Content deleted Content added
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 31:
===Issues found===
*Most references seem reliable, but some need formatting with titles, author, etc. Additionally publishers should have correct titles and italics where necessary (for example, ''Game Informer'', not GameInformer). Right now there are multiple iterations of publishers, some spelled one way, some another, some wikilinked, some externally linked (and should be), some not wikilinked. Publishers should also be wikilinked where possible.
:* I believe that I've identified and modified them all.
*What makes the following sources reliable?
:*[http://talkinrealatyou.blogspot.com/ http://talkinrealatyou.blogspot.com/] (#44)
:*[http://www.squidcakes.blogspot.com/ http://www.squidcakes.blogspot.com/] (#45)
:*[http://liquidmesh3d.com/animation.html http://liquidmesh3d.com/animation.html] (#61)
::* Well, it seems the issue can be ignored entirely. #61 doesn't have the quote that was cited anymore, and neither #44 and #45 seemed to directly relate to the point, but I was able to find an alternate link that seems to relate to the prose.
*So far prose looks pretty good. No quick spot-check issues.
:* Hooray!
Line 45 ⟶ 47:
:* As far as my Edit > Find searches are showing, that was the only one.
*Inline citations belong immediately after punctuation marks ([[WP:CITEFOOT]]). I know there's at least one in the '''Gearbox revival and release, 2010–2011''' section
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Teancum|Teancum]] ([[User talk:Teancum|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Teancum|contribs]]) 14:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
:* I've completed the review. Please correct the following issues to have it pass GAN
::* Have I caught all of the issues? Thanks! -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] ([[User talk:Zanimum|talk]]) 20:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
:::*Looks good now. I need a bit to have time to pass the GAN, but it's definitely GA quality now. --[[User:Teancum|Teancum]] ([[User talk:Teancum|talk]]) 18:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
::::* Thank you in advance! -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] ([[User talk:Zanimum|talk]]) 17:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
| |||