Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go! (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was keep |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''keep'''. '''[[User:LFaraone|L]]
===[[Go! (programming language)]]===
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go! (programming language)}}</ul></div>
Line 15:
So suggesting deletion per [[WP:N]]. [[User:WikiLaurent|Laurent]] ([[User talk:WikiLaurent|talk]]) 13:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' It doesn't meet [[WP:GNG]], and it's already mentioned in [[Go (programming language)]]. [[User:Citrusbowler|<
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. —[[User:Mikemoral|<span style="color: green">Mike</span>]][[User talk:Mikemoral|<span style="color: #21421E">moral</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mikemoral|<span style="color: #01796F">♪♫</span>]] 20:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' Plenty of academic references, so it meets [[WP:GNG]]. The original paper is [http://scholar.google.de/scholar?cites=1871771403673686891&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=it cited many times] academically. Some of them are self citations, but there are ''independent'' descriptions in the academic literature: [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F11691792_7.pdf This book chapter] contains a description of features of the language, [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.140.3947&rep=rep1&type=pdf this Ph.D. thesis] dedicates a small chapter to it, [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.90.9815&rep=rep1&type=pdf this] also mentions features of the language and its derivation, etc. --[[User:Cyclopia|<
*'''Delete''' The subject of this article is mentioned in the article for [[Go (programming language)]]. In addition, I'm not completely sure it meets [[WP:N]] or has enough [[WP:INCITE|in-line citations]]. [[User:APerson241|APerson241]] ([[User talk:APerson241|talk]]) 12:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
** It is mentioned in the article, but just because of the similary names... [[User:Christian75|Christian75]] ([[User talk:Christian75|talk]]) 21:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Line 30:
*'''Keep''' Article has some notability in scope of functional programming languages. The worse thing is that if article is deleted, it would be extremely hard to find info on that language because search engines will show results for google's "go" instead. I suppose it is important that wikipedia have some info on the topic, if it is really mentioned in at least one published book, or article. Notability is not equal to popularity. [[User:Rodion Gork|Rodion Gork]] ([[User talk:Rodion Gork|talk]]) 14:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||