Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plain Old Java Object: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:49, 21 April 2006

Latest revision as of 13:19, 16 March 2023

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 4:

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Keep''' <span style="border: 1px solid #800080;">[[User:(aeropagitica)|<fontspan style="background: #800080"; face="font-family:Ariel"; color=":#FFFFFF;">'''&nbsp;(aeropagitica)&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|<fontspan style="background:#FFFFFF"; face="font-family:Ariel"; color=":#800080;">'''&nbsp;(talk)&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span> 22:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

===[[Plain Old Java Object]]===

Unsure about this one, but it looks to me like a jargon entry that is [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Plain+Old+Java+Object%22+POJO&hl=en&hs=7RH&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=10&sa=N not that notable]. I'd say it's a '''weak delete''' [[User:Bruguiea|Tony Bruguier]] 02:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Line 13:

*'''Keep''' good definition of POJO 19:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>