Wikipedia:Featured article review/Algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
=== [[Algorithm]] ===
:''Article is [[Wikipedia:Former featured articles|no longer a featured article]].''
I feel that this article as it stands should not be a featured articles. It lacks references, is incoherently written and the history section is almost completely missing. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 23:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Line 23 ⟶ 24:
** This is not [[WP:AFD]] (nor is Wikipedia a linkfarm). —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 10:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
***The page in question is the entry point for a big amout of articles about Algos. I the page is removed of featured list of article, we need for another page to replace it (in this list) as entry point. Of course the page itself must be valuable. Secondly, the guideline allow to add external links and they are part of content of the page. Removing them is vandalism. There is now just 2 links in this article. Can't be justified. [[User:Splang|Splang]] 06:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Remove'''. It's not horrible but it's not good enough for featured status. It really needs more careful referencing. [[User:Haukurth|Haukur]] 14:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
*<span style="color:red;">'''Invalid nomination'''</span>—No notice, as required, has been provided on the talk page. A directive that the article "must be rewritten in a langage with a more conventionnal syntax" has recently appeared, but that does not fulfill the requirements here; nor does a "to do" list from some time ago. [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 02:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
|