|
*Regain Featured article status
*the use of weasel words and unclear quotation
*Watch for information about Final Fantasy IV (Nintendo DS) which could also pertain to this original version's article
*3 paragraph lead
*trim down plot, other sections that are growing for no reason
*expand reception section, only one paragraph, what did japanese reviewers think?
*find back issues of independent game magazines from 1991, and whether critics' views of the unchanged aspects of the game (characters, story) have changed over 15 years. I stress "independent" because I wouldn't trust, say, Nintendo Power to give an objective review of Final Fantasy II, although such a source might provide insight on how the game was marketed.
*didn't one of the (recent) reviews compare the complexity of the plot of FFIV to that of Phantasy Star II? Direct comparisons to other games would be good to include.
*"Final Fantasy IV has been called one of the greatest video games of all time . . . ." Called by whom? Rephrase it as an active sentence to give more information about the source of that indirect quote.
*". . . and is considered by many to be the popularizer of many common computer role-playing game features." "Considered by many" is a phrase that should set off warning bells in a reader's mind. Rephrase it to say exactly who considers it to be such.
*"Development" section expansion. Influences? "Graphical Improvements" more technical stuff, memory on the cartidge versus other SNES games
*get some primary sources, replace bahamut reference
*was there a japanese re-release? how was it recieved?
*including reviews and opinions of the sound track alone. influences?
*What was different between Wonderswan color version and others?
----
*<s>Set up remaining versions boxes</s>
*<s>fix red links</s>
*<s>Fix version boxes alignment</s>
| 