Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-object programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Post-object programming]]: close (del) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8:
===[[Post-object programming]]===
I've searched references for the whole content of the article for too long, yet haven't been lucky. I've already asked for them in the talkl page again and again, with no answer. The original article had a whole section which was nonsense (see Talk page), so I believe the article's topic is completely made up, or maybe original research by some non-expert in the topic. In conclusion, the article is non-verifiable and (consequently) perhaps original research. [[User:Euyyn|euyyn]] 00:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*If this were a notable programming method, one would expect a fair amount of google hits (since it is related to computers). But [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22post-object+programming%22&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official this isn't the case]. Thus, I must say, '''delete'''. -- [[User:Where|<b
*'''Expand''' or '''delete'''. I think it might be a valid article except that no references have been given for the article. Unless sources can be given, '''delete'''. - [[User:DNewhall|DNewhall]] 01:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': I repeated my search for references (with google: [http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22post-object+programming%22+-%22is+a+new+generation%22+-%22aspect-oriented+programming%22&btnG=B%C3%BAsqueda&meta= "post-object programming" -"is a new generation" -"aspect-oriented programming"], trying to avoid WP mirrors and pages about AOP - which says it's a kind of Post-object P.) and among the 95 results found 2 (non-chinesse) pages about the topic:
Line 17:
*'''delete''' - The content is mostly weak and the few things of note are well covered elsewhere. The implication that these things are post-OO is simply wrong; delegation, mixins and multiple dispatch are an intergral part of OO. I've only ever come across this as an expression used in a descriptive sense and it not deserving of it's own page. [[User:MartinSpamer|MartinSpamer]]
*'''delete''' - another unsourced, unverified article. These do a disservice to WP. [[User:BlueValour|BlueValour]] 22:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|