Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Filiocht: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 04:51, 30 May 2006 edit RoryBot (talk \| contribs) 11,939 edits BOT- bypassing cross-namespace redirect using AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:10, 19 March 2023 edit undo Legobot (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,703,206 edits m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x) Tag: Fixed lint errors
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 143: :No. As I see it, there are no "rights" here, only responsibilities. We are supposed to be building an encyclopaedia, not playing lawyer-games. [[User:Filiocht\|Filiocht]] \| [[User talk:Filiocht\|The kettle's on]] 08:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC) I believe that with increased power should come increased responsibilities, and it is my view that the current ArbCom has made corrupt decisions, showing favoritism and issuing inequitable penalties. Consequently, I would like to know your view of ~~the~~ the proposed [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]]. --<~~font color~~span style="color: darkred;"><~~font face~~span style="font-family: georgia;">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky\|<span style="color: darkred;">HK</span>]]</~~font~~span></~~font~~span> 15:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC) == Questions being asked by [[User:Titoxd\|Titoxd]] to all candidates ==