Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept-oriented model: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Concept-oriented model. (TW) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 01:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
===[[Concept-oriented model]]===
:{{la|Concept-oriented model}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept-oriented model|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 24#{{anchorencode:Concept-oriented model}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Concept-oriented_model Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Concept-oriented model}})
The "Concept-oriented model" subject appears to have originated from "Alexandr Savinov", who also seems to be the its only proponent (and the article's author), seeing as the article is sourced only by primary sources of which he is the author, which violates WP:PRIMARY and WP:N. Therefore, this looks like a clear-cut case to me. [[User:Silver hr|Silver hr]] ([[User talk:Silver hr|talk]]) 00:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - I take a liberal view in what should be on Wikipedia. However, I agree with the above comment. Everything I could find on the article's subject, at least in English, was written by the article's author. Wikipedia articles must have significant information from sources independent of the article's author. Unless the author can produce independent sources, I cannot be convinced to vote to keep this article. [[User:Wpollard|Bill Pollard]] ([[User talk:Wpollard|talk]]) 01:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - [[WP:ONEDAY|Wikipedia is not for things you wrote up for an academic journal one day.]] Agree with everything said above; this is a clear violation of [[WP:PRIMARY]] and [[WP:NOR]], and there are no third-party references (reliable or otherwise) apparent in the article or on Big Search Engine to indicate notability. [[User:De Guerre|De Guerre]] ([[User talk:De Guerre|talk]]) 02:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)</small>
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||