Work Flow Language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 03:00, 9 December 2012 edit 174.16.238.141 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:39, 13 February 2025 edit undo Ourobosch (talk \| contribs) 89 edits Disagree with the suggestion to delete. Merging with the Burroughs Large Systems article is the better option in my opinion as WFL is a distinct enough language from JCL and was integral to a product line sold by a company of notable influence in the history of computing. This makes WFL, in my opinion, notable enough to at least include as a subsection in the aforementioned article. Tag: Manual revert
(18 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 7: WFL also has an instruction block command which is used to give operators instructions needed to run the current job. These instructions are displayed using the 'IB' operator command. WFL was a compiled language on the ~~mediaum~~medium systems. Because some OS interfaces may change from release to release, Medium Systems WFL code included a copy of hethe source in the object file. Upon executing a WFL job it would check to determine if the object was compatible with the OS version. If not it would trigger a recompile of the object using the source embedded in the object code. ==See also== Line 17: [[Category:ALGOL 60 dialect]] [[Category:Burroughs mainframe computers]] [[Category:Scripting languages]] [[Category:Mainframe computer software]] ~~[[pt:WFL]]~~