chan]] ([[User talk:Madison-chan|talk]]) 02:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Not notable enough for its own language. I would support W Nowicki's suggestion for a more creation of a more general article and inclusion of this specific instance within that. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||