Talk:BlackBerry Limited: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:53, 6 April 2006

Latest revision as of 15:10, 21 August 2025

(118 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{talk header|search=yes}}

Moved to this capitalization; company policy is to capitalize the 'I'. [[User:Radagast|Radagast]]

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|

==My reversion==

{{WikiProject Canada|on=yes|importance=High}}

I reverted the change to this article because it is a cut and paste from current event news. That is against the [[WP:CP|Copyright Policy]] of Wikipedia.--[[User:Kungfuadam|Adam]] [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]^{([[User_talk:Kungfuadam|talk]])} 23:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

{{WikiProject Companies|importance=Mid}}

==Patent Litigation==

{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid|hardware=yes|hardware-importance=Mid|software=yes|software-importance=Low}}

Added section on earlier history of RIM patent litigation. See links for sources.--[[User:Nowa|Nowa]] 16:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

{{WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction|importance=Mid}}

:Can someone put reference tags on these, and put the links down in the reference section? I would do it, but I am bogged down at the moment. --[[User:Kungfuadam|Adam]] [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]]^{([[User_talk:Kungfuadam|talk]])} 16:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

{{WikiProject Systems|field=Software engineering|importance=Low}}

::Good suggestion. Links put in reference section--[[User:Nowa|Nowa]] 22:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

{{WikiProject Technology}}

{{WikiProject Telecommunications|importance=Mid}}

In my opinion, the history of the litigation between RIM and NTP needs to be in one place. The addition of a paragraph to this page detailing one particular bit of it gives a very point of view feel to it - there is also huge amounts missing, and now there is no link to the ___location of the full detail on the litigation (at [[NTP, Inc.]]) as there was before. I'd suggest moving all the material related to the NTP litigation to [[NTP, Inc.]] and putting a link across to it. [[User:kcordina|Kcordina]] ^{[[User talk:Kcordina|Talk]]} 08:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

}}

{{refideas|http://www.alacrastore.com/mergers-acquisitions/Research_In_Motion_Limited-2103735 RIM acquisitions}}

:I agree. however, the last 'litigation conclusion' paragraph sould remain and a link added to NTP. [[User:PDAgeek|PDAgeek]] 18:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

{{User:MiszaBot/config

::I disagree with PDAgeek's edits. There may be milder ways to express it, but it appears that Nowa's edits are all factually correct. Perhaps if someone could edit to remove inflamatory language without diminishing content, that would be acceptable to all.--[[User:Glin|Glin]] 21:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

|archiveheader = {{atnhead|noredlinks=y}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

I still agree that the story of the litigation should go in one place and I'll lend my support to those that take it on. In the meantime, I think PDAgeek has a good point about POV. I've tried to remove it, but if those interested still see some in there, please remove without diluting content. I also split out the case of RIM v Glenayre. Even if the NTP case is moved out, I'm not sure the Glenayre case should go with it.

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 0

I probably got a little wordy with the reexamination so feel free to trim. The basic point I was trying to make is that a reexamination goes on even after two parties settle. NTP, therefore, could still loose the patents despite the settlement. It is normal in these cases to have clauses in the settlement that state that NTP doesn't have to give the money back, even if the patents are held invalid. I didn't want to put that in, however, without a source. Otherwise it would just be speculation--[[User:Nowa|Nowa]] 00:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

|minthreadstoarchive = 0

|algo = old(90d)

:I've reworked the litigation section a fair bit, and I think it's now neutral and more readable. Nowa, I was perhaps a bit merciless in editting your reexam bit, but I do think it fits far better in the NTP article (I've moved it there) - particularly since now the case is settled, it is, as you say, very unlikely to affect RIM. [[User:kcordina|Kcordina]] ^{[[User talk:Kcordina|Talk]]} 08:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

|archive = Talk:BlackBerry Limited/Archive %(counter)d

::Kcordina, No problem. I like what you've done.--[[User:Nowa|Nowa]] 17:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

}}

{{old move | date =2 February 2013| destination = BlackBerry | result = not moved}}