Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useful unix command (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9:
Now that this has been transwikied, it should be deleted, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useful unix command|''just like everyone agreed to do last time'']]. Thanks for the needless bureaucracy. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 15:47, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. This is not an article. I see no reason at all to drag it through a slow AfD process. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User_talk:Friday|(talk)]] 16:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
* '''speedy delete''', of course. What bureaucracy forces us to list this again? I thought CSD A5 allows us to speedy articles that have been AfD'd and then successfully transwiki'd. — [[User:Brighterorange|<
**A5 only lets us speedy articles that have been afd'd with a result to transwiki. Despite every comment being to delete or transwiki, it was closed as no consensus. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 18:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 18:02, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Line 20:
*'''Speedy delete''', and for purposes of ''whether the article exists in Wikipedia'', the answer to Tony's question is "No. Of course not." [[User:Nandesuka|Nandesuka]] 11:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <
|