Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge normalization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:23, 19 August 2004

Latest revision as of 04:15, 22 April 2010

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''''NOTE: Originally listed here on [[August 18]] and not delete despite overwhelming consensus. Additionally, I have moved this article to [[wikibooks:transwiki:Knowledge Normalization]].''''' -- [[User:Davodd|Davodd]] 11:16, Aug 24, 2004 (UTC)

Dump of a lengthy original essay. Not entirely coherent. I'm not sure it's a cohesive whole. [[User:Yardcock]] suggested on [[Talk:Knowledge normalization]] that it could be moved to [http://wikisource.org/ Wikisource], but I'm not sure I'd even do that. The user who wrote this seems to have had most of his edits eventually reverted. 329 Google hits for [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&q=%22knowledge+normalization%22 "knowledge normalization"], and the first ones are just copies of this article. [[User:Triskaideka|<nowiki></nowiki>]]&mdash;[[User:Triskaideka|Triskaideka]] 22:46, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' it: Sheesh, all those copyright symbols (from HTML tags), and then "domains" and then "paradigm" and starting off with dictionary definitions...it's nearly a perfect template of the 7 habits of highly moronic essay writers. An essay with no encyclopedic content. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 00:58, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Line 7 ⟶ 9:

*'''Delete'''. Falls under "no original research" clause, unless it's a copyvio. In either case, delete. [[User:Andris|Andris]] 09:53, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)

*Delete. The author's edit summary, ''a new paradigm in the discipline of engineering human knowledge, Knowledge Normalization.'', identifies it pretty clearly as original research. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] 17:23, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

*Delete. Original research clearly, and a bit creepy to boot. -[[User:Sethmahoney|Seth Mahoney]] 18:49, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)