Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decode-Encode Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Computing |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 17:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
===[[Decode-Encode Language]]===
:{{la|Decode-Encode Language}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decode-Encode Language|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 19#{{anchorencode:Decode-Encode Language}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 6 ⟶ 12:
While many of the 6000 RFCs are notable (and indeed used as the basis of systems like wikipedia), I can find no evidence that this particular RFC is notable. The name isn't conducive to googling, so I'd encourage other's to have a crack too. The fact that the internet version of the RFC appears to contain OCR errors that appear to have gone unnoticed is also telling. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 02:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
* Weak '''Delete''' The OCR errors are because it was written in 1969, before the days anyone thought of putting documents on a computer (they were way too expensive back then).That makes it quite historical; way ahead of its time like much else in the Englebart SRI lab which developed early Arpanet applications. But it is already mentioned in Rulifson's article. RFC 2555 does mention it on its 30th anniversary. In some ways it had a similar function to the original purpose of the [[NeWS]] window system, ActiveX, and the [[Java programming language]] which runs on billions of devices today. It should be mentioned probably in those aritcles too, much of the computer networking history on Wikipedia starts in the 1990s and ignores the previous 30 years. But probably does not need one of its own, especially one that does not give historic context. I do not think it was ever implemented, for example. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 18:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||