Draft talk:Community Based Program Design: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:31, 14 March 2014

Latest revision as of 16:25, 26 August 2019

(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{ course assignment | course = Education Program:University of Michigan/Social Work Practice with Community and Social Systems (Winter 2014) | term = 2013 Q3 }}

== Welcome ==

Welcome to my template for a Wikipedia article on '''Community-based program design'''. I welcome any discussion or feedback related to the topic. Please begin discussions in the discussion section below. If you are replying to a comment, please reply below that comment. Also, you can begin a new discussion by using a heading to signify the beginning of another topic. This will make it much easier for people to follow the conversations.

Line 37:

:::Good observation, Ubuntu. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Community practice in social work is linked with the historical roots of the professions beginning in the United States. More specifically, the history of community-based social work has evolved from the charity organization society (COS), and the settlement house movements. [[1]] However, during the earlier half of the 20th century, much of this work focused on institutionalization. Not until the 1960s did the shift from institutions to communities exacerbate the emphasis on community-based program design. This is known as the era of deinstitutionalization[2].

Community-based organizations and community-based programs burgeoned during the period of deinstitutionalization. The poor conditions of mental health institutions and an increasing amount of research that illustrated the benefits of maintaining the relationships of the individuals served within the community surfaced to further the growth of community-based programs. (for more, see: deinstitutionalization)

Line 56:

::''Make sure that this list is one of necessary contributors; for instance, all power to Professor Patton, but should he be noted on this wiki page out of all the community organizers in the entire world?'' --[[User:Blunthought|Blunthought]] ([[User talk:Blunthought|talk]]) 00:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

::''Might even think of taking this section out entirely. Unless you are actually going into how each of these people contributed"'' --[[User:Blunthought|Blunthought]] ([[User talk:Blunthought|talk]]) 00:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

:::I deleted this section for the time being. It may be added back if a more complete list is compiled. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Line 80:

::''As mentioned previously, the intro paragraph for this section could definitely be incorporated into your overall general description. I think it is a toss up as to whether or not it is really needed in this section if mentioned previously, but I do not think it would be bad to keep it here.'' --[[User:Ubuntu713|Ubuntu713]] ([[User talk:Ubuntu713|talk]]) 23:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Revised [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

::''The below levels of the Socio-Ecological Model could be reformatted to look more visually appealing. Also, in your first draft organizational was misspelled, so just a heads up on remembering to do a final spellcheck and edit.''--[[User:Ubuntu713|Ubuntu713]] ([[User talk:Ubuntu713|talk]]) 23:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Thanks! [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

::"To be specific about formatting, make sure the socio-ecological model is the same height as its corresponding section. The way it is spanning down the page (alongside entirely different models) is confusing." [[User:Millelin|Millelin]] ([[User talk:Millelin|talk]]) 02:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Good point. Thanks. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

::''See formatting below for list'' --[[User:Blunthought|Blunthought]] ([[User talk:Blunthought|talk]]) 00:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Line 95 ⟶ 101:

::''This section needs more explanation. I know you have it linked to the actual page, but if I wanted to stay on this page, I still have no idea why this is a community based tool for program design. Connect it to the original intent of this page.'' --[[User:Blunthought|Blunthought]] ([[User talk:Blunthought|talk]]) 00:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Thanks! [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

===Social Action Model===

Line 100 ⟶ 108:

::''Consider where your citations are being placed. For example, the above citation is placed at the beginning for the blurb, but if I am assuming correctly, the three objectives your are referring to are also from that citation. Maybe move the {6} citation to the end of the blurb.''--[[User:Ubuntu713|Ubuntu713]] ([[User talk:Ubuntu713|talk]]) 00:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Resolved. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 22:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

===Evaluation===

Line 108 ⟶ 118:

::''The "Advantages of Community-Based Program Design" and the "Challenges of Community-Based Program Design" could be combined into one large heading of "Advantages and Challenges" with two subsections of "Advantages" and "Challenges." By saying "of Community-Based Program Design" after advantages and challenges (whether heading or subsection) it kind of makes the page a bit busier than it needs to be.''--[[User:Ubuntu713|Ubuntu713]] ([[User talk:Ubuntu713|talk]]) 00:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Thanks. Revised. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 23:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

:: I agree combining the sections would be helpful. I would also recommend placing this before you discuss the "Program Design Tools" because it provides important description that would be helpful context to have while reading about the tools. --[[User:Amynav|Amynav]] ([[User talk:Amynav|talk]]) 01:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)amynav

:::Good observation. Revised. Thanks. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 23:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

::Also, try to be more specific when describing the advantages. You say, "gaining insight into the social context of an issue or problem mutual learning experiences, broadening understanding of professional roles in the community" with out having a clear noun/actor in the sentence. Be sure to describe who is gaining? Mutual learning between who? What do you mean by professional roles?--[[User:Amynav|Amynav]] ([[User talk:Amynav|talk]]) 01:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)amynav

:::Revised. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 23:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

===Challenges of community-based program design===

Line 136 ⟶ 152:

[[Special:Contributions/99.185.56.42|99.185.56.42]] ([[User talk:99.185.56.42|talk]]) 17:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Doing some research on tables that will clearly identify the components of our socio-ecological model[[Special:Contributions/99.185.56.42|99.185.56.42]] ([[User talk:99.185.56.42|talk]]) 17:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

:Cool Thanks. [[User:Umich hudsonmh|Umich hudsonmh]] ([[User talk:Umich hudsonmh|talk]]) 17:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

==== Welcome Yinmingl ====

:::Hi [[User:Yinmingl|Yinmingl]] ([[User talk:Yinmingl|talk]]) 16:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)