Talk:Bayesian hierarchical modeling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Placing Wikipedia:Articles for creation project banner (AFCH)
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Statistics}}.
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20140601210517|reviewer=Joe Decker}}
{{WikiProject Statistics|classimportance=mid}}
}}
 
== Someone made a link to a suspicious website ==
 
I accidentally clicked on the link http://www.allbookez.com/pdf/e1qdo/ on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bayesian_hierarchical_modeling&oldid=790833442 - the link was labelled as the second one linking supposedly to reference page for Andrew Gelman's Bayesian Data Analysis book. But the link, as one can see is some suspicious link.
 
I do not know if my computer is damaged by this - but before that, can anyone, any admin, check whether this site does/did cause damages, and edit this page accordingly? [[Special:Contributions/2601:240:8100:708:9C4B:C4EC:49FD:527A|2601:240:8100:708:9C4B:C4EC:49FD:527A]] ([[User talk:2601:240:8100:708:9C4B:C4EC:49FD:527A|talk]]) 01:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 
== Why? ==
''But the probability of selecting a red ball on the second draw given that the red ball has already been selected in the first draw is 0,...''
 
Why? If we have urn with 2 red balls and 2 blue balls, after first drawing (red ball) urn contains 1 red ball and 2 blue, so probability of next red ball is 1/3, not 0. [[User:Jumpow|Jumpow]] ([[User talk:Jumpow|talk]]) 09:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 
== Uninterpretable Sentence ==
"The assumed occurrence of a real-world event will typically modify preferences between certain options." No offense intended to the writer, but I don't think anyone can hope to extract any meaning here unless they already know the rest of the topic. I hope someone will fix it up so it has a discernible meaning. For example "the assumed occurrence of a real-world event" means what? There exists an assumption by somebody that a particular real-world event occurred? "...will typically modify..." So now we have that an assumed occurrence, whatever that is, modifies something. What does it modify? "[P]references between certain options." This is now so vague as to be beyond interpretation.[[User:Chafe66|Chafe66]] ([[User talk:Chafe66|talk]]) 20:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 
== Copy & Pasted content from another page ==
 
the section "Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model" is exact copy from
 
[[Nonlinear mixed-effects model|Nonlinear mixed-effects model - Wikipedia]]
 
Should both pages be update with a short description and "Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model" have its own page?
 
[[User:Braim|Braim]] ([[User talk:Braim|talk]]) 04:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)